On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 22:40 -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 01:39:44AM -0700, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
... I was told that
generating a *texi file from (GPLv3+ licensed, FSF copyrighted) source
code could be incompatible with the GFDL license of gccint.texi.
The SC is
Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
To my greatest extremely positive surprise, I got today an answer from
the FSF (I really am very happy of such a quick answer)! I hope it OK to
cite here part of the reply I've got to my question [gnu.org #579118]
to licens...@fsf.org since Karl Berry replied to me
Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
To my greatest extremely positive surprise, I got today an answer from
the FSF (I really am very happy of such a quick answer)! I hope it OK to
cite here part of the reply I've got to my question [gnu.org #579118]
to licens...@fsf.org since Karl Berry replied to
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 12:51 -0400, Robert Dewar wrote:
Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
To my greatest extremely positive surprise, I got today an answer from
the FSF (I really am very happy of such a quick answer)! I hope it OK to
cite here part of the reply I've got to my question [gnu.org
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 22:46 +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
I did wrote on http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-05/msg02442.html
about the patch I intend to apply to the MELT branch (changing copyright
notice of gcc/melt/warmelt*.melt files there).
I also emailed k...@gnu.org about
Dear Sir,
[adressed to licens...@fsf.org g...@gcc.gnu.org]
[I assume you understand both GPL vs GFDL licenses software
architecture]
I am a (write after approval) contributor to GCC, and the author of the
MELT branch of GCC (on which I am working since 2008 at least). So far,
I am the only
On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 10:39 +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
Dear Sir,
[adressed to licens...@fsf.org g...@gcc.gnu.org]
Apparently, some human at FSF got my email.
An automaton send me:
There is no need to reply to this message right now. Your request has
been assigned an ID of
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 01:39:44AM -0700, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
... I was told that
generating a *texi file from (GPLv3+ licensed, FSF copyrighted) source
code could be incompatible with the GFDL license of gccint.texi.
The SC is trying to work something out with RMS on this (more
