[Bug rtl-optimization/55845] 454.calculix miscompares with -march=btver2 -O3 -ffastmath -fschedule-insns -mvzeroupper for test data run

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55845 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #17 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 08:58:05 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Jan 4 08:57:58 2013 New Revision: 194885 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194885 Log: 2013-01-03

[Bug fortran/55854] ICE on intent(out) dummy argument with unlimited polymorphic component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55854 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 08:58:03 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Jan 4 08:57:58 2013 New Revision: 194885 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194885 Log: 2013-01-03

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #18 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 08:59:53 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Jan 4 08:59:47 2013 New Revision: 194886 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194886 Log: 2014-01-04

[Bug fortran/55854] ICE on intent(out) dummy argument with unlimited polymorphic component

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55854 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/55845] 454.calculix miscompares with -march=btver2 -O3 -ffastmath -fschedule-insns -mvzeroupper for test data run

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55845 --- Comment #5 from Venkataramanan venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com 2013-01-04 09:12:09 UTC --- Hi Uros. Thank you for conforming. I suspected this is a problem with jump optimization. Uros what flag we need to pass to bypass the

[Bug rtl-optimization/55845] 454.calculix miscompares with -march=btver2 -O3 -ffastmath -fschedule-insns -mvzeroupper for test data run

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55845 --- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-01-04 09:20:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) I suspected this is a problem with jump optimization. Uros what flag we need to pass to bypass the .jump2 pass? The pass

[Bug rtl-optimization/55845] 454.calculix miscompares with -march=btver2 -O3 -ffastmath -fschedule-insns -mvzeroupper for test data run

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55845 --- Comment #7 from Venkataramanan venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com 2013-01-04 09:24:47 UTC --- Hi Uros, Sorry , my intention was just know if we have some flags to disable this pass. Not as a solution :) Regards, Venkat.

[Bug rtl-optimization/55845] [4.8 Regression] 454.calculix miscompares with -march=btver2 -O3 -ffastmath -fschedule-insns -mvzeroupper for test data run

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55845 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug bootstrap/55871] New: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap broken by Ada changes after revision 194883 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55871 Bug #: 55871 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap broken by Ada changes after revision 194883 on x86_64-apple-darwin10 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug bootstrap/55871] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap broken by Ada changes after revision 194883 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55871 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/55871] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap broken by Ada changes after revision 194883 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55871 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-01-04 10:03:26 UTC --- Please post the output of 'gcc -v'. Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc

[Bug bootstrap/55871] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap broken by Ada changes after revision 194883 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55871 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug bootstrap/55871] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap broken by Ada changes after revision 194883 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55871 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 10:11:47 UTC --- It's a typo (OpenVMS_On_Target is expected). You can install the obvious fix.

[Bug bootstrap/55871] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap broken by Ada changes after revision 194883 on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55871 Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c/54554] Undetected use of uninitialized variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54554 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug libstdc++/55872] New: Crash issue with RTLD_DEEPBIND usage with stdc++ library

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55872 Bug #: 55872 Summary: Crash issue with RTLD_DEEPBIND usage with stdc++ library Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/55872] Crash issue with RTLD_DEEPBIND usage with stdc++ library

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55872 --- Comment #1 from Yogesh Gaur gauryogesh.nsit at gmail dot com 2013-01-04 10:29:37 UTC --- Created attachment 29081 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29081 LD_DEBUG=all output of working executable

[Bug tree-optimization/55869] different bit shift/or optimization.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55869 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/55863] Fails to fold (i + 2) - (i + 1) to 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55863 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 10:45:44 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Jan 4 10:45:37 2013 New Revision: 194899 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194899 Log: 2013-01-04

[Bug middle-end/55863] Fails to fold (i + 2) - (i + 1) to 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55863 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/48914] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored -Wc++0x-compat doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48914 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug lto/48065] LTO: assertion failed in optimize_inline_calls, at tree-inline.c:4246

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48065 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 10:51:30 UTC --- I think we don't fail late now, at least not in expand_call_inline (unless inline_failed is re-computed at LTRANS stage).

[Bug libstdc++/42679] RTLD_DEEPBIND dlopen option for shared library that uses libstdc++ std::ostream crashes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42679 --- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 10:58:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) (In reply to comment #16) I am using -fpic/-fPIC and in fact am using: // g++ -g -O0 main.cpp -ldl // g++ -g -O0

[Bug libstdc++/55872] Crash issue with RTLD_DEEPBIND usage with stdc++ library

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55872 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal

[Bug middle-end/55859] Mention -Og/-Ofast in error: argument to '-O' should be a non-negative integer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55859 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 11:16:39 UTC --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Jan 4 11:15:55 2013 New Revision: 194901 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194901 Log: PR55859.

[Bug middle-end/55859] Mention -Og/-Ofast in error: argument to '-O' should be a non-negative integer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55859 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/55753] [C++11][4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE constexpr ctor, tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:14336

/cmssw/slc5_amd64_gcc480/external/gcc/4.8.0 --disable-isl-version-check --enable-shared CC='gcc -fPIC' CXX='c++ -fPIC' CPP=cpp CXXCPP='c++ -E' Thread model: posix gcc version 4.8.0 20130104 (experimental) (GCC) COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-save-temps' '-m64' '-O2' '-std=c++11' '-c' '-fPIC' '-g

[Bug c++/55753] [C++11][4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE constexpr ctor, tsubst_copy_and_build, at cp/pt.c:14336

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55753 --- Comment #9 from David Abdurachmanov david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com 2013-01-04 11:32:39 UTC --- Created attachment 29082 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29082 testcase #2

[Bug middle-end/55873] New: Missed trivial uninitialized use warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55873 Bug #: 55873 Summary: Missed trivial uninitialized use warning Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/55873] Missed trivial uninitialized use warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55873 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/55874] New: Incorrect warning location for uninitialized variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55874 Bug #: 55874 Summary: Incorrect warning location for uninitialized variable Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/55862] [4.8 Regression] ICE in compute_antic, at tree-ssa-pre.c:2495

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55862 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 11:59:42 UTC --- For BB 7 we iterate between (gdb) call debug_bitmap_set (old) debug[0] := { {mem_ref0B,addr_exprg}@.MEM_7 (0018), {plus_expr,g.0_18,1} (0031),

[Bug tree-optimization/55875] New: [4.8 Regression] IVopts caused miscompilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55875 Bug #: 55875 Summary: [4.8 Regression] IVopts caused miscompilation Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/55875] [4.8 Regression] IVopts caused miscompilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55875 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug fortran/51713] Type mismatch for polymorphic dummy arguments depending on use path

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51713 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/55874] Incorrect warning location for uninitialized variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55874 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/55875] [4.8 Regression] IVopts caused miscompilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55875 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/55875] [4.8 Regression] IVopts caused miscompilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55875 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 12:24:12 UTC --- ssa name _12 type long unsigned int base 4294967295 step 1 ssa name _13 type long unsigned int base 34359738360 step 8 ssa name _14

[Bug c/54554] Undetected use of uninitialized variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54554 --- Comment #4 from Dimitris Papavasiliou dpapavas at gmail dot com 2013-01-04 12:41:02 UTC --- Still even without knowing that a may be used uninitialized warning can be issued in any case.

[Bug middle-end/55874] Incorrect warning location for uninitialized variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55874 --- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 12:46:17 UTC --- Not sure if we want to warn about the other location (or how well that would play out). I think we definitely want to warn about the location of the

[Bug c/54554] Undetected use of uninitialized variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54554 --- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 12:49:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Still even without knowing that a may be used uninitialized warning can be issued in any case. GCC does not warn if it can

[Bug debug/55579] SRA doesn't create debug stmts when they would be useful

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55579 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug tree-optimization/55755] Invalid VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR produced by SRA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55755 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug c++/55870] Compiler crash when template includes sizeof of something that shouldn't be dereferenced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55870 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/55755] Invalid VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR produced by SRA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55755 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 13:20:50 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Fri Jan 4 13:20:38 2013 New Revision: 194905 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194905 Log: 2013-01-04

[Bug fortran/45797] ICE (segfault): Invalid read in gfc_use_derived

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45797 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/55862] [4.8 Regression] ICE in compute_antic, at tree-ssa-pre.c:2495

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55862 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 13:29:02 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Jan 4 13:28:53 2013 New Revision: 194906 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194906 Log: 2013-01-04

[Bug tree-optimization/55862] [4.8 Regression] ICE in compute_antic, at tree-ssa-pre.c:2495

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55862 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ada/864] --program-suffix is ignored (for ada)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=864 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #18256|0 |1

[Bug fortran/55117] Programs fails to read namelist (contains derived types objects)

') read(1,NML=test_NML) write(*,*) t1e%x, t1e%string, answer end program test_type_extension File test1.inp contains: test_NML t1e%x = 2.,t1e%string='gfortran',answer=42 / wws@w6ws-4:~/fortran/xxx$ gfortran --version GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.8.0 20130104 (experimental) Copyright (C

[Bug debug/54971] SRA pessimizes debug info by not creating debug stmts for fields without replacements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54971 --- Comment #17 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 14:41:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) So, beyond the creation of new debug only accesses for whole struct writes into hole if there aren't too many holes, I

[Bug c/54554] Undetected use of uninitialized variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54554 --- Comment #6 from Dimitris Papavasiliou dpapavas at gmail dot com 2013-01-04 14:50:32 UTC --- Well this seems to be a core decision regarding the way GCC warnings work (which probably has more far-reaching consequences) but just for the

[Bug target/55876] New: internal compiler error: in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:776

--disable-libitm --enable-poison-system-directories --with-build-time-tools=install/mips-linux-gnu/bin --with-build-time-tools=install/mips-linux-gnu/bin Thread model: posix gcc version 4.8.0 20130104 (experimental) (GCC) ...

[Bug c++/55877] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Anon visibility issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877 Bug #: 55877 Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Anon visibility issues Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/55876] internal compiler error: in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:776

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55876 --- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 15:23:25 UTC --- while expanding the xor, we try to widen an DImode reg from QImode to SImode: ... #6 0x085d7da5 in widen_operand (op=0xf7cd2ec0, mode=SImode, oldmode=QImode,

[Bug c++/55877] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Anon visibility issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/55877] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Anon visibility issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.4

[Bug c++/54526] [C++11] :: is incorrectly treated as digraph : followed by colon

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54526 --- Comment #10 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 15:30:32 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Jan 4 15:30:24 2013 New Revision: 194909 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194909 Log:

[Bug c++/54526] [C++11] :: is incorrectly treated as digraph : followed by colon

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54526 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED

[Bug c/25702] feature request: generate a warning for sizeof on a pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25702 David Csirmaz forgcc at calmarius dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||forgcc

[Bug c/25702] feature request: generate a warning for sizeof on a pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25702 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug target/55876] internal compiler error: in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:776

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55876 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 16:00:07 UTC --- This patch introduces an assert that triggers before rather than during gen_rtx_SUBREG: ... Index: optabs.c

[Bug target/55876] internal compiler error: in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:776

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55876 --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 16:42:36 UTC --- Another way to go about it is to prevent the assert from triggering: ... Index: optabs.c === ---

[Bug c++/55877] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Anon visibility issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 16:50:37 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jan 4 16:50:28 2013 New Revision: 194910 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194910 Log: PR c++/55877

[Bug c++/55877] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Anon visibility issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 16:51:12 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jan 4 16:51:02 2013 New Revision: 194911 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194911 Log: PR c++/55877

[Bug c++/55877] [4.6 Regression] Anon visibility issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/55117] Programs fails to read namelist (contains derived types objects)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55117 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot

[Bug c++/55877] [4.6 Regression] Anon visibility issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 17:07:55 UTC --- The reason for listing 4.6 was that the PR54883 change has been applied to 4.6 branch fairly recently, making it for the enum case a recent 4.6 regression.

[Bug fortran/55117] Programs fails to read namelist (contains derived types objects)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55117 --- Comment #8 from Walter Spector w6ws at earthlink dot net 2013-01-04 17:22:31 UTC --- Good point. The key is: T1E%T1_T%X= 2., If the full expanded version is used, in other words %T1_T is specified, the example

[Bug fortran/55852] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] internal compiler error: in gfc_build_intrinsic_call, at fortran/expr.c:4647

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55852 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c/39170] provide an option to silence -Wconversion warnings for bit-fields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170 --- Comment #12 from Tom Geocaris tom at atoptech dot com 2013-01-04 17:32:22 UTC --- Is there any resolution to this issue? We need to move to a more recent version of gcc, but are still stuck at gcc 4.2.4. I looked at gcc 4.7.2 but

[Bug c++/55878] New: [4.7/4.8 Regression] --enable-checking=yes rejection of typeid

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55878 Bug #: 55878 Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] --enable-checking=yes rejection of typeid Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug c/39170] provide an option to silence -Wconversion warnings for bit-fields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170 --- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 17:53:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) Is there any resolution to this issue? We need to move to a more recent version of gcc, but are still stuck at gcc 4.2.4.

[Bug other/54800] libiberty/simple-object-mach-o.c:704: possible optimisation ?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54800 --- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 18:36:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) I think the correct patch is the following, but I have no way to test it. this looks fine for all darwin, I've tested it on

[Bug other/54800] libiberty/simple-object-mach-o.c:704: possible optimisation ?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54800 --- Comment #4 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 19:00:15 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Fri Jan 4 19:00:06 2013 New Revision: 194914 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194914 Log: PR

[Bug other/54800] libiberty/simple-object-mach-o.c:704: possible optimisation ?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54800 Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/55879] New: [C++11][constexpr] nested constexpr Initialisation raises internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55879 Bug #: 55879 Summary: [C++11][constexpr] nested constexpr Initialisation raises internal compiler error Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2

[Bug c++/55877] [4.6 Regression] Anon visibility issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55877 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 20:30:25 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jan 4 20:30:15 2013 New Revision: 194915 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194915 Log: PR c++/55877

[Bug fortran/55172] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE on invalid: gfc_variable_attr(): Bad array reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55172 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-04 20:50:23 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Fri Jan 4 20:50:15 2013 New Revision: 194916 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194916 Log: 2013-01-04 Paul

[Bug web/52239] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 4.4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52239 Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 4.2 |Upgrade GCC

[Bug lto/48065] LTO: assertion failed in optimize_inline_calls, at tree-inline.c:4246

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48065 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2013-01-04 21:26:04 UTC --- I think we don't fail late now, at least not in expand_call_inline (unless inline_failed is re-computed at LTRANS stage). Yes, i think we simply produce

[Bug other/55880] New: demangler crash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55880 Bug #: 55880 Summary: demangler crash Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/55273] [4.8 Regression] ICE in iv_number_of_iterations, at loop-iv.c:2819

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55273 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/55569] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in check_probability, at basic-block.h:944 with -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55569 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/55763] Issues with some simpler CLASS(*) programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763 --- Comment #19 from Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de 2013-01-04 23:57:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) Author: burnus Date: Fri Jan 4 08:57:58 2013 New Revision: 194885 Great! I extended the example from comment #10 to

[Bug bootstrap/55792] Bad memory access with profiledbootstrap and LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2013-01-04 23:57:55 UTC --- Created attachment 29085 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29085 A patch to move lto_global_var_decls to lto/lto.c With this patch, I

[Bug c++/55881] New: #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored ignored when inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55881 Bug #: 55881 Summary: #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored ignored when inlining Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c/55882] New: unaligned load/store : incorrect struct offset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55882 Bug #: 55882 Summary: unaligned load/store : incorrect struct offset Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/55882] unaligned load/store : incorrect struct offset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55882 Jan Smets jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.com changed: What|Removed |Added Target||mips*

[Bug tree-optimization/55883] New: with -fwrapv, (x 0 -x 0) is assumed to be false

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55883 Bug #: 55883 Summary: with -fwrapv, (x 0 -x 0) is assumed to be false Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/55172] [4.7 only] [OOP] gfc_variable_attr(): Bad array reference in SELECT TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55172 Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.8.0 |4.7.3