http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50014
--- Comment #3 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09 06:02:04 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Tue Aug 9 06:02:00 2011
New Revision: 177581
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177581
Log:
PR tree-optimization/50014
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49923
--- Comment #10 from Søren Holm sgh at sgh dot dk 2011-08-09 06:37:41 UTC ---
Sweet, but why is it not applied to gcc-4_6-branch ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49923
--- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09
07:16:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Sweet, but why is it not applied to gcc-4_6-branch ?
Because I have started the final bootstrap and test on the branch only a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49923
--- Comment #12 from Søren Holm sgh at sgh dot dk 2011-08-09 07:37:30 UTC ---
Great. I asked because other bugfixes has been commited both places in a single
commit. :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49781
--- Comment #38 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09 07:38:07 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Aug 9 07:38:02 2011
New Revision: 177583
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177583
Log:
PR target/49781
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50016
好小爱新 cgl_lgs at 163 dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cgl_lgs at 163 dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50021
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2011-08-09 08:27:16 UTC ---
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50021
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka hubicka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50027
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50026
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09 10:17:45
UTC ---
ld doesn't ignore anything - the rules it is (supposed) to use are there in
man ld.
however suppose:
object.o : contains (public) symbols foo and bar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50014
Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49937
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #16 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09 11:56:33
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
(In reply to comment #10)
This is radar://6320843 duplicate symbols from static libraries not
properly
ignored revisiting
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48841
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-08-09 12:16:59 UTC ---
I don't think it is the path, but it is possible I just didn't notice a
not-enough temp space error; the other possibillity
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49937
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
--- Comment #113 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-08-09 12:56:20 UTC ---
As you've probably seen, I've cleaned up and tested Marc's patches over
the weekend, threw some more testing (Solaris 8/9/10)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24712|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09 13:15:26
UTC ---
the use of -c (for libbackend.a) was introduced by
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=84088
without any specific comment as to why it was done.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49721
--- Comment #23 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09
13:22:10 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Aug 9 13:22:05 2011
New Revision: 177591
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177591
Log:
Revert fix for PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49937
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09
13:22:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 24959
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24959
patch
Patch I'm testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49721
--- Comment #24 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09
13:24:07 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Aug 9 13:24:04 2011
New Revision: 177592
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177592
Log:
Also permute
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #18 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-09
13:52:29 UTC ---
The radr://6320843, duplicate symbols from static libraries not properly
ignored, has been open since 26-Oct-2008. I later opened radr://6733684,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50028
Summary: Ternary operator and static const member variable
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50028
--- Comment #1 from protocolocon protocolocon at gmail dot com 2011-08-09
13:55:05 UTC ---
Created attachment 24961
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24961
Intermediate assembly code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50028
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #19 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09 14:10:46
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
The radr://6320843, duplicate symbols from static libraries not properly
ignored, has been open since 26-Oct-2008. I later opened
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50028
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09
14:16:03 UTC ---
and PR 42101
and finally,
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/VerboseDiagnostics#missing_static_const_definition
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #20 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-09
14:19:34 UTC ---
I wonder if addressing...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42554#c15
would help such that the change in r157563 is extended to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09 14:26:36
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
I wonder if addressing...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42554#c15
would help such that the change in r157563 is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25145
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50028
--- Comment #4 from protocolocon protocolocon at gmail dot com 2011-08-09
14:32:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
and PR 42101
and finally,
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/VerboseDiagnostics#missing_static_const_definition
Thanks for the fast
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #22 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-09
14:35:18 UTC ---
or more correctly just...
Index: gcc/configure.ac
===
--- gcc/configure.ac(revision
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49990
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09
14:35:26 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Aug 9 14:35:21 2011
New Revision: 177599
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177599
Log:
2011-08-09
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50026
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09
14:35:27 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Aug 9 14:35:21 2011
New Revision: 177599
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177599
Log:
2011-08-09
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50028
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09
14:39:44 UTC ---
that last link should be
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/VerboseDiagnostics#undefined_reference_to_.60S::a.27
(I'm not sure why the Permalink doesn't work)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #23 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09 14:49:19
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
or more correctly just...
Index: gcc/configure.ac
===
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39870
--- Comment #15 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09
14:58:53 UTC ---
VRP optimizes the testcase form comment #12, it doesn't optimize the original
one because there we deal with symbolic ranges.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45522
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2010-10-28 20:41:46 |2011-08-09
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49965
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-08-09 15:10:25 UTC ---
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-03
16:37:36 UTC ---
So what values it printed? Did it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49965
--- Comment #7 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09 15:11:57 UTC
---
Created attachment 24962
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24962
reduced testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49965
--- Comment #8 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09 15:12:53 UTC
---
Created attachment 24963
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24963
corresponding assembler output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49965
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #24 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-09
15:27:34 UTC ---
Then you will also want to adjust the original toplevel configure change...
Author: mrs
Date: Fri Mar 19 10:19:52 2010
New Revision: 157563
URL:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #25 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-09
15:30:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
and ... watch out for the first case matching all darwin ;-) and the second
never firing.
Why would you say that? I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50029
Summary: nowrap_type_p encounters void TREE_TYPE
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49937
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09
15:38:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Thanks for looking.
hp, can you maybe answer the question about correctness for aligns
bigger than BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT?
I'm not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #26 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09 15:40:38
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
(In reply to comment #23)
and ... watch out for the first case matching all darwin ;-) and the second
never firing.
Why
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47653
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50022
Greta Yorsh Greta.Yorsh at arm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Greta.Yorsh at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50029
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09
16:13:53 UTC ---
if TREE_CODE (base) == SSA_NAME, the TREE_TYPE (base) is void, which can
introduce segfault.
No, the TREE_TYPE of a SSA_NAME should be correct. I think you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49923
--- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09
16:33:01 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Aug 9 16:32:59 2011
New Revision: 177604
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=177604
Log:
2011-08-09 Martin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50022
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50022
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |ramana at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49923
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49923
--- Comment #15 from Søren Holm sgh at sgh dot dk 2011-08-09 17:19:06 UTC ---
Sweet. Thanks Martin :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50030
Summary: Regression: sin optimized in sinf at -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #27 from Mike Stump mikestump at comcast dot net 2011-08-09
17:29:28 UTC ---
So, the fix is trivial but you guys are wondering in the weeds. Make the
symbols unique and be done with it, that, or remove one of them. You are
getting
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50031
Summary: Sphinx3 has a 10% regression going from GCC 4.5 to GCC
4.6 on powerpc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50031
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09
17:38:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 24965
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24965
Patch to avoid the problem by optionally disabling vector 32-bit to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50029
nash,steve nash11228 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50032
Summary: Bad optimization with sin/cos
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #28 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09 17:41:25
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #27)
So, the fix is trivial but you guys are wondering in the weeds. Make the
symbols unique and be done with it, that, or remove one of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #29 from Mike Stump mikestump at comcast dot net 2011-08-09
17:55:15 UTC ---
From the thread last time we talked about this code:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-12/msg01183.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49935
Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49781
--- Comment #39 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-08-09 18:37:37
UTC ---
Created attachment 24967
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24967
Patch that recognizes addresses, zero-extended with AND
Attached patch adds
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Douglas Mencken dougmencken at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49781
--- Comment #40 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-08-09 18:50:10
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #39)
Created attachment 24967 [details]
Patch that recognizes addresses, zero-extended with AND
Attached patch adds recognision of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #30 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09 18:57:36
UTC ---
so, if we have no regressions from omitting the -c we might conclude that
things have changed since then ;-)
===
simple testcase:
$ cat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49781
--- Comment #41 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-08-09 18:59:46
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #39)
Created attachment 24967 [details]
Patch that recognizes addresses, zero-extended with AND
Attached patch adds recognision of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50030
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2011-08-09
19:02:59 UTC ---
Regression from? Because 4.1.x already performed the transformation ;)
Not to say the issue can't be serious, but normally we use Regression in the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49948
--- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09
19:27:12 UTC ---
Thanks, Ulrich fixed it:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revisionrevision=177594
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50033
Bug #: 50033
Summary: Failing ADL for template-id function call
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50033
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09
19:51:15 UTC ---
ADL does not work this way. It only works when it is just a name and not a
template-id.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50030
vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Regression: sin optimized |sin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #31 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-09
20:23:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #27)
So, the fix is trivial but you guys are wondering in the weeds. Make the
symbols unique and be done with it, that, or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49993
--- Comment #3 from Arnaud Desitter arnaud02 at users dot sourceforge.net
2011-08-09 20:24:59 UTC ---
static int ia[] = { 2 }; is equivalent to integer, save :: ia(1) = (/ 2 /).
Anyway, the C example was there to show that allocating a constant
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49937
--- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09
20:25:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT is the
biggest alignment that any data type can require on this machine, in bits
this is not the biggest
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #32 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09 20:28:54
UTC ---
testing this (all languages, lto bootstrap, compare debug) on darwin 9.
will post comment 6 for review (it's a tidy up anyway unless there's some
gotcha reason
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44698
PcX xunxun1982 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xunxun1982 at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50033
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-09
20:59:33 UTC ---
G++ is correct, and EDG and Clang agree
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #33 from Mike Stump mikestump at comcast dot net 2011-08-09
20:58:15 UTC ---
The patches are wrong, so, I don't favor them. The patch to fix this, is the
patch to either boost things to -fno-common, or to fix trim_filename.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50033
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49781
--- Comment #42 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-08-09 21:21:35
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #41)
(In reply to comment #39)
Created attachment 24967 [details]
Patch that recognizes addresses, zero-extended with AND
Attached
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: cr...@gcc.gnu.org
The following code fails to compile with
g++ (GCC) 4.7.0 20110809 (experimental) [trunk revision 177606]
template typename From, typename To
class implicit {
private:
static
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #34 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-08-09
22:00:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #33)
The patches are wrong, so, I don't favor them. The patch to fix this, is the
patch to either boost things to -fno-common,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50022
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49937
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-10
00:00:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Created attachment 24959 [details]
patch
Patch I'm testing.
Me too: fixes the bug with no regressions for cris-elf at r177605.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49977
Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46328
Damian Rouson damian at rouson dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||damian at rouson
89 matches
Mail list logo
