$ cat foo.f90
program main
implicit none
type foo
integer a
real b
end type foo
type(foo) :: a
namelist /nl/ a
read (*,nl)
end program main
$ gfortran -v
Reading specs from /home/zfkts/lib/gcc/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.0.0/specs
Configured with: ../gcc-4.0-20041107/configure
alpha and ppc require target's system headers
(eg. in /usr/{alpha,ppc}-*/include)
gcc/config/alpha/linux.h:77:20: signal.h: No such file or directory
gcc/config/alpha/linux.h:78:26: sys/ucontext.h: No such file or directory
cross-{amd64,arm,sparc*} build/work fine witohut it.
do alpha
With LAST_UPDATED: Tue Nov 9 00:36:20 UTC 2004 I get:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/strct-pack-3.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/strct-pack-3.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/strct-pack-3.c execution, -Os
With the message in the .log being:
*** EXIT code 4242
(a call to
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 09:10
---
With Tue Nov 9 00:36:20 UTC 2004 the execution failures are gone,
but the compilation failure at -Os remains, same log message.
(Confirmed, because tested on separate system, with pristine sources.)
--
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 09:18
---
Confirmed on separate system with Tue Nov 9 00:36:20 UTC 2004, still an abort
call.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From asachdeva at gmail dot com 2004-11-09 09:26
---
The following code also crashes. Can somebody suggest a workaround while I am
using gcc 3.2
#include assert.h
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
extern bool cond;
int (*funcPtr)();
#define printf
int
--- Additional Comments From asachdeva at gmail dot com 2004-11-09 09:28
---
I am planning to use the following code as workaround, which does not crash.
#include assert.h
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
extern bool cond;
typedef int (*FuncPtr)();
FuncPtr funcPtr;
int foobar(int
--- Additional Comments From eric dot valette at free dot fr 2004-11-09
09:30 ---
I can confirm this bug with glibc cvs (yesterday) and gcc-3.4.2. The result is
that it is not possible to run the Open Posix test suite with glibc compiled as
NPTL + static library.
I have a real world RT
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 09:48
---
Confirmed, separate system than original report, with Tue Nov 9 00:36:20 UTC
2004 (no .log reconfirmation)
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 09:48
---
Confirmed, separate system than original report, with Tue Nov 9 00:36:20 UTC
2004 (no .log reconfirmation)
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 09:48
---
Confirmed, separate system than original report, with Tue Nov 9 00:36:20 UTC
2004 (no .log reconfirmation)
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 09:48
---
Confirmed, separate system than original report, with Tue Nov 9 00:36:20 UTC
2004 (no .log reconfirmation)
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 09:48
---
Confirmed, separate system than original report, with Tue Nov 9 00:36:20 UTC
2004 (no .log reconfirmation)
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 09:48
---
Confirmed, separate system than original report, with Tue Nov 9 00:36:20 UTC
2004 (no .log reconfirmation)
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 09:48
---
Confirmed, separate system than original report, with Tue Nov 9 00:36:20 UTC
2004 (no .log reconfirmation)
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 09:48
---
Confirmed, separate system than original report, with Tue Nov 9 00:36:20 UTC
2004 (no .log reconfirmation)
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 09:48
---
Confirmed, separate system than original report, with Tue Nov 9 00:36:20 UTC
2004 (no .log reconfirmation)
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 09:48
---
Confirmed, separate system than original report, with Tue Nov 9 00:36:20 UTC
2004 (no .log reconfirmation)
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 09:49
---
Confirmed, separate system than original report, with Tue Nov 9 00:36:20 UTC
2004 (no .log reconfirmation)
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 09:48
---
Confirmed, separate system than original report, with Tue Nov 9 00:36:20 UTC
2004 (no .log reconfirmation)
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 09:49
---
Confirmed, separate system than original report, with Tue Nov 9 00:36:20 UTC
2004 (no .log reconfirmation)
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 09:49
---
Confirmed, separate system than original report, with Tue Nov 9 00:36:20 UTC
2004 (no .log reconfirmation)
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 09:49
---
Confirmed, separate system than original report, with Tue Nov 9 00:36:20 UTC
2004 (no .log reconfirmation)
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 09:49
---
Confirmed, separate system than original report, with Tue Nov 9 00:36:20 UTC
2004 (no .log reconfirmation)
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 09:49
---
Confirmed, separate system than original report, with Tue Nov 9 00:36:20 UTC
2004 (no .log reconfirmation)
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 09:49
---
Confirmed, separate system than original report, with Tue Nov 9 00:36:20 UTC
2004 (no .log reconfirmation)
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 09:49
---
Confirmed, separate system than original report, with Tue Nov 9 00:36:20 UTC
2004 (no .log reconfirmation)
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 09:49
---
Confirmed, separate system than original report, with Tue Nov 9 00:36:20 UTC
2004 (no .log reconfirmation)
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:48:38 |2004-11-09 09:54:01
date||
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:48:41 |2004-11-09 09:54:11
date||
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:48:41 |2004-11-09 09:54:08
date||
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:48:51 |2004-11-09 09:54:21
date||
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:48:48 |2004-11-09 09:54:18
date||
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:48:41 |2004-11-09 09:54:14
date||
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:48:54 |2004-11-09 09:54:24
date||
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:48:45 |2004-11-09 09:54:15
date||
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:48:58 |2004-11-09 09:54:26
date||
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:49:00 |2004-11-09 09:54:30
date||
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:49:01 |2004-11-09 09:54:31
date||
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:49:03 |2004-11-09 09:54:33
date||
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:48:59 |2004-11-09 09:54:29
date||
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-11-09 09:54:35
date||
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:49:12 |2004-11-09 09:54:38
date||
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:49:10 |2004-11-09 09:54:34
date||
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:49:12 |2004-11-09 09:54:38
date||
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:49:13 |2004-11-09 09:54:39
date||
--
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:49:11 |2004-11-09 09:54:37
date||
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:54:39
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:54:11
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:54:38
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:54:33
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:54:34
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:54:08
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:54:15
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:54:37
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:54:29
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:54:01
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:54:14
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:54:31
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:54:26
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:54:24
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:54:18
--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09
11:46 ---
Patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg00716.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09
11:55 ---
Zack, the regression appears with your patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-06/msg00815.html
Could you please have a look?
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09
12:25 ---
The problem here is that combine only combines chains of instructions that have
no other uses of the intermediate results. In this case, the intermediate
result is stored into a global variable.
One
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09
12:35 ---
Subject: Bug 14940
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-09 12:35:16
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog
gcc/config :
This is a catch all bug report to document failures in combine.
There are at least two problems with combine.
1) It only combines chains of instructions that have no other uses of the
intermediate results.
2) It functions by generating promising patterns and then seeing if they exist.
This is
--
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||16798
nThis||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18395
I think I'm almost done with namelist (or maybe I'm the only person
in the world who uses it :-)
$ gfortran -v
Reading specs from /home/zfkts/lib/gcc/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.0.0/specs
Configured with: ../gcc-4.0-20041107/configure --prefix=/home/zfkts
--enable-languages=c,c++,f95
Thread model:
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
Severity|normal
The commandline is as follows.
Making all in nav
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/vegastrike/src/gfx/nav'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/vegastrike/src/gfx/nav'
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/vegastrike/src/gfx'
if g++
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09
12:55 ---
3.2.x is so old and not maintained any more and ther other one is fixed also
already in 3.3, I think it is
time to update.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |middle-end
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00
--- Additional Comments From zephiris at gmail dot com 2004-11-09 12:57
---
Created an attachment (id=7498)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7498action=view)
Preprocessed version of mesh_xml.cpp which produces ICE
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09
12:58 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09
13:00 ---
You have to have the glibc headers to compile a cross compiler.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From zephiris at gmail dot com 2004-11-09 13:15
---
Created an attachment (id=7499)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7499action=view)
Preprocessed version of mesh_xml.cpp (with -O2) which does NOT produce ICE
--
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|4.0 3.0 |4.0.0 3.0
Target Milestone|3.4.2 |4.0.0
--- Additional Comments From wayne dot gray at coynetextileservices dot com
2004-11-09 13:36 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
The code says:
while (br.read(charBuff,0,fileLength) != -1)
bw.write(charBuff,0,fileLength);
There is no guarantee that read() will fill the buffer.
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09
13:45 ---
Most likely the same problem as some of the recent failures on big endian
targets caused by RTH's
patch.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-09 09:54:21
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Keywords|
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
Status|UNCONFIRMED
The attached test case ought to exactly reproduce its input, and it does not on
two counts: 1. There are missing lines in the output 2. It gives a run time
error.
The runtime error appears similar to that of bug 17597, but this is on formatted
I/O. If the source is compiled with g77 it produces
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09
14:01 ---
I cannot reproduce it on powerpc-darwin or i686-openbsd3.1 or on
i686-pc-linux-gnu which only has
4.0.0 20041102.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2004-11-09
14:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=7500)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7500action=view)
Test case source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18398
--- Additional Comments From sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2004-11-09
14:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=7501)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7501action=view)
test case input file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18398
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09
14:05 ---
And I can say this was caused by RTH's patch:
2004-11-05 Richard Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* expmed.c (extract_force_align_mem_bit_field): New.
(extract_split_bit_field): Call it.
--
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
GCC target triplet|hppa*-*-*
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09
14:22 ---
So closing as works for me.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09
14:34 ---
Subject: Bug 15576
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-09 14:33:36
Modified files:
gcc/java : ChangeLog check-init.c expr.c
As reported in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-11/msg00713.html. We
no longer do the
class initializer optimization after inlining.
--
Summary: [4.0 Regression] Class initialization optimization does
not work with the inliner
Product: gcc
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18399
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09
14:36 ---
Fixed, I filed PR 18399 for this optimization not working with the inliner.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
Bug 8709 depends on bug 15576, which changed state.
Bug 15576 Summary: [4.0 Regression] Class initialization optimization is
disabled
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15576
What|Old Value |New Value
--
What|Removed |Added
Bug 18399 depends on bug 15576, which changed state.
Bug 15576 Summary: [4.0 Regression] Class initialization optimization is
disabled
--
Bug 12911 depends on bug 15576, which changed state.
Bug 15576 Summary: [4.0 Regression] Class initialization optimization is
disabled
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15576
What|Old Value |New Value
--
Bug 17574 depends on bug 15576, which changed state.
Bug 15576 Summary: [4.0 Regression] Class initialization optimization is
disabled
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15576
What|Old Value |New Value
1 - 100 of 207 matches
Mail list logo
