http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54286
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-13 08:57:51
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Jan 13 08:57:46 2013
New Revision: 195133
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195133
Log:
2013-01-13 Paul
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55956
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909
--- Comment #39 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-13
09:07:24 UTC ---
By forcing --with-tls through the configure script and reinstalling the glibc,
g++ seems to notice glibc supporting tls and generates the code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909
--- Comment #40 from philip.copeland at oracle dot com 2013-01-13 09:18:16 UTC
---
Seems that way 8/
I do apologise for consuming so much of everyone's time. My only defence being
it wasn't terribly obvious without the comparison of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55959
Bug #: 55959
Summary: [OOP] ICE in in gfc_simplify_expr, at
fortran/expr.c:1920
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55959
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-13 09:58:49 UTC ---
Reduced test case:
module pdfs
type :: pdf
contains
procedure, nopass :: getx
end type pdf
contains
real function getx()
end function
end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
Bug #: 55960
Summary: [OOP] ICE in replace_comp, at fortran/expr.c:4356
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-13 10:32:08 UTC ---
With this variant:
module pdfs
type :: pdf
end type pdf
abstract interface
pure function getdims(this)
import pdf
class(pdf), intent(in)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19820
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-13 10:36:22 UTC ---
Yet another variant:
module pdfs
type, abstract :: pdf
contains
procedure(getdims), deferred :: getdims
procedure(getx), deferred :: getx
end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19820
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55952
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15492
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vhaisman at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55957
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-13
11:29:13 UTC ---
Yeah, what bootstrap compiler are you using?
And are you sure your tree is in consistent state?
$ grep gimple_call_builtin_p gimple.h
extern bool
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55909
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072
--- Comment #21 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-13 12:06:10 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Sun Jan 13 12:06:04 2013
New Revision: 195135
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195135
Log:
2013-01-13 Janus Weil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55957
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-13
12:14:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 29154
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29154
Typescript from compilation
Bootstrap compiler is
Using
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55935
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-13
12:33:49 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sun Jan 13 12:33:43 2013
New Revision: 195136
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195136
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55959
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55959
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-13 13:07:01 UTC ---
Apparently it is trivially fixed by this patch:
Index: gcc/fortran/expr.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/expr.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55961
Bug #: 55961
Summary: gcc/system.h:639:17: fatal error: gmp.h: No such file
or directory
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55925
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-01-13 13:39:25
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
When building a native x86_64-w64-mingw32 compiler using a 4.7.2 cross
compiler, I get the following:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55935
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-13 16:57:18 UTC ---
This fixes the ICE in comment 0:
Index: gcc/fortran/expr.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/expr.c(revision
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55962
Bug #: 55962
Summary: improper location for static_assert
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55963
Bug #: 55963
Summary: std::vectorconst T fails
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55963
--- Comment #1 from Corey Richardson corey at octayn dot net 2013-01-13
18:16:05 UTC ---
Created attachment 29157
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29157
g++ output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55957
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55961
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55963
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55962
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55964
Bug #: 55964
Summary: Segmentation fault with -O -ftree-loop-distribution
-funswitch-loops
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54107
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55308
nwfilardo at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nwfilardo at gmail
After spending hours to find the cause of the segmentation fault i found out
that the problem coausing source is the gcc/config/i386/djgpp-stdint.h wich
uses the identifier signed to declare signed types.
Reading the top of the c_common_nodes_and_builins() function in c-common.c it
tells:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55884
--- Comment #10 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-01-13 21:27:19 UTC ---
Can you try perhaps:
--- libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.fortran/fortran.exp2012-12-20
11:38:48.663282599 +0100
+++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55963
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-13
22:43:56 UTC ---
Looks like PJP's comment was from 2008, so I'm not sure what requirements he
means were standardized in 2008.
Looking further into it, I see that the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55925
--- Comment #2 from lailavrazda1979 at gmail dot com 2013-01-13 23:31:01 UTC ---
How did I configure which GCC? The cross compiler or the native one?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55963
--- Comment #4 from Corey Richardson corey at octayn dot net 2013-01-13
23:52:59 UTC ---
A more clear error message would be really useful, the feature itself
isn't all that important to me. Thank you for giving this your
attention so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55965
Bug #: 55965
Summary: gcc -std=c99 emits code for inline even without extern
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54286
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55966
Bug #: 55966
Summary: __atomic_fetch_* generate wrong code for HLE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
43 matches
Mail list logo
