[Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2008-12-08 19:34:48

[Bug web/56063] New: last reconfirmed : now

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063 Bug #: 56063 Summary: last reconfirmed : now Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug fortran/56052] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in omp_add_variable, at gimplify.c:5606

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56052 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openmp

[Bug sanitizer/55975] asan does not work with 46 bit address space on PowerPC64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 --- Comment #24 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 09:11:22 UTC --- I've tried adding the offset instead of OR-ing it and got 2%-5% slowdown and same code size increase on SPEC on x86_64 (using fresh clang -02). So,

[Bug web/56063] last reconfirmed : now

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug middle-end/56022] [4.8 regression] ICE (segfault) at convert_memory_address_addr_space (explow.c:334)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56022 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 10:01:40 UTC --- The problem is that aggregate_value_p can rely on that invoke_set_current_function_hook has already been called which my patch foolishly moved below

[Bug debug/54402] [4.8 Regression] var-tracking does not scale

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402 --- Comment #29 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-01-21 10:07:02 UTC --- --- Comment #28 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18 11:08:06 UTC --- Is the mem-clobbering

[Bug go/54507] libgo testsuite does not timeout compilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54507 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-01-21 10:09:18 UTC --- --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-18 11:08:43 UTC --- FYI, var-tracking just got a

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #11 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 10:15:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) Neither insn 24/145 nor insn 28 move through insn 17. The two UNSPEC 44 insn (LC..2,, LCM..2) are inputs to insn 17.

[Bug target/56058] GCC arm-none-eabi build failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56058 --- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 10:45:09 UTC --- Author: ramana Date: Mon Jan 21 10:45:05 2013 New Revision: 195332 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195332 Log: Fix up

[Bug c++/56009] Nested global destruction semantics not working (mingw)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56009 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/56009] Nested global destruction semantics not working (mingw)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56009 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug driver/56062] Enhance -fuse-ld= option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56062 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 11:13:44 UTC --- Yes, but why? How many linkers do you have in a single directory? If you have different veersions of binutils in differnt paths then use -B to

[Bug web/12821] dead link on onlinedocs/gccint/Top-Level.html

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12821 --- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 11:14:43 UTC --- In fact, the nicest solution would be to investigate how much of Ian's document is already duplicated in the GNU binutils sources:

[Bug c/56048] -Werror=format=2 does not work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56048 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||LpSolit at

[Bug fortran/56052] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in omp_add_variable, at gimplify.c:5606

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56052 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause prototype does not match errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29211|0 |1

[Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063 --- Comment #3 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net 2013-01-21 12:20:04 UTC --- You are free to type the date yourself instead of using the calendar if you already know the exact date. The calendar is more helpful to people who

[Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 12:31:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) You are free to type the date yourself instead of using the calendar if you already know the exact date. The calendar is

[Bug c/56048] -Werror=format=2 does not work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56048 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug web/55237] Please implement gcc.gnu.org/r123456 URL shorts for fast SVN revision access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55237 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||LpSolit at

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 12:53:09 UTC --- I've tried to reproduce this with a cross compiler (without cross binutils) on x86_64-linux host, but it ICEs elsewhere: ../configure --target

[Bug fortran/56052] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in omp_add_variable, at gimplify.c:5606

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56052 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 13:03:03 UTC --- Yeah, if this ever worked, it was by pure accident. OpenMP 3.1 vs. Fortran OOP is simply undefined territory, gfortran won't run e.g. any

[Bug tree-optimization/56064] New: Optimize VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR with FIXED_CST

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56064 Bug #: 56064 Summary: Optimize VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR with FIXED_CST Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/56065] New: Constant expression incorrectly recognized not as such

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56065 Bug #: 56065 Summary: Constant expression incorrectly recognized not as such Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/56052] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in omp_add_variable, at gimplify.c:5606

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56052 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/56065] Constant expression incorrectly recognized not as such

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56065 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 13:23:18 UTC --- dup of PR 55663 ?

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #13 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 13:23:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) I've tried to reproduce this with a cross compiler (without cross binutils) on x86_64-linux host, but it ICEs

[Bug tree-optimization/56034] [4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed (invalid PHI argument) with -ftree-loop-distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56034 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/56035] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1581 (loop n’s header does not belong directly to it !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56035 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/56049] [4.8 Regression] Simplification to constants not done

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56049 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/56065] Constant expression incorrectly recognized not as such

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56065 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/55663] [C++11] Alias template combined with constexpr function is considered non-const

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55663 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/52911] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc 4.7.0 (ppc32 e500mc) when compile a c file, after a lot of time, gcc failed and internal compiler error occurs.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug rtl-optimization/51447] [4.6/4.7 Regression] global register variable definition incorrectly removed as dead code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51447 --- Comment #17 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-01-21 14:52:35 UTC --- The failure in comment 16 appears to be PR51784.

[Bug c++/56066] New: g++ generates strong symbols conflicting with C99 extern inline code on Windows

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56066 Bug #: 56066 Summary: g++ generates strong symbols conflicting with C99 extern inline code on Windows Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #14 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 15:13:38 UTC --- Created attachment 29237 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29237 auto-host.h for AIX 7.1

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #15 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 15:16:04 UTC --- libbacktrace only supports ELF file format and AIX does not use ELF, so libbacktrace will not work on AIX. Also, you patch called libbacktrace

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 15:25:00 UTC --- Using your auto-host.h (with the exception of HAVE_DECL_BASENAME - clearly host rather than target thing) with i686-linux - powerpc-ibm-aix7.1.0.0 cross

[Bug c++/56067] New: Removal of -Wsynth from doc didn't remove example

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56067 Bug #: 56067 Summary: Removal of -Wsynth from doc didn't remove example Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/56047] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in in gfc_conv_expr_op

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56047 --- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 15:34:27 UTC --- Hi, ich antworte jetzt mal privat, dann müssen wir unsere Privatgespräche nicht auf Bugzilla führen ;) Janus, long time no see! XD Right! It's been a while since you

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #17 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 15:37:48 UTC --- AIX 5.3 does not support TLS, so there are pieces not implemented in config/rs6000/aix53.h. Jakub's configuration probably will not work. Also, GNU

[Bug c++/56067] Removal of -Wsynth from doc didn't remove example

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56067 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #18 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 15:41:24 UTC --- Probably something like Index: rs6000.c === --- rs6000.c(revision 195319) +++

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 15:54:08 UTC --- Indeed, with #c18 patch I can reproduce the ICE. Andrey, can you try that too? On x86_64-linux, do for current trunk + #c18 patch applied: mkdir obj

[Bug middle-end/56022] [4.8 regression] ICE (segfault) at convert_memory_address_addr_space (explow.c:334)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56022 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug tree-optimization/55264] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: in ipa_make_edge_direct_to_target, at ipa-prop.c:2141 with -O2 -fno-early-inlining -fno-weak

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264 --- Comment #12 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 17:02:18 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Mon Jan 21 17:02:08 2013 New Revision: 195339 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195339 Log: 2013-01-21

[Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 17:07:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #3) You are free to type the date yourself instead of using the calendar if you already know the

[Bug c/56068] New: -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 Bug #: 56068 Summary: -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.6 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #1 from Jason Pyeron jpyeron at pdinc dot us 2013-01-21 17:08:47 UTC --- Created attachment 29239 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29239 gcc -dM -E - -march=native

[Bug tree-optimization/55264] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: in ipa_make_edge_direct_to_target, at ipa-prop.c:2141 with -O2 -fno-early-inlining -fno-weak

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264 --- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 17:09:27 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Mon Jan 21 17:09:22 2013 New Revision: 195340 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195340 Log: 2013-01-21

[Bug c/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #2 from Jason Pyeron jpyeron at pdinc dot us 2013-01-21 17:10:34 UTC --- Created attachment 29240 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29240 diff of defines

[Bug tree-optimization/55264] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: in ipa_make_edge_direct_to_target, at ipa-prop.c:2141 with -O2 -fno-early-inlining -fno-weak

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #3 from Jason Pyeron jpyeron at pdinc dot us 2013-01-21 17:12:15 UTC --- mockbuild@centos6-64bit-builder ~/build/BUILD/tmp (mock-chroot) $ cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family :

[Bug c/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #4 from Jason Pyeron jpyeron at pdinc dot us 2013-01-21 17:13:25 UTC --- Created attachment 29241 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29241 gcc -v test.c output

[Bug c/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #5 from Jason Pyeron jpyeron at pdinc dot us 2013-01-21 17:14:05 UTC --- Created attachment 29242 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29242 gcc test.c -march=native -v

[Bug c/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 17:14:54 UTC --- sse4a There is the issue I think.

[Bug middle-end/56022] [4.8 regression] ICE (segfault) at convert_memory_address_addr_space (explow.c:334)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56022 --- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 17:17:19 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Mon Jan 21 17:16:57 2013 New Revision: 195341 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195341 Log: 2013-01-21

[Bug middle-end/56022] [4.8 regression] ICE (segfault) at convert_memory_address_addr_space (explow.c:334)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56022 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|

[Bug target/55939] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] gcc miscompiles gmp-5.0.5 on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at

[Bug fortran/56052] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in omp_add_variable, at gimplify.c:5606

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56052 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 17:20:11 UTC --- Created attachment 29243 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29243 gcc48-pr56052.patch Anyway, the following patch fixes the ICE, by

[Bug target/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #8 from Jason Pyeron jpyeron at pdinc dot us 2013-01-21 17:26:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) Please try a newer version of GCC, 4.4 is no longer supported. Also since which version is the oldest supported version, I

[Bug fortran/56047] [4.8 Regression] [OOP] ICE in in gfc_conv_expr_op

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56047 --- Comment #14 from Jürgen Reuter juergen.reuter at desy dot de 2013-01-21 17:28:12 UTC --- On Monday 21 January 2013 16:34:27 you wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56047 --- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/52911] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc 4.7.0 (ppc32 e500mc) when compile a c file, after a lot of time, gcc failed and internal compiler error occurs.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2013-01-21 17:28:19 UTC --- I can reproduce with a gcc-4.7-20130119 cross from x86_64-linux to ppc-linux, but not with gcc-4.8-20130120. So possibly fixed on trunk.

[Bug middle-end/55889] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6153 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55889 --- Comment #20 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 17:31:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) Indeed, with #c18 patch I can reproduce the ICE. Andrey, can you try that too? Sure, will do, I'll be out of office

[Bug target/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 17:32:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) Using -mno-avx (or replacing -march=cirei7) worked for me. Bah, that should be replacing -march=native with -march=corei7

[Bug target/52911] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc 4.7.0 (ppc32 e500mc) when compile a c file, after a lot of time, gcc failed and internal compiler error occurs.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug rtl-optimization/56069] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] RA pessimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56069 Bug #: 56069 Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] RA pessimization Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug target/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #11 from Jason Pyeron jpyeron at pdinc dot us 2013-01-21 17:42:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) (In reply to comment #9) Using -mno-avx (or replacing -march=cirei7) worked for me. Bah, that should be replacing

[Bug rtl-optimization/56023] [4.6 Regression]: [alpha] -fcompare-debug failure due to sched1 pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56023 --- Comment #11 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 17:51:38 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Mon Jan 21 17:51:23 2013 New Revision: 195342 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195342 Log: PR rtl-optimization/56023

[Bug tree-optimization/56051] Wrong expression evaluation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56051 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 17:55:46 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jan 21 17:55:34 2013 New Revision: 195343 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195343 Log: PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/56023] [4.6 Regression]: [alpha] -fcompare-debug failure due to sched1 pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56023 --- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 17:59:34 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Mon Jan 21 17:59:28 2013 New Revision: 195344 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195344 Log: PR rtl-optimization/56023

[Bug target/52911] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc 4.7.0 (ppc32 e500mc) when compile a c file, after a lot of time, gcc failed and internal compiler error occurs.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911 --- Comment #10 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2013-01-21 18:00:06 UTC --- Let me run a bisection first...

[Bug tree-optimization/56051] Wrong expression evaluation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56051 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 18:01:59 UTC --- Fixed on the trunk so far.

[Bug rtl-optimization/56023] [4.6 Regression]: [alpha] -fcompare-debug failure due to sched1 pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56023 --- Comment #13 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 18:03:07 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Mon Jan 21 18:02:57 2013 New Revision: 195345 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195345 Log: PR rtl-optimization/56023

[Bug rtl-optimization/56023] [4.6 Regression]: [alpha] -fcompare-debug failure due to sched1 pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56023 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug debug/54114] [4.8/4.9 Regression] variable-tracking performance regression from 4.8-20120610 to 4.8-20120701

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54114 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|lto |debug

[Bug target/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 19:14:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) I will try 4.6 to prove that. Off to build 4.6... Thanks for checking. See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/InstallingGCC for the

[Bug fortran/56008] [F03] wrong code with lhs-realloc on assignment with derived types having allocatable components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 19:30:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) Created attachment 29221 [details] Fix for this PR and PR 47517 I confirm for this PR. However while the original code

[Bug target/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #13 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-01-21 19:31:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) (In reply to comment #11) I will try 4.6 to prove that. Off to build 4.6... Thanks for checking. See

[Bug fortran/55919] [4.8 Regression] Bogus warning with -J directory/

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55919 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 19:58:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) Maybe GCC could work around it by checking both flags in the AVX detection logic. Recent 4.6+ does. Please see

[Bug target/56068] -march=native creates Illegal instruction on KVM guests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56068 --- Comment #15 from Jason Pyeron jpyeron at pdinc dot us 2013-01-21 20:14:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) (In reply to comment #11) I will try 4.6 to prove that. Off to build 4.6... ... If that prints 0 for OSXSAVE and

[Bug c++/56059] [4.7/4.8 Regression] SIGSEGV on invalid C++11 code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56059 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/56070] New: genattrtab: unknown value `alu' for `type' attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56070 Bug #: 56070 Summary: genattrtab: unknown value `alu' for `type' attribute Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug bootstrap/56070] genattrtab: unknown value `alu' for `type' attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56070 --- Comment #1 from Denis Onischenko denis.onischenko at gmail dot com 2013-01-21 20:53:29 UTC --- Created attachment 29244 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29244 output

[Bug bootstrap/56070] genattrtab: unknown value `alu' for `type' attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56070 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/56058] GCC arm-none-eabi build failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56058 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/56058] GCC arm-none-eabi build failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56058 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/56069] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] RA pessimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56069 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21 21:56:02 UTC --- LRA does not generate any reloads (additional insns). So I don't think it is LRA problem. I've checked reload. It generates the same code.

[Bug c++/56071] New: noexcept with template and private ctor fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56071 Bug #: 56071 Summary: noexcept with template and private ctor fails Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug web/56063] [bugzilla] last reconfirmed : now

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063 --- Comment #7 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net 2013-01-21 22:20:33 UTC --- What I could do is to hide the calendar button and add a Now link instead. I'm not sure that having both the calendar button and a Now link would be nice

[Bug target/52911] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] gcc 4.7.0 (ppc32 e500mc) when compile a c file, after a lot of time, gcc failed and internal compiler error occurs.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911 --- Comment #11 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2013-01-21 22:52:18 UTC --- This ICE was fixed for 4.8 by Alan Modra's PR53914, rs6000 constraints and reload queries fix in r189801. The ICE described in

[Bug target/52911] [4.6/4.7 Regression] gcc 4.7.0 (ppc32 e500mc) when compile a c file, after a lot of time, gcc failed and internal compiler error occurs.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52911 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug c++/56071] friend class template cannot access private constructor in exception-specification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56071 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug target/55939] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] gcc miscompiles gmp-5.0.5 on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55939 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2013-01-21 23:18:34 UTC --- I'm using the ARAnym full-system m68040 emulator -- that's the only realistic option for testing gcc on Linux/m68k at the moment. I maintain my own

  1   2   >