[Bug c++/53650] [4.7/4.8 Regression] large array causes huge memory use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53650 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot

[Bug c++/53646] Surprising effects of cxx11 vs cxx98 ABI compatibility

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53646 --- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-14 06:32:19 UTC --- I don't see the general problem. C++98 and C++11 code should be ABI-compatible in general; the incompatibility in this case is a bug.

[Bug c++/53658] internal compiler error -- segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53658 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2012-06-14 07:04:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Reduced: % cat test.ii struct A; template typename using Foo = const A; template typename Item Foo Item;

[Bug fortran/53667] New: Cray pointer: Wrong result with optimizations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53667 Bug #: 53667 Summary: Cray pointer: Wrong result with optimizations Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug c++/53658] internal compiler error -- segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53658 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug bootstrap/50229] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Can't cross compile for i686-apple-darwin10 from x86_64-redhat_linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50229 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug target/49826] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug c++/53524] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bogus and unsuppressible enum comparison warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53524 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug libstdc++/53218] [4.7 regression] cmake segfaults on sparcv9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53218 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug ada/51483] [4.7/4.8 regression] cstand.adb:Register_Float_Type makes invalid assumptions about FP representation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51483 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug c++/52637] [4.7 regression] ICE producing debug info for c++11 code using local class as template argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52637 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug middle-end/51939] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: in compute_affine_dependence, at tree-data-ref.c:4103 with -fcheck-data-deps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51939 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug lto/53604] ld reports errors using lto after upgrading from gcc-4.6.2 to gcc-4.7.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604 --- Comment #10 from Paul Scruby paul.scruby at ghco dot co.uk 2012-06-14 08:16:28 UTC --- I released that I needed to add Yuri's patch to gcc-4.7.1.RC-20120606 as it had not made it into the trunk. However, this still made no difference and I

[Bug bootstrap/52947] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bootstrap fails due to wrong include search path composition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52947 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug debug/48150] [4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/guality/sra-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48150 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug lto/50008] [4.7/4.8 Regression] type mismatch in array reference, verify_gimple failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50008 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug c++/53494] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with invalid initializer list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53494 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug libgcj/50421] [4.7/4.8 Regression] GC Warning: Out of Memory! Returning NIL!

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50421 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug testsuite/51097] [4.7/4.8 Regression] a lot of FAIL: gcc.dg/vect on i686 avx build 181167 to 181177

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51097 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug tree-optimization/52631] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] VN does not use simplified expression for lookup

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52631 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/49847] [4.7/4.8 Regression] NULL deref in fold_rtx (prev_insn_cc0 == NULL)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug middle-end/21953] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Many tmpdir-gcc.dg-struct-layout-1 tests fail on Tru64 UNIX V5.1B

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21953 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug tree-optimization/49498] [4.7/4.8 Regression]: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-8_b.c bogus warning line 20

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49498 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug middle-end/49319] [4.7/4.8 regression] g++.dg/abi/thunk5.C FAILs on Tru64 UNIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49319 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug target/50678] [4.7/4.8 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug middle-end/52285] [4.7/4.8 Regression] libgcrypt _gcry_burn_stack slowdown

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52285 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug c++/51214] [4.7 Regression] [C++11] name lookup issue with c++11 enums

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51214 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug middle-end/53204] [4.7 regression] ICE during final link of large codebase with -O2 -finline-functions -flto, adding -flto-partition=none fixes the problem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53204 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug other/50925] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression][avr] ICE at spill_failure, at reload1.c:2118

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug middle-end/52372] [4.7/4.8 regression] gcc.target/mips/mips16-attributes{,-4}.c SEGV in dwf_regno

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52372 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug tree-optimization/52868] [4.7/4.8 Regression] 4.6 is faster on Atom

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52868 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug fortran/53667] Cray pointer: Wrong result with optimizations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53667 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/53666] -std=c++0x cause cc1plus to eat up RAM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53666 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/53650] [4.7/4.8 Regression] large array causes huge memory use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53650 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||slbyan at

[Bug target/53621] [SH] Frame pointers not generated with -fno-omit-frame-pointer on GCC 4.7.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53621 --- Comment #19 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-14 08:38:37 UTC --- Author: chrbr Date: Thu Jun 14 08:38:22 2012 New Revision: 188598 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188598 Log: PR target/53621 * config/sh/sh.c

[Bug target/43052] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Inline memcmp is *much* slower than glibc's, no longer expanded inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43052 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/50557] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Register pressure increase after reassociation (x86, 32 bits)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50557 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug tree-optimization/53663] 4.7 inconsistent inline handling of bool within union

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53663 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug debug/51570] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr45003-[23].c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51570 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/53589] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start with asm goto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53589 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug target/52630] [4.7 regression] ICE when compiling ppl-0.12 testsuite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52630 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug target/53621] [SH] Frame pointers not generated with -fno-omit-frame-pointer on GCC 4.7.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53621 --- Comment #20 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-14 08:43:26 UTC --- Author: chrbr Date: Thu Jun 14 08:43:20 2012 New Revision: 188599 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188599 Log: PR target/53621 * config/sh/sh.c

[Bug java/50045] [4.7/4.8 regression] ICE in gcc/java/lang.c:427 with -fdump-tree-all

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50045 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug libstdc++/53657] [C++11] pair(pair) move constructor is non-trivial

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53657 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/52841] [4.7 Regression] error: type 'Solvable' is not a base type for type 'Resolvable'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52841 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug c++/53039] [4.7/4.8 Regression] including functional breaks std::is_convertible with template-pack expansion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53039 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug ada/52123] [4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc bootstrap with ada fails on mingw target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52123 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug fortran/53379] [4.7/4.8 Regression] No backtrace generated for array bounds violation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53379 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/52250] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in sel_remove_bb, at sel-sched-ir.c:5213 with -fsel-sched-pipelining -fsel-sched-pipelining-outer-loops -fselective-scheduling2 and other flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52250 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug tree-optimization/45685] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] missed conditional move opportunity in loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45685 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.7.1 |4.7.2 ---

[Bug target/53621] [SH] Frame pointers not generated with -fno-omit-frame-pointer on GCC 4.7.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53621 --- Comment #21 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-14 08:55:41 UTC --- Author: chrbr Date: Thu Jun 14 08:55:36 2012 New Revision: 188601 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188601 Log: PR target/53621 * config/sh/sh.c

[Bug target/53621] [SH] Frame pointers not generated with -fno-omit-frame-pointer on GCC 4.7.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53621 chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/53663] 4.7 inconsistent inline handling of bool within union

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53663 --- Comment #3 from brendan.jones.it at gmail dot com 2012-06-14 09:00:37 UTC --- Sorry - wrong file /* -*- Mode: C ; c-basic-offset: 4 -*- */ /* gcc test.c -Wall -Wextra -o test -O1 ./test ; echo $? should print 0, prints 10 gcc known to

[Bug middle-end/53667] Cray pointer: Wrong result with optimizations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53667 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/53668] New: Do some Cray-pointer fixes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53668 Bug #: 53668 Summary: Do some Cray-pointer fixes Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic, missed-optimization

[Bug libstdc++/53657] [C++11] pair(pair) move constructor is non-trivial

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53657 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.7.0, 4.7.1,

[Bug libstdc++/53657] [C++11] pair(pair) move constructor is non-trivial

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53657 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-14 09:17:51 UTC --- it was also non-trivial in 4.5.0, but not 4.5.1+

[Bug other/32998] -frecord-gcc-switches issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32998 philomath philomath868 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||philomath868 at

[Bug target/52941] SH Target: Add support for movco.l / movli.l atomics on SH4A

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52941 --- Comment #12 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-06-14 09:26:33 UTC --- Probably, you should update libjava/sysdep/sh/locks.h as well.

[Bug libstdc++/53657] [4.7/4.8 Regression][C++11] pair(pair) move constructor is non-trivial

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53657 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.5.1, 4.6.0

[Bug libstdc++/53657] [C++11] pair(pair) move constructor is non-trivial

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53657 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.5.1, 4.6.0

[Bug libstdc++/53657] [C++11] pair(pair) move constructor is non-trivial

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53657 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug c++/53039] [4.7/4.8 Regression] including functional breaks std::is_convertible with template-pack expansion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53039 --- Comment #14 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-06-14 10:03:07 UTC --- Thus, is it possible that a different approach at fixing PR46394, among those already envisaged, could work for this one? Maybe Dodji can look again

[Bug rtl-optimization/53652] *andn* isn't used for vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53652 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-14 10:23:31 UTC --- Such a def_insn_and_split isn't going to work well, because the hw supported alternative (xor with all ones vector) needs the vector constant loaded into

[Bug libstdc++/53657] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] pair(pair) move constructor is non-trivial

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53657 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.5.1, 4.6.1

[Bug rtl-optimization/53669] New: suboptimal small switch - 3-way jump with only 1 comparison

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53669 Bug #: 53669 Summary: suboptimal small switch - 3-way jump with only 1 comparison Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/53669] suboptimal small switch - 3-way jump with only 1 comparison

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53669 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug c++/51033] generic vector subscript and shuffle support was not added to C++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51033 --- Comment #26 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-14 11:22:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #23) (In reply to comment #21) What does it mean exercise the backend a lot? Do you mean it takes a lot of time? I

[Bug lto/53604] ld reports errors using lto after upgrading from gcc-4.6.2 to gcc-4.7.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53604 --- Comment #11 from Paul Scruby paul.scruby at ghco dot co.uk 2012-06-14 11:46:32 UTC --- I've written half a dozen test harnesses this morning to tried to recreate this bug unsuccessfully. My team writes very low-latency code so they do quite

[Bug c++/53455] boost::python segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455 --- Comment #11 from Niall Douglas s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2012-06-14 11:49:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) maybe related: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/6919 Had similar crash issue. Though in my case (which may well be

[Bug c++/53670] New: GCC internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53670 Bug #: 53670 Summary: GCC internal compiler error Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/53425] No warnings are given for -mno-sse

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53425 jon_y jon_y at users dot sourceforge.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz70 at

[Bug c++/53670] GCC internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53670 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-14 12:39:21 UTC --- 4.1.2 is no longer maintained or supported, I suggest you try a more recent release.

[Bug c++/53455] boost::python segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-14 12:51:08 UTC --- Maybe someone should look at fixing these warnings in Boost.Python, or ensure -fno-strict-aliasing is used g++ -ftemplate-depth-128 -O3

[Bug c++/53670] GCC internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53670 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug c++/52841] [4.7 Regression] error: type 'Solvable' is not a base type for type 'Resolvable'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52841 --- Comment #19 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-14 12:55:19 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jun 14 12:55:11 2012 New Revision: 188613 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188613 Log: 2012-06-14 Richard

[Bug c++/52841] [4.7 Regression] error: type 'Solvable' is not a base type for type 'Resolvable'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52841 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/52841] [4.7 Regression] error: type 'Solvable' is not a base type for type 'Resolvable'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52841 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/53597] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] F95/F2003 constraint no longer triggers: un-SAVED default-initialized module variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53597 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-14 13:00:55 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Jun 14 13:00:50 2012 New Revision: 188614 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188614 Log: 2012-06-14 Tobias Burnus

[Bug middle-end/53616] [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53616 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-14 13:02:12 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Jun 14 13:02:06 2012 New Revision: 188615 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188615 Log: 2012-06-14 Richard

[Bug c++/53605] [4.7 Regression] Compiler ICEs in size_binop_loc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53605 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/50619] Surprising interaction between -finit-real=NAN and the associate construct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50619 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-14 13:04:57 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Jun 14 13:04:43 2012 New Revision: 188617 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188617 Log: 2012-06-14 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/50619] Surprising interaction between -finit-real=NAN and the associate construct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50619 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/53597] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] F95/F2003 constraint no longer triggers: un-SAVED default-initialized module variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53597 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-14 13:11:32 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Jun 14 13:11:27 2012 New Revision: 188618 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=188618 Log: 2012-06-14 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/53597] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] F95/F2003 constraint no longer triggers: un-SAVED default-initialized module variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53597 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/53455] boost::python segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/53657] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] pair(pair) move constructor is non-trivial

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53657 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/53455] boost::python segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-14 13:21:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) I tried boost as delivered with fedora 17, a home-compiled version with -std=c++11 and a home-compiled version without c++11. The

[Bug c++/53455] boost::python segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455 --- Comment #15 from Niall Douglas s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2012-06-14 13:24:58 UTC --- Agreed, but it is highly unlikely to happen anytime soon unless a new sponsor turns up. BPL needs a fair bit of post-bitrot work as it is. Niall (In

[Bug c++/53455] boost::python segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455 --- Comment #16 from Jonas Wielicki org.gnu.gcc.bugtracker at sotecware dot net 2012-06-14 13:26:53 UTC --- I think I built it correctly with std=c++11, but is there a way to verify this properly in the built library?

[Bug tree-optimization/51581] Integer division by constant is not vectorized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51581 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #27617|0 |1 is

[Bug c++/53455] boost::python segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455 --- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-14 14:00:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) I think I built it correctly with std=c++11, but is there a way to verify this properly in the built library? crashtest.cpp

[Bug debug/53671] New: [4.8 Regression] Many guality test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53671 Bug #: 53671 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Many guality test failures Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

optimizations are deleting my adds

Hi, I have a small problem. I am making a new pass for my gcc, and some of my adds are deleted by optimization passes. here is the code i add : t = builtin_decl_explicit (BUILT_IN_ACC_SETUPARGUMENT); g = gimple_build_call(t, 3, build1(ADDR_EXPR,

[Bug c++/53670] GCC internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53670 --- Comment #2 from Prakash satyaprakash.prasad at gmail dot com 2012-06-14 14:21:27 UTC --- Thanks for the quick update. But our organization is heavily using GCC 4.1.2. I have the source code downloaded, build and deployed locally in one of our

[Bug c++/53670] GCC internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53670 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-14 14:32:28 UTC --- There have been thousands of changes made in the five years since 4.1.2, noone knows if any of them fixes your issue, or even if it has been fixed, and I

[Bug rtl-optimization/53533] [4.7/4.8 regression] vectorization causes loop unrolling test slowdown as measured by Adobe's C++Benchmark

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53533 Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot

[Bug debug/53671] [4.8 Regression] Many guality test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53671 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-06-14 14:41:43 UTC --- It is caused by revision 188531.

[Bug c++/53455] boost::python segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455 --- Comment #18 from Niall Douglas s_gccbugzilla at nedprod dot com 2012-06-14 15:15:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) (In reply to comment #16) I think I built it correctly with std=c++11, but is there a way to verify this properly in

[Bug c++/53455] boost::python segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53455 --- Comment #19 from Jonas Wielicki org.gnu.gcc.bugtracker at sotecware dot net 2012-06-14 15:21:07 UTC --- Right, because otherwise I would not consider that as a safe verification that this is indeed a duplicate of the referenced bug. And I

  1   2   >