Re: 27% regression of gcc 4.3 performance on cpu2k6/calculix

2007-02-08 Thread H. J. Lu
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 05:32:28PM +0300, Vladimir Sysoev wrote: Hi! I create test to reproduce issue with cpu2006/454.calculix See attached. File e_c3d.f contains cutted subroutine from calculix. tr535.f main entry point of the test. you can use go-script as a reference how i get these

Re: 27% regression of gcc 4.3 performance on cpu2k6/calculix

2007-02-07 Thread Vladimir Sysoev
Hi! I create test to reproduce issue with cpu2006/454.calculix See attached. File e_c3d.f contains cutted subroutine from calculix. tr535.f main entry point of the test. you can use go-script as a reference how i get these results. find_stall.pl script which find problem instruction combinations.

Re: 27% regression of gcc 4.3 performance on cpu2k6/calculix

2007-01-18 Thread H. J. Lu
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 07:05:34PM +0300, Grigory Zagorodnev wrote: Toon Moene wrote: Calculix is a combined C/Fortran program. Did you try to compile the Fortran parts with --param max-aliased-vops=something higher than the default 50 ? Right, calculix is a combined program. Gprof says

Re: 27% regression of gcc 4.3 performance on cpu2k6/calculix

2007-01-18 Thread Grigory Zagorodnev
H. J. Lu wrote: Is that possible to extract a smaller testcase? I'm working on the small reproducer. That would take some time because of benchmark complexity. - Grigory

Re: 27% regression of gcc 4.3 performance on cpu2k6/calculix

2007-01-16 Thread Grigory Zagorodnev
Toon Moene wrote: Calculix is a combined C/Fortran program. Did you try to compile the Fortran parts with --param max-aliased-vops=something higher than the default 50 ? Right, calculix is a combined program. Gprof says the regression is in e_c3d routine which is 1k lines of Fortran code.

Re: 27% regression of gcc 4.3 performance on cpu2k6/calculix

2007-01-15 Thread H. J. Lu
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 09:47:34PM +0100, Toon Moene wrote: Grigory, Calculix is a combined C/Fortran program. Did you try to compile the Fortran parts with --param max-aliased-vops=something higher than the default 50 ? Diego up'd the default from 10 to 50 because one (or more) of the