[Bug target/20924] [4.0/4.1 regression] inline float divide does not set correct fpu status flags

2005-04-10 Thread aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aj at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 07:33 --- This problem shows with running the glibc testsuite. If the inlined functions are used, the functions are not setting the state and this is a violation of ISO C. -- What|Removed

[Bug ada/20042] [4.0/4.1 regression] ACATS cxaca01 assembler Bad Absolute Expression error on

2005-04-10 Thread laurent at guerby dot net
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-04-10 07:48 --- A similar error happens on hppa-hpux with 4.0.0 20050408 (prerelease): /mnt/gnu/gcc-3.3/objdir/gcc/xgcc -c -I./ -B/mnt/gnu/gcc-3.3/objdir/gcc/ -gnatws -O2

[Bug libfortran/19106] segfault in executable for print *,sum(a,dim=2,mask=a0)

2005-04-10 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:23 --- Waiting for the 4.0 branch to reopen to apply there. -- What|Removed |Added Known to

[Bug libfortran/19014] print *,maxloc(array) segfaults

2005-04-10 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:24 --- Waiting for the 4.0 branch to reopen to apply there. -- What|Removed |Added Known to

[Bug libfortran/17992] reading empty line does not return 0

2005-04-10 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:36 --- Subject: Bug 17992 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-10 08:35:40 Modified files: libgfortran: ChangeLog libgfortran/io :

[Bug libfortran/20131] gfortan - incorrectly reads beyond the end of line.

2005-04-10 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:36 --- Subject: Bug 20131 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-10 08:35:40 Modified files: libgfortran: ChangeLog libgfortran/io :

[Bug libfortran/19595] eor does not work

2005-04-10 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:36 --- Subject: Bug 19595 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-10 08:35:40 Modified files: libgfortran: ChangeLog libgfortran/io :

[Bug libfortran/20744] size= isn't implemented correctly

2005-04-10 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:36 --- Subject: Bug 20744 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-10 08:35:40 Modified files: libgfortran: ChangeLog libgfortran/io :

[Bug libfortran/19568] incorrect formatted read

2005-04-10 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:36 --- Subject: Bug 19568 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-10 08:35:40 Modified files: libgfortran: ChangeLog libgfortran/io :

[Bug libfortran/20661] End of record not detected

2005-04-10 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:36 --- Subject: Bug 20661 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-10 08:35:40 Modified files: libgfortran: ChangeLog libgfortran/io :

[Bug fortran/20138] fortran (driver?) bug: array bound checking conflicts with preprocessing

2005-04-10 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:36 --- Subject: Bug 20138 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-10 08:35:40 Modified files: libgfortran: ChangeLog libgfortran/io :

[Bug libfortran/20005] reading a single return character fails

2005-04-10 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:36 --- Subject: Bug 20005 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-10 08:35:40 Modified files: libgfortran: ChangeLog libgfortran/io :

[Bug libfortran/20092] console input doesn't deal correctly with CR

2005-04-10 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:36 --- Subject: Bug 20092 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-10 08:35:40 Modified files: libgfortran: ChangeLog libgfortran/io :

[Bug libfortran/17992] reading empty line does not return 0

2005-04-10 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:37 --- Fixed in 4.1.0, waiting for inclusion into 4.0. -- What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug libfortran/19568] incorrect formatted read

2005-04-10 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:38 --- Fixed in 4.1.0, waiting for 4.0 to reopen. -- What|Removed |Added Known to work|

[Bug libfortran/19595] eor does not work

2005-04-10 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:39 --- Fixed in 4.1.0, waiting for 4.0 to reopen. -- What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug libfortran/20005] reading a single return character fails

2005-04-10 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:40 --- Fixed in 4.1.0, waiting for 4.0 to reopen. -- What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug libfortran/20092] console input doesn't deal correctly with CR

2005-04-10 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:41 --- Fixed in 4.1.0, waiting for 4.0 to reopen. -- What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug libfortran/20131] gfortan - incorrectly reads beyond the end of line.

2005-04-10 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:41 --- Fixed in 4.1.0, waiting for 4.0 to reopen. -- What|Removed |Added Known to work|

[Bug fortran/20854] error needed

2005-04-10 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:42 --- Confirmed. Intel says: Dummy argument A of procedure TRY cannot have a type that is PRIVATE. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/20855] error needed

2005-04-10 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:44 --- Right now gfortran is giving the right warning, but the compiler then encounters an internal error. - In file pr20855.f90:1 0 CONTINUE 1 Warning: Ignoring statement

[Bug fortran/20138] fortran (driver?) bug: array bound checking conflicts with preprocessing

2005-04-10 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:44 --- (In reply to comment #4) Subject: Bug 20138 Whoops, an erroneous entry in the Changelog here. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20138

[Bug libfortran/20661] End of record not detected

2005-04-10 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:44 --- Fixed in 4.1.0, waiting for 4.0 to reopen. -- What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug libfortran/20744] size= isn't implemented correctly

2005-04-10 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:45 --- Fixed in 4.1.0, waiting for 4.0 to reopen. -- What|Removed |Added Known to fail|4.0.0

[Bug fortran/20856] error needed

2005-04-10 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:46 --- I'm not sure what the error should be for that one. Is the problem the SAVE attribute given to Y? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20856

[Bug fortran/20857] error needed

2005-04-10 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:47 --- Confirmed. As g95 says: Argument for parameter 'i' at (1) is INTENT(INOUT) and actual argument is not a variable. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/20858] error needed

2005-04-10 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:48 --- Intel says The type of the target is different from the pointer. Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/20859] error needed

2005-04-10 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:49 --- An array section having a vector subscript is not permitted if dummy argument has intent [IN]OUT, says Intel. We should do something too. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/20860] error needed

2005-04-10 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 08:50 --- g95 says: Derived type variable 'dd' at (1) has a default initialization and cannot be EQUIVALENCEd. Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/20375] [4.0/4.1 Regression] C++ ICE in assign_parm_find_entry_rtl

2005-04-10 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 09:17 --- Bum. I will look at it this week. Changing the target arch field to alpha -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/19872] [4.0 only] closed and re-opened file not overwriten

2005-04-10 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 09:36 --- Fixed in 4.1.0, waiting for 4.0 to reopen. -- What|Removed |Added Known to work|

[Bug libfortran/20163] [4.0 only] gfortran - error opening direct access file

2005-04-10 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 09:41 --- First half is ixed in 4.1.0 - waiting for 4.0 to reopen. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/20788] Loading libgfortran.so clobbers C redirection of stdin

2005-04-10 Thread tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 10:20 --- Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-04/msg00278.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/20788] Loading libgfortran.so clobbers C redirection of stdin

2005-04-10 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 10:38 --- Subject: Bug 20788 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-10 10:38:00 Modified files: libgfortran: ChangeLog

[Bug libfortran/20788] Loading libgfortran.so clobbers C redirection of stdin

2005-04-10 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 10:38 --- For your problem, an easy solution is to use static linking, which seems to avoid that issue (that is, you program works as expected without having to set GFORTRAN_STDIN_UNIT). Otherwise, I commited a

[Bug target/20924] [4.0/4.1 regression] inline float divide does not set correct fpu status flags

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||sje at cup dot hp dot com Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug ada/20042] [4.0/4.1 regression] ACATS cxaca01 assembler Bad Absolute Expression error on

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 12:42 --- (In reply to comment #1) But it does not happen on hppa-linux for some reason. Because it is just a warning with gas which is I feel is wrong. It is the same reason why it only happens on darwin and not

[Bug libfortran/20163] [4.0 only] gfortran - error opening direct access file

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.0.0 |4.0.1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20163

Re: Fix tree-optimization/20920

2005-04-10 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Apr 9, 2005, at 11:27 PM, Diego Novillo wrote: Sigh. Another SSA_NAME flowing through EH edges getting in the way. I'm starting to think that it would be much better to make these SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI into virtuals. We would avoid all the monkeying around that optimizers have to

[Bug tree-optimization/20926] New: ICE: tree check, in recent builds, multiple functions in file

2005-04-10 Thread tprince at computer dot org
gfortran -c -v -O -march=pentium4 llnt.f90 GNU F95 version 4.1.0 20050403 (experimental) (i686-pc-cygwin) compiled by GNU C version 4.1.0 20050403 (experimental). GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096 llnt.f90: In function 'supply': llnt.f90:4931:

[Bug tree-optimization/20926] ICE: tree check, in recent builds

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/20926] ICE: tree check, in recent builds

2005-04-10 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Additional Comments From tprince at computer dot org 2005-04-10 13:30 --- Created an attachment (id=8575) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8575action=view) A Livermore Fortran Kernel driver, reproduces ICE as described --

[Bug tree-optimization/20926] ICE: tree check, in recent builds

2005-04-10 Thread tprince at computer dot org
--- Additional Comments From tprince at computer dot org 2005-04-10 13:34 --- Created an attachment (id=8576) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8576action=view) A Livermore Fortran Kernel driver, reproduces ICE as described The functions can be compiled one by one

[Bug target/20927] New: ICE in smallest_mode_for_size, at stor-layout.c:221 (s390x)

2005-04-10 Thread aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
Compiling plotutils with GCC 4.0 CVS as of yesterday I get the following ICE: $ gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/X11R6/include -I./../include -DLIBPLOT -I/usr/X11R6/include -O2 -fmessage-length=0 -Wall -pipe -c g_subpaths.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/g_subpaths.o -v -save-temps gcc: warning:

[Bug target/20927] ICE in smallest_mode_for_size, at stor-layout.c:221 (s390x)

2005-04-10 Thread aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aj at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 15:00 --- Created an attachment (id=8578) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8578action=view) Preprocessed source file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20927

[Bug target/20928] New: ICE: unrecognoizable insns

2005-04-10 Thread aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.0.0 --with-slibdir=/lib64 --with-system-zlib --enable-shared --enable-__cxa_atexit --without-system-libunwind --host=x86_64-suse-linux Thread model: posix gcc version 4.0.0 20050410 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux) /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.0.0/cc1 -E -quiet -v -I

[Bug target/20928] ICE: unrecognizable insns

2005-04-10 Thread aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE: unrecognoizable insns |ICE: unrecognizable insns http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20928

[Bug target/20928] ICE: unrecognizable insns

2005-04-10 Thread aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aj at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 15:08 --- Created an attachment (id=8579) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8579action=view) Preprocessed source file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20928

[Bug libfortran/19872] [4.0 only] closed and re-opened file not overwriten

2005-04-10 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 15:14 --- Re-open to bug report, so patch gets committed to 4.0.1 -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/20929] New: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed.

2005-04-10 Thread aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
--with-system-zlib --enable-shared --enable-__cxa_atexit --without-system-libunwind --host=i586-suse-linux Thread model: posix gcc version 4.0.0 20050410 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux) /usr/lib/gcc/i586-suse-linux/4.0.0/cc1plus -E -quiet -v -I./../../base/src -I./../../style/src -I./../../content/src -I

[Bug c++/20929] internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed.

2005-04-10 Thread aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From aj at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 15:34 --- Created an attachment (id=8580) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8580action=view) Preprocessed source file - i586 compilation -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20929

[Bug target/20928] ICE: unrecognizable insns

2005-04-10 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 16:01 --- Also happens with mainline. extern struct symbol_tab_ { void *S_nil; } symbol_tab_data; typedef struct { unsigned int length; void *data[0]; } s; void * allocate_vector (unsigned int

[Bug target/20928] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE: unrecognizable insns

2005-04-10 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 16:03 --- Needs -O -mtune=k8 -fPIC of course. -fPIC seems to cause the problem. -- What|Removed |Added

asl pls

2005-04-10 Thread susan gomelis
Hi Users, we have update new stuff on my website. Just check it out dont be missed. Enjoy www.anch4.ne/banner.htm regard susan you receive this email because you subscribe. to unsubscribe contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.anch4.net

[Bug target/20928] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE: unrecognizable insns

2005-04-10 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 16:08 --- Double *sigh*. The old loop optimizer introduces the offending insn. From the .loop dump: Insn 26: regno 70 (life 1), move-insn forces 25 savings 1 moved to 56 Hoisted regno 74 r/o from (mem/u/c:DI

[Bug tree-optimization/20929] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed.

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Severity|normal

[Bug libfortran/20930] New: [4.0 Regression] gfortran.dg/backspace.f execution test

2005-04-10 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc-3.3/objdir/gcc/testsuite/../gfortran -B/test/gn u/gcc-3.3/objdir/gcc/testsuite/../ /test/gnu/gcc-3.3/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gfortran. dg/backspace.f -O0 -pedantic-errors -L/test/gnu/gcc-3.3/objdir/hppa64-hp-hp ux11.11/./libgfortran/.libs

[Bug libfortran/20930] [4.0 Regression] gfortran.dg/backspace.f execution test

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 16:34 --- Does this work on the mainline? If so the following patch fixes it: 2005-04-08 Eric Botcazou [EMAIL PROTECTED] * io/backspace.c (unformatted_backspace): Do not dereference the pointer to

[Bug libfortran/20930] [4.0 Regression] gfortran.dg/backspace.f execution test

2005-04-10 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 16:39 --- Eric's patch went in after my last mainline build and codesourcery isn't building fortran. I'll check. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20930

[Bug libfortran/20930] [4.0 Regression] gfortran.dg/backspace.f execution test

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 16:42 --- Hmm, it is on the 4.0 branch too so it might not have fixed it. I think powerpc-aix is also seeing the same failure. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20930

[Bug tree-optimization/20931] New: fold checking failure

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
With the following C++ code we get a fold checking failure on the 4.0 branch at least: int __finite (double __x) throw () { return (__extension__ (union { double __d; int __i[2]; }) {__d: __x}).__i[1] | 0x800fu) + 1) 31)); } } -- Summary: fold checking failure

[Bug tree-optimization/20931] fold checking failure

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added GCC target triplet||x86_64-* http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20931

[Bug target/20928] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE: unrecognizable insns

2005-04-10 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 17:24 --- After CSE1 (t.c.04.cse) we have: (insn 20 18 22 1 (set (reg:DI 66) (mem/u/c:DI (const:DI (unspec:DI [ (symbol_ref:DI (bar) [flags 0x40] var_decl 0x2a95a2f000 bar)

[Bug target/20928] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE: unrecognizable insns

2005-04-10 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 17:39 --- The offending insn is created by emit_move_insn in loop.c, here: 2354start_sequence (); 2355emit_move_insn (m-insert_temp ? newreg : m-set_dest, 2356

[Bug fortran/20932] New: Writing of strings sometime does not work

2005-04-10 Thread milan at cmm dot ki dot si
I don't have a short example for this bug, but maybe someone can see what is going on from the error message that I get. I am running large molecular dynamics program named CHARMM (Chemistry at HARvard Macromolecular Mechanics) and it runs fine when compiled with gfortran

[Bug target/20928] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE: unrecognizable insns

2005-04-10 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 17:52 --- My RTL-fu is way below par, so perhaps this doesn't make sense at all, but... It seems that emit_move_insn must always produce valid move insns. So it should check that an immediate is a valid PIC

[Bug fortran/20932] Writing of strings sometime does not work

2005-04-10 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 18:20 --- Can you try compiling your code with a compiler from today's source (2005-05-10)? Thomas Koenig just committed several fixes for handling End-of-Record. --

[Bug libfortran/20788] Loading libgfortran.so clobbers C redirection of stdin

2005-04-10 Thread ripley at stats dot ox dot ac dot uk
--- Additional Comments From ripley at stats dot ox dot ac dot uk 2005-04-10 18:33 --- Subject: Re: Loading libgfortran.so clobbers C redirection of stdin Thank you for the suggestion, which had already been tried. It does not always work as the static library is not compiled with

[Bug target/20126] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Inlined memcmp makes one argument null on entry

2005-04-10 Thread mark at codesourcery dot com
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-04-10 18:44 --- Subject: Re: [PR target/20126, RFC] loop DEST_ADDR biv replacement may fail Roger Sayle wrote: On 9 Apr 2005, Alexandre Oliva wrote: On Apr 8, 2005, Roger Sayle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ++ /* If

[Bug middle-end/20396] TRULY_NOOP_TRUNCATION ignored

2005-04-10 Thread echristo at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From echristo at redhat dot com 2005-04-10 19:02 --- I think I'm ok with this, but I'd like a bit more info. What changes to the backend do you forsee this needing? The one patch that you applied to the 4.1 sh branch was too big to just get that particular set of

[Bug target/20928] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE: unrecognizable insns

2005-04-10 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 19:03 --- FWIW, smallest test case I could find: extern struct bar_t bar; void foo (void) { void **p; do { *p++ = ((unsigned char *) bar + ((unsigned long int) 1L 31)); } while (p); } --

[Bug fortran/20932] Writing of strings sometime does not work

2005-04-10 Thread giovannibajo at libero dot it
-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20932

[Bug tree-optimization/20929] [4.0 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed.

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 20:32 --- This was fixed on the mainline by: 2005-03-16 Daniel Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fix PR tree-optimization/20490 * tree-ssa-pre.c (create_expression_by_pieces): Use

[Bug libfortran/20788] Loading libgfortran.so clobbers C redirection of stdin

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 20:33 --- (In reply to comment #5) Subject: Re: Loading libgfortran.so clobbers C redirection of stdin Also 4.0.0's release of gfortran is only a preview, a lot more bug will be fixed for 4.0.1. --

[Bug bootstrap/20933] New: mainline bootstrap failure on i686-linux-gnu

2005-04-10 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
I just had a bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu with CVS mainline of a few minutes ago. I ran (in an empty directory): $ ../gcc-4.1/configure --prefix=$HOME --enable-languages=c,f95 $ make bootstrap ... m -f include/limits.h cp xlimits.h include/limits.h chmod a+r include/limits.h rm -f

[Bug bootstrap/20933] mainline bootstrap failure on i686-linux-gnu

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 20:41 --- I saw the same problem last night with my auto tester which means we are creating wrong code somewhere. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/20933] [4.1 Regression] gcc can no longer bootstrap itself

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Component|bootstrap |middle-end Summary|mainline bootstrap failure |[4.1 Regression] gcc can no |on

[Bug middle-end/20934] New: [4.1 Regression] Segmentation fault in gnat1

2005-04-10 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.1.0/hppa-linux/bin/ -c -g - O2 -gnatpg -gnata -I- -I. -Iada -I../../gcc/gcc/ada ../../gcc/gcc/ada/ada.a ds -o ada/ada.o +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+ | 4.1.0 20050410 (experimental) (hppa

[Bug middle-end/20934] [4.1 Regression] Segmentation fault in gnat1

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||ctice at apple dot com Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code Target

[Bug middle-end/20934] [4.1 Regression] Segmentation fault in gnat1

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 20:51 --- This might also be the failure which Diego is seeing with libjava building: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-04/msg01050.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20934

[Bug middle-end/20934] [4.1 Regression] Segmentation fault in gnat1

2005-04-10 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-04-10 20:53 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] Segmentation fault in gnat1 This might also be the failure which Diego is seeing with libjava building: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-04/msg01050.html I

[Bug middle-end/20933] [4.1 Regression] gcc can no longer bootstrap itself

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org

[Bug target/20795] ICE in assign_parms

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 20:59 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/20126] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] Inlined memcmp makes one argument null on entry

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 21:00 --- Fixed at least on the mainline. -- What|Removed |Added Summary|[3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1

[Bug tree-optimization/20922] missed always false conditional

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 21:02 --- Reduced testcase showing fold does not do it: int f(int i) { return (i - 2) i; } -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20922

[Bug tree-optimization/20922] missed always false conditional

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||19986 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20922

[Bug target/20928] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE: unrecognizable insns

2005-04-10 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 21:05 --- Alexandre Oliva pointed out to me that it was probably the expander who should produce a proper legitimate insn. I looked at this some more and found that in legitimize_pic_address we do not check if a

[Bug tree-optimization/20922] missed always false conditional

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 21:06 --- This is not caught untill RTL combine. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20922

Re: Fix tree-optimization/20920

2005-04-10 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Apr 9, 2005, at 11:27 PM, Diego Novillo wrote: Sigh. Another SSA_NAME flowing through EH edges getting in the way. I'm starting to think that it would be much better to make these SSA_NAME_OCCURS_IN_ABNORMAL_PHI into virtuals. We would avoid all the monkeying around that optimizers have to

[Bug tree-optimization/20922] missed always false conditional

2005-04-10 Thread kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
-- What|Removed |Added CC||kazu at cs dot umass dot edu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20922

[Bug libfortran/18958] eoshift segfaults when shifting off the end of an array

2005-04-10 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 22:21 --- Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-04/msg00300.html -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/20935] New: failed assertion for maxloc(n, mask=.true.)

2005-04-10 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
-languages=c,f95 Thread model: posix gcc version 4.1.0 20050410 (experimental) From the .t02.original file: logical4 C.502 = 1; struct array2_int4 parm.7; struct array1_int4 parm.6; parm.6.dtype = 265; parm.6.dim[0].lbound = 1; parm.6.dim[0].ubound = 2; parm.6.dim[0].stride

[Bug fortran/20935] failed assertion for maxloc(n, mask=.true.)

2005-04-10 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 22:32 --- s/as a minor bug/as a frontend bug/ *sigh* -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20935

[Bug tree-optimization/20936] New: [4.1 Regression] tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands

2005-04-10 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/home/dave/opt/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.1.0/hppa-linux/bin/ -c -g - O2 -gnatpg -gnata -I- -I. -Iada -I../../gcc/gcc/ada ../../gcc/gcc/ada/errou t.adb -o ada/errout.o +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+ | 4.1.0 20050410 (experimental) (hppa

[Bug tree-optimization/20936] [4.1 Regression] tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands

2005-04-10 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 22:44 --- Created an attachment (id=8581) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8581action=view) Hot/cold patch. I think there was some mention of this bug on the gcc list. --

[Bug tree-optimization/20936] [4.1 Regression] tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 22:46 --- This is reproducable every where and is a latent bug in tree-ssa-ccp on the 4.0 branch. See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-04/msg00443.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-04/msg00439.html. --

[Bug tree-optimization/19126] Missed IV optimization (redundant instruction in loop)

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 23:20 --- I should note that XLC does this. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19126

[Bug target/20927] ICE in smallest_mode_for_size, at stor-layout.c:221 (s390x)

2005-04-10 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 23:32 --- Yup: Breakpoint 1, fancy_abort (file=0x82a7f8 ../../gcc-4.0/gcc/stor-layout.c, line=221, function=0x82a87c smallest_mode_for_size) at diagnostic.c:556 556 internal_error (in %s, at %s:%d,

[Bug target/20927] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE in smallest_mode_for_size, at stor-layout.c:221 (s390x)

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 23:37 --- But that would mean this was a latent bug as you would get the wrong code before. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/20922] missed always false conditional

2005-04-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-10 23:43 --- Note this is only true with -fno-wrapv (which is default for C and C++ and I think Fortran too but not Java). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20922

  1   2   >