[Bug c++/52830] New: ICE: canonical types differ for identity types ... when attempting SFINAE with member type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52830 Bug #: 52830 Summary: ICE: canonical types differ for identity types ... when attempting SFINAE with member type Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug c/52825] incorrect message for incompatible pointer type with extra struct for a typedeffed struct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52825 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug fortran/52789] gfortran sets -Wunused-parameter in the C sense as well as the Fortran sense

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52789 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-02 07:40:32 UTC --- This may have been fixed with the fix for PR 48847. Can you maybe check on trunk/4.7.0 ?

[Bug c++/9050] [DR 147] Can't explicitly specialize C++ constructor templates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9050 --- Comment #16 from Johannes Schaub schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com 2012-04-02 07:43:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) (In reply to comment #14) Good point, I've pointed out the problem with the proposed resolution. Note that we

[Bug fortran/52789] gfortran sets -Wunused-parameter in the C sense as well as the Fortran sense

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52789 --- Comment #4 from Mat Cross mathewc at nag dot co.uk 2012-04-02 08:03:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Can you maybe check on trunk/4.7.0 ? I've just tried with $ gfortran --version GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.7.1 20120331 (prerelease) $

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 --- Comment #31 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-02 08:16:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #30) (In reply to comment #26) The caret is not a solution to this problem, because what Gabriel wants is to not reconstruct

[Bug c++/40942] GCC accepts code that Comeau and MSVC deems invalid.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40942 --- Comment #9 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-02 08:51:30 UTC --- Author: dodji Date: Mon Apr 2 08:51:26 2012 New Revision: 186067 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186067 Log: PR c++/40942 - Failure of

[Bug c++/40942] GCC accepts code that Comeau and MSVC deems invalid.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40942 Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/52821] [4.8 Regression] 191.fma3d in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52821 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug libstdc++/52822] [C++11] stable_partition destroys sequence due to inappropriate self-move-assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52822 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/52814] Internal compiler error: segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52814 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/52808] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52808 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug java/52805] [4.8 Regression] 243 new GCC HEAD@185977 regressions (libjava failures)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52805 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 ---

[Bug c/52802] Equality rewrites pessimizes code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52802 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug middle-end/52793] [4.8 Regression] 483.xalancbmk in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52793 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/52803] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in ira, at ira.c:3616 with -fno-move-loop-invariants on almost any code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52803 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/52789] gfortran sets -Wunused-parameter in the C sense as well as the Fortran sense

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52789 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug middle-end/52831] New: extract_bit_field_1: issue when str_rtx unsafe from target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52831 Bug #: 52831 Summary: extract_bit_field_1: issue when str_rtx unsafe from target Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/52831] extract_bit_field_1: issue when str_rtx unsafe from target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52831 --- Comment #1 from Aurelien Buhrig aurelien.buhrig.gcc at gmail dot com 2012-04-02 09:42:28 UTC --- Created attachment 27062 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27062 Fix

[Bug c/52802] Equality rewrites pessimizes code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52802 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug fortran/52729] Symbol has no implicit type in SELECT TYPE block

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52729 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug fortran/52832] New: ASSOCIATE construct with proc-pointer selector is rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52832 Bug #: 52832 Summary: ASSOCIATE construct with proc-pointer selector is rejected Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/52833] New: -O2 optimizes loop to infinite when loop invariant based on arithmetic overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52833 Bug #: 52833 Summary: -O2 optimizes loop to infinite when loop invariant based on arithmetic overflow Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1

[Bug c++/52833] -O2 optimizes loop to infinite when loop invariant based on arithmetic overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52833 --- Comment #1 from Grzegorz Wierzowiecki gwpublic at wp dot pl 2012-04-02 10:09:15 UTC --- Created attachment 27064 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27064 overflow_loop-O1.s - Assembly after -O1

[Bug c++/52833] -O2 optimizes loop to infinite when loop invariant based on arithmetic overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52833 --- Comment #2 from Grzegorz Wierzowiecki gwpublic at wp dot pl 2012-04-02 10:09:48 UTC --- Created attachment 27065 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27065 overflow_loop-O2.s - assembly after -O2

[Bug c++/52833] -O2 optimizes loop to infinite when loop invariant based on arithmetic overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52833 --- Comment #3 from Grzegorz Wierzowiecki gwpublic at wp dot pl 2012-04-02 10:11:02 UTC --- Created attachment 27066 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27066 compiler flags enabled by -O1

[Bug c++/52833] -O2 optimizes loop to infinite when loop invariant based on arithmetic overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52833 --- Comment #4 from Grzegorz Wierzowiecki gwpublic at wp dot pl 2012-04-02 10:11:32 UTC --- Created attachment 27067 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27067 compiler flags enabled by -O2

[Bug c++/52833] -O2 optimizes loop to infinite when loop invariant based on arithmetic overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52833 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-02 10:12:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) following code is based on artihmetic overflow assumption (after overflow we gen 0 number on x86 and x86_64): Bad assumption,

[Bug c++/52833] -O2 optimizes loop to infinite when loop invariant based on arithmetic overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52833 Grzegorz Wierzowiecki gwpublic at wp dot pl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/52802] Equality rewrites pessimizes code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52802 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug fortran/52832] ASSOCIATE construct with proc-pointer selector is rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52832 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc

[Bug middle-end/52800] [4.8 Regression] eglibc build broken with internal compiler error in cfgloop .

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52800 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/52808] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52808 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||52756 ---

[Bug c++/52833] -O2 optimizes loop to infinite when loop invariant based on arithmetic overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52833 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug middle-end/52756] [4.8 Regression] 255.vortex in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52756 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-02 11:38:59 UTC --- It doesn't work, as we expect loop_latch_edge () to work during further threading. It also does not work because we miss some threadings and thus hit the

[Bug rtl-optimization/52803] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in ira, at ira.c:3616 with -fno-move-loop-invariants on almost any code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52803 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-02 11:59:51 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Apr 2 11:59:47 2012 New Revision: 186080 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186080 Log: 2012-04-02 Richard

[Bug middle-end/52800] [4.8 Regression] eglibc build broken with internal compiler error in cfgloop .

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52800 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/52803] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in ira, at ira.c:3616 with -fno-move-loop-invariants on almost any code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52803 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/52800] [4.8 Regression] eglibc build broken with internal compiler error in cfgloop .

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52800 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-02 12:00:34 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Apr 2 12:00:30 2012 New Revision: 186081 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186081 Log: 2012-04-02 Richard

[Bug regression/52834] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in check_tag_decl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52834 Bug #: 52834 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in check_tag_decl Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug regression/52834] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in check_tag_decl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52834 Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus

[Bug middle-end/52756] [4.8 Regression] 255.vortex in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52756 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-02 14:05:31 UTC --- With that patch gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-thread-2.c regresses as we do not perform the threading through the header edge anymore. Note that using

[Bug middle-end/52756] [4.8 Regression] 255.vortex in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52756 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-02 15:13:50 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Apr 2 15:13:45 2012 New Revision: 186085 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186085 Log: 2012-04-02 Richard

[Bug fortran/52835] New: Incorrect code generated by gfortran 4.7.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52835 Bug #: 52835 Summary: Incorrect code generated by gfortran 4.7.0 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 --- Comment #32 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-02 15:57:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #31) Well, that is reassuring. Then, will we still pretty-print expressions in diagnostics once we have the caret? No, there should be

[Bug middle-end/52835] [4.7/4.8 Regression] -O3 wrongly optimizes loop __builtin_memcpy away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52835 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug middle-end/52835] [4.7/4.8 Regression] -O3 wrongly optimizes loop __builtin_memcpy away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52835 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-04-02 16:18:47 UTC --- r183622 is OK r183649 miscompiles the code.

[Bug java/52805] [4.8 Regression] 243 new GCC HEAD@185977 regressions (libjava failures)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52805 --- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-02 16:29:25 UTC --- Rainer's commit (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-04/msg00031.html) fixes this for i686-darwin9.

[Bug fortran/52774] Derived-type assignment: check required to prevent double deallocation of allocatable component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52774 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug libstdc++/52822] [C++11] stable_partition destroys sequence due to inappropriate self-move-assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52822 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey Yasskin jyasskin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-02 16:41:41 UTC --- Sounds good. Will send the patches to the list, probably tomorrow. Thanks!

[Bug regression/52834] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in check_tag_decl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52834 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug java/52805] [4.8 Regression] 243 new GCC HEAD@185977 regressions (libjava failures)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52805 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-02 17:13:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) e.g. AFAICT, although darwin defines JCR_SECTION_NAME, there is no crt machinery to deal with it [darwin has it's own crt code] JFTR

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 --- Comment #33 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-02 17:15:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #32) (In reply to comment #31) Well, that is reassuring. Then, will we still pretty-print expressions in diagnostics once we

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 --- Comment #34 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-02 17:18:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #32) Of course this may fail in some cases, like non-ANSI input, and not preprocessing, but it will work in 99% of the cases. In

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 --- Comment #35 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-02 17:19:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #34) (In reply to comment #32) Of course this may fail in some cases, like non-ANSI input, and not preprocessing, but it

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 --- Comment #36 from pinskia at gmail dot com pinskia at gmail dot com 2012-04-02 17:35:59 UTC --- I know some of us use tee and that disables termainal detection code usually. Or output to a file and then use tail -f. So please don't do that. It

[Bug middle-end/52835] [4.7/4.8 Regression] -O3 wrongly optimizes loop __builtin_memcpy away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52835 --- Comment #3 from Arnaud Desitter arnaud02 at users dot sourceforge.net 2012-04-02 17:54:06 UTC --- Additionally: cat xxx.f SUBROUTINE XXX(RES,ALP,REN,NN ) DIMENSION ALP(NN),REN (NN),RES (NN) DO IP = 1,NN REN(IP) =

[Bug regression/52834] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in check_tag_decl

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52834 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2012-04-02 18:31:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Dup of PR52671 ? Yes. Gcc-4.8 from today is fine. Gcc-4.7 release fails. Haven't tried the gcc-4.7 branch, but it seems

[Bug libffi/52497] libffi doesn't build on powerpc64-linux after latest upstream merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52497 Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug libffi/52497] libffi doesn't build on powerpc64-linux after latest upstream merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52497 Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/52835] [4.7/4.8 Regression] -O3 wrongly optimizes loop __builtin_memcpy away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52835 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/52835] [4.7/4.8 Regression] -O3 wrongly optimizes loop __builtin_memcpy away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52835 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-02 19:38:31 UTC --- Created attachment 27069 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27069 gcc48-pr52835.patch Untested fix. Ignoring failures from compute_*loop

[Bug fortran/52724] Internal read with character(kind=4) data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52724 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/52836] New: internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix, at config/arm/arm.c:13084

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52836 Bug #: 52836 Summary: internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix, at config/arm/arm.c:13084 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug target/52836] internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix, at config/arm/arm.c:13084

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52836 --- Comment #1 from Meador Inge meadori at codesourcery dot com 2012-04-02 20:54:30 UTC --- Created attachment 27070 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27070 Reproduction case

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 --- Comment #37 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-02 22:05:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #36) I know some of us use tee and that disables termainal detection code usually. Right, so then you don't get the caret by default.

[Bug c++/52837] New: ICE in cp/mangle.c:3306

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52837 Bug #: 52837 Summary: ICE in cp/mangle.c:3306 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/52837] ICE in cp/mangle.c:3306

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52837 --- Comment #1 from Matt Godbolt matt at godbolt dot org 2012-04-02 22:17:15 UTC --- Created attachment 27071 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27071 This is the .ii file that reproduces the problem. (gzipped to get past upload

[Bug c++/52837] ICE in cp/mangle.c:3306

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52837 --- Comment #2 from Matt Godbolt matt at godbolt dot org 2012-04-02 22:51:14 UTC --- After a little more research, I've managed to get a 4-line reproduction case. (See attached). I also confirmed this code compiles without error on GCC4.5 and

[Bug c++/52837] ICE in cp/mangle.c:3306

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52837 --- Comment #3 from Matt Godbolt matt at godbolt dot org 2012-04-02 22:52:26 UTC --- Created attachment 27072 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27072 Minimal reproducible test case $ /site/apps/gcc-4.7.0-drw.2/bin/gcc -c

[Bug target/52838] New: [x32] missed optimization for pointer return value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52838 Bug #: 52838 Summary: [x32] missed optimization for pointer return value Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug java/52815] class.c:2815:53: error: 'JCR_SECTION_NAME' was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52815 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-04-03 01:05:02 UTC --- Fix is obvious but should GCC be smart enough to ignore code code after gcc_unreachable? -- John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net

[Bug libstdc++/52839] New: double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839 Bug #: 52839 Summary: double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/52828] powerpc -m32 -Os writes register saves below stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52828 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug ada/52752] GNAT bug box on instantiation of subprogram with not null-qualified named access type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52752 denkpadje at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||denkpadje at gmail dot com

[Bug c++/49152] Unhelpful diagnostic for iterator dereference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152 --- Comment #38 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-03 03:41:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #37) Actually, it's not clear to me that the caret line would be likely to cause trouble for IDEs in any case; they already have to

[Bug target/52836] internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix, at config/arm/arm.c:13084

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52836 Chung-Lin Tang cltang at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cltang at gcc