--- Comment #20 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 09:06
---
What we want to prevent with the patch for PR29323 is the TREE_NOTHROW flag
propagating to a locally binding function. Consider
void foo() nothrow __attribute__((weak)) {}
void bar()
{
foo();
}
we need EH
--- Comment #21 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 09:07
---
CCint Paolo who changed the meaning of TREE_NOTHROW.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #22 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2007-02-05 09:22 ---
If you refer to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-07/msg00559.html this
little patch would undo any semantic changes introduced there. I didn't follow
the discussion however and I don't know if this is the correct
--- Comment #6 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2007-02-05 09:37 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 and 4.1 only] Allocatable components
of a derived type require the SAVE attribute.
toon,
1
Error: Object 'g_dest' at (1) must have the SAVE attribute for default
--- Comment #11 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-02-05 09:55 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
The testcase in comment #2 works for me on the 4.2 branch now, but the one in
comment #7 fails with
t.ii:7: internal compiler error: in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:434
Yeah, I
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 10:16 ---
This works ok on a little-endian target. How does the optimized tree-dump look
like? (I suppose we use VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR for the memcpy and maybe even fold
the constant therein)
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 12:17 ---
Slightly reduced testcase:
#include cassert
#include string
struct A
{
A() : _x(0.0), _y(0.0) { }
float f(const int i) { return (i == 0 ? _x : _y); }
float _x, _y;
};
A h(const char* s)
{
A a;
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 12:30 ---
We have (alias1):
Type memory tags
TMT.89, UID 17988, struct
basic_stringchar,std::char_traitschar,std::allocatorchar , is an alias
tag, is addressable, is global, call clobbered
...
TMT.95, UID 17994, float, is
Intermediate File
-
# 1 b.c
# 1 built-in
# 1 command line
# 1 b.c
short fx;
void foo()
{
long diff;
int sample;
sample = 128;
diff = fx - (fx 128);
}
Output
--
$ avr-gcc -v -fverbose-asm -S -save-temps b.c
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/avr/3.4.3/specs
Configured
--- Comment #1 from david_henry_il at hotmail dot com 2007-02-05 12:42
---
Created an attachment (id=13007)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13007action=view)
preprocessor output
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30705
--- Comment #21 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 12:43
---
Subject: Bug 30510
Author: mueller
Date: Mon Feb 5 12:43:17 2007
New Revision: 121596
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121596
Log:
2007-02-05 Dirk Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #22 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 12:43
---
Fixed in 4.3.
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 13:14
---
Subject: Bug 29682
Author: mkuvyrkov
Date: Mon Feb 5 13:14:20 2007
New Revision: 121599
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121599
Log:
PR target/29682
* config/ia64/ia64.c
struct obj_symbol
{
struct obj_symbol *next;
unsigned int size;
};
struct common_entry
{
struct common_entry *next;
struct obj_symbol *sym;
};
extern void do_something(struct obj_symbol *sym);
void obj_allocate_commons(struct obj_symbol *sym)
{
struct common_entry *common_head = ((void
--- Comment #7 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 13:28
---
Fixed on trunk and gcc-4_2-branch.
--
mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #20 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 13:51 ---
I see this for cris-elf (r121581) and mmix-knuth-mmixware (r121569) too, both
mayalias-2 and -3 both at -O3 -g like for x86_64.
As we have this PR, I intend to XFAIL it for these ports with those options;
IIRC that's
--- Comment #1 from vivekrao4 at yahoo dot com 2007-02-05 14:05 ---
Compiling the code above with
gfortran -std=f2003
gives
In file xarithmetic_if.f90:5
if (i) 10,20,30
1
Error: Obsolete: arithmetic IF statement at (1)
which is incorrect, because the arithmetic IF
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 14:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=13008)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13008action=view)
reduced testcase
This is a reduced testcase (still requires libstdc++ at link time) where you
can see the wrong
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 14:10 ---
4.1.0 works, so this is a regression on the branch. Janis, can you hunt what
broke it?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 14:19 ---
Confirmed. Maybe related to PR30088. The first alias dump at -O2 (-O
-fstrict-aliasing is fine) has
bb 0:
# common_head_5 = V_MUST_DEF common_head_4;
common_head = 0B;
...
L0:;
p_10 = common_head;
--- Comment #9 from nickc at redhat dot com 2007-02-05 14:28 ---
Hi Steven,
There is no longer a buf to fix. In fact the hack mentioned in comment #4
has been removed and the test case compiles without problems using the current
mainline sources.
Cheers
Nick
--
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 14:45 ---
Thanks, aermod now works. :-)
channel, gas_dyn, induct, nf, protein, rnflow still fail respectively fail now.
$ gfortran -fprofile-generate -march=opteron -ffast-math -funroll-loops
-ftree-vectorize -O3 -o channel
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 14:52 ---
Actually the original testcase also fails with 4.1.0.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
gcc/objdir$../gcc/configure --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu
--prefix=$HOME/local make bootstrap
failed with such message:
.libs/in_pack_generic.o: In function `gnu_dev_minor':
/home/evgeniy/test/gcc/objdir/./gcc/include/sys/sysmacros.h:66: multiple
definition of
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 16:25 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Compiling the code above with
gfortran -std=f2003
gives
In file xarithmetic_if.f90:5
if (i) 10,20,30
1
Error: Obsolete: arithmetic IF statement at (1)
which
This bug may be fixed or not. It may be known or not.
It would be too much work for me to find out.
gfortran segfaults at:
subroutine bar(a, n)
implicit none
integer, intent(IN) :: n
character(n), pointer :: a(:)
allocate(a(1))
end subroutine bar
$ gfortran -v
Using built-in specs.
--- Comment #6 from Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de 2007-02-05 16:51
---
Proposed patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-02/msg00039.html
--
Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 17:35 ---
If the patch is okay on SLES 9, as Richard says,
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-02/msg00068.html
then it's fine with me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30370
--- Comment #6 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2007-02-05 17:44 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Can you try after:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121295
The snapshot 20070202 seems fixed to me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30559
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 17:46 ---
This code compiles with
troutmask:sgk[208] gfc41 --version
GNU Fortran 95 (GCC) 4.1.2 20070127 (prerelease)
troutmask:sgk[209] gfc42 --version
GNU Fortran 95 (GCC) 4.2.0 20070126 (prerelease)
troutmask:sgk[210]
--- Comment #23 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 18:34
---
(In reply to comment #20)
I suppose PR29323 was found by inspection of GCC code rather than a real-world
testcase so the option to revert that patch on the 4.1 branch looks appealing.
(CCed Joern to clarify)
--- Comment #9 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-02-05 18:53 ---
Referring to Comment #7, currently in mainline, 4_2-branch and even 4.1.1 the
only loop not eliminated at -O2 is foo2 - actually, that is pretty good for the
library: very nice that we don't need special code to avoid
--- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 19:03 ---
Now we always require MPFR, it should be easy to fix this by using MPFR's
facilities for parsing numbers from strings.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21718
--- Comment #14 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 19:17
---
Richard, thank you for the testing. Since David is now comfortable, I think we
should include this patch on the 4.1 branch, so that we fix this problem for
4.1.2. If nobody beats me to it, I will apply the
--- Comment #24 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 19:26
---
(In reply to comment #18)
It was argued in PR 29323 that it was incorrect to mark functions
that don't bind locally with TREE_NOTHROW.
I'm not sure whether it's valid at the language level to replace
a
--- Comment #25 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2007-02-05 19:33 ---
Subject: Re: Shared libstdc++ fails to link
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
[Paolo, see below for question.]
--- Comment #20 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 09:06
---
What we
--- Comment #26 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 19:35
---
(In reply to comment #22)
If you refer to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-07/msg00559.html this
little patch would undo any semantic changes introduced there. I didn't
follow
the discussion however
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 19:40 ---
As Dick Hendrickson points out in c.l.fortran:
13.7 (the function descriptions) says
A program is prohibited from invoking an intrinsic procedure under
circumstances where a value to be returned in a subroutine
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 19:43 ---
Confirmed on powerpc64-linux-gnu also.
.LC0:
.tc FD__f[TC],0x000f
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 19:44 ---
This was fixed in 3.4.4.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19293 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 19:44
---
*** Bug 30705 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 19:48
---
Testing alternate patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30562
--- Comment #27 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 19:52
---
(In reply to comment #25)
I think the analysis should be deeper than just binds_local_p, though;
I think it should be based on whether attribute ((weak)) (or
equivalent) explicitly appears, so that we don't
--- Comment #28 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2007-02-05 20:08 ---
Subject: Re: Shared libstdc++ fails to link
amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #27 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 19:52
---
(In reply to comment #25)
I think the
--- Comment #6 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-02-05 20:12 ---
a patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg00353.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30391
--- Comment #4 from sliedes at cc dot hut dot fi 2007-02-05 21:11 ---
It does compile (with gcc 4.1.1-15 in Debian amd64), but cc1 eats ~ 1 GiB of
memory.
--
sliedes at cc dot hut dot fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 21:20 ---
Subject: Bug 30665
Author: hp
Date: Mon Feb 5 21:20:36 2007
New Revision: 121611
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121611
Log:
PR target/30665
* gcc.dg/torture/pr30665-1.c,
--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 21:22 ---
Subject: Bug 30665
Author: hp
Date: Mon Feb 5 21:22:24 2007
New Revision: 121613
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121613
Log:
PR target/30665
* config/cris/cris.md (*andsi_movu,
--- Comment #9 from sje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 21:28 ---
Subject: Bug 30432
Author: sje
Date: Mon Feb 5 21:28:46 2007
New Revision: 121615
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121615
Log:
Backport from trunk
PR fortran/30432
*
--- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 21:44 ---
Might be worthwhile to import this to other branches, but closing with 4.3
milestone for now.
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 21:45
---
Hello,
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #1)
With -funsafe-loop-optimizations we remove them.
Using -Wunsafe-loop-optimizations, we get:
t.c:2: warning: cannot optimize loop, the loop counter
--- Comment #1 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 22:10 ---
Model and version_id are already documented. It is only syscall_linkage that
is undocmented, and that would be my fault.
Meanwhile, you can find info about it in the gcc sources, in the file
gcc/config/ia64/ia64.c.
--- Comment #10 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 22:15
---
When the program hangs, we're in
#0 0x9002bbc8 in semaphore_wait_signal_trap ()
#1 0x90001410 in pthread_mutex_lock ()
#2 0x0025595c in get_external_unit (n=6, do_create=275) at
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 22:23
---
It's not target specific as it is also seen on i686-pc-linux-gnu with mainline,
when compiling enum_2.f90 under valgrind:
==6149== Invalid read of size 4
==6149==at 0x86522E3: __gmpz_add_ui (in
--- Comment #10 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 22:23 ---
Reported as fixed, see comment #9.
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 22:30 ---
I don't think there is a compelling reason to have the patch in GCC 4.2. But
it would still be nice to get this out of the way, to reduce the number of VOPs
a bit further.
I have updated the patch of comment #6
--- Comment #15 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 22:46 ---
Closing as DONTCARE, by request from Diego :-)
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 22:51
---
Reopen ...
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 22:51
---
... to mark as WONTFIX.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from Scott at coral8 dot com 2007-02-05 23:40 ---
I tried 4.1.2 RC1 -- the bug is still present.
--
Scott at coral8 dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-05 23:47 ---
(This is, as you probably already realize, a name generated internally by g++;
there is no such variable in the source.)
The name is generated internally by g++ but it is really p.m_value which was
actually already
--- Comment #3 from Scott at coral8 dot com 2007-02-06 00:17 ---
Actually, I didn't look closely enough; the error generated by 4.1.2 RC1 is
different:
/usr/local/gcc-4.1.2/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.11/4.1.2/../../../../include/c++/4.1.2/ext/new_allocator.h:
In function void
--- Comment #4 from Scott at coral8 dot com 2007-02-06 00:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=13010)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13010action=view)
Preprocessed source, as requested (gzipped)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30633
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-06 00:28 ---
Subject: Bug 30605
Author: kargl
Date: Tue Feb 6 00:28:14 2007
New Revision: 121631
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121631
Log:
2007-02-05 Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-06 00:31 ---
Fixed in trunk and 4.2. Won't fix in 4.1 or earlier.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-06 00:34 ---
This is a true warning.
With the mainline we get an extra note:
boost_1_33_1/boost/graph/detail/adjacency_list.hpp:2116: note:
'p.boost::propertyboost::edge_back_t, bool, boost::no_property::m_value' was
declared
--- Comment #6 from Scott at coral8 dot com 2007-02-06 01:01 ---
Ah, very good. Thanks for taking a look at this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30633
--- Comment #4 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-06 01:34 ---
Subject: Bug 30189
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Feb 6 01:34:37 2007
New Revision: 121637
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121637
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR debug/30189
* dwarf2out.c (modified_type_die):
--- Comment #5 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-06 01:35 ---
Subject: Bug 30189
Author: aoliva
Date: Tue Feb 6 01:35:10 2007
New Revision: 121638
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121638
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR debug/30189
* dwarf2out.c (modified_type_die):
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-06 03:04
---
See the commentary near the top of io/unit.c . This is a basic explanation.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30617
--- Comment #5 from marie dot vidal at inria dot fr 2007-02-06 07:27
---
I got exactly the same error, I tried to build a cross-compiler
x86 - x86-64 using crosstool 0.43.
host: x86
-
Linux 2.6.10-1.771_FC2
gcc (GCC) 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8)
glibc-2.3.6-3
72 matches
Mail list logo
