http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56992
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56995
Bug #: 56995
Summary: sh4 -mfmovd: ICE in find_costs_and_classes
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56996
Bug #: 56996
Summary: no warning on using extern C in namespace
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56991
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|constexpr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56994
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56994
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56984
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56997
Bug #: 56997
Summary: Incorrect write to packed field when
strict-volatile-bitfields enabled on aarch32
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56988
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56991
--- Comment #2 from Matheus Izvekov mizvekov at gmail dot com 2013-04-18
08:10:19 UTC ---
I get also a similar bug:
#include initializer_list
//is accepted by gcc
constexpr std::initializer_listint good1 = { 1, 2, 3 };
struct foo { int a, b;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56991
--- Comment #3 from Morwenn morwenn29 at hotmail dot fr 2013-04-18 08:12:44
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I don't see the compiler *crashing*, I see it *rejecting* the snippet.
Indeed, sorry for the poor formulation.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56997
--- Comment #1 from Joey Ye joey.ye at arm dot com 2013-04-18 08:12:50 UTC ---
Quoted from
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.8.0/gcc/Code-Gen-Options.html#Code-Gen-Options:
-fstrict-volatile-bitfields
If the target requires strict
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56997
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56997
--- Comment #3 from Joey Ye joey.ye at arm dot com 2013-04-18 08:46:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
-fstrict-volatile-bitfields implementation is bogus, as I repeatedly said
it should now piggy-back on DECL_BIT_FIELD_REPRESENTATIVE.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56957
--- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-18
09:08:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Created attachment 29886 [details]
proposed patch
You should probably make this a static inline function and add a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56957
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-18
09:18:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
Created attachment 29886 [details]
proposed patch
You should probably make this a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
Shakthi Kannan skannan at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||skannan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56124
bin.cheng amker.cheng at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53632
Shakthi Kannan skannan at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||skannan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45655
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45655
--- Comment #3 from Shakthi Kannan skannan at redhat dot com 2013-04-18
10:27:40 UTC ---
I shall write to overseers(at)gcc.gnu.org.
Thanks for your prompt response. Appreciate it!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56988
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56942
--- Comment #1 from andrew.bennett at imgtec dot com 2013-04-18 12:47:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 29895
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29895
mips.md patch file
This is similar to:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45655
Frank Ch. Eigler fche at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56909
--- Comment #16 from Arthur Zhang mail2arthur at gmail dot com 2013-04-18
14:48:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
Why below output has '-march=pentiumpro'?
I think it's the autodetected arch, but maybe I'm confused. Never mind.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56998
Bug #: 56998
Summary: [4.8.0] ICE in value_dependent_expression_p, at
cp/pt.c:19598
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56797
gretay at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56952
gee jojelino at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56975
gee jojelino at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jojelino at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53632
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-18
16:03:39 UTC ---
I think this was fixed when we migrated to a new machine. The old machine was
overloaded.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52239
--- Comment #5 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net 2013-04-18
16:19:51 UTC ---
I saw that the OS has finally been upgraded to RHEL6. This means that it's now
possible to upgrade to Bugzilla 4.4. I won't have time this month, but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55933
Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53632
Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56975
--- Comment #4 from gee jojelino at gmail dot com 2013-04-18 16:25:13 UTC ---
Caused by r197373. Reverting the commit fixed the problem.
commit 5496fac88af2009a2c4d5cfec0e722d5f962d80e
Author: ktietz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56999
Bug #: 56999
Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] LRA caused miscompilation of
xulrunner
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55237
Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|gerald at pfeifer dot com |LpSolit at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56999
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-18
16:29:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 29896
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29896
jsi.ii
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56999
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56999
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-18
16:42:34 UTC ---
BTW, of course much lower priority, this also shows another spot where I think
reload code is better.
In the same ebb as the wrong-code, reload has
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45655
--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-18
17:12:01 UTC ---
So someone has root access after DBerlin left?
Are we using the latest version of moinmoin?
Could you give DeSpam powers to people that usually remove
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45655
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-18
17:12:41 UTC ---
Also Tobias Burnus should have Despam powers.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56996
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-18
17:13:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Using extern C in namespace is not right
It avoids cluttering the global namespace. The namespace still affects name
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56996
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-18
17:17:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
(In reply to comment #0)
Using extern C in namespace is not right
It avoids cluttering the global namespace. The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56999
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-18
17:39:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 29897
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29897
gcc49-pr56999-test.patch
Adjusted testcase, so that it aborts if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56975
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-18 18:19:28
UTC ---
Created attachment 29898
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29898
Patch for supporting cygwin32's SYSV_ABI proper
This patch should fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56816
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56816
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56999
Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45655
--- Comment #7 from Frank Ch. Eigler fche at redhat dot com 2013-04-18
18:44:30 UTC ---
Added ThomasSchwinge, StevenBosscher, TobiasBurnus to the gcc wiki admins.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57000
Bug #: 57000
Summary: 4.8 Regression?, ICE with -Ofast and -frounding-math
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57000
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Fuka vladimir.fuka at gmail dot com 2013-04-18
19:20:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 29899
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29899
Preprocessed was too long, is at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56847
--- Comment #9 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at redhat dot com 2013-04-18
20:10:34 UTC ---
I am still working on this. I have a patch solving the problem but I'd like to
try other solutions too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57000
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57000
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-18
20:37:17 UTC ---
Started with http://gcc.gnu.org/r191925 .
:
b .L2
mov%o5, %g2
.L8:
mov 0, %o1
jmp %o7+8
st %o1, [%o3]
.size PointToRowCol, .-PointToRowCol
.ident GCC: (GNU) 4.9.0 20130418 (experimental) [trunk revision
198052]
.section.note.GNU-stack
include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions.
$ ./xgcc --version
xgcc (GCC) 4.9.0 20130418 (experimental) [trunk revision 198052]
Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57001
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43314
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38449
--- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-18
21:49:14 UTC ---
Can this new hook replace MD_CAN_REDIRECT_BRANCH?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38026
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57002
Bug #: 57002
Summary: ARM back end has extra entries in attribute interrupt
array.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57002
--- Comment #1 from Bill Pringlemeir bpringlemeir at gmail dot com 2013-04-18
22:40:40 UTC ---
static const isr_attribute_arg isr_attribute_args [] =
{
{ IRQ, ARM_FT_ISR },
{ irq, ARM_FT_ISR },
{ FIQ, ARM_FT_FIQ },
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56944
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-18 22:47:55
UTC ---
Created attachment 29900
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29900
(x inf) inf
I only vaguely checked that the resulting asm was what
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57003
Bug #: 57003
Summary: gcc-4.8.0 breaks -O2 optimization with Wine(64) -
links/info/bisect of commits included
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57003
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57003
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-19
01:00:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
IIRC this is usually due to mis writing of memcpy/memset where you return null
rather than the dest (first argument).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56412
nightstrike nightstrike at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56975
--- Comment #6 from Alexey Pavlov alexpux at gmail dot com 2013-04-19
04:56:31 UTC ---
With your patch I also has freeze xgcc on building stage2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56999
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
70 matches
Mail list logo