Re: missed vectorization (was Some thoughts about steerring commitee work)

2007-06-18 Thread Dorit Nuzman
Tim Prince [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17/06/2007 19:47:10: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tim Prince [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17/06/2007 04:15:56: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 06:54:46PM +0300, Dorit Nuzman wrote: There are quite a few known simple cases which

Re: missed vectorization (was Some thoughts about steerring commitee work)

2007-06-17 Thread Tim Prince
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tim Prince [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17/06/2007 04:15:56: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 06:54:46PM +0300, Dorit Nuzman wrote: There are quite a few known simple cases which vectorizer fails to vectorize. by known you mean there are open

Re: missed vectorization (was Some thoughts about steerring commitee work)

2007-06-17 Thread Janne Blomqvist
Tim Prince wrote: There are several issues. EQUIVALENCE produces such a problem (PR32373) as do various kinds of references to multiple sections of the same array (PR32375,32376,32377,32378,32379,32380). Only 2 of those PRs involve actual source/destination overlap, where the vectorizer

Re: missed vectorization (was Some thoughts about steerring commitee work)

2007-06-17 Thread Tim Prince
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tim Prince wrote: There are several issues. EQUIVALENCE produces such a problem (PR32373) as do various kinds of references to multiple sections of the same array (PR32375,32376,32377,32378,32379,32380). Only 2 of those PRs involve actual source/destination overlap,