[Bug target/50310] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in gen_vcondv2div2df, at config/i386/sse.md:1435 with -O -ftree-vectorize and __builtin_isunordered()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50310 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 06:01:45 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Sep 8 06:01:40 2011 New Revision: 178674 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178674 Log: PR target/50310 *

[Bug c++/50255] Linker stumbles over non-grouped text/rodata for a non-virtual thunk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50255 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 06:03:11 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Sep 8 06:03:01 2011 New Revision: 178675 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178675 Log: PR c++/50255 *

[Bug target/50310] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in gen_vcondv2div2df, at config/i386/sse.md:1435 with -O -ftree-vectorize and __builtin_isunordered()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50310 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/50255] [4.5 Regression] Linker stumbles over non-grouped text/rodata for a non-virtual thunk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50255 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.4

[Bug fortran/44646] [F2008] Implement DO CONCURRENT

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44646 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 06:38:17 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Sep 8 06:38:13 2011 New Revision: 178677 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178677 Log: gcc/fortran/ 2011-09-08

[Bug c++/49085] Crash with SIGSEGV during compilation.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49085 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||scovich at gmail

[Bug c++/50312] ICE when calling offsetof() illegally on incomplete template class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50312 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/50229] [4.7 Regression] Can't cross compile for i686-apple-darwin10 from x86_64-redhat_linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50229 Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot

[Bug bootstrap/50229] [4.7 Regression] Can't cross compile for i686-apple-darwin10 from x86_64-redhat_linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50229 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 07:43:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) Not necessarily related to your specific problem - but a heads up: I've just committed a change to the Darwin port that will make

[Bug target/50022] [4.7 regression] incorrect condition in IT block when building mozilla code base for ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50022 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/15558] [tree-ssa] A missed forward propagation opportunity involving floats

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15558 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug ada/37245] GDB reports No definition of var1 in current context. for an existing variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37245 --- Comment #7 from Timo Lindfors timo.lindfors at iki dot fi 2011-09-08 08:06:42 UTC --- Great news! I can verify that this indeed was fixed in debian (amd64 unstable) too: $ gnatmake -ggdb3 -O0 gdb_bug_2 gcc-4.6 -c -ggdb3 -O0 gdb_bug_2.adb

[Bug middle-end/50323] verify_ssa fail: number of operands and imm-links don't agree in statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50323 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/50307] [4.7 Regression] SSA checking ICE when building Linux kernel

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50307 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marcus at

[Bug middle-end/50307] [4.7 Regression] SSA checking ICE when building Linux kernel

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50307 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/50287] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsnprintf-chk.c compilation, -O2 -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50287 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 09:17:13 UTC --- *** Bug 50307 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/47765] Wrong template deduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47765 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/19831] Missing DSE/malloc/free optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19831 --- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 09:21:47 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Sep 8 09:21:39 2011 New Revision: 178683 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178683 Log: 2011-09-08 Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/50162] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50162 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 09:23:12 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Sep 8 09:23:08 2011 New Revision: 178684 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178684 Log: 2011-09-08 Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/50162] [4.5 Regression] Wrong vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50162 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.2

[Bug tree-optimization/48092] associative property of builtins is not exploited on GIMPLE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48092 --- Comment #3 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch 2011-09-08 10:01:48 UTC --- btw even in C with -Ofast a*exp(x)*exp(y) (same for sqrt) is NOT optimized. compare double exp0(double x, double y) { return exp(x)*exp(y);

[Bug c++/50324] New: SFINAE does not handle the object creation of an incomplete type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50324 Bug #: 50324 Summary: SFINAE does not handle the object creation of an incomplete type Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/50325] New: 76 new fails with rev. 177691

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325 Bug #: 50325 Summary: 76 new fails with rev. 177691 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/49518] [4.6 Regression] ICE in vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment, at tree-vect-data-refs.c:1555

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49518 --- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 10:31:44 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Sep 8 10:31:39 2011 New Revision: 178685 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178685 Log: 2011-09-08 Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/49518] [4.6 Regression] ICE in vect_enhance_data_refs_alignment, at tree-vect-data-refs.c:1555

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49518 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/49628] [4.7 Regression] 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49628 --- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 10:31:43 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Sep 8 10:31:39 2011 New Revision: 178685 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178685 Log: 2011-09-08 Richard

[Bug middle-end/50325] 76 new fails with rev. 177691

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-09-08 10:49:08 UTC --- It looks as a duplicate of pr50137 (with less failures on ppc-darwin).

[Bug c++/47765] Wrong template deduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47765 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug tree-optimization/48092] associative property of builtins is not exploited on GIMPLE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48092 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2011-09-08 10:50:46 UTC --- On Thu, 8 Sep 2011, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48092 --- Comment #3 from vincenzo

[Bug c++/50324] [C++0x] SFINAE does not handle the object creation of an incomplete type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50324 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/50325] [4.7 Regression] 76 new fails with rev. 177691

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at

[Bug middle-end/50325] [4.7 Regression] 76 new fails with rev. 177691

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 12:10:13 UTC --- That said, please pick one fail and investigate a bit. ppc-darwin doesn't seem to be STRICT_ALIGNMENT.

[Bug tree-optimization/50326] New: [4.7 regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:456

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50326 Bug #: 50326 Summary: [4.7 regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:456 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/50326] [4.7 regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:456

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50326 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/48660] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ARM ICE in expand_expr_real_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48660 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/19831] Missing DSE/malloc/free optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19831 --- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 13:00:32 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Sep 8 13:00:23 2011 New Revision: 178687 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178687 Log: 2011-09-08 Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/19831] Missing DSE/malloc/free optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19831 --- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 13:05:26 UTC --- More cases handled now. What we still miss is conditional free, see gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr19831-3.c for XFAILed testcases.

[Bug tree-optimization/50287] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/vsnprintf-chk.c compilation, -O2 -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50287 --- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 13:09:43 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Thu Sep 8 13:09:38 2011 New Revision: 178688 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178688 Log: 2011-09-08 Martin

[Bug target/50304] poor code for accessing certain element of arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50304 --- Comment #2 from Tamas Fenyvesi tom at deltasystem dot hu 2011-09-08 13:14:44 UTC --- Created attachment 25225 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25225 some testcases

[Bug target/50304] poor code for accessing certain element of arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50304 --- Comment #3 from Tamas Fenyvesi tom at deltasystem dot hu 2011-09-08 13:16:20 UTC --- Created attachment 25226 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25226 -O1..-O3 compiled objdumped result

[Bug target/50304] poor code for accessing certain element of arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50304 --- Comment #4 from Tamas Fenyvesi tom at deltasystem dot hu 2011-09-08 13:16:53 UTC --- Please find a sample code and its objdump-ed asm in the attachment. The command line is: arm-none-eabi-gcc -D__REDLIB__ -DDEBUG -D__USE_CMSIS -D__CODE_RED

[Bug fortran/50327] New: [4.7 Regression] Front-end optimization generates wrong code for BLAS's srotmg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50327 Bug #: 50327 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Front-end optimization generates wrong code for BLAS's srotmg Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug tree-optimization/50328] New: loop interchange confuses vectorizer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50328 Bug #: 50328 Summary: loop interchange confuses vectorizer Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/50328] loop interchange confuses vectorizer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50328 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/50328] loop interchange confuses vectorizer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50328 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 13:36:23 UTC --- With the following untested patch we apply outer loop vectorization. Index: gcc/tree-vect-loop.c

[Bug tree-optimization/50328] loop interchange confuses vectorizer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50328 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 13:40:30 UTC --- Triggered by report http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-09/msg00052.html OpenCC then unrolls the outer loop to get .LBB16_double_array_mults_by_const: #loop

[Bug c++/33255] A warning for unused typedefs?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33255 --- Comment #26 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 13:54:33 UTC --- Author: dodji Date: Thu Sep 8 13:54:24 2011 New Revision: 178692 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178692 Log: PR c++/33255 - Support

[Bug fortran/50327] [4.7 Regression] Front-end optimization generates wrong code for BLAS's srotmg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50327 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 ---

[Bug tree-optimization/49911] SRA + DOM + VRP + -fstrict-enums incorrectly remove predicate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49911 --- Comment #24 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 13:58:39 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Thu Sep 8 13:58:30 2011 New Revision: 178693 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178693 Log: 2011-09-08 Martin

[Bug tree-optimization/50328] reduction with constant or invariant not vectorized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50328 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 13:55:54 UTC --- Created attachment 25228 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25228 preliminary patch Patch that still ICEs its testcase. Works for

[Bug tree-optimization/50328] reduction with constant or invariant not vectorized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50328 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 14:06:58 UTC --- Hmm, we fail to set the vectype for the PHI - I'm somewhat lost in the reduction code.

[Bug target/50329] New: [PowerPC] Unnecessary stack frame set up

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50329 Bug #: 50329 Summary: [PowerPC] Unnecessary stack frame set up Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug fortran/47978] [OOP] Invalid INTENT in overriding TBP not detected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47978 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/50330] New: Misleading error message with struct declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50330 Bug #: 50330 Summary: Misleading error message with struct declaration Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/50324] [C++0x] SFINAE does not handle the object creation of an incomplete type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50324 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 14:58:24 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Sep 8 14:58:21 2011 New Revision: 178694 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178694 Log: /cp 2011-09-08

[Bug c++/50324] [C++0x] SFINAE does not handle the object creation of an incomplete type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50324 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/50331] New: -Wuninitialized and variable passed to WRITE statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50331 Bug #: 50331 Summary: -Wuninitialized and variable passed to WRITE statements Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/50330] Misleading error message with struct declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50330 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/16189] obfuscated error message for missing semicolon after declaration in C++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16189 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||froydnj at gcc

[Bug c/50330] Misleading error message with struct declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50330 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE ---

[Bug c++/45331] Generate clear diagnostics when a semicolon is missing at the end of a class definition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45331 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rui.maciel at

[Bug fortran/50331] -Wuninitialized and variable passed to WRITE statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50331 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-09-08 15:18:30 UTC --- It is likely a duplicate of pr34721.

[Bug fortran/50331] -Wuninitialized and variable passed to WRITE statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50331 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 CC|

[Bug c++/16189] obfuscated error message for missing semicolon after declaration in C++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16189 Nathan Froyd froydnj at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c/50332] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-invalid.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50332 Bug #: 50332 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-invalid.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/50333] New: internal compiler error: in extract_ops_from_tree, at gimple.h:1909

-stage1-languages=c --disable-libstdcxx-v3 Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.0 20110908 (experimental) (GCC) CFLAGS='-O2 -ftree-vectorize' ; make (-O3 fails too, -O2 + -ftree-vectorize seems to me the minimal failure case) Preprocessed file attached.

[Bug c++/47765] Wrong template deduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47765 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug fortran/50334] New: interaction between -Wuninitialized and -finit-real=snan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50334 Bug #: 50334 Summary: interaction between -Wuninitialized and -finit-real=snan Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/47997] gcc on macosx: ld: warning: -fwritable-strings not compatible with literal CF/NSString

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997 --- Comment #25 from Tobias Netzel tobias.netzel at googlemail dot com 2011-09-08 16:27:21 UTC --- As for me the patch does what it is expected to do; no more linker warnings when linking objective-c code. I didn't notice anything that might be

[Bug middle-end/50335] New: ICE in psct_dynamic_dim, at graphite-poly.h:659

=c --disable-libstdcxx-v3 Thread model: posix gcc version 4.7.0 20110908 (experimental) (GCC) CFLAGS='-Ofast -floop-flatten' ; make (doesn't fail with -O3 -floop-flatten) Preprocessed file attached.

[Bug fortran/50334] interaction between -Wuninitialized and -finit-real=snan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50334 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 16:40:19 UTC --- Well this is kinda of expected, since you are saying all float variables are going to be initialized with SNAN so you can detect at runtime those variables

[Bug libstdc++/50336] New: LWG issue 445

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50336 Bug #: 50336 Summary: LWG issue 445 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/47765] Wrong template deduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47765 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2011-09-08 16:57:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) In fact I expected that there is some implementation freedom which allows this (I was thinking of 14.7.1 p6), but I

[Bug tree-optimization/50337] New: -ftree-dse performs wrong elimination on electric-fence

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50337 Bug #: 50337 Summary: -ftree-dse performs wrong elimination on electric-fence Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50334] interaction between -Wuninitialized and -finit-real=snan

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50334 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/50337] -ftree-dse performs wrong elimination on electric-fence

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50337 --- Comment #1 from Colin Watson cjwatson at ubuntu dot com 2011-09-08 17:06:08 UTC --- Created attachment 25232 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25232 test case

[Bug libstdc++/50336] LWG issue 445

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50336 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/50337] -ftree-dse performs wrong elimination on electric-fence

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50337 --- Comment #2 from Colin Watson cjwatson at ubuntu dot com 2011-09-08 17:09:45 UTC --- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=625756 reports that this happens at least as far back as GCC 4.5, and

[Bug tree-optimization/49911] SRA + DOM + VRP + -fstrict-enums incorrectly remove predicate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49911 --- Comment #25 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 17:21:15 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Thu Sep 8 17:20:52 2011 New Revision: 178701 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178701 Log: 2011-09-08 Martin

[Bug rtl-optimization/50326] [4.7 regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:456

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50326 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/50337] -ftree-dse performs wrong elimination on electric-fence

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50337 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 17:42:19 UTC --- I think this is due to efence not implementing malloc like it should be. That is -fno-builtin also fixes the issue.

[Bug c++/46862] ICE on std::decimal::decimal32 without any fields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46862 --- Comment #12 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 18:09:02 UTC --- Author: bergner Date: Thu Sep 8 18:08:53 2011 New Revision: 178703 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178703 Log: gcc/ Backport from

[Bug c++/50207] [4.7 Regression] G++ segv's on reduced test case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50207 --- Comment #10 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 18:09:02 UTC --- Author: bergner Date: Thu Sep 8 18:08:53 2011 New Revision: 178703 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178703 Log: gcc/ Backport from

[Bug libstdc++/44416] [4.6 regression] Failed to build 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44416 Quentin Neill qneill at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||qneill at gcc

[Bug c++/47765] Wrong template deduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47765 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 18:50:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) In fact I expected that there is some implementation freedom which allows this (I was thinking of 14.7.1 p6), but I still wonder: I

[Bug c++/47765] Wrong template deduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47765 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 19:22:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) But another reasonable interpretation would be to skip the parameter during deduction and then let normal overload resolution check

[Bug tree-optimization/50318] ICE optimizing widening multiply-and-accumulate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50318 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Stubbs ams at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 19:45:41 UTC --- Author: ams Date: Thu Sep 8 19:45:37 2011 New Revision: 178708 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178708 Log: 2011-09-08 Andrew Stubbs

[Bug tree-optimization/50318] ICE optimizing widening multiply-and-accumulate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50318 Andrew Stubbs ams at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/50272] A case that PRE optimization hurts performance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50272 Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c/50332] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-invalid.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50332 Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug c++/33255] A warning for unused typedefs?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33255 --- Comment #27 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org 2011-09-08 20:55:19 UTC --- As a follow-up, I have posted a patchlet[1] to enable this warning whenever -Wall or -Wunused is used. This patchlet would be applied when the

[Bug fortran/50327] [4.7 Regression] Front-end optimization generates wrong code for BLAS's srotmg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50327 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug lto/50338] New: ICE Linking with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50338 Bug #: 50338 Summary: ICE Linking with -flto Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: lto Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/50332] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-invalid.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50332 --- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 21:46:17 UTC --- Author: dodji Date: Thu Sep 8 21:46:14 2011 New Revision: 178712 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178712 Log: Fix PR c/50332

[Bug c/50332] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-invalid.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50332 Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/50336] LWG issue 445

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50336 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-08 22:42:29 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Sep 8 22:42:21 2011 New Revision: 178713 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178713 Log: 2011-09-09 Paolo

[Bug libstdc++/50336] LWG issue 445

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50336 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c/50330] Misleading error message with struct declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50330 Ben Bacarisse bugzilla at bsb dot me.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzilla at bsb