[Bug middle-end/54838] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in merge_latch_edges, at cfgloop.c:678 with -ftracer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54838 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 09:12:01 UTC --- And I'd say that something in bypass_block from cprop.c is the culprit. Not calling bypass_block - no ICE, and compilation proceeds fine. Working on

[Bug fortran/43207] [OOP] invalid pointer assignment = type%parent

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43207 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 09:25:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) Here is a draft patch which rejects comment #1: This shows one testsuite failure: FAIL: gfortran.dg/abstract_type_3.f03 -O (test

[Bug rtl-optimization/55221] [regression] gcc-4.6-20121102/gcc/rtl.h:2105: error: 'FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER' undeclared here (not in a fnction)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55221 --- Comment #1 from Anton Shterenlikht mexas at bristol dot ac.uk 2012-11-08 09:49:08 UTC --- On the same system gcc47 updated fine to gcc-4.7.3.20121103

[Bug c++/55137] [4.8 Regression] Unexpected static structure initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55137 --- Comment #9 from Sebastian Huber sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de 2012-11-08 10:19:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) Created attachment 28624 [details] gcc48-pr55137.patch Untested patch. I tried this patch and GCC Git

[Bug target/48385] x86-64: Tail call recursion optimization with -mcmodel=large can generate invalid assembly (immediate operand illegal with absolute jump)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48385 Martin Decky martin at decky dot cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/55216] [4.8 Regression] Infinite loop generated on non-infinite code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55216 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID

[Bug middle-end/53073] [4.8 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53073 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug web/55237] New: Please implement gcc.gnu.org/r123456 URL shorts for fast SVN revision access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55237 Bug #: 55237 Summary: Please implement gcc.gnu.org/r123456 URL shorts for fast SVN revision access Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug tree-optimization/54153] [4.8 Regression] Bytemark IDEA 6% slower

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54153 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug debug/54499] [4.8 Regression] GCC produces wrong debugging information, failure while assembling generated .s file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54499 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/55238] New: ICE in find_aggregate_values_for_callers_subset, at ipa-cp.c:2908 building zlib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55238 Bug #: 55238 Summary: ICE in find_aggregate_values_for_callers_subset, at ipa-cp.c:2908 building zlib Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/55006] [4.8 Regression] aermod.f90 is miscompiled with '-m64 -O2 -funroll-loops' after revision 192526

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-apple-darwin10

[Bug debug/54519] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Debug info quality regression due to (pointless) partial inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54519 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/53518] [4.8 regression] testsuite_abi_check.cc doesn't compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53518 --- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-11-08 12:27:20 UTC --- --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-07 18:20:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) [...]

[Bug middle-end/53518] [4.8 regression] testsuite_abi_check.cc doesn't compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53518 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug debug/54499] [4.8 Regression] GCC produces wrong debugging information, failure while assembling generated .s file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54499 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 12:30:21 UTC --- Created attachment 28635 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28635 gcc48-pr54499.patch That change looks very much broken to me, this

[Bug debug/54499] [4.8 Regression] GCC produces wrong debugging information, failure while assembling generated .s file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54499 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/54564] [4.8 Regression] Broken __builtin_ia32_vfmadds[sd]3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/44786] -fcatch-undefined-behavior: Turn on runtime code generation to check for undefined behavior

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44786 Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/55235] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr44948-2a.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55235 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/55153] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:205 with -fsched2-use-superblocks and __builtin_prefetch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55153 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug middle-end/44786] -fsanitize=undefined: Turn on runtime code generation to check for undefined behavior

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44786 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|-fcatch-undefined-behavior:

[Bug fortran/54881] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2016

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54881 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/55239] New: Spurious unused variable warning on function-local objects with a destructor and an initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55239 Bug #: 55239 Summary: Spurious unused variable warning on function-local objects with a destructor and an initializer Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug rtl-optimization/55177] missed optimizations with __builtin_bswap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177 --- Comment #7 from David Woodhouse dwmw2 at infradead dot org 2012-11-08 14:29:37 UTC --- Linux kernel patch to use the builtins at http://marc.info/?l=linux-archm=135212414925921w=2 I think I have the GCC version checks right there,

[Bug c++/55240] New: [c++0x] ICE on non-static data member initialization using 'auto' variable from containing function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55240 Bug #: 55240 Summary: [c++0x] ICE on non-static data member initialization using 'auto' variable from containing function Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/53787] Possible IPA-SRA / IPA-CP improvement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/55239] Spurious unused variable warning on function-local objects with a destructor and an initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55239 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/55240] [c++0x] ICE on non-static data member initialization using 'auto' variable from containing function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55240 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/51976] [F2003] Support deferred-length character components of derived types (allocatable string length)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51976 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug tree-optimization/55238] ICE in find_aggregate_values_for_callers_subset, at ipa-cp.c:2908 building zlib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55238 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/55239] Spurious unused variable warning on function-local objects with a destructor and an initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55239 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-11-08 15:04:05 UTC --- I fixed this in mainline, didn't I?

[Bug c++/10416] 'unused variable' warning ignores ctor/dtor side-effects

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10416 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/55239] Spurious unused variable warning on function-local objects with a destructor and an initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55239 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c++/54859] [4.8 Regression] constexpr in template alias rejected as non-constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54859 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/55241] New: [C++11] diagnostics show sizeof...(T) as sizeof(T...)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55241 Bug #: 55241 Summary: [C++11] diagnostics show sizeof...(T) as sizeof(T...) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/55239] Spurious unused variable warning on function-local objects with a destructor and an initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55239 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 15:14:25 UTC --- Oops, thanks, Paolo!

[Bug c++/55239] Spurious unused variable warning on function-local objects with a destructor and an initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55239 --- Comment #5 from Joel Yliluoma bisqwit at iki dot fi 2012-11-08 15:16:48 UTC --- Nice. I had no idea this was first reported in 2003 and fixed in 2012 in a version recent enough to be still unreleased :)

[Bug c++/55239] Spurious unused variable warning on function-local objects with a destructor and an initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55239 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-11-08 15:20:37 UTC --- Understandable: the kind of work I have been doing lately at times is pretty weird ;)

[Bug c++/55239] Spurious unused variable warning on function-local objects with a destructor and an initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55239 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 15:21:40 UTC --- Paolo's been very busy recently, cleaning up loads of longstanding bugs like that

[Bug fortran/51727] Changing module files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727 --- Comment #28 from Tobias Schlüter tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 15:46:13 UTC --- Author: tobi Date: Thu Nov 8 15:46:07 2012 New Revision: 193329 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193329 Log: PR fortran/51727 *

[Bug middle-end/55142] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142 --- Comment #24 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 16:11:25 UTC --- I applied i386 change at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28591 to compile it: [hjl@gnu-tools-1 tmp]$

[Bug rtl-optimization/55177] missed optimizations with __builtin_bswap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 16:14:23 UTC --- I think I have the GCC version checks right there, for the availability of the builtins? That is, __builtin_bswap32() and __builtin_bswap64() since

[Bug tree-optimization/55236] [4.8 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr22493-1.c FAILs with -fPIC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55236 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/55142] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142 --- Comment #25 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-11-08 16:24:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #24) I think the most robust solution would be to always zero-extend the addresses for -mx32, i.e. output movl%ecx,

[Bug middle-end/55142] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142 --- Comment #26 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2012-11-08 16:34:27 UTC --- I think the most robust solution would be to always zero-extend the addresses for -mx32, i.e. output movl%ecx, -1073743664(%eax) even if the

[Bug lto/54966] Does LTO requires a larger inline-unit-growth?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54966 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug fortran/48636] Enable more inlining with -O2 and higher

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636 --- Comment #35 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 16:46:28 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Thu Nov 8 16:46:18 2012 New Revision: 193331 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193331 Log: PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/54850] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20041113-1.c execution, -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54850 --- Comment #13 from Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 17:10:34 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Thu Nov 8 17:10:26 2012 New Revision: 193332 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193332 Log: PR

[Bug middle-end/55142] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142 --- Comment #27 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 17:17:35 UTC --- No, this would be one giant kludge by itself. The failure just shows that the controversial patch [1] for PR 49721 was wrong. Quote from [1]:

[Bug tree-optimization/55238] ICE in find_aggregate_values_for_callers_subset, at ipa-cp.c:2908 building zlib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55238 --- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 17:33:11 UTC --- Created attachment 28637 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28637 Untested patch This is the fix I am currently bootstrapping and

[Bug tree-optimization/55238] ICE in find_aggregate_values_for_callers_subset, at ipa-cp.c:2908 building zlib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55238 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug libstdc++/54075] [4.7.1] unordered_map insert still slower than 4.6.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54075 --- Comment #44 from François Dumont fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 20:06:08 UTC --- Author: fdumont Date: Thu Nov 8 20:06:00 2012 New Revision: 193335 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193335 Log: 2012-11-08 François

[Bug target/54308] [4.8 regression] build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 20:09:20 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Nov 8 20:09:14 2012 New Revision: 193336 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193336 Log: PR

[Bug c++/55137] [4.8 Regression] Unexpected static structure initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55137 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 20:10:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) If it is valid, the series of foldings that result into the overflow are first folding sizeof (int) - 1UL into sizeof (int)

[Bug driver/54789] [4.8 Regression] Error in GCC driver when defining GCC_COMPARE_DEBUG

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54789 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 20:13:17 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Nov 8 20:13:13 2012 New Revision: 193337 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193337 Log: PR

[Bug debug/54499] [4.8 Regression] GCC produces wrong debugging information, failure while assembling generated .s file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54499 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 20:15:12 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Nov 8 20:15:06 2012 New Revision: 193338 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193338 Log: PR

[Bug libstdc++/54075] [4.7.1] unordered_map insert still slower than 4.6.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54075 --- Comment #45 from François Dumont fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 20:16:15 UTC --- Author: fdumont Date: Thu Nov 8 20:16:04 2012 New Revision: 193339 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193339 Log: 2012-11-08 François

[Bug c++/55137] [4.8 Regression] Unexpected static structure initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55137 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 20:16:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) (In reply to comment #3) If it is valid, the series of foldings that result into the overflow are first folding

[Bug debug/54499] [4.8 Regression] GCC produces wrong debugging information, failure while assembling generated .s file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54499 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug driver/54789] [4.8 Regression] Error in GCC driver when defining GCC_COMPARE_DEBUG

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54789 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/54308] [4.8 regression] build regression in 190498 on ppc64/linux: legitimate_indirect_address_p undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug debug/53145] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/pch/save-temps-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53145 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 20:20:33 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Nov 8 20:20:10 2012 New Revision: 193340 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193340 Log: PR

[Bug libstdc++/54075] [4.7.1] unordered_map insert still slower than 4.6.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54075 --- Comment #46 from frs.dumont at gmail dot com 2012-11-08 20:21:15 UTC --- Attached patch applied to trunk and 4.7 branch. 2012-11-08 François Dumont fdum...@gcc.gnu.org PR libstdc++/54075 * include/bits/hashtable.h

[Bug debug/45882] No debug info for vars depending on unused parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45882 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug preprocessor/55242] New: continued lines not always merged into one long line

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55242 Bug #: 55242 Summary: continued lines not always merged into one long line Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libstdc++/54075] [4.7.1] unordered_map insert still slower than 4.6.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54075 --- Comment #47 from frs.dumont at gmail dot com 2012-11-08 21:19:05 UTC --- On 11/08/2012 03:25 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: On 11/08/2012 02:56 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: On the other hand, the old-old code for rehash didn't use _M_growth_factor

[Bug c++/55240] [c++0x] ICE on non-static data member initialization using 'auto' variable from containing function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55240 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/55243] New: STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243 Bug #: 55243 Summary: STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/55191] [4.8 Regression] ICE in compute_antic at tree-ssa-pre.c:2511

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55191 --- Comment #7 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 21:47:54 UTC --- Author: steven Date: Thu Nov 8 21:47:50 2012 New Revision: 193341 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193341 Log: gcc/ PR

[Bug tree-optimization/55191] [4.8 Regression] ICE in compute_antic at tree-ssa-pre.c:2511

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55191 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug web/55237] Please implement gcc.gnu.org/r123456 URL shorts for fast SVN revision access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55237 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/55243] STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243 --- Comment #2 from Rolf Ebert rolf.ebert.gcc at gmx dot de 2012-11-08 22:08:16 UTC --- A complete build instruction is in http://arduino.ada-language.com/building-avr-gnat-for-avr-ada.html I'll add a make output without the patch

[Bug fortran/51727] Changing module files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727 Tobias Schlüter tobi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/53908] [4.6 Regression] csa removes needed memory load

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53908 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/18046] Missed jump threading optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18046 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2012-03-18 10:29:57

[Bug rtl-optimization/13355] Suboptimal code generated with global register variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13355 --- Comment #9 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 22:41:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) A reduced testcase for the second case. On mainline, i686-pc-linux-gnu. /* -march=i686 -mtune=i686

[Bug rtl-optimization/13355] Suboptimal code generated with global register variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13355 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven

[Bug rtl-optimization/13355] Suboptimal code generated with global register variables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13355 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org |

[Bug tree-optimization/18316] Missed IV optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18316 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2010-02-12 21:46:26

[Bug target/53087] [powerpc] Poor code from cstore expander

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53087 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/55142] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142 --- Comment #28 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-08 23:02:54 UTC --- So for POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED 0, we should transform (zero_extend:DI (plus:SI (FOO:SI) (const_int Y))) in such a way that it won't cause ICE and

[Bug tree-optimization/55238] ICE in find_aggregate_values_for_callers_subset, at ipa-cp.c:2908 building zlib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55238 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug middle-end/41004] missed merge of basic blocks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41004 --- Comment #9 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 23:07:36 UTC --- May be fixed by the patch that was applied for PR54364.

[Bug libstdc++/55244] New: char_traitschar compares characters as though unsigned

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55244 Bug #: 55244 Summary: char_traitschar compares characters as though unsigned Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/16564] g++ seems to go into an infinite loop after errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16564 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug libstdc++/55244] char_traitschar compares characters as though unsigned

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55244 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Houck GCC at DanielRHouck dot com 2012-11-08 23:19:27 UTC --- Created attachment 28642 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28642 The original source code before preprocessing I am including this

[Bug middle-end/55142] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142 --- Comment #29 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-08 23:21:44 UTC --- So for POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED 0, we should transform (zero_extend:DI (plus:SI (FOO:SI) (const_int Y))) in such a way that it won't

[Bug libstdc++/55244] char_traitschar compares characters as though unsigned

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55244 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|GCC at DanielRHouck dot com |

[Bug libstdc++/55244] char_traitschar compares characters as though unsigned

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55244 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-11-08 23:50:34 UTC --- In short, I think we are fine.

[Bug libstdc++/55244] char_traitschar compares characters as though unsigned

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55244 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2012-11-08 23:52:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Agreed, looks like an invalid issue to me.

[Bug libstdc++/55244] char_traitschar compares characters as though unsigned

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55244 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug go/55228] index.go should check size of int instead of GOARCH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55228 Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/55245] New: Compiler segfault when compiling the small test case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55245 Bug #: 55245 Summary: Compiler segfault when compiling the small test case Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/55142] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142 --- Comment #30 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-09 00:35:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #24) I think the most robust solution would be to always zero-extend the addresses for -mx32, i.e. output movl%ecx,

[Bug c++/55245] Compiler segfault when compiling the small test case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55245 davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.7.3 |4.8.0 ---

[Bug c++/16564] g++ seems to go into an infinite loop after errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16564 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug c++/16564] g++ seems to go into an infinite loop after errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16564 --- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-09 00:58:20 UTC --- As I said in PR 43113, it would be wonderful if g++ detected that something is a recursive template instantiation and it didn't print the whole

[Bug c++/16564] g++ seems to go into an infinite loop after errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16564 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug target/55246] New: Define a macro for 16*1024*1024

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55246 Bug #: 55246 Summary: Define a macro for 16*1024*1024 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

  1   2   >