[Bug c++/52922] failed to build gcc 4.7 on SL6.1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52922 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug c/52923] New: Warn if making external references to local stack memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52923 Bug #: 52923 Summary: Warn if making external references to local stack memory Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/52922] failed to build gcc 4.7 on SL6.1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52922 --- Comment #3 from scott at smedleyfamily dot net 2012-04-10 07:45:58 UTC --- Hi Andrew, Works fine - see below. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help. Scott. :) lcas-el6build1 cat ! test.cc #include string.h #include stdio.h int

[Bug c++/52922] failed to build gcc 4.7 on SL6.1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52922 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-10 07:52:39 UTC --- This implies the /usr/local/bin/gcc compiler you're using was not built on SL6.1, or was built against an older glibc I've had exactly this error when trying

[Bug c/52923] Warn if making external references to local stack memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52923 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-10 07:59:40 UTC --- These all need to have some kind of flow analysis going on (the return one is the only one which does not which is why we warn already).

[Bug c/52923] Warn if making external references to local stack memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52923 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-10 08:03:13 UTC --- See also PR 49974 requesting the same thing for C++ and PR 51270 and PR 44859 are similar but for temporaries

[Bug c++/52922] failed to build gcc 4.7 on SL6.1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52922 --- Comment #5 from scott at smedleyfamily dot net 2012-04-10 08:13:44 UTC --- H, you are right. I was compiling gcc with a version of gcc built on Centos 5.6. (though I compiled Andrew's test program with a different native version) I would

[Bug c++/52924] New: Using an std::function object as deleter of shared_ptr in C++0x mode does not compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52924 Bug #: 52924 Summary: Using an std::function object as deleter of shared_ptr in C++0x mode does not compile Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/52925] New: [4.5/4.6 Regression] var-tracking never terminates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52925 Bug #: 52925 Summary: [4.5/4.6 Regression] var-tracking never terminates Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/52925] [4.5/4.6 Regression] var-tracking never terminates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52925 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.3.6

[Bug middle-end/52925] [4.5/4.6 Regression] var-tracking never terminates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52925 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-10 08:40:29 UTC --- Created attachment 27124 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27124 preprocessed source

[Bug c++/52924] Using an std::function object as deleter of shared_ptr in C++0x mode does not compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52924 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug c++/52922] failed to build gcc 4.7 on SL6.1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52922 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-10 09:11:03 UTC --- No, in general you can't use GCC built for one target on a different target. What I do is just build the same version of GCC with the exact same

[Bug bootstrap/52887] Bootstrap on AIX failure: Undefined symbol: .std::functionvoid (std::__regex::_PatternCursor const, std::__regex::_Results)::function(std::functionvoid (std::__regex::_Patte

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52887 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-10 09:12:39 UTC --- we might need an explicit instantiation of that type in libstdc++.so, I'll investigate

[Bug libstdc++/52917] [DR 2048] explicitly stated return type in std::mem_fn cannot be compiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52917 --- Comment #3 from freunddeslichts at web dot de 2012-04-10 09:54:28 UTC --- Ok, I didn't know about the defect report and resolution yet. I must admit that I quite like the int() syntax. I added a remark about the defect and a short example to

[Bug fortran/52916] [4.8 Regression] 481.wrf in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52916 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug c++/52924] [4.7 Regression] Using an std::function object as deleter of shared_ptr in C++0x mode does not compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52924 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug fortran/52916] [4.8 Regression] 481.wrf in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52916 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/52925] [4.5/4.6 Regression] var-tracking never terminates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52925 Bart Van Assche bart.vanassche at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c/52926] New: gcc 4.7.0 20120324: wrong optimized asm code produced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52926 Bug #: 52926 Summary: gcc 4.7.0 20120324: wrong optimized asm code produced Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug tree-optimization/52870] ICE during SLP pattern matching

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52870 --- Comment #3 from Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-10 10:56:17 UTC --- Author: uweigand Date: Tue Apr 10 10:56:11 2012 New Revision: 186272 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186272 Log: gcc/ PR

[Bug tree-optimization/52870] ICE during SLP pattern matching

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52870 Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/52917] [DR 2048] explicitly stated return type in std::mem_fn cannot be compiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52917 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-10 11:23:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Ok, I didn't know about the defect report and resolution yet. I must admit that I quite like the int() syntax. It's a peculiarity

[Bug middle-end/52881] [4.8 Regression] ICE due to null pointer deref in cfgloop.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52881 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/52886] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr36978.c -On (internal compiler error), n=1 and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52886 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/52921] With realloc-lhs: Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52921 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/52888] Unable to inline function pointer call with inexact signature match

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52888 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/52890] Revision 185336 causes 10% degradation on cpu2000 benchmark 252.eon

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52890 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/52891] [4.8 Regression] ICE in adjust_bool_pattern

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52891 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/52894] [4.5,4.6,4.7 Regression] Stage1 bootstrap fails with gcc-4.6.3: Infinite loop in pointer_set_insert

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52894 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.4

[Bug c++/52900] Compile source using Boost header with -static -flto -std=c++11 breaks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52900 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto

[Bug c++/52906] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in check_tag_decl (decl.c:4230) with __attribute__ ((__deprecated__)); alone

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52906 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.1

[Bug tree-optimization/52904] -Wstrict-overflow false alarm with bounded loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52904 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug rtl-optimization/48496] [4.7/4.8 Regression] 'asm' operand requires impossible reload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48496 --- Comment #21 from Ulrich Weigand uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-10 12:16:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) and the matching alternative would be (f, Q) with ;; Note that while this accepts mem, it only accepts non-volatile mem,

[Bug tree-optimization/52907] Underflowing floating point expressions wrongly folded to zero

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52907 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/52911] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc 4.7.0 (ppc32 e500mc) when compile a c file, after a lot of time, gcc failed and internal compiler error occurs.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.3.6

[Bug tree-optimization/52912] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52912 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/52918] [4.8 Regression] ICE: Invalid bb-loop_father (NULL) in add_bb_to_loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52918 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |target

[Bug middle-end/52835] [4.7/4.8 Regression] -O3 wrongly optimizes loop __builtin_memcpy away

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52835 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||garfieldsk

[Bug tree-optimization/52920] function call optimized away with ftree-loop-distribute-patterns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52920 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/52918] [4.8 Regression] ICE: Invalid bb-loop_father (NULL) in add_bb_to_loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52918 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c/52923] Warn if making external references to local stack memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52923 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c/52926] gcc 4.7.0 20120324: wrong optimized asm code produced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52926 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/52923] Warn if making external references to local stack memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52923 --- Comment #4 from Fredrik Hederstierna fredrik.hederstie...@securitas-direct.com 2012-04-10 12:52:36 UTC --- Maybe it have advantages to have a pointer-deref analysis pass rather than a point-to analysis pass. Then GCC could warn only if the

[Bug c++/52924] [4.7 Regression] Using an std::function object as deleter of shared_ptr in C++0x mode does not compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52924 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-10 12:55:40 UTC --- another testcase showing a similar bug: #include memory templatetypename T struct Alloc : std::allocatorT { templatetypename U struct rebind { typedef

[Bug c/52927] New: procps do not work with -Os flag.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52927 Bug #: 52927 Summary: procps do not work with -Os flag. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/52927] procps do not work with -Os flag.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52927 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug middle-end/52888] Unable to inline function pointer call with inexact signature match

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52888 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/52888] Unable to inline function pointer call with inexact signature match

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52888 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-10 13:20:55 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Apr 10 13:20:50 2012 New Revision: 186276 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186276 Log: 2012-04-10 Richard

[Bug target/52928] New: Alpha/VMS: c++ triggers gas errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52928 Bug #: 52928 Summary: Alpha/VMS: c++ triggers gas errors Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/52928] Alpha/VMS: c++ triggers gas errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52928 ging...@gcc.gnu.org gingold at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|

[Bug debug/52727] [4.7/4.8 Regression] internal compiler error at dwarf2cfi.c2:685

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52727 --- Comment #15 from Florian Fainelli florian at openwrt dot org 2012-04-10 13:39:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) Author: rth Date: Fri Mar 30 18:00:37 2012 New Revision: 186018 URL:

[Bug target/52908] xop-mul-1:f9 miscompiled on bulldozer (-mxop)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52908 --- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-04-10 13:49:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Created attachment 27117 [details] Proposed patch Michael, can you please test this patch?

[Bug c/44005] gcc should implement __int64, so it can e.g. read the VMS system headers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44005 ging...@gcc.gnu.org gingold at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug other/44279] system.h calloc/malloc/realloc VMS size_t vs. __size_t

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44279 ging...@gcc.gnu.org gingold at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/44242] vms-crt0*.c should compile with gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44242 ging...@gcc.gnu.org gingold at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/44000] gcc/resource.h conflicts with sysroot/usr/include/resource.h (alpha-dec-vms)#8207;

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44000 ging...@gcc.gnu.org gingold at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/52891] [4.8 Regression] ICE in adjust_bool_pattern

Configured with: ../configure --with-libelf=/usr/local --enable-lto --prefix=/home/regehr/z/compiler-install/gcc-r186257-install --program-prefix=r186257- --enable-languages=c,c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.8.0 20120410 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c/44003] gcc 4.5.0 stddef.h clobbers __size_t with #define, breaks VMS (code already avoids similar on FreeBSD)#8207;

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44003 ging...@gcc.gnu.org gingold at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug translation/45116] config/ia64/vms_symvec_libgcc_s.opt not an options file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45116 ging...@gcc.gnu.org gingold at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/52876] [x32] - Sign extend 32 to 64bit then clear upper 32bits fails O1 or higher

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52876 --- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-04-10 14:49:37 UTC --- A patch is posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/msg00320.html

[Bug lto/52722] ICE in lto_output_varpool_node

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52722 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug lto/52634] multiple definition error when using alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52634 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-10 15:09:27 UTC --- Fixed on mainline, will backport the fix if no problems shows up.

[Bug libstdc++/52839] double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839 --- Comment #19 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2012-04-10 15:13:24 UTC --- I think I was on the right track when I questioned whether the problem might be mixing atomics and mutex protected ops, but was looking in the wrong place. I

[Bug c/52927] procps do not work with -Os flag.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52927 --- Comment #2 from Jonatan GOebel jonatan.goebel at digitel dot com.br 2012-04-10 15:14:53 UTC --- The ps code calls the funcion set_personality() This function ends with a goto *(found-jump); this goto jump to case_unknown: do some stuffs

[Bug fortran/52473] CSHIFT slow - inline it?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52473 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc

[Bug libstdc++/52604] mt allocator crashes on multi-threaded

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52604 --- Comment #7 from Laurent Aflonsi laurent.alfonsi at st dot com 2012-04-10 15:28:07 UTC --- Ping ? Here is the patch proposed. --- libstdc++-v3/src/mt_allocator.cc2011/08/04 07:56:492064 +++

[Bug rtl-optimization/48496] [4.7/4.8 Regression] 'asm' operand requires impossible reload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48496 --- Comment #22 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-10 15:29:46 UTC --- ;; Note that while this accepts mem, it only accepts non-volatile mem, ;; and so cannot be fixed by adjusting the address. Thus it cannot ;; and

[Bug libstdc++/52839] double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-10 15:36:40 UTC --- You're quite right, my apologies for telling you that wouldn't happen. In bits/shared_ptr_base.h we have: template inline void

[Bug libstdc++/52839] double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.1 ---

[Bug middle-end/52890] Revision 185336 causes 10% degradation on cpu2000 benchmark 252.eon

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52890 Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/52476] [DR 518] Unordered multimap reorders equivalent elements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52476 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/52924] [4.7 Regression] Using an std::function object as deleter of shared_ptr in C++0x mode does not compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52924 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|jpr at essi dot fr | ---

[Bug tree-optimization/52558] write introduction incorrect wrt the C++11 memory model

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52558 --- Comment #14 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-10 17:07:22 UTC --- Richard G., or perhaps another aliasing expert. I am working on a patch for this problem. Could you pontificate as to why no optimization pass has been

[Bug middle-end/52890] Revision 185336 causes 10% degradation on cpu2000 benchmark 252.eon

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52890 Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever

[Bug c/52927] procps do not work with -Os flag.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52927 --- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-04-10 17:52:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Please follow instructions at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#report on how to provide all required information.

[Bug c/52927] procps do not work with -Os flag.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52927 --- Comment #4 from Jonatan GOebel jonatan.goebel at digitel dot com.br 2012-04-10 18:15:58 UTC --- Created attachment 27125 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27125 S file compiled with -Os flag

[Bug c/52927] procps do not work with -Os flag.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52927 --- Comment #5 from Jonatan GOebel jonatan.goebel at digitel dot com.br 2012-04-10 18:16:36 UTC --- Created attachment 27126 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27126 S file compiled without -Os flag

[Bug c/52927] procps do not work with -Os flag.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52927 --- Comment #6 from Jonatan GOebel jonatan.goebel at digitel dot com.br 2012-04-10 18:17:39 UTC --- Created attachment 27127 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27127 compiled sorce file.

[Bug c/52927] procps do not work with -Os flag.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52927 --- Comment #7 from Jonatan GOebel jonatan.goebel at digitel dot com.br 2012-04-10 18:24:55 UTC --- props project: http://procps.sourceforge.net/index.html Hi, I attached the i and the S files from the source code that causes the program to

[Bug c++/52929] New: use of undeclared identifier '__ATOMIC_ACQ_REL'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52929 Bug #: 52929 Summary: use of undeclared identifier '__ATOMIC_ACQ_REL' Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/52929] use of undeclared identifier '__ATOMIC_ACQ_REL'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52929 ncahill_alt at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ncahill_alt at yahoo dot

[Bug c++/52929] use of undeclared identifier '__ATOMIC_ACQ_REL'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52929 Andrew Macleod amacleod at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at

[Bug c++/52900] Compile source using Boost header with -static -flto -std=c++11 breaks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52900 --- Comment #4 from gccBugs at haatschii dot de 2012-04-10 20:37:36 UTC --- To large to attach it directly: http://haatschii.de/preprocessed_source.cpp

[Bug c++/52929] use of undeclared identifier '__ATOMIC_ACQ_REL'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52929 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug c/52927] procps do not work with -Os flag.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52927 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/43366] [OOP][F2008] Intrinsic assign to polymorphic variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366 Andrew Benson abenson at caltech dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||abenson at

[Bug target/52918] [4.8 Regression] ICE: Invalid bb-loop_father (NULL) in add_bb_to_loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52918 --- Comment #4 from B. Scott Michel bscottm at ieee dot org 2012-04-10 21:28:25 UTC --- Created attachment 27128 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27128 Preprocessed eh_alloc.cc, for reference Per request, preprocessed source

[Bug target/52918] [4.8 Regression] ICE: Invalid bb-loop_father (NULL) in add_bb_to_loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52918 --- Comment #5 from B. Scott Michel bscottm at ieee dot org 2012-04-10 21:31:13 UTC --- I deduced that add_bb_to_loop and a null bb-loop_father meant that the enclosing basic block was either missing or incorrectly annotated. The fix, however, is

[Bug middle-end/52894] [4.5,4.6,4.7 Regression] Stage1 bootstrap fails with gcc-4.6.3: Infinite loop in pointer_set_insert

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52894 --- Comment #6 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-10 22:11:45 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Tue Apr 10 22:11:38 2012 New Revision: 186296 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186296 Log: PR

[Bug middle-end/52894] [4.5,4.6,4.7 Regression] Stage1 bootstrap fails with gcc-4.6.3: Infinite loop in pointer_set_insert

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52894 --- Comment #7 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-10 22:13:56 UTC --- Author: danglin Date: Tue Apr 10 22:13:52 2012 New Revision: 186297 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=186297 Log: PR

[Bug other/52930] New: quadmath: missing logbq, modfq, nexttowardq, exp2q

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52930 Bug #: 52930 Summary: quadmath: missing logbq, modfq, nexttowardq, exp2q Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/52734] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect optimization of uClibc sbrk()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52734 joerg.jungermann at gmx dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joerg.jungermann at gmx

[Bug tree-optimization/52734] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect optimization of uClibc sbrk()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52734 --- Comment #13 from Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek at gmail dot com 2012-04-10 22:57:15 UTC --- Just some remarks: Freetz is an OSS project supporting router (platforms) of a popular German company. The target-system is mostly MIPS(EL). The majority

[Bug c++/52922] failed to build gcc 4.7 on SL6.1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52922 --- Comment #7 from scott at smedleyfamily dot net 2012-04-10 23:19:58 UTC --- Thanks Jonathan, No, in general you can't use GCC built for one target on a different target. I realise this is off-topic but I would love to know: what is causing

[Bug rtl-optimization/30957] Misscompare with variable expansion optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30957 m...@gcc.gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot

[Bug libstdc++/52839] double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |--- --- Comment #22

[Bug libstdc++/52839] double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839 --- Comment #23 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-11 00:30:46 UTC --- I hadn't got as far as tracking down when it changed - if you're right that would be quite nice and we'll be able to fix it properly.

[Bug c++/52922] failed to build gcc 4.7 on SL6.1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52922 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-04-11 00:49:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) I realise this is off-topic but I would love to know: what is causing this limitation? GCC's fixincludes mechanism, which installs

[Bug libstdc++/52839] double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bkoz at gcc dot

  1   2   >