[Bug target/52883] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1464

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52883 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/48496] [4.7/4.8 Regression] 'asm' operand requires impossible reload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48496 --- Comment #19 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-09 08:04:40 UTC --- However, recog.c contains in various places checks that will *accept* -during reload- a pseudo in places where a memory constraint is required; exactly

[Bug target/52883] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1464

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52883 --- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-04-09 08:07:47 UTC --- Created attachment 27116 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27116 Untested patch Patch in testing.

[Bug target/52908] xop-mul-1:f9 miscompiled on bulldozer (-mxop)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52908 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug target/52717] thunk referenced in discarded section when building samba with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52717 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-09 08:53:33 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Mon Apr 9 08:53:27 2012 New Revision: 186237 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186237 Log: PR target/52717

[Bug target/52717] thunk referenced in discarded section when building samba with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52717 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-09 08:53:54 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Mon Apr 9 08:53:49 2012 New Revision: 186239 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186239 Log: PR target/52717

[Bug target/52717] thunk referenced in discarded section when building samba with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52717 --- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-09 08:54:07 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Mon Apr 9 08:54:03 2012 New Revision: 186240 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186240 Log: PR target/52717

[Bug target/52717] thunk referenced in discarded section when building samba with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52717 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-09 08:53:40 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Mon Apr 9 08:53:37 2012 New Revision: 186238 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186238 Log: PR target/52717

[Bug target/52717] thunk referenced in discarded section when building samba with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52717 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/52883] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1464

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52883 --- Comment #10 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-09 09:57:18 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Mon Apr 9 09:57:13 2012 New Revision: 186243 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186243 Log: PR target/52883 *

[Bug target/52883] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1464

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52883 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86

[Bug java/49258] -ffunction-sections and --gc-sectinons have no effect at gcj

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49258 --- Comment #6 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2012-04-09 11:14:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #4) Yes,but why we can't remove the function notused() form vtable, since this function

[Bug target/52908] xop-mul-1:f9 miscompiled on bulldozer (-mxop)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52908 --- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-04-09 11:48:05 UTC --- Created attachment 27117 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27117 Proposed patch There are indeed two problems with XOP patterns: a)

[Bug c/52911] New: gcc 4.7.0 (ppc32 e500mc) when compile a c file, after a lot of time, gcc failed and internal compiler error occurs.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911 Bug #: 52911 Summary: gcc 4.7.0 (ppc32 e500mc) when compile a c file, after a lot of time, gcc failed and internal compiler error occurs. Classification: Unclassified

[Bug fortran/52909] [F03] Procedure pointers not private to modules

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52909 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/52679] [4.6 Regression] ICE in gfortran 4.6.3, x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52679 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |normal

[Bug fortran/52622] ICE in gfortran 4.6.3, x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52622 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |normal

[Bug c/52912] New: ICE: verify_ssa failed

--with-libelf=/usr/local --enable-lto --prefix=/home/regehr/z/compiler-install/gcc-r186233-install --program-prefix=r186233- --enable-languages=c,c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.8.0 20120409 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c/52911] gcc 4.7.0 (ppc32 e500mc) when compile a c file, after a lot of time, gcc failed and internal compiler error occurs.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug tree-optimization/50439] gfortran infinite loop with -floop-interchange

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50439 --- Comment #10 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-09 16:03:27 UTC --- FWIW, my original compile did eventually complete (after 31.5 hours)...

[Bug c++/24985] caret diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985 --- Comment #27 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org 2012-04-09 16:04:46 UTC --- manu at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org a écrit: Dodji, are you planning to propose to enable -ftrack-macro-expansion by default in

[Bug c/52913] New: segfault due to null ptr deref

with: ../configure --with-libelf=/usr/local --enable-lto --prefix=/home/regehr/z/compiler-install/gcc-r186233-install --program-prefix=r186233- --enable-languages=c,c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.8.0 20120409 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c/52914] New: ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1464

Configured with: ../configure --with-libelf=/usr/local --enable-lto --prefix=/home/regehr/z/compiler-install/gcc-r186233-install --program-prefix=r186233- --enable-languages=c,c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.8.0 20120409 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c++/24985] caret diagnostics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985 --- Comment #28 from dodji at seketeli dot org dodji at seketeli dot org 2012-04-09 16:19:15 UTC --- manu at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org a écrit: Of course, it needs some fine-tuning to avoid repetitions, but this is a problem

[Bug c/52913] segfault due to null ptr deref

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52913 John Regehr regehr at cs dot utah.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/52881] [4.8 Regression] ICE due to null pointer deref in cfgloop.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52881 --- Comment #1 from John Regehr regehr at cs dot utah.edu 2012-04-09 16:18:46 UTC --- *** Bug 52913 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/52915] New: [C++11] Deleted default-constructor of anonymous unions not honored

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52915 Bug #: 52915 Summary: [C++11] Deleted default-constructor of anonymous unions not honored Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug rtl-optimization/48496] [4.7/4.8 Regression] 'asm' operand requires impossible reload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48496 --- Comment #20 from Leif Leonhardy bugfeed at online dot de 2012-04-09 16:42:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) It is time to do something as GCC 4.7 is quite hampered by this on IA-64. Indeed. Besides MPIR (hence presumably also GMP) and

[Bug fortran/52916] New: [4.8 Regression] 481.wrf in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52916 Bug #: 52916 Summary: [4.8 Regression] 481.wrf in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/52607] v4df __builtin_shuffle with {0,2,1,3} or {1,3,0,2}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52607 --- Comment #27 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2012-04-09 16:50:47 UTC --- Notes to self (or other): - Intel's SDE makes it possible to test without appropriate hardware; - for V4DF shuffles, there seems to be a very simple

[Bug lto/52722] ICE in lto_output_varpool_node

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52722 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-09 18:57:49 UTC --- This seems to be another manifestation of the alias partitioning issues. I am testing a fix. Honza

[Bug target/52883] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1464

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52883 --- Comment #12 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-04-09 18:59:50 UTC --- *** Bug 52914 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/52914] ICE in simplify_const_unary_operation, at simplify-rtx.c:1464

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52914 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/52916] [4.8 Regression] 481.wrf in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52916 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug libstdc++/52476] [DR 518] Unordered multimap reorders equivalent elements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52476 --- Comment #6 from François Dumont fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-09 19:12:23 UTC --- Author: fdumont Date: Mon Apr 9 19:12:18 2012 New Revision: 186249 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186249 Log: 2012-04-09 François

[Bug java/49258] -ffunction-sections and --gc-sectinons have no effect at gcj

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49258 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-09 19:40:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) and i test a c++ file,it will remove the unused funcitons notused: But that is not the same as there is no vtable for hello. Try:

[Bug libstdc++/52917] New: explicitly stated return type in std::mem_fn cannot be compiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52917 Bug #: 52917 Summary: explicitly stated return type in std::mem_fn cannot be compiled Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/52918] New: ICE: Invalid bb-loop_father (NULL) in add_bb_to_loop

\xgcc.exe Target: x86_64-w64-mingw32 Configured with: ../../gcc/configure --target=x86_64-w64-mingw32 --enable-targets=all --with-sysroot=/c/mingw64-devel --prefix=/c/mi ngw64-devel Thread model: win32 gcc version 4.8.0 20120409 (experimental) (GCC) COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-shared-libgcc' '-B' 'c:/scottm

[Bug c++/52918] ICE: Invalid bb-loop_father (NULL) in add_bb_to_loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52918 B. Scott Michel bscottm at ieee dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |blocker

[Bug c++/52918] ICE: Invalid bb-loop_father (NULL) in add_bb_to_loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52918 --- Comment #1 from B. Scott Michel bscottm at ieee dot org 2012-04-09 20:31:53 UTC --- Patch to check bb-loop_father is relatively obvious, but not clear that the patch would do the right thing.

[Bug libstdc++/52476] [DR 518] Unordered multimap reorders equivalent elements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52476 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.1

[Bug libstdc++/52917] [DR 2048] explicitly stated return type in std::mem_fn cannot be compiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52917 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED

[Bug libstdc++/52917] [DR 2048] explicitly stated return type in std::mem_fn cannot be compiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52917 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-09 21:35:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Or you can do auto y = std::mem_fn((int (X::*)())X::get ); Or auto y = std::mem_fn int()(X::get ); Which should also work

[Bug middle-end/52919] New: shift expansion mishandles SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED on partial integer modes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52919 Bug #: 52919 Summary: shift expansion mishandles SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED on partial integer modes Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug middle-end/52919] shift expansion mishandles SHIFT_COUNT_TRUNCATED on partial integer modes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52919 --- Comment #1 from Peter A. Bigot bigotp at acm dot org 2012-04-09 22:30:20 UTC --- Created attachment 27119 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27119 Replace GET_MODE_BITSIZE with GET_MODE_PRECISION where necessary

[Bug middle-end/52856] misuse of MODE_SIZE vice MODE_PRECISION in get_mode_bounds

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52856 --- Comment #1 from Peter A. Bigot bigotp at acm dot org 2012-04-09 22:31:59 UTC --- Created attachment 27120 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27120 Replace GET_MODE_BITSIZE with GET_MODE_PRECISION where necessary

[Bug lto/51765] Testsuite ICEs with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51765 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-09 23:39:16 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Mon Apr 9 23:39:11 2012 New Revision: 186252 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186252 Log: PR lto/52722 PR

[Bug lto/52634] multiple definition error when using alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52634 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-09 23:39:15 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Mon Apr 9 23:39:11 2012 New Revision: 186252 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186252 Log: PR lto/52722 PR

[Bug lto/52722] ICE in lto_output_varpool_node

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52722 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-09 23:39:15 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Mon Apr 9 23:39:11 2012 New Revision: 186252 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186252 Log: PR lto/52722 PR

[Bug tree-optimization/52571] vectorizer changes alignment of common symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571 m...@gcc.gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot

[Bug c/52920] New: function call optimized away with ftree-loop-distribute-patterns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52920 Bug #: 52920 Summary: function call optimized away with ftree-loop-distribute-patterns Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/52777] [4.8 Regression] ./options.h:3546:0: error: MASK_SIO redefined [-Werror]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52777 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-04-10 00:51:35 UTC --- On 29-Mar-12, at 2:26 PM, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52777 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com

[Bug other/52777] [4.8 Regression] ./options.h:3546:0: error: MASK_SIO redefined [-Werror]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52777 --- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-10 00:56:37 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Tue Apr 10 00:56:27 2012 New Revision: 186257 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186257 Log: Remove SIO and GNU_LD

[Bug fortran/52921] New: Memory errors when compiled with -fstrict-overflow flag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52921 Bug #: 52921 Summary: Memory errors when compiled with -fstrict-overflow flag Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/52922] New: failed to build gcc 4.7 on SL6.1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52922 Bug #: 52922 Summary: failed to build gcc 4.7 on SL6.1 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/52922] failed to build gcc 4.7 on SL6.1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52922 --- Comment #1 from scott at smedleyfamily dot net 2012-04-10 05:41:18 UTC --- Created attachment 27122 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27122 config.log