[Bug target/56028] Splitting a 64-bit volatile store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56028 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug libquadmath/56072] info page wrongly defines M_PI_2 and M_PI_4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56072 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-22 08:23:39 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 22 08:23:32 2013 New Revision: 195360 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195360 Log: PR

[Bug libquadmath/56072] info page wrongly defines M_PI_2 and M_PI_4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56072 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/56071] friend class template cannot access private constructor in exception-specification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56071 --- Comment #3 from Stephen steveire at gmail dot com 2013-01-22 08:41:02 UTC --- clang has other issues relating to this. Something to maybe add unit tests for if they don't exist already:

[Bug libgomp/56073] New: SPEComp2012 376.kdtree fails to complete

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56073 Bug #: 56073 Summary: SPEComp2012 376.kdtree fails to complete Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libgomp/56073] SPEComp2012 376.kdtree fails to complete

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56073 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/56028] Splitting a 64-bit volatile store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56028 --- Comment #11 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-01-22 08:46:48 UTC --- I was thinking of removing (!o,n) alternative from movdi (together with corresponding splitters). Splitter/peephole2 actually always generates movabs

[Bug rtl-optimization/55686] [4.8 Regression] ICE in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1244

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55686 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/56074] New: [4.8 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/vect/pr49093.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56074 Bug #: 56074 Summary: [4.8 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/vect/pr49093.c Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/56074] [4.8 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/vect/pr49093.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56074 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/53609] Wrong variadic template pack expansion in alias template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53609 --- Comment #3 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-22 10:05:13 UTC --- Author: dodji Date: Tue Jan 22 10:05:05 2013 New Revision: 195367 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195367 Log: PR c++/53609 -

[Bug c++/56067] Removal of -Wsynth from doc didn't remove example

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56067 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/56035] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1581 (loop n’s header does not belong directly to it !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56035 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-22 10:22:21 UTC --- The problem looks to be in fix_loop_structures: /* If there was no latch, schedule the loop for removal. */ if (!first_latch)

[Bug sanitizer/55374] [asan] -static-libasan -static-libstdc++ doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-22 10:33:53 UTC --- The patch isn't sufficient. For both -static-libasan -fsanitize=address and just -fsanitize=address, we want -Bstatic -lasan -Bdynamic resp. -lasan to

[Bug sanitizer/55374] [asan] -static-libasan -static-libstdc++ doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-22 10:52:55 UTC --- One way out of this would be for libasan.a to be an *.o object rather than *.a archive: mv libasan.a libasan_a.a gcc -Wl,-r -nostdlib -o libasan.a

[Bug tree-optimization/56035] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1581 (loop n’s header does not belong directly to it !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56035 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug libgomp/51376] libgomp taskwait failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51376 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra amodra at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-22 11:41:56 UTC --- Author: amodra Date: Tue Jan 22 11:41:53 2013 New Revision: 195370 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195370 Log: PR

[Bug libgomp/56073] SPEComp2012 376.kdtree fails to complete

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56073 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra amodra at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-22 11:41:57 UTC --- Author: amodra Date: Tue Jan 22 11:41:53 2013 New Revision: 195370 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195370 Log: PR

[Bug fortran/55891] Problem with shared library and EQUIVALENCE on darwin 11.4.2 x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55891 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-01-22 11:52:27 UTC --- Form https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/E_ll5RFNL14 FX said: Compiling shared libraries on Darwin is a bit

[Bug libgomp/56073] SPEComp2012 376.kdtree fails to complete

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56073 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target|

[Bug libffi/56033] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_struct_va1.c on powerpc-apple-darwin9 with -m64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56033 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-apple-darwin9

[Bug tree-optimization/56075] New: [gcc-4.7.1] 64-bit version, -Os eliminate some line of code which working fine in gcc-4.6.2 64-bit version

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56075 Bug #: 56075 Summary: [gcc-4.7.1] 64-bit version, -Os eliminate some line of code which working fine in gcc-4.6.2 64-bit version Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc

[Bug other/56076] New: [4.8 regression] Several 64-bit libgo tests FAIL in read_line_header

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56076 Bug #: 56076 Summary: [4.8 regression] Several 64-bit libgo tests FAIL in read_line_header Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug fortran/56007] Remarkably bad error message with DO array=1,2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56007 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Schlüter tobi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-22 12:56:26 UTC --- Just for the fun of it, another confusing way this error message appears: $ cat t3.f90 character c(5) do c=2,3 end do END $ gfortran t3.f90 t3.f90:3.4:

[Bug tree-optimization/56035] [4.8 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1581 (loop n’s header does not belong directly to it !)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56035 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-22 13:24:40 UTC --- Created attachment 29248 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29248 pr56035 Potential fix

[Bug sanitizer/55374] [asan] -static-libasan -static-libstdc++ doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-22 13:35:28 UTC --- Created attachment 29249 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29249 gcc48-pr55374.patch Untested fix. If -static-libasan is missing,

[Bug c++/56059] [4.7 Regression] SIGSEGV on invalid C++11 code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56059 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.7

[Bug c++/56067] Removal of -Wsynth from doc didn't remove example

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56067 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-22 15:09:50 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Jan 22 15:09:45 2013 New Revision: 195375 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195375 Log:

[Bug c++/56067] Removal of -Wsynth from doc didn't remove example

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56067 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/56059] [4.7 Regression] SIGSEGV on invalid C++11 code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56059 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-22 15:22:21 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jan 22 15:22:16 2013 New Revision: 195377 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195377 Log: PR c++/56059

[Bug c++/56059] [4.7 Regression] SIGSEGV on invalid C++11 code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56059 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/55761] process_assignment assumes -1 can be created

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55761 --- Comment #6 from Paulo J. Matos pa...@matos-sorge.com 2013-01-22 15:30:48 UTC --- I have some further patches that replace the previously posted ones that I will upload soon. Should these also be sent to gcc-patches or it's unnecessary

[Bug tree-optimization/53787] Possible IPA-SRA / IPA-CP improvement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787 --- Comment #14 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com 2013-01-22 15:32:06 UTC --- Created attachment 29250 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29250 testcase in F90 Reproducer for IPA_CP

[Bug tree-optimization/53787] Possible IPA-SRA / IPA-CP improvement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787 Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/56071] friend class template cannot access private constructor in exception-specification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56071 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c/56077] New: volatile ignored when function inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077 Bug #: 56077 Summary: volatile ignored when function inlined Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/55944] [C++11] static local member with constexpr c'tor causes ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55944 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/55761] process_assignment assumes -1 can be created

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55761 Paulo J. Matos pa...@matos-sorge.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29014|0 |1

[Bug c++/56071] friend class template cannot access private constructor in exception-specification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56071 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-22 16:05:12 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jan 22 16:05:04 2013 New Revision: 195378 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195378 Log: PR c++/56071

[Bug c++/56071] friend class template cannot access private constructor in exception-specification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56071 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-22 16:25:29 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jan 22 16:25:10 2013 New Revision: 195379 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195379 Log: PR c++/56071

[Bug tree-optimization/55761] process_assignment assumes -1 can be created

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55761 Paulo J. Matos pa...@matos-sorge.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29251|0 |1

[Bug c++/53650] [4.7 Regression] large array causes huge memory use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53650 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-22 16:29:07 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jan 22 16:28:58 2013 New Revision: 195380 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195380 Log: PR c++/53650

[Bug c++/56071] friend class template cannot access private constructor in exception-specification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56071 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/53650] [4.7 Regression] large array causes huge memory use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53650 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/55686] [4.8 Regression] ICE in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1244

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55686 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-22 16:41:44 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 22 16:41:30 2013 New Revision: 195381 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195381 Log: PR

[Bug middle-end/56074] [4.8 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/vect/pr49093.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56074 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-22 17:03:47 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 22 17:03:33 2013 New Revision: 195382 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195382 Log: PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/55686] [4.8 Regression] ICE in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1244

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55686 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/56074] [4.8 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/vect/pr49093.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56074 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c/56078] New: causes cc1 to crash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56078 Bug #: 56078 Summary: causes cc1 to crash Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3

[Bug c++/56071] friend class template cannot access private constructor in exception-specification

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56071 --- Comment #7 from Stephen steveire at gmail dot com 2013-01-22 17:28:14 UTC --- Thank you!

[Bug debug/55794] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/non-virtual-thunk.C -std=gnu++98 and -std=gnu++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55794 Janis Johnson janis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janis at

[Bug debug/55794] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/non-virtual-thunk.C -std=gnu++98 and -std=gnu++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55794 Janis Johnson janis at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ccoutant

[Bug fortran/56008] [F03] wrong code with lhs-realloc on assignment with derived types having allocatable components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56008 --- Comment #7 from stefan.mauerberger at gmail dot com 2013-01-22 19:08:10 UTC --- Unfortunately, I do not understand a thing about all the internals and the actual implementations. I just wanted to let you know that I am totally

[Bug fortran/56079] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE with C_PTR renaming

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56079 Bug #: 56079 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE with C_PTR renaming Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/56079] [4.8 Regression] ICE with C_PTR renaming and TRANSFER

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56079 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug target/56028] Splitting a 64-bit volatile store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56028 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug target/56028] Splitting a 64-bit volatile store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56028 --- Comment #13 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-22 20:58:45 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Tue Jan 22 20:58:37 2013 New Revision: 195386 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195386 Log: PR target/56028 *

[Bug c++/56080] New: Incorrect code generated when changing lvalue of pointer and using inline code and optimizations.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56080 Bug #: 56080 Summary: Incorrect code generated when changing lvalue of pointer and using inline code and optimizations. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/56069] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] RA pessimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56069 Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/53650] [4.7 Regression] large array causes huge memory use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53650 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pluto at agmk

[Bug rtl-optimization/56069] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] RA pessimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56069 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug c++/56080] Incorrect code generated when changing lvalue of pointer and using inline code and optimizations.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56080 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug web/55237] Please implement gcc.gnu.org/r123456 URL shorts for fast SVN revision access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55237 --- Comment #6 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net 2013-01-22 21:24:25 UTC --- It would be simpler to simply type r1234 in Bugzilla instead of http://gcc.gnu.org/r1234 and have it linkified to point to

[Bug web/55237] Please implement gcc.gnu.org/r123456 URL shorts for fast SVN revision access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55237 --- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2013-01-22 21:27:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) It would be simpler to simply type r1234 in Bugzilla instead of http://gcc.gnu.org/r1234 and have it linkified to point to

[Bug fortran/56079] [4.8 Regression] ICE with C_PTR renaming and TRANSFER

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56079 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug c++/56080] Incorrect code generated when changing lvalue of pointer and using inline code and optimizations.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56080 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING

[Bug bootstrap/56001] [4.7 Regression] relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC_REL24 breaks bootstrap on powerpc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56001 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/56081] New: Seg fault ICE on select with bad case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56081 Bug #: 56081 Summary: Seg fault ICE on select with bad case Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/41076] [avr] pessimal code for logical OR of 8-bit fields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41076 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug c/56078] causes cc1 to crash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56078 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug middle-end/56077] volatile ignored when function inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c

[Bug middle-end/56077] volatile ignored when function inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-22 22:51:33 UTC --- I think you need to report this bug to Ubuntu/Linaro as I said I had fixed this via bug 54494

[Bug middle-end/56077] volatile ignored when function inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-22 23:13:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) I thought I fixed this already via PR54494 Did you check? It looks like I can reproduce the issue with trunk from last week,

[Bug middle-end/56077] volatile ignored when function inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56077 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-22 23:15:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Did you check? It looks like I can reproduce the issue with trunk from last week, whereas you fixed PR54494 months ago.

[Bug c++/55944] [C++11] static local member with constexpr c'tor causes ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55944 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-22 23:38:39 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Jan 22 23:38:34 2013 New Revision: 195391 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195391 Log: /cp

[Bug c++/55944] [C++11] static local member with constexpr c'tor causes ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55944 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/56081] Seg fault ICE on select with bad case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56081 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot

[Bug c++/53650] [4.7 Regression] large array causes huge memory use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53650 --- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-23 02:48:07 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jan 23 02:48:00 2013 New Revision: 195397 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195397 Log: PR c++/53650

[Bug libitm/55693] [4.8 Regression] libitm.c++/eh-1.C execution test fails on darwin from r193271

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55693 --- Comment #19 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-01-23 04:01:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) BTW, the reason this works when forcing the instrumented path as Torvald suggested (comment #7) is because when f1()

[Bug fortran/56081] Seg fault ICE on select with bad case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56081 --- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2013-01-23 04:28:01 UTC --- On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 01:27:11AM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Index: match.c

[Bug libitm/55693] [4.8 Regression] libitm.c++/eh-1.C execution test fails on darwin from r193271

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55693 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c/56078] causes cc1 to crash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56078 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|