[Bug fortran/57538] New: SAVE attribute needed for derived type with default initialization?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57538 Bug ID: 57538 Summary: SAVE attribute needed for derived type with default initialization? Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/57538] SAVE attribute needed for derived type with default initialization?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57538 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/53812] lower_stmt (4.6), verify_gimple_stmt (4.7.0, 4.7.1)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53812 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/57447] [4.9 Regression] ICE on 435.gromacs from spec2006 after r199298

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57447 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- I see this problem also. Additional test case available on request.

[Bug regression/53964] regression: sparc64 FreeBSD: /usr/ports/lang/gcc46/work/build/./prev-gcc/include/stddef.h:150:26: error: two or more data types n declaration specifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53964 --- Comment #8 from Anton Shterenlikht mexas at bristol dot ac.uk --- With this patch to binutils: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gas/config/tc-sparc.h.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.31r2=1.32 I can build gcc-4.6.4,1 successfully. I can now

[Bug c/57539] New: ice in ipa_edge_duplication_hook

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57539 Bug ID: 57539 Summary: ice in ipa_edge_duplication_hook Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug tree-optimization/30604] Unable to coalesce ssa_names x and y which are marked as MUST COALESCE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30604 David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at

[Bug rtl-optimization/57540] New: stack pointer related loop invariants after reload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57540 Bug ID: 57540 Summary: stack pointer related loop invariants after reload Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/30604] Unable to coalesce ssa_names x and y which are marked as MUST COALESCE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30604 --- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, dcb314 at hotmail dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30604 David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed:

[Bug middle-end/57541] New: [Cilkplus]: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7809

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57541 Bug ID: 57541 Summary: [Cilkplus]: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7809 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/57541] [Cilkplus]: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7809

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57541 --- Comment #1 from Anna anna.m.tikhonova at gmail dot com --- Same test, another ICE. $ gcc -fcilkplus 1.c -DN=10 1.c: In function 'main': 1.c:4:8: internal compiler error: in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2042 char c = (char)N;

[Bug middle-end/57541] [Cilkplus]: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7809

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57541 --- Comment #2 from Anna anna.m.tikhonova at gmail dot com --- Comment out line long l = (long)N; and here's another ICE. $ gcc -fcilkplus 1.c 1.c: In function 'main': 1.c:4:18: error: 'N' undeclared (first use in this function) char c =

[Bug tree-optimization/57539] [4.9 Regression] ice in ipa_edge_duplication_hook

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57539 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mjambor at

[Bug tree-optimization/57537] [4.8/4.9 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-widen-mult-half.c generating wrong code on PowerPC64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57537 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug tree-optimization/57539] [4.9 Regression] ice in ipa_edge_duplication_hook

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57539 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/57542] New: [OOP, Fortran] ICE on FINALization with specific options

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57542 Bug ID: 57542 Summary: [OOP, Fortran] ICE on FINALization with specific options Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/57543] New: decltype needs eplicity 'this' pointer in member function declaration of template class with trailing return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57543 Bug ID: 57543 Summary: decltype needs eplicity 'this' pointer in member function declaration of template class with trailing return type Product: gcc Version:

[Bug fortran/54370] [4.7 Regression] error: non-trivial conversion in unary operation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54370 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c/57544] New: /../libcommon/stdio.h:121:12: error: expected declaration specifiers or ... before numeric constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57544 Bug ID: 57544 Summary: /../libcommon/stdio.h:121:12: error: expected declaration specifiers or ... before numeric constant Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/56442] Could not identify that register is clobbered already

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56442 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eric.weddington

[Bug c/57544] /../libcommon/stdio.h:121:12: error: expected declaration specifiers or ... before numeric constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57544 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |normal

[Bug fortran/57542] [4.9 Regression][OOP] ICE on FINALization with specific options

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57542 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c/57544] /../libcommon/stdio.h:121:12: error: expected declaration specifiers or ... before numeric constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57544 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug fortran/57542] [4.9 Regression][OOP] ICE on FINALization with specific options

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57542 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Jun 6 14:36:41 2013 New Revision: 199736 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199736root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-06-06 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de

[Bug fortran/57542] [4.9 Regression][OOP] ICE on FINALization with specific options

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57542 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/57459] [4.8/4.9 Regression] LRA inheritance bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57459 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot

[Bug fortran/57530] [OOP] Wrongly rejects type_pointer = class_target (which have identical declared type)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57530 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #3) The resolve patch has been approved (but not yet committed): http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-06/msg00049.html The trans*.c patch has

[Bug rtl-optimization/57468] [4.9 Regression] 26% performance drop on important benchmark after r199298.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57468 Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at

[Bug rtl-optimization/55342] [4.8/4.9 Regression] [LRA,x86] Non-optimal code for simple loop with LRA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55342 Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at

[Bug rtl-optimization/57447] [4.9 Regression] ICE on 435.gromacs from spec2006 after r199298

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57447 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #1) I see this problem also. Additional test case available on request. Please upload a testcase here. Thanks.

[Bug c++/57545] New: Generation of debug symbols leads to internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57545 Bug ID: 57545 Summary: Generation of debug symbols leads to internal compiler error Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/57447] [4.9 Regression] ICE on 435.gromacs from spec2006 after r199298

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57447 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Created attachment 30270 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30270action=edit C++ source code The attached source code causes the following crash on gcc-4.9 trunk

[Bug fortran/54370] [4.7 Regression] error: non-trivial conversion in unary operation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54370 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Jun 6 16:45:04 2013 New Revision: 199746 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=199746root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-06-06 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de

[Bug fortran/54370] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: non-trivial conversion in unary operation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54370 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/57546] New: templated gnu multiversion function pointer returns wrong value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57546 Bug ID: 57546 Summary: templated gnu multiversion function pointer returns wrong value Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/57545] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Generation of debug symbols leads to internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57545 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug web/57547] New: Missing vector intrinsics in PowerPC Altivec documentation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57547 Bug ID: 57547 Summary: Missing vector intrinsics in PowerPC Altivec documentation Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial

[Bug target/57547] Missing vector intrinsics in PowerPC Altivec documentation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57547 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation

[Bug c++/57548] New: calling gnu multiversioned function at file scope causes ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57548 Bug ID: 57548 Summary: calling gnu multiversioned function at file scope causes ICE Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/57547] Missing vector intrinsics in PowerPC Altivec documentation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57547 Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/57549] New: Bogus error with array constructor with derived-type typespec

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57549 Bug ID: 57549 Summary: Bogus error with array constructor with derived-type typespec Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid

[Bug c++/57543] decltype needs explicit 'this' pointer in member function declaration of template class with trailing return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57543 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/43652] wrong column number for duplicate qualifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43652 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org|

[Bug c++/43652] wrong column number for duplicate qualifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43652 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/55149] capturing VLA in lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55149 David Abdurachmanov david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/57447] [4.9 Regression] ICE on 435.gromacs from spec2006 after r199298

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57447 Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at

[Bug c++/44811] non controllable bogus warning: right/left shift count is negative

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44811 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/11856] unsigned warning in template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11856 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gpiez at

[Bug rtl-optimization/57459] [4.8/4.9 Regression] LRA inheritance bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57459 --- Comment #6 from wmi at google dot com --- continue the analysis in the first post, for the smallcase 1.c, the IR after calling inherit_in_ebb in lra_inheritance for bb12 is: (insn 289 47 48 12 (set (reg:SI 116 [79]) (reg:SI 121 [79]))

[Bug c++/55109] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault while reporting error in template function instantiation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55109 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/57183] [C++11] auto and -Wunused-variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57183 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ricilake

[Bug c++/55128] auto changes storage from .data to .rodata

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55128 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/57550] New: [4.8/4.9] Regression: bogus error ... is private

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57550 Bug ID: 57550 Summary: [4.8/4.9] Regression: bogus error ... is private Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/57550] [4.8/4.9 Regression] : bogus error ... is private

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57550 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.8/4.9] Regression: bogus |[4.8/4.9

[Bug c++/57550] [4.8/4.9 Regression] bogus error ... is private

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57550 --- Comment #2 from Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) I think the problem is that you cannot take an address of a private static function as that would get around access controls.

[Bug regression/57551] New: [4.9 Regression]: g++.dg/ext/visibility/anon6.C scan-assembler 1BIiE1cE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57551 Bug ID: 57551 Summary: [4.9 Regression]: g++.dg/ext/visibility/anon6.C scan-assembler 1BIiE1cE Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/53658] internal compiler error -- segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53658 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/55520] [C++11] ICE when capturing a variable-length stack array in lambda; in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9122

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55520 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code

[Bug rtl-optimization/57540] stack pointer related loop invariants after reload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57540 --- Comment #1 from bin.cheng amker.cheng at gmail dot com --- The dump of loop_init is like, 72: r178:SI=0 106: L106: 90: NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK 6 91: r178:SI=r178:SI+0x1 94: r190:SI=r177:SI0x2 REG_DEAD r177:SI 95: