http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431
Fabio nomegenerico at email dot it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nomegenerico at email
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
--- Comment #8 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
Still fails on 20130710.
Another test case that generates the same message is available on request.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56417
David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57886
Bug ID: 57886
Summary: Invalid folding of (float)-x to -(float)x
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57887
Bug ID: 57887
Summary: nested non-type template parameters not declared in
this scope
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57855
Patrick Marlier patrick.marlier at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57888
Bug ID: 57888
Summary: using non-type template parameter in constexpr
function for non static data member intializer
segfaults
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57886
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se ---
Dup of PR55771?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57886
Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55771
Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57889
Bug ID: 57889
Summary: Improvement: builtin to return a string from a type
(type to string builtin)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57717
Alexandru-Cezar Sărdan alexandru.sardan at freescale dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57890
Bug ID: 57890
Summary: gcc 4.8.1 regression: loops become slower
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57890
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57889
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56417
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57878
--- Comment #2 from Easwaran Raman eraman at google dot com ---
After IRA, we have:
(insn 116 115 117 6 (set (reg:DI 130 [ D.3288 ])
(mem:DI (plus:SI (reg/v/f:SI 172 [orig:109 __first ] [109])
(const_int 4 [0x4])) [10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46333
--- Comment #22 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Did someone try to bootstrap gcc using CC=suncc CXX='sunCC -library=stlport4'
recently? Is this PR still relevant?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29834
--- Comment #13 from M.S. Babaei ace.of.zerosync at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to James Kanze from comment #9)
Re using the init list syntax: it won't work if you have to be compatible
with other compilers (like Sun CC). Using something like
19 matches
Mail list logo