http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57192
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-05-08
06:01:02 UTC ---
On x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0 at revision 198697 with the patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-05/msg00367.html the test executes under
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57197
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57094
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-05-08
06:07:11 UTC ---
For the record, the first test in comment #1 is invalid as n is not
initialized. Now I see something I don't expect for both trunk and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57192
--- Comment #10 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-05-08 06:18:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
On x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0 at revision 198697 with the patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57192
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-05-08 06:27:32 UTC ---
Can you check what you see by running f951 under valgrind ?
It fails for me with:
[macbook] f90/bug% valgrind
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57068
--- Comment #2 from Kai Koehne kai.koehne at digia dot com 2013-05-08
06:39:48 UTC ---
Still reproducable in revision 198685 . This is most likely a regression
introduced by http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00024.html.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55278
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-08
06:58:37 UTC ---
unsigned int
f1 (unsigned int x, unsigned int y)
{
return (x y) | (x (32 - y));
}
unsigned int
f2 (unsigned int x, unsigned long y)
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57202
Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-*-* i?86-*-* |x86_64-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41590
Shakthi Kannan skannan at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||skannan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57094
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-08
07:22:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
For the record, the first test in comment #1 is invalid as n is not
initialized. Now I see something I don't expect for both
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57202
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-*-* i?86-*-* arm-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57094
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-05-08
07:52:22 UTC ---
as tmp is only len=1, only a is assigned
Thanks for the explanation. I missed the fact that len=1 for tmp(i).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57201
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57202
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-08 08:02:23
UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00740.html
that patch (or maybe a later iteration) is waiting for reviews but I think it
is what this PR is
Resolution|FIXED |
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2013-05-08
08:27:18 UTC ---
I tried the same C++ source code on trunk from 20130508 and I got
/home/dcb/rpmbuild/BUILD/OpenCV-2.3.1/modules/imgproc/src/smooth.cpp: In
function ‘void cv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57203
Bug #: 57203
Summary: [4.9 Regression] verify_gimple failed after SLSR
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57203
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53050
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57201
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57200
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-08
08:44:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
This issue is easy, isn't it? Something like:
Index: tree-ssa-loop-niter.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57199
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50345
--- Comment #1 from Paulo J. Matos pa...@matos-sorge.com 2013-05-08 08:58:54
UTC ---
I am revisiting this bug and it seems that there's just an extra work, nothing
specially unexplained and the correct URL for the problem is:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57193
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57200
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57204
Bug #: 57204
Summary: Auto-vectorization in nested loops with non-varying
indexed array access results in very poor performance
(worse than no auto-vectorization)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50345
--- Comment #2 from Paulo J. Matos pa...@matos-sorge.com 2013-05-08 09:09:30
UTC ---
Created attachment 30050
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30050
Patch with typo fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57200
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57204
--- Comment #1 from Sasanka Nagavalli snagavallis at outlook dot com
2013-05-08 09:16:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 30051
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30051
Test case for issue 57204
Attached a small test case to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41590
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-05-08 09:17:11 UTC ---
--- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan skannan at redhat dot com 2013-05-08
07:05:37 UTC ---
Which version of GCC are you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57188
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54659
--- Comment #27 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de
2013-05-08 10:06:30 UTC ---
On Tue, 7 May 2013, Diego Novillo wrote:
On 2013-05-07 13:06 , roland at gnu dot org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57205
Bug #: 57205
Summary: unfinished function declaration and inclusion of
assert.h causes compiler errors
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57206
Bug #: 57206
Summary: Auto-vectorization fails when array index is an
unsigned int expression
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57206
--- Comment #1 from Sasanka Nagavalli snagavallis at outlook dot com
2013-05-08 10:51:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 30052
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30052
Test case for issue 57206
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57207
Bug #: 57207
Summary: Incorrect lifetime of const references bound to
temporary
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57206
Sasanka Nagavalli snagavallis at outlook dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57205
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57207
vlukas at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vlukas at gmx dot de
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56628
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56630
Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57207
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52239
--- Comment #6 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net 2013-05-08
11:43:08 UTC ---
I plan to upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 4.4 this week. Is there any objection or
anything else that I should be aware of before doing the upgrade?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57207
--- Comment #3 from DimanNe DimanNe at ya dot ru 2013-05-08 11:44:17 UTC ---
Ok, thanks for clarification.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57206
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-05-08
11:49:11 UTC ---
I don't think this is a C++ front-end issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57201
--- Comment #5 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2013-05-08 12:30:02
UTC ---
Yes, it does issue a warning as expected with -Wsystem-headers.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208
Bug #: 57208
Summary: Latest chromium compilation fails with enabled LTO
[4.8.1/4.9.0]
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška marxin.liska at gmail dot com 2013-05-08
12:32:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 30054
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30054
Savetemps dump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška marxin.liska at gmail dot com 2013-05-08
12:32:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 30055
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30055
common.gypi - build configuration
: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: ishiura-compi...@ml.kwansei.ac.jp
The following code is miscompiled by GCC 4.8.1 20130508 (prerelease)
for x86_64 (as well as for i686). The option in question is
-funsafe-math-optimizations
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52239
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-05-08
12:42:47 UTC ---
Any chance we can take the occasion to restore the svn - Bugzilla link, where
the former automatically sends the commit ChangeLogs to the audit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52239
--- Comment #8 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net 2013-05-08
12:49:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Any chance we can take the occasion to restore the svn - Bugzilla link, where
the former automatically sends the commit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57210
Bug #: 57210
Summary: Using alignas with an union does not compile.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57199
Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52239
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-05-08
12:57:04 UTC ---
Maybe you could refuse to do the update if nobody helps about that. Kidding ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57210
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56859
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57192
--- Comment #12 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2013-05-08 13:03:59 UTC ---
Reduced testcase that still triggers the valgrind warning during compilation:
MODULE orbital_pointers
INTEGER, DIMENSION(:,:),
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57211
Bug #: 57211
Summary: wrong line indicated in warning for synthesized method
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57209
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57201
minux minux.ma at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||minux.ma at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57206
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54659
--- Comment #28 from dnovillo at google dot com dnovillo at google dot com
2013-05-08 13:23:22 UTC ---
On 2013-05-08 06:05 , Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 7 May 2013, Diego Novillo wrote:
On 2013-05-07 13:06 , roland at gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57201
--- Comment #7 from minux minux.ma at gmail dot com 2013-05-08 13:24:20 UTC
---
the comment for function linemap_location_in_system_header_p
in libcpp/line-map.c says:
/* // snip
Note that this function returns 1 if LOCATION belongs to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57212
Bug #: 57212
Summary: Don't use pe-coff weak support with mingw
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57212
--- Comment #1 from Andoni ylatuya at gmail dot com 2013-05-08 13:40:46 UTC
---
Created attachment 30056
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30056
Fix libstdc threads for mingw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57212
Andoni ylatuya at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30056|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54659
Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57212
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57201
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-08
14:23:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
the comment for function linemap_location_in_system_header_p
in libcpp/line-map.c says:
/* // snip
Note that this function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52235
--- Comment #4 from Paulo J. Matos pa...@matos-sorge.com 2013-05-08 14:24:08
UTC ---
This issue persists in HEAD, the submitted patch seems to have been forgotten.
Ping, ping.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57212
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57201
--- Comment #9 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com 2013-05-08 14:33:58
UTC ---
The --save-temps thing is interesting, but I guess I'm more interested in how
we can get the warning back. I can open up a different PR if people prefer.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57201
Chung-Ju Wu jasonwucj at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jasonwucj at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57201
--- Comment #11 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-08
14:48:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
The --save-temps thing is interesting, but I guess I'm more interested in how
we can get the warning back. I can open up a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57212
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-05-08
15:11:53 UTC ---
Thanks Kai, please commit the patch with an appropriate ChangeLog entry
mainline and 4_8-branch. Please also send it to gcc-patches.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57212
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-05-08
15:16:09 UTC ---
Remember to regenerate Makefile.in.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51226
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target: i386-pc-solaris2.10
Configured with: /export/home/sbn/src/gcc-4.8/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-4.8
--enable-languages=c,c++ --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --without-gnu-ld
--with-gnu-as --with-as=/opt/csw/bin/gas
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.1 20130508 (prerelease) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS
tried to compile the package dvdauthor-0.7.1-3
on gcc-4.9 trunk dated 20130508 on an AMD x86_64 box.
The compiler said
mpeg2desc.c:335:13: internal compiler error: tree check: expected ssa_name,
have integer_cst in coalesce_partitions, at tree-ssa-coalesce.c:1194
static void process_packets
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57214
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2013-05-08
15:56:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 30059
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30059
C source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57213
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-08
16:01:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
In C++ standard (C++03) I can see 22.2.2.1.2p1 [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]:
If an error occurs, val is unchanged; otherwise it is
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: dcb...@hotmail.com
Created attachment 30060
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30060
C++ source code
I just tried to compile the package efte-1.1-6
on gcc-4.9 trunk dated 20130508
-23
on gcc-4.9 trunk dated 20130508 on an AMD x86_64 box.
The compiler said
SDL_gfxPrimitives.c: In function 'ellipseColor':
SDL_gfxPrimitives.c:2317:5: error: definition in block 255 does not dominate
use in block 252
int ellipseColor(SDL_Surface * dst, Sint16 x, Sint16 y, Sint16 rx, Sint16 ry
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57217
Bug #: 57217
Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression][OOP] Accepts invalid TBP
overriding - lacking arguments check
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57203
--- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-08
17:52:20 UTC ---
I can't reproduce this with an x86_64 cross-compiler today, using r198713.
Could you please verify this still fails natively with at least r198709? I
hope
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57218
Bug #: 57218
Summary: Excessive inlining even at -Os
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52235
--- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-08
18:56:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
This issue persists in HEAD, the submitted patch seems to have been forgotten.
Ping, ping.
Ping it on gcc-patches, BZ is *not*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57212
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57219
Bug #: 57219
Summary: __builtin_isinf_sign source comments more restrictive
than documentation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57220
Bug #: 57220
Summary: [mingw] Undefined reference to __mingw_strtod
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57220
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57220
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57220
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57219
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57220
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ktietz70 at googlemail dot |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57220
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2013-05-08 19:56:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Thanks for the litmus test, Kay. The result output I'm getting is:
MinGW-W64 Runtime 3.0 (alpha - rev. 0) -00-00
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57220
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-08 20:04:56
UTC ---
Fine, by which date this version was built?
I am pretty curious to see that issue for 4.9 due I don't happen to see it on
my box.
Could you check, if libmingwex.a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52235
--- Comment #6 from Paulo J. Matos pa...@matos-sorge.com 2013-05-08 20:20:00
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
This issue persists in HEAD, the submitted patch seems to have been
forgotten.
Ping, ping.
Ping it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57220
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2013-05-08 20:25:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
The attached '-v' '-save-temps' output indicates version 4.9.0 20130505
(experimental) (x86_64-w64-mingw32), but I'm not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57220
--- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-05-08 21:02:08
UTC ---
Well, you should us the nm tool to check for existance of a symbol. Grepping
for strings might lead you to wrong direction.
I don't see anything obviously wrong
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
