http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53201
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53186
--- Comment #3 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-05-03 06:42:46 UTC ---
not bad…
hope it could be back ported to 4.7.1
c++ -std=gnu++11 -c opFinal.cpp; nm opFinal.o; otool -t -v -V -X opFinal.o |
c++filt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53206
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53186
--- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-05-03 06:46:01 UTC ---
Ciao Paolo,
grazie per il patch.
Io no so quale sia lo standard gcc, ma credo sarebbe meglio distribuire patch
che si applicano direttamente
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53201
--- Comment #4 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
06:50:25 UTC ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Thu May 3 06:50:16 2012
New Revision: 187075
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187075
Log:
PR target/53201
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53194
--- Comment #3 from Yukhin Kirill kirill.yukhin at intel dot com 2012-05-03
07:01:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 27299
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27299
Proposed solution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53194
--- Comment #4 from Yukhin Kirill kirill.yukhin at intel dot com 2012-05-03
07:02:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Created attachment 27299 [details]
Proposed solution
Attached patch cures failing tests
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53194
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52864
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
07:19:08 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu May 3 07:18:56 2012
New Revision: 187076
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187076
Log:
2012-05-03 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53201
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52864
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53187
Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53190
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
07:59:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
(clobber (reg:QI 18 fpsr))
(clobber (reg:QI 17 flags))
It might
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53206
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
08:08:53 UTC ---
It depends what you consider a false positive. I imagine it's 100% accurate,
but it doesn't always indicate a bug, sometimes it warns about code that
behaves
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53190
--- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-05-03 08:15:00
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
So you say that it's correct for CSE to CSE asm()s if they have the same
asm string and the same asm operands in case the asm is not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53190
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2012-05-03 08:19:17 UTC ---
On Thu, 3 May 2012, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53190
--- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53202
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
08:22:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 27301
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27301
preprocessed source
This preprocessed source was created by G++ version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53202
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
08:30:38 UTC ---
For that preprocessed source the difference is in the Bind_simple constructor,
for 4.6 it is:
Bind_simpleCallable::Bind_simple(const Callable) [with Callable
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53168
--- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
08:31:54 UTC ---
I don't remember. Did you look at the paper/thesis to see if it says anything
about this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53144
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
08:37:24 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu May 3 08:37:18 2012
New Revision: 187078
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187078
Log:
2012-05-03 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53190
--- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-05-03 08:39:19
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Well, the asm in glibc is simply
extern __inline __attribute__ ((__always_inline__)) long int
__attribute__ ((__nothrow__ ))
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53144
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
08:49:09 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu May 3 08:49:03 2012
New Revision: 187080
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187080
Log:
2012-05-03 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53144
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53190
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Jaeger aj at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03 09:19:16
UTC ---
So, how should the inline rewritten?
Adding volatile is one option:
extern __inline __attribute__ ((__always_inline__)) long int
__attribute__ ((__nothrow__ ))
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53206
--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
09:38:13 UTC ---
So what is your opinion? Should it be enabled?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53190
--- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-05-03 09:38:59
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
So, how should the inline rewritten?
Adding volatile is one option:
extern __inline __attribute__ ((__always_inline__)) long int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53194
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
10:12:39 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu May 3 10:12:33 2012
New Revision: 187084
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187084
Log:
PR target/53194
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53187
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
10:16:05 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu May 3 10:16:01 2012
New Revision: 187085
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187085
Log:
PR target/53187
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53187
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
10:17:06 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu May 3 10:17:02 2012
New Revision: 187086
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187086
Log:
PR target/53187
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53174
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
10:18:39 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu May 3 10:18:34 2012
New Revision: 187087
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187087
Log:
PR debug/53174
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53174
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
10:19:32 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu May 3 10:19:29 2012
New Revision: 187088
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187088
Log:
PR debug/53174
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53187
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176
Greta Yorsh Greta.Yorsh at arm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Greta.Yorsh at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53194
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53174
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.6 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53203
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.7.0 |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53200
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53126
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
10:40:58 UTC ---
And eventually split out the code to avoid bogus duplicates?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53201
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53198
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53206
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
10:54:09 UTC ---
I don't have a strong opinion.
In the large codebase I'm working on currently we use -Wall -Wextra but don't
use -Woverloaded-virtual (and we are aware of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53209
Bug #: 53209
Summary: tree check ICE: expected tree_vec, have error_mark in
comp_template_args_with_info, at cp/pt.c:7038
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53185
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de
2012-05-03 10:59:05 UTC ---
The testcase now (trunk@187082) segfaults in fold_binary_loc:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to process 29611]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53190
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Jaeger aj at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03 11:02:43
UTC ---
So, should somebody file a bug against GCC that to make the SSE cr available?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53126
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
11:09:12 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu May 3 11:09:07 2012
New Revision: 187090
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187090
Log:
PR plugins/53126
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53128
--- Comment #4 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com 2012-05-03
11:09:15 UTC ---
Isn't it too aggressive from user perspective to perform such transformation
even without warning? Especially for the case when that wrong read is not
used
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53126
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
11:09:51 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu May 3 11:09:46 2012
New Revision: 187091
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187091
Log:
PR plugins/53126
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52841
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
11:23:33 UTC ---
Ping?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53190
--- Comment #11 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-05-03 11:43:16
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
So, should somebody file a bug against GCC that to make the SSE cr available?
Er, gcc doesn't need it, all SSE conversion builtins
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53210
Bug #: 53210
Summary: warning for data member initialized with itself should
be in -Wall
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53210
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
12:29:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
The code has a typo, the mem-initializer should have been l(i)
Oops, typo! I meant is should have been j(i)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53211
Bug #: 53211
Summary: range-based 'for' expression of type 'const int []'
has incomplete type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53212
Bug #: 53212
Summary: cpp consumes comment after pragma
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53210
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176
--- Comment #13 from Kenneth Zadeck zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2012-05-03 13:14:31 UTC ---
The arm is one of the architectures for which lower-subreg is harmful
for some of the implementations.
kenny
On 05/03/2012 06:29 AM, Greta.Yorsh at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53206
--- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
13:15:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
In the large codebase I'm working on currently we use -Wall -Wextra but don't
use -Woverloaded-virtual (and we are aware of it,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53211
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176
Greta Yorsh Greta.Yorsh at arm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53206
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
13:28:50 UTC ---
This is slightly contrived:
namespace library
{
struct Interface {
virtual void handle(int) = 0;
};
struct Implementation : Interface {
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53213
Bug #: 53213
Summary: Internal compiler error in math.h
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53168
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
14:17:32 UTC ---
I think it is because of how we do VN lookup / insert during phi_translation.
SCCVN does not guarantee availability of its lookup result, thus when
such
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53214
Bug #: 53214
Summary: [lto]: ICE: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53213
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53186
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-03 14:28:52 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu May 3 14:28:46 2012
New Revision: 187097
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187097
Log:
/cp
2012-05-03
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53186
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-03 14:32:20 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu May 3 14:32:15 2012
New Revision: 187098
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187098
Log:
/cp
2012-05-03
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53186
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53214
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50602
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50602
--- Comment #17 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2012-05-03
14:57:13 UTC ---
Hmm, my assumption was always that this option would be passed through and then
used by lto1 step. That's true for other -f* options at least.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51771
--- Comment #4 from Luke Dalessandro luked at cs dot rochester.edu 2012-05-03
15:06:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 27303
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27303
RBTree microbenchmark test case
I believe that I'm seeing this in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53106
--- Comment #8 from William J. Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
15:16:39 UTC ---
FWIW, I verified that Honza's proposed patch fixes the build problems for
483.xlancbmk and 32-bit 447.dealII on powerpc-linux. Any ETA for getting
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53213
--- Comment #2 from lbl2007 at gmx dot net 2012-05-03 15:51:06 UTC ---
The command to reproduce the error is g++ bug.c, not gcc bug.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53209
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53128
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53211
--- Comment #2 from niXman i.nixman at gmail dot com 2012-05-03 16:04:26 UTC
---
This code also works:
#include iostream
templatetypename... Args
void func(Args... args) {
const int arr[] = {args...};
for (int it: arr) { //
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176
--- Comment #15 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-05-03 16:19:04
UTC ---
32bit x86 regressed (-O2 -mmovbe) with following testcase:
void
foo (long long i)
{
x = __builtin_bswap64 (i);
}
from:
foo:
movbe 4(%esp), %eax
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53200
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
16:36:17 UTC ---
Hmm. I see nothing amiss in that generated config file.
But see if by chance it isn't the same problem as fixed by r187102.
Hey there,
I tried to write a template that finds the smallest signed integer type
that can represent a given number. To achieve that, I am computing boolean
constant expressions and use them to pick the right template
specializations. This produces multiple comparison is always true/false
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52605
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
17:00:48 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu May 3 17:00:32 2012
New Revision: 187109
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187109
Log:
2012-05-03 Martin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52605
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52543
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-03 17:04:49 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu May 3 17:04:41 2012
New Revision: 187110
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187110
Log:
Add PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53215
Bug #: 53215
Summary: Warn if orphaned memory is created by ignoring return
value of new
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52543
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-03 17:50:20 UTC ---
lower-subreg patched committed here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-05/msg00011.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53119
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53216
Bug #: 53216
Summary: fmaf() alters rounding mode of sse2 FPU
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53217
Bug #: 53217
Summary: [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_ssa
failed
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53217
--- Comment #1 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-05-03 18:38:27 UTC ---
The following testcase causes an ICE with current trunk (4.8)
MODULE xc_cs1
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: dp=KIND(0.0D0)
REAL(KIND=dp),
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53106
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
19:18:56 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu May 3 19:18:51 2012
New Revision: 187114
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187114
Log:
PR middle-end/53106
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53101
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2012-05-03
19:19:00 UTC ---
(define_peephole2
[(set (mem:VI8F_256 (match_operand 2))
(match_operand:VI8F_256 1 register_operand))
(set (match_operand:ssehalfvecmode 0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53093
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-03
19:22:07 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu May 3 19:22:03 2012
New Revision: 187115
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187115
Log:
PR middle-end/53093
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53218
Bug #: 53218
Summary: cmake segfaults on sparcv9
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53219
Bug #: 53219
Summary: inline function erroneously clobbers %i0 register on
64 bit sparc comiple of perls regcomp.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53218
--- Comment #1 from Tom Callaway tcallawa at redhat dot com 2012-05-03
19:47:15 UTC ---
Also seeing a very similar segfault with source-highlight (same environment,
Linux/sparcv9/32bit userspace):
(gdb) bt
#0 0xf7ae0d98 in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53216
Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: ppluzhni...@google.com
This appears to be a gcc-4.7 regression. Confirmed in:
g++ (GCC) 4.8.0 20120331 (experimental)
g++ (GCC) 4.8.0 20120503 (experimental)
#include stdio.h
int main()
{
for (int *p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53220
--- Comment #1 from Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com 2012-05-03
19:53:07 UTC ---
gcc-compiled code for reference:
(gdb) disas main
Dump of assembler code for function main:
0x00400540 +0: push %rbp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53221
Bug #: 53221
Summary: [C++11] basic_string lacks copy/move constructors
with allocator
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53221
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51564
Matt Hargett matt at use dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at use dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53200
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
