http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57331
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57333
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tmsriram at google
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57331
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Reduced testcase without missing return:
int
foo (int x)
{
void *p = x ? (void *) 1 : (void *) 0;
__INTPTR_TYPE__ b = (__INTPTR_TYPE__) p;
if (b)
return 0;
return 1;
}
The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57300
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57281
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57175
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57199
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51976
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
FYI: Ian Hardy has some fancy examples uses character(:) in DT at the bottom of
the thread http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/topic/326077 (attached files)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57333
--- Comment #3 from bernhard.hartleb at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
LZCNT insn is part of ABM abi, and is enabled with -mabm. Does LZCNT insn
really cause SIGILL on your target?
No sorry, this was an error on my
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10207
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57327
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23885
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57267
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com ---
testcase fixed in 198917
is this PR duplicate of lto/57038 ?
and how it's related to lto/47375 ? Sounds like PR number mismatch...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57335
Bug ID: 57335
Summary: internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_bit_field_ref, at
cp/semantics.c:6977
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57336
Bug ID: 57336
Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] Cannot INVOKE a reference_wrapper
around an abstract type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57336
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.3, 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57335
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57335
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Note: all the other compilers I have at hand reject the snippet with an error
message about the static_assert expression not being constant (which behavior,
in case the analysis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20724
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23608
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23608
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
(Nit: the location is off by 2 chars, I think I can easily fix this separately:
build_new_op_1 isn't propagating loc to cp_build_binary_op)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57335
Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57267
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
is this PR duplicate of lto/57038 ?
You are right, I meant lto/57038.
This PR is not exactly dup of lto/57038, but while fixing lto/57038 I
constructed artificial testcase similar to yours
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53991
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53991
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
The inlining is failed in ipa-inline.c, around line 294:
/* TM pure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57267
Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
Dmitry G. Dyachenko dimhen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53991
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56950
--- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This patch makes the ICE go away, but it doesn't really solve the bug.
The scheduler inserts (in this case) notes between basic blocks in the
sched1 pass, which runs in cfglayout
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38470
Bug 38470 depends on bug 23608, which changed state.
Bug 23608 Summary: constant propagation (CCP) would improve -Wsign-compare
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23608
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23608
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56950
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
That still doesn't look safe -fcompare-debug wise.
I mean, if BB ends in a DEBUG_INSN (or more), it could be preceeded by note,
label, or some other insns. So shouldn't that be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57319
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57337
Bug ID: 57337
Summary: 416.gamess ICE on x86 after r199048
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56950
--- Comment #7 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Index: haifa-sched.c
===
--- haifa-sched.c (revision 199028)
+++ haifa-sched.c (working copy)
@@ -7435,20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57338
Bug ID: 57338
Summary: ICE with assumed rank
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56950
--- Comment #8 from stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com
---
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
That still doesn't look safe -fcompare-debug wise.
I mean, if BB ends in a DEBUG_INSN (or more),
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56950
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Steven Bosscher from comment #7)
Index: haifa-sched.c
===
--- haifa-sched.c (revision 199028)
+++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57337
--- Comment #1 from Easwaran Raman eraman at google dot com ---
Could you please attach the preprocessed file? Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57199
--- Comment #4 from Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
it can't prove the following loop that uses _8 as upper bound is dead, ...
Do we need a separate may invoke undefined behavior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57199
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
But this isn't any form of the may invoke, the loop certainly unconditionally
invokes undefined behavior, just the whole loop is very unlikely to be ever
executed (in this case if size
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12288
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57339
Bug ID: 57339
Summary: [SH] Wrong ISR FPU register save/restore
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57199
Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57317
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57303
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I wonder if, in addition to fixing the sink pass, we should add an optimization
like the following (it passes bootstrap+testsuite, but I am not so sure where
it should go and what it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56547
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed for SH on 4.9:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revisionrevision=199110
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR target/56547
* config/sh/sh.md (fmasf4): Remove empty constraints strings.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57325
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57319
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57035
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Should be fixed by the - pending - patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-04/msg00206.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57338
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12288
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54651
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12288
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Excellent, thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36486
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37140
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57316
--- Comment #3 from Paul H. Hargrove PHHargrove at lbl dot gov ---
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #1)
Sorry for the breakages, but we are unable to monitor build failures on old
kernels unless someone sets up a regular testing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36486
Richard Smith richard-gccbugzilla at metafoo dot co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36486
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jason at gcc dot gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
--- Comment #23 from Martin Liška marxin.liska at gmail dot com ---
The patch fixed weakrefs problems.
Compilation goes further and some undefined stuff in libreoffice is met:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61627
I think this gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
--- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon May 20 20:03:48 2013
New Revision: 199118
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199118root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-05-20 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
--- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon May 20 20:05:40 2013
New Revision: 199119
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199119root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-05-20 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
--- Comment #16 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon May 20 20:08:05 2013
New Revision: 199120
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199120root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-05-20 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57337
Pat Haugen pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pthaugen at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53478
Bug 53478 depends on bug 48858, which changed state.
Bug 48858 Summary: Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic
interface specifics
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55465
Bug 55465 depends on bug 48858, which changed state.
Bug 48858 Summary: Incorrect error for same binding label on two generic
interface specifics
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48858
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55465
--- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon May 20 20:08:05 2013
New Revision: 199120
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199120root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-05-20 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55465
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57340
Bug ID: 57340
Summary: [4.9 regression] stage2 miscompiles
build/genconditions on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi breaking
bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
at all optimization levels
with gcc 4.7.
$ gcc-trunk -v
gcc version 4.9.0 20130520 (experimental) [trunk revision 199099] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk -O2 -m32 wrong.c
$ ./a.out
1
$ gcc-trunk -O3 -m64 wrong.c
$ ./a.out
1
$ gcc-4.7 -O3 -m32 wrong.c
$ ./a.out
1
$ gcc-trunk -O3 -m32 wrong.c
$ ./a.out
0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57330
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
-gnu/4.9.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/usr/local/google/home/austern/root
--enable-languages=c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20130520 (experimental) (GCC)
[isolde:tmp]$
.
$ gcc-trunk -v
gcc version 4.9.0 20130520 (experimental) [trunk revision 199099] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk -O1 wrong.c
$ ./a.out
4
$ gcc-4.7 -Os wrong.c
$ ./a.out
4
$ gcc-trunk -Os wrong.c
$ ./a.out
0
$
--
int printf (const char *, ...);
int a[6];
int b, c, d, e;
int f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57342
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57016
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57102
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
optimization levels, and 4.7 which
does not.
$ gcc-trunk -v
gcc version 4.9.0 20130520 (experimental) [trunk revision 199099] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk -O0 -m32 wrong.c
$ ./a.out
-3161
$ gcc-trunk -O1 -m64 wrong.c
$ ./a.out
-3161
$ gcc-4.6 -O1 -m32 wrong.c
$ ./a.out
-3161
$ gcc-trunk -O1 -m32 wrong.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57345
Bug ID: 57345
Summary: Preprocessor fails to evaluation string token not
valid
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57345
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think GCC is correct as it is processing the macros after they have been
redefined even though they are using #elif.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57345
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57345
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38161
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||signupnathan at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38161
Harald van Dijk harald at gigawatt dot nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57345
signupnathan at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57346
Bug ID: 57346
Summary: g++ prematurely rejects references to local variables
that are not odr-uses from local classes inside
templates
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36453
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36320
Bug 36320 depends on bug 36453, which changed state.
Bug 36453 Summary: [DR 412] PR36320 breaks boost
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36453
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36453
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|SUSPENDED
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57345
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38161
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 57345 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57343
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57339
--- Comment #1 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #0)
One idea for now would be to emit fixed ISR prologue / epilogue asm blocks
that deal with the FP regs, if FP regs need to be
).
$ gcc-trunk -v
gcc version 4.9.0 20130520 (experimental) [trunk revision 199099] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk -O1 wrong.c
$ ./a.out
1
$ gcc-4.7 -Os wrong.c
$ ./a.out
1
$ gcc-trunk -Os wrong.c
$ ./a.out
0
$
-
int printf(const char *, ...);
struct S1 {
int f0;
int f1 : 10;
int f2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57043
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|converting overloaded
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54891
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57342
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57342
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||31158
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57328
Bud Davis bdavis at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bdavis at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57046
Easwaran Raman eraman at google dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eraman at google
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
