Hi!
I create test to reproduce issue with cpu2006/454.calculix
See attached. File e_c3d.f contains cutted subroutine from calculix.
tr535.f main entry point of the test. you can use go-script as a
reference how i get these results. find_stall.pl script which find
problem instruction combinations.
Hello, Daniel
It looks like your changeset listed bellow makes performance
regression ~40% on SPEC2006/leslie3d. I will try to create minimal
test for this issue this week and update you in any case.
Feel free to ask if any question.
FYI:
Hardware is Core2Duo.
Compiler config
Target:
Hi, All
Try minimal reproducer for internal compiler error attached.
See go file for command line and report.log for issue reported by
trunk compiler/
-Vladimir
On 3/5/07, Eric Botcazou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I observe a massive compilation time regression for bootstrap on x86-64
here, in
Hi, All
Sorry for my previous post. It was into wrong place.
There is minimal reproducer for cpu2006/h264ref is attached
use
gcc -O2 -c ./image.c
Compiler from trunk produces:
image.c: In function 'UnifiedOneForthPix':
image.c:35: internal compiler error: in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:267
FYI
Bug has been already reported
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31037
-Vladimir
