http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57097
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57130
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-02
06:58:38 UTC ---
Slightly more reduced testcase:
struct S { int a, b, c, d; } s[2] = { { 6, 8, -8, -5 }, { 0, 2, -1, 2 } };
__attribute__((noinline, noclone)) void
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57138
--- Comment #2 from Jacob Metcalfe jmetcalfe at acm dot org 2013-05-02
07:02:47 UTC ---
Modified the subject to reflect the stack produced by the given example. In our
larger code base the stack was somewhat different but related. I have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2013-05-02 07:37:55 UTC ---
On Wed, 1 May 2013, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865
Bill Schmidt wschmidt at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57124
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-02
08:01:39 UTC ---
At least the reduced testcase contains undefined signed integer overflow.
It multiplies 65531 by 65536 here:
x3 = x2 * 65536;
it's still
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57134
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57140
Bug #: 57140
Summary: Segmentation fault in backtrace_dwarf_add
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57141
Bug #: 57141
Summary: Cannot change attributes of USE-associated intrinsic
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57140
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2013-05-02 08:54:39
UTC ---
In libgcj-tools.so
20316: 00456aec 144 OBJECT LOCAL DEFAULT 22
_ZN3gnu9classpath5tools7keytool17Main$ShutdownHook6class$E
That's in .data, as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57130
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57140
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57130
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-02
09:23:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 29995
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29995
simplify-truncate.patch
Another thing, it is weird we don't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57140
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57138
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56864
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-05-02 10:37:53
UTC ---
r196872 it is.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57130
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-02
10:49:08 UTC ---
Created attachment 29996
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29996
gcc49-pr57130.patch
Alternative to the #c3 patch, using SET instead
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57141
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2013-05-02 11:35:20
UTC ---
I believe this is triggered by powerpc turning on -fsection-anchors by default,
and a section anchor bug loses the alignment. The classes are all nicely
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57142
Bug #: 57142
Summary: SIZE/SHAPE overflow despite kind=8
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57143
Bug #: 57143
Summary: gcc failed to parse try/catch(...) when exception_ptr
is involved
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57143
--- Comment #1 from Fabien Pichot pichot.fabien at gmail dot com 2013-05-02
11:52:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 29998
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29998
g++-4.8.0 -v output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57143
--- Comment #2 from Fabien Pichot pichot.fabien at gmail dot com 2013-05-02
11:53:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 2
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2
preprocessed file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57142
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57143
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56388
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57142
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2013-05-02 14:01:59
UTC ---
So the section anchor code places vars (and constants) in blocks according to
their alignment and sizes (varasm.c:place_block_symbol). The calculations are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56988
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-02
14:05:35 UTC ---
Patch committed to trunk. I will commit the 4.8 version early next week.
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu May 2 14:03:02 2013
New Revision: 198540
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-05-02 14:25:09
UTC ---
There is a long standing bug with VLA types (see bug 28865) that has a similar
effect.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48231
Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joel at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52892
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57144
Bug #: 57144
Summary: [4.9 regression] mpfr miscompiled after r198413
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57109
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57145
Bug #: 57145
Summary: [OOP] Faulty Actual argument must be polymorphic
error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57144
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57146
Bug #: 57146
Summary: Makefile error in wiselib library
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57146
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-02
15:27:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Correct. Dumping order is affected by the patch though, thus if
we previously disabled vectorization at some point the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-02
15:29:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 30001
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30001
Vectorization details dump for r196871
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-02
15:29:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 30002
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30002
Vectorization details dump for r196872
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57027
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-02
15:42:23 UTC ---
Related fails:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/991202-1.c -O2 (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/991202-1.c -O2 (test for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57084
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57140
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57145
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56864
Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56864
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-05-02 16:19:57
UTC ---
Created attachment 30003
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30003
r196871 dump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57027
--- Comment #3 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-05-02 16:28:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 30004
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30004
tentative patch
Would that help?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57144
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57142
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56864
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2013-05-02 16:36:18
UTC ---
Created attachment 30005
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30005
r196872 dump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57144
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
C (GCC) version 4.9.0 20130502 (experimental) (arm-linux-gnueabi)
compiled by GNU C version 4.6.3, GMP version 5.0.2, MPFR version 3.1.0-p3,
MPC version 0.9
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
ignoring nonexistent directory
/usr/local/google/home/mcgrathr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57147
roland at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48231
--- Comment #5 from DJ Delorie dj at redhat dot com 2013-05-02 17:39:29 UTC
---
I'm OK with it being committed, but it's not up to me, ping Jeff or Kazu.
h8 portJeff Lawl...@redhat.com
h8 portKazu Hirata
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aph at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48231
--- Comment #6 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-02 18:55:02
UTC ---
From Jeff Law:
The problem is that's not the right fix. See this thread:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00707.html
Basically
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14283
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57148
Bug #: 57148
Summary: integer*4 fails to read largest negative number
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33285
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jayas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57148
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57131
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-02
19:26:38 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu May 2 06:00:46 2013
New Revision: 198511
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198511root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57091
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57097
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57046
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57018
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56999
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56847
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57149
Bug #: 57149
Summary: [4.8 Regression] wrong -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
with -Os
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57150
Bug #: 57150
Summary: GCC when targeting power7 spills long double using VSX
instructions.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57150
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-02
19:37:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 30009
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30009
Assembler file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-02
19:37:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 30010
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30010
gcc49-pr57074.patch
Fix I've tried, but it didn't survive
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57150
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29968|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57148
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57151
Bug #: 57151
Summary: Wasted work in method verify_cgraph_node
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54318
Nathan Ridge zeratul976 at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.8.0 |4.7.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57150
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-02
21:03:08 UTC ---
It shows up due to -fcaller-saves, which creates a V2DF save area.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-02
21:08:36 UTC ---
The problem is the following in gimplify.c:
In gimplify_cond_expr, one has:
/* If this COND_EXPR has a value, copy the values into a temporary
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53846
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Ridge zeratul976 at hotmail dot com 2013-05-02
21:12:27 UTC ---
This seems to be fixed in the 4.8.0 release. Close?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-02
22:00:53 UTC ---
For completeness, gimplify_ctxp-into_ssa is 0 for the -O0 optimization and it
gets set to 1 in gimple_regimplify_operands. Thus, it is not surprising
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57074
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.1 |---
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57152
Bug #: 57152
Summary: [C++11] Compiler segfault when using const in template
alias
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57121
--- Comment #9 from Netra netravathi.muniraju at asia dot thalesgroup.com
2013-05-03 00:58:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Simple work around is to use -fprofile-generate instead of -lgcov and GCC
knows
what it should be linking
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57153
Bug #: 57153
Summary: [C++11] tries to use copy constructor for in-class
initialized member in default constructor of template
struct
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
Bug #: 57154
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap broken for
powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57154
--- Comment #1 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com 2013-05-03
05:13:07 UTC ---
Investigating. I am not sure I have access to a powerpc64, but I am
trying to trigger it on x86_64.
Teresa
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 9:16 PM, wschmidt at
89 matches
Mail list logo