Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-06 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
On 06/03/2024 15:04, Andrew Carlotti via Gcc wrote: > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 06:39:54PM +0100, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 12:00, Mark Wielaard wrote: >>> >>> Hi Christophe, >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:22:33AM +0100, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: I've

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-06 Thread Andrew Carlotti via Gcc
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 06:39:54PM +0100, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: > On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 12:00, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > > Hi Christophe, > > > > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:22:33AM +0100, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: > > > I've noticed that sourceware's buildbot has a small script >

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-05 Thread Richard Earnshaw via Gcc
On 05/03/2024 14:26, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 04/03/2024 20:04, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 19:27, Vladimir Mezentsev >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 3/4/24 09:38, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: Tools like git (and svn before it) don't try to maintain

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-05 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
On 04/03/2024 20:04, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 19:27, Vladimir Mezentsev > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 3/4/24 09:38, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: >>> Tools like git (and svn before it) don't try to maintain time-stamps on >>> patches, the tool just modifies the file and the

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-04 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 19:27, Vladimir Mezentsev wrote: > > > > On 3/4/24 09:38, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > > Tools like git (and svn before it) don't try to maintain time-stamps on > > patches, the tool just modifies the file and the timestamp comes from the > > time of the modification.

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-04 Thread Vladimir Mezentsev via Gcc
On 3/4/24 09:38, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: Tools like git (and svn before it) don't try to maintain time-stamps on patches, the tool just modifies the file and the timestamp comes from the time of the modification. That's fine if there is nothing regenerated within the repository

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-04 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
On 04/03/2024 16:42, Christophe Lyon wrote: > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 16:41, Richard Earnshaw > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 04/03/2024 15:36, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: >> > On 04/03/2024 14:46, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: >> >> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 12:25, Jonathan Wakely >> >> wrote: >> >>>

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-04 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 16:41, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > > > > On 04/03/2024 15:36, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > > On 04/03/2024 14:46, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: > >> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 12:25, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >>> > >>> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 10:44, Christophe Lyon via Gcc >

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-04 Thread Richard Earnshaw via Gcc
On 04/03/2024 15:36, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 04/03/2024 14:46, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: >> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 12:25, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 10:44, Christophe Lyon via Gcc >>> wrote: Hi! On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 10:36,

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-04 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
On 04/03/2024 14:46, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 12:25, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> >> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 10:44, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 10:36, Thomas Schwinge wrote: Hi! On

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-04 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 12:25, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 10:44, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 10:36, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > On 2024-03-04T00:30:05+, Sam James wrote: > > > > Mark Wielaard writes: >

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-04 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 10:44, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: > > Hi! > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 10:36, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > On 2024-03-04T00:30:05+, Sam James wrote: > > > Mark Wielaard writes: > > >> On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 05:32:15PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: > >

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-04 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc
Hi! On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 10:36, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > Hi! > > On 2024-03-04T00:30:05+, Sam James wrote: > > Mark Wielaard writes: > >> On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 05:32:15PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: > >>> [...], I read > >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Regenerating_GCC_Configuration >

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-04 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On 2024-03-04T00:30:05+, Sam James wrote: > Mark Wielaard writes: >> On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 05:32:15PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: >>> [...], I read >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Regenerating_GCC_Configuration >>> which basically says "run autoreconf in every dir where there is a >>>

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-03 Thread Sam James via Gcc
Mark Wielaard writes: > Hi Christophe, Hi Mark, Christophe, et. al, > > On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 05:32:15PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: >> > > > And it was indeed done this way because that way the files are >> > > > regenerated in a reproducible way. Which wasn't the case when using >> > >

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-03 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Christophe, On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 05:32:15PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > > > And it was indeed done this way because that way the files are > > > > regenerated in a reproducible way. Which wasn't the case when using > > > > --enable-maintainer-mode (and autoreconfig also doesn't

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-01 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 at 14:08, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Hi Christophe, > > On Thu, 2024-02-29 at 18:39 +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 12:00, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > That python script works across gcc/binutils/gdb: > > >

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-01 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 at 14:08, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Hi Christophe, > > On Thu, 2024-02-29 at 18:39 +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 12:00, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > That python script works across gcc/binutils/gdb: > > >

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-01 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Christophe, On Thu, 2024-02-29 at 18:39 +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: > On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 12:00, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > That python script works across gcc/binutils/gdb: > > https://sourceware.org/cgit/builder/tree/builder/containers/autoregen.py > > > > It is installed into a

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-01 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 20:49, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > > Hello, > > Christophe Lyon writes: > > > I hoped improving this would be as simple as adding > > --enable-maintainer-mode when configuring, after making sure > > autoconf-2.69 and automake-1.15.1 were in the PATH (using our host's

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-02-29 Thread Thiago Jung Bauermann via Gcc
Hello, Christophe Lyon writes: > I hoped improving this would be as simple as adding > --enable-maintainer-mode when configuring, after making sure > autoconf-2.69 and automake-1.15.1 were in the PATH (using our host's > libtool and gettext seems OK). > > However, doing so triggered several

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-02-29 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 12:00, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Hi Christophe, > > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:22:33AM +0100, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: > > I've noticed that sourceware's buildbot has a small script > > "autoregen.py" which does not use the project's build system, but > > rather calls

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-02-29 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 11:41, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > > On 29/02/2024 10:22, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Sorry for cross-posting, but I'm not sure the rules/guidelines are the > > same in gcc vs binutils/gdb. > > > > TL;DR: are there some guidelines about how to

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-02-29 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Christophe, On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:22:33AM +0100, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: > I've noticed that sourceware's buildbot has a small script > "autoregen.py" which does not use the project's build system, but > rather calls aclocal/autoheader/automake/autoconf in an ad-hoc way. > Should

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-02-29 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
On 29/02/2024 10:22, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: > Hi! > > Sorry for cross-posting, but I'm not sure the rules/guidelines are the > same in gcc vs binutils/gdb. > > TL;DR: are there some guidelines about how to use/enable maintainer-mode? > > In the context of the Linaro CI, I've been

Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-02-29 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc
Hi! Sorry for cross-posting, but I'm not sure the rules/guidelines are the same in gcc vs binutils/gdb. TL;DR: are there some guidelines about how to use/enable maintainer-mode? In the context of the Linaro CI, I've been looking at enabling maintainer-mode at configure time in our