On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Revital1 Eres wrote:
Hello,
I have one more question regarding the comment in
tree-ssa-ccp.c file -
/* Note that for propagation purposes, we are only interested in
visiting statements that load the exact same memory reference
stored here.
Hello,
I have one more question regarding the comment in
tree-ssa-ccp.c file -
/* Note that for propagation purposes, we are only interested in
visiting statements that load the exact same memory reference
stored here. Those statements will have the exact same list
The engine only knew how to propagate cases that always make the same
set of vdef/vuses, so it was safe to only tell it to use the first
vdef.
/* Note that for propagation purposes, we are only interested in
visiting statements that load the exact same memory reference
On 6/12/07, Revital1 Eres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The engine only knew how to propagate cases that always make the same
set of vdef/vuses, so it was safe to only tell it to use the first
vdef.
/* Note that for propagation purposes, we are only interested in
visiting statements
I can modify it to catch it pretty easily, just walk back a few vuses
if the current set of vuses is defined by something that does not
actually touch our offset.
This sounds like what I am trying to do in ccp...
I am not sure I understand. The new patch uses the infrastructure of
the
On 6/5/07, Revital1 Eres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can modify it to catch it pretty easily, just walk back a few vuses
if the current set of vuses is defined by something that does not
actually touch our offset.
This sounds like what I am trying to do in ccp...
I am not sure I
I will greatly appreciate any suggestions regarding the following
problem I have with the ccp propagator. I am testing the new store
ccp patch which propagates constants by walking the virtual use-def
chain (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg00055.html) and I
encountered the
On 6/4/07, Revital1 Eres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will greatly appreciate any suggestions regarding the following
problem I have with the ccp propagator. I am testing the new store
ccp patch which propagates constants by walking the virtual use-def
chain
Hello,
I will greatly appreciate any suggestions regarding the following
problem I have with the ccp propagator. I am testing the new store
ccp patch which propagates constants by walking the virtual use-def
chain (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg00055.html) and I
encountered the
