[Bug bootstrap/50229] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Can't cross compile for i686-apple-darwin10 from x86_64-redhat_linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50229 --- Comment #16 from Ray Donnelly mingw.android at gmail dot com 2013-01-16 07:59:48 UTC --- Of course, when I wrote '--enable-plugins' I really mean't *not* passing --disable-plugin (without the 's').

[Bug target/55940] [4.7 Regression] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/55998] [4.8 Regression] [C++11] 'integral expression .. is not constant' when instantiating template alias in a template using a parameter of an encapsulating template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55998 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug middle-end/56000] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56000 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-01-16 08:08:33 UTC --- Does this help? http://sourceware.org/ml/libffi-discuss/2012/msg00279.html

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause prototype does not match errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 --- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 08:11:42 UTC --- Merging of target attribute is what gcc/g++ did though, the function would get then both target attributes (seems later decl's target wins), and the

[Bug target/55301] [SH] broken sp_switch function attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55301 chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chrbr at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/55984] [4.8 Regression] ICE: gfc_trans_code(): Bad statement code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55984 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 08:31:21 UTC --- The patch in comment 4 fails on: FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_type_24.f90 -O (test for errors, line 48)

[Bug target/55301] [SH] broken sp_switch function attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55301 --- Comment #2 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 08:30:05 UTC --- Author: chrbr Date: Wed Jan 16 08:29:54 2013 New Revision: 195230 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195230 Log: PR target/55301 *

[Bug target/55301] [SH] broken sp_switch function attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55301 chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/55940] [4.7 Regression] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 --- Comment #15 from Frank Mehnert fm3 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de 2013-01-16 09:01:02 UTC --- Great, thank you Jakub! As it will take some time until the Linux distributions will update their gcc binaries to include this fix, do you

[Bug c++/52688] static local variable can accessed from local class of function template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52688 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/52122] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] incorrect ln -s replacement for mingw like targets in configure files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug target/55940] [4.7 Regression] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 09:16:15 UTC --- As a workaround, you can use something like #if __GNUC__ == 4 __GNUC_MINOR__ == 7 __attribute__((__optimize__ (no-shrink-wrap))) #endif on the

[Bug libstdc++/55043] [4.7/4.8 Regression] issue with nesting unordered_map containing unique_ptr into vector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043 --- Comment #22 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 09:20:43 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Wed Jan 16 09:20:34 2013 New Revision: 195231 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195231 Log: PR

[Bug middle-end/55882] [4.7 Regression] unaligned load/store : incorrect struct offset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55882 --- Comment #16 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 09:26:11 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jan 16 09:26:05 2013 New Revision: 195232 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195232 Log: 2013-01-16

[Bug libstdc++/55043] [4.7 Regression] issue with nesting unordered_map containing unique_ptr into vector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression] issue |[4.7

[Bug libstdc++/55043] [4.7 Regression] issue with nesting unordered_map containing unique_ptr into vector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glisse at

[Bug libstdc++/55043] [4.7 Regression] issue with nesting unordered_map containing unique_ptr into vector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043 --- Comment #25 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com 2013-01-16 09:43:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #24) That really feels like a hack. It is also broken, I think. The P/R has the effect that is_copy_constructible is now

[Bug target/52122] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] incorrect ln -s replacement for mingw like targets in configure files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52122 --- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 09:51:45 UTC --- Created attachment 29176 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29176 Patch for using recursive copy for directories. AFAIU we are talking

[Bug tree-optimization/55999] gcc 4.7.2 -O2 -floop-parallelize-all generates incorrect code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55999 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/55999] gcc 4.7.2 -O2 -floop-parallelize-all generates incorrect code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55999 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug sanitizer/55975] FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c -O0 output pattern test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug middle-end/56000] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56000 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug libstdc++/55997] build of libstd3++ segfaults armv5tel.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55997 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 10:07:07 UTC --- While generating a PCH ... ugh.

[Bug tree-optimization/55995] vect increase_alignment notes missing from dump file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55995 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/55975] FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c -O0 output pattern test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 --- Comment #4 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 10:14:03 UTC --- Btw, the mapping I see on my PPC linux box ends with 0x1000 (with ASLR off) ffd-1000 rw-p 00:00 0

[Bug middle-end/55882] [4.7 Regression] unaligned load/store : incorrect struct offset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55882 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug libstdc++/55043] [4.7 Regression] issue with nesting unordered_map containing unique_ptr into vector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043 --- Comment #26 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 10:25:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #24) That really feels like a hack. It is a hack, to work around a throwing move ctor that I don't have time to fix.

[Bug bootstrap/56001] New: [4.7.3 regression] relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC_REL24 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56001 Bug #: 56001 Summary: [4.7.3 regression] relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC_REL24 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug sanitizer/55975] FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c -O0 output pattern test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 10:38:01 UTC --- Sounds like a recent change: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git;a=commitdiff;h=048ee0993ec8360abb0b51bdf8f8721e9ed62ec4

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 10:47:18 UTC --- BTW, does Fortran have well defined number of iterations if say a do loop goes from (unknown to compiler): integer :: i, m, n m = huge(0) - 7 n

[Bug libstdc++/55043] [4.7 Regression] issue with nesting unordered_map containing unique_ptr into vector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55043 --- Comment #27 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 10:52:57 UTC --- Actually, now that the unordered containers do not inherit from Hashtable it should be much easier to implement something like comment 17. When Daniel first

[Bug rtl-optimization/50176] [4.7/4.8 Regression] 4.7 generates spill-fill dealing with char-int conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50176 --- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 11:22:23 UTC --- Created attachment 29177 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29177 gcc48-pr50176.patch Are you sure about it? For me on the

[Bug rtl-optimization/55153] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:205 with -fsched2-use-superblocks and __builtin_prefetch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55153 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 11:31:51 UTC --- Author: vmakarov Date: Tue Jan 15 16:47:36 2013 New Revision: 195211 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195211 Log: 2013-01-15

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug sanitizer/55975] asan does not work with 46 bit address space on PowerPC64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|FAIL: |asan

[Bug sanitizer/55975] asan does not work with 46 bit address space on PowerPC64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 11:50:47 UTC --- I think for 44-46 bits we can still make it constant. But generally, the constructors of libasan are usually run from the stack of the initial thread,

[Bug sanitizer/55975] asan does not work with 46 bit address space on PowerPC64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 --- Comment #8 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 11:54:36 UTC --- Sounds good for both. Andreas, could you please try replacing kHighMemEnd = 0x0fffUL with kHighMemEnd = 0x3fffUL and

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 11:59:29 UTC --- Created attachment 29178 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29178 gcc48-pr52865.patch This untested patch makes the loop

[Bug libstdc++/56002] New: [mutex] allow generic classes to be used without requiring plattform support for threads

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56002 Bug #: 56002 Summary: [mutex] allow generic classes to be used without requiring plattform support for threads Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2

[Bug libstdc++/56002] [mutex] allow generic classes to be used without requiring plattform support for threads

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56002 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/42108] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] 50% performance regression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42108 --- Comment #54 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 12:36:52 UTC --- Re-confirmed on trunk. The initial GFortran IL is still ... awkward. Apart from the issue of using a canonicalized IV at all we have

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 --- Comment #29 from Michael van der Kolff mvanderkolff at gmail dot com 2013-01-16 12:38:41 UTC --- Created attachment 29180 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29180 testcase for member function pointer that isn't inlined

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 Michael van der Kolff mvanderkolff at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/55273] [4.8 Regression] ICE in iv_number_of_iterations, at loop-iv.c:2819

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55273 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 13:17:30 UTC --- OK, the problem is that the induction variable here is not normal induction variable but handed by xor. PPC target seems to be only that translates

[Bug lto/54095] Unnecessary static variable renaming

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54095 --- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 13:18:51 UTC --- Well, we slipped the 4.8 window :( But I will make the patch soon so it goes into early 4.9 at least.

[Bug fortran/55983] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in find_typebound_proc_uop, at fortran/class.c:2711

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55983 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 13:30:42 UTC --- Further reduced test case: type :: mpdata_t class(bcd_t), pointer :: bcx, bcy end type type(mpdata_t) :: this call this%bcx%fill_halos() end

[Bug tree-optimization/56003] New: SCEV should thread flags ^= 0x80000000 as an addition to discover an IV var.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56003 Bug #: 56003 Summary: SCEV should thread flags ^= 0x8000 as an addition to discover an IV var. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/54767] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect code generated with -O2 -fcheck=bounds

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54767 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 13:57:53 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jan 16 13:57:48 2013 New Revision: 195238 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195238 Log: 2013-01-16

[Bug tree-optimization/53465] [4.7/4.8 Regression] wrong code with -O1 -ftree-vrp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53465 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 13:57:54 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jan 16 13:57:48 2013 New Revision: 195238 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195238 Log: 2013-01-16

[Bug tree-optimization/55964] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Segmentation fault with -O -ftree-loop-distribution -funswitch-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55964 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 14:07:03 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jan 16 14:06:58 2013 New Revision: 195239 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195239 Log: 2013-01-16

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 --- Comment #31 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 14:20:46 UTC --- Well, after early optimizations we get: int main() () { struct Foo x; void Foo::T392 (const struct Foo *) * iftmp.0; long int _3; long int

[Bug tree-optimization/55964] [4.7 Regression] Segmentation fault with -O -ftree-loop-distribution -funswitch-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55964 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.7

[Bug tree-optimization/3713] Pointers to functions or member functions are not folded or inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth

[Bug c++/56004] New: Possible bug with decltype and access modifer order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56004 Bug #: 56004 Summary: Possible bug with decltype and access modifer order Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug rtl-optimization/55547] [4.8 Regression] Alias analysis does not handle AND addresses correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55547 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug tree-optimization/54767] [4.7 Regression] Incorrect code generated with -O2 -fcheck=bounds

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54767 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.0

[Bug bootstrap/56001] [4.7 Regression] relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC_REL24 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56001 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/56005] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr45352.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56005 Bug #: 56005 Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr45352.c (internal compiler error) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug target/56005] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr45352.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56005 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug rtl-optimization/55153] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:205 with -fsched2-use-superblocks and __builtin_prefetch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55153 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/56005] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr45352.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56005 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-*-* i686-*-* |x86_64-*-*

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause prototype does not match errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 --- Comment #24 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 15:53:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #23) Merging of target attribute is what gcc/g++ did though, the function would get then both target attributes (seems later

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause prototype does not match errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 --- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 16:02:35 UTC --- The actual merging of target attribute isn't that important, what would be more important is that other attributes are merged together in that case and

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause prototype does not match errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 --- Comment #26 from richard.guenther at gmail dot com richard.guenther at gmail dot com 2013-01-16 16:05:01 UTC --- On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:02 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 16:05:42 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jan 16 16:05:27 2013 New Revision: 195241 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195241 Log: PR

[Bug c++/56004] Possible bug with decltype and access modifer order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56004 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 16:19:33 UTC --- As was explained on stackoverflow, this has nothing t odo with access modifiers, as you can easily demonstrate by making everything public. _t has

[Bug driver/55884] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/omp_parse3.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55884 --- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 16:19:42 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Wed Jan 16 16:19:32 2013 New Revision: 195242 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195242 Log: gcc/fortran/

[Bug middle-end/56000] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56000 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2013-01-16 16:24:47 UTC --- On 1/16/2013 3:08 AM, sch...@linux-m68k.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56000 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org

[Bug debug/56006] New: [4.8 Regression] Many guality testsuite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56006 Bug #: 56006 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Many guality testsuite failures Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/55547] [4.8 Regression] Alias analysis does not handle AND addresses correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55547 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 16:31:10 UTC --- Ah, hjl opened PR56006 to track #c11.

[Bug debug/56006] [4.8 Regression] Many guality testsuite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56006 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug driver/55884] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/omp_parse3.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55884 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/55995] vect increase_alignment notes missing from dump file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55995 --- Comment #2 from Janis Johnson janis at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 16:38:24 UTC --- Interesting, it causes the compiler to segfault on both arm-none-eabi and powerpc-none-eabi:

[Bug rtl-optimization/56005] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr45352.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56005 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 16:39:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55153#c4 Let's close PR55153 as fixed and keep this PR to track the

[Bug target/27855] [4.5/4.7/4.8 regression] reassociation causes the RA to be confused

4.8.0 20130116 (experimental) [trunk revision 195240] (GCC) corei7 SNB: -DREPS=1 -msse3 -O2 -ffast-math ALGORITHM NB REPSTIME MFLOPS = = = == == atlasmm 60 1 1.636 2640.99 -DREPS=1 -msse3 -O2 -ffast

[Bug c++/56004] Possible bug with decltype and access modifer order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56004 --- Comment #2 from David Irvine david.irvine at maidsafe dot net 2013-01-16 16:40:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) As was explained on stackoverflow, this has nothing t odo with access modifiers, as you can easily demonstrate by

[Bug tree-optimization/55995] vect increase_alignment notes missing from dump file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55995 Sharad Singhai singhai at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/56007] New: Remarkably bad error message with DO array=1,2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56007 Bug #: 56007 Summary: Remarkably bad error message with DO array=1,2 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/56007] Remarkably bad error message with DO array=1,2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56007 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause prototype does not match errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 --- Comment #27 from Sriraman Tallam tmsriram at google dot com 2013-01-16 17:20:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #26) On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:02 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause prototype does not match errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 --- Comment #28 from Sriraman Tallam tmsriram at google dot com 2013-01-16 17:25:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #25) The actual merging of target attribute isn't that important, what would be more important is that other attributes

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla with LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 --- Comment #171 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 17:25:04 UTC --- Created attachment 29182 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29182 Patch to compress line info This patch removes column information

[Bug c++/56004] Possible bug with decltype and access modifer order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56004 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 17:30:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) As was explained on stackoverflow, this has nothing t odo with access modifiers, as you can

[Bug fortran/56007] Remarkably bad error message with DO array=1,2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56007 Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx

[Bug lto/55493] [4.8 Regression] LTO always ICEs on i686-mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55493 --- Comment #6 from Fanael fanael4 at gmail dot com 2013-01-16 18:15:25 UTC --- Oh right. Works for me too. I should've tested it more thoroughly first. Sorry for bothering you guys.

[Bug c++/56004] Possible bug with decltype and access modifer order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56004 --- Comment #4 from David Irvine david.irvine at maidsafe dot net 2013-01-16 18:16:58 UTC --- I see In my case in a simpler version than posted this compiles fine template class T class Synchronised { public:

[Bug c++/56004] Possible bug with decltype and access modifer order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56004 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/56005] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr45352.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56005 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 18:28:04 UTC --- Author: vmakarov Date: Wed Jan 16 18:27:58 2013 New Revision: 195247 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195247 Log:

[Bug target/41557] gcc.exe: Internal error: (null) (program cc1plus)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41557 Andris Pavenis andris.pavenis at iki dot fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/56005] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr45352.c (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56005 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/55433] [4.8 Regression][LRA] ICE on excessive reloads

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55433 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 18:44:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) This bug is still present and biting me as of r195176. Is there anything I can do to help make some progress on this?

[Bug testsuite/54622] gcc.dg/vect test failures for arm big-endian

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54622 --- Comment #8 from Janis Johnson janis at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 18:50:06 UTC --- Author: janis Date: Wed Jan 16 18:49:57 2013 New Revision: 195249 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195249 Log: PR

[Bug testsuite/55994] multiple definition or memset or strlen for builtins tests with LTO options

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55994 --- Comment #5 from Janis Johnson janis at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 18:52:56 UTC --- Author: janis Date: Wed Jan 16 18:52:51 2013 New Revision: 195250 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195250 Log: PR

[Bug target/41557] gcc.exe: Internal error: (null) (program cc1plus)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41557 --- Comment #3 from Andris Pavenis andris.pavenis at iki dot fi 2013-01-16 18:57:42 UTC --- I also verified that I have already mostly applied a patch sent to gcc-bugs recently (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2013-01/msg01142.html) already

[Bug bootstrap/56001] [4.7 Regression] relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC_REL24 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56001 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-01-16 19:04:34 UTC --- Is your toolchain using BSS PLT?

[Bug debug/56006] [4.8 Regression] Many guality testsuite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56006 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-16 19:06:09 UTC --- The second patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-01/msg00822.html (which is waiting for Uros' bootstrap/regtest on alpha AFAIK) seems to fix

[Bug sanitizer/55975] asan does not work with 46 bit address space on PowerPC64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-01-16 19:12:01 UTC --- -FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c -O0 output pattern test, is ==9876== AddressSanitizer CHECK failed:

  1   2   >