[Bug fortran/57922] [OOP] Memory leak with allocatable polymorphics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57922 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/46321] [OOP] Polymorphic deallocation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46321 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment 0 has apparently been fixed by r199643. One should check whether the remaining items are also handled correctly already (in particular comments 1 - 3).

[Bug target/57952] New: AVX/AVX2 no ymm registries used in a trivial reduction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57952 Bug ID: 57952 Summary: AVX/AVX2 no ymm registries used in a trivial reduction Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/56937] Unnecessarily temporary with array-vector assignments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56937 --- Comment #12 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #11) A big part is fixed now. Do people think that the case of comment#8 is worth fixing? At least it's worth having one PR open for it

[Bug c++/57880] cp/parser.c: 6 * missing break ?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57880 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Ed?

[Bug c++/57888] using non-type template parameter in constexpr function for non static data member intializer segfaults

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57888 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/57827] compiler segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57827 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||plasmahh

[Bug c++/57892] g++ internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9122 while attempting to brace-initialize a dynamically allocated array class member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57892 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/57897] Target x86_64-w64-mingw32 failed with '-mno-fentry isn't compatible with SEH'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57897 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at

[Bug c++/57901] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Cannot call-by-value such that class has non-trivial (constexpr) move constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57901 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/57926] Atomic functions broken with C++ but not C?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57926 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod

[Bug c++/57938] Compiler breaks when a lambda expression is used as a default parameter in a constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57938 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.0,

[Bug c++/57930] missing destructor call after thrown exception in C++11 list initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57930 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug lto/57602] [4.9 Regression] Runfails for several C/C++ benchmarks from spec2000 for i686 with -flto after r199422

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57602 Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/57948] internal compiler error: in initialize_reference, at cp/call.c:9285

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57948 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/57946] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault in int_fits_type_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57946 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/57947] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault using extended initializer lists without -std=c++11 or -std=gnu++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57947 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug c++/57930] missing destructor call after thrown exception in C++11 list initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57930 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/57510] initializer_list memory leak

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57510 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mmehlich at

[Bug fortran/37336] Fortran 2003: Finish derived-type finalization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336 Bug 37336 depends on bug 55207, which changed state. Bug 55207 Summary: Automatic deallocation of variables declared in the main program http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55207 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/55207] Automatic deallocation of variables declared in the main program

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55207 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/57762] [4.9 Regression] Memory leak in gfortran.dg/class_array_7.f03 after revision 200084

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57762 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/57793] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with bitfields in get_bit_range

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57793 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/57925] discrete_distribution can be improved to O(1) per sampling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57925 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug inline-asm/57950] wrong line numbers in error messages for inline assembler statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57950 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug inline-asm/57950] wrong line numbers in error messages for inline assembler statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57950 --- Comment #4 from Frank Heckenbach f.heckenb...@fh-soft.de --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #3) (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #2) GCC uses the line number of the start of the asm statement, so line 8 is correct.

[Bug testsuite/57591] gcc-4.8 libbacktrace btest failure on Linux ppc64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57591 --- Comment #4 from acrux acrux at linuxmail dot org --- same failure with gcc-4.8-20130718

[Bug libstdc++/57920] [c++11] Linux: std::random_device reads too much from /dev/urandom

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57920 --- Comment #5 from Frank Heckenbach f.heckenb...@fh-soft.de --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #1) Note that in 4.8.x and mainline for modern x86 and x86_64 targets we don't use /dev/urandom at all, we use __x86_rdrand. In general, the

[Bug libstdc++/57920] [c++11] Linux: std::random_device reads too much from /dev/urandom

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57920 --- Comment #6 from Frank Heckenbach f.heckenb...@fh-soft.de --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #3) I'm going to attach a patchlet which does the trick (fread - read) for me. Note I'm on purpose disabling the use of

[Bug libstdc++/57920] [c++11] Linux: std::random_device reads too much from /dev/urandom

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57920 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Agreed, let's just commit the improvement. If/when you become aware of ways to extend the use of builtins to other CPUs / targets, please let me know, thanks.

[Bug inline-asm/57950] wrong line numbers in error messages for inline assembler statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57950 --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #5) The error messages are all generated by the assembler which knows nothing about the source file. It knows the locations passed by

[Bug inline-asm/57950] wrong line numbers in error messages for inline assembler statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57950 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- The error messages are all generated by the assembler which knows nothing about the source file.

[Bug inline-asm/57950] wrong line numbers in error messages for inline assembler statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57950 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- There is no way to know how the newline was written.

[Bug libstdc++/57953] no C++11 compliant std::ios_base::failure found

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57953 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to unixway.drive+gcc from comment #0) §27.5.3 states that ios_base defines ... a class failure derived from system_error. And

[Bug c++/57892] g++ internal compiler error: in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9122 while attempting to brace-initialize a dynamically allocated array class member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57892 --- Comment #4 from morell at cs dot atu.edu --- Thank you! On 07/22/2013 04:55 AM, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57892 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:

[Bug libstdc++/57953] New: no C++11 compliant std::ios_base::failure found

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57953 Bug ID: 57953 Summary: no C++11 compliant std::ios_base::failure found Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/57880] cp/parser.c: 6 * missing break ?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57880 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Maybe he is simply traveling or unable to read email, don't you think? Still, if you want to send a patch to the mailing list, of course it's fine. For a quicker review, I

[Bug c++/54853] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54853 --- Comment #4 from Leonid Volnitsky leonid at volnitsky dot com --- I can not reproduce this ICE with 4.8.1. It is ok to close this bug.

[Bug c++/57926] Atomic functions broken with C++ but not C?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57926 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Macleod amacleod at redhat dot com --- Short answer.. I'm not a sure, but it appears to be a g++ thing. I looks like g++ is using ARRAY_TYPE instead of POINTER_TYPE. the 4.8 branch does the same thing, but it does seem

[Bug c++/57905] braced-init-list allowed in default template-argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57905 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/57811] Wasted work in find_reloads()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57811 --- Comment #4 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu --- Patch sent to gcc-patches@ http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00930.html

[Bug rtl-optimization/57812] Wasted work in computed_jump_p()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57812 --- Comment #3 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu --- Patch sent to gcc-patches@ http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00931.html

[Bug lto/57602] [4.9 Regression] Runfails for several C/C++ benchmarks from spec2000 for i686 with -flto after r199422

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57602 --- Comment #8 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com --- And a testcase from PR57879 fails with -O2 / -O1 and -flto, it happens when building GCC itself.

[Bug lto/57879] GCC with -flto generates invalid code for genmddeps program

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57879 Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/57806] Wasted work in propagate_nothrow()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57806 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/57790] Wasted work in can_move_insns_across()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57790 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/57809] Wasted work in omega_eliminate_red()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57809 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/57803] Wasted work in gfc_build_dummy_array_decl()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57803 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/57920] [c++11] Linux: std::random_device reads too much from /dev/urandom

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57920 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/57880] cp/parser.c: 6 * missing break ?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57880 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #2) Ed? He's had eleven days to think about it and said nothing. I'd be happy to supply the obvious patch.

[Bug target/57949] [powerpc64] Structure parameter alignment issue with vector extensions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57949 --- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- The front end identifies the structure as having the correct alignment. From the 001t.tu dump: @2846 record_type name: @2857size: @127 algn: 128

[Bug target/57954] New: AVX missing vxorps (zeroing) before vcvtsi2s %edx, slow down AVX code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57954 Bug ID: 57954 Summary: AVX missing vxorps (zeroing) before vcvtsi2s %edx, slow down AVX code Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/52816] [C++11] Access to private members inside decltype in the signature of a member template causes access control error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52816 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Let's add the testcase and close the issue as fixed for 4.8.0.

[Bug c++/54853] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54853 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug target/57949] [powerpc64] Structure parameter alignment issue with vector extensions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57949 --- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- The wrong code is introduced during expand. vs.m is computed as mem(plus(virtual-incoming-args, 72)) with the pad at offset 80, v[0..1] at offset 88, and v[2..3] at offset 96.

[Bug lto/57602] [4.9 Regression] Runfails for several C/C++ benchmarks from spec2000 for i686 with -flto after r199422

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57602 Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/57762] [4.9 Regression] Memory leak in gfortran.dg/class_array_7.f03 after revision 200084

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57762 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Jul 22 17:02:26 2013 New Revision: 201137 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=201137root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-07-22 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de

[Bug fortran/57762] [4.9 Regression] Memory leak in gfortran.dg/class_array_7.f03 after revision 200084

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57762 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/52816] [C++11] Access to private members inside decltype in the signature of a member template causes access control error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52816 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/54853] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54853 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/57926] Atomic functions broken with C++ but not C?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57926 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at

[Bug fortran/57906] Coarray components: Assignment optimized away (gfortran.dg/coarray/lib_realloc_1.f90)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57906 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/52052] [Coarray] Properly handle coarray components of derived types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52052 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #0) Intrinsic assignment: Contrary to normal allocatable components, no reallocation is allowed. The programmer guarantees that the shape and

[Bug fortran/52052] [Coarray] Properly handle coarray components of derived types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52052 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Jul 22 17:28:56 2013 New Revision: 201140 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=201140root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-07-22 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de

[Bug fortran/57906] Coarray components: Assignment optimized away (gfortran.dg/coarray/lib_realloc_1.f90)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57906 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Jul 22 17:28:56 2013 New Revision: 201140 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=201140root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-07-22 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de

[Bug c++/57947] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault using extended initializer lists without -std=c++11 or -std=gnu++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57947 --- Comment #2 from Craig Schroeder cas43 at cs dot stanford.edu --- Unfortunately that is because I tried cleaning up the test case some more after reducing it down. How about this: namespace std { template class _E class initializer_list {};

[Bug c++/57947] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault using extended initializer lists without -std=c++11 or -std=gnu++11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57947 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug target/57787] Wasted work in ix86_valid_target_attribute_inner_p() and ix86_pad_returns()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57787 --- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu --- Patch sent to gcc-patches@ http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00941.html

[Bug inline-asm/57950] wrong line numbers in error messages for inline assembler statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57950 --- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #7) There is no way to know how the newline was written. Sorry I don't get this. Could you elaborate? There are some technical

[Bug inline-asm/57950] wrong line numbers in error messages for inline assembler statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57950 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- The assembler only sees literal newlines, it does not know how they were written in the source. The compiler cannot put line directives in the middle of an assembler string by itself

[Bug c++/57926] Atomic functions broken with C++ but not C?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57926 Andrew Macleod amacleod at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug inline-asm/57950] wrong line numbers in error messages for inline assembler statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57950 --- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #9) The assembler only sees literal newlines, it does not know how they were written in the source. Is there other way to generate

[Bug target/57949] [powerpc64] Structure parameter alignment issue with vector extensions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57949 --- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- The problem is target-specific, in config/rs6000/rs6000.c: rs6000_function_arg_boundary(). static unsigned int rs6000_function_arg_boundary (enum machine_mode mode, const_tree type)

[Bug middle-end/56417] internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56417 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 30536 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30536action=edit gcc49-pr56417.patch Untested fix. Though, strlen on function address? Ugh.

[Bug middle-end/57955] New: Uniquization of constants breaks constant alignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57955 Bug ID: 57955 Summary: Uniquization of constants breaks constant alignment Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug inline-asm/57950] wrong line numbers in error messages for inline assembler statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57950 --- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- See the example in the original description.

[Bug middle-end/57955] Uniquization of constants breaks constant alignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57955 David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/57782] Wasted work in remove_path()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57782 --- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu --- Patch sent to gcc-patches@ http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00963.html

[Bug middle-end/57661] [4.9 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in verify_ssa

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57661 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/57955] Uniquization of constants breaks constant alignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57955 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- The subject is very misleading, the alignment of constants is _not_ changed at all, otherwise many things would have been broken. The only change pertains to the internal

[Bug middle-end/57661] [4.9 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in verify_ssa

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57661 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Perhaps if copy_cfg_body saved a pointer to the blocks_to_copy bitmap temporarily into a new field in *id, the copying of clobber stmts could check if for MEM_REF clobbers the SSA_NAME

[Bug c++/57942] g++-4.8.1 tries to instantiate wrong constructor (C++11)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57942 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug c/57956] New: missing 'msgstr' section errors when building

/home/townsend/mesasdk/include -I/home/townsend/mesasdk/include -I../.././gcc/../libdecnumber -I../.././gcc/../libdecnumber/bid -I../libdecnumber -I../.././gcc/../libbacktrace\ -DBASEVER=\4.9.0\ -DDATESTAMP=\ 20130722\ \ -DREVISION=\\ \ -DDEVPHASE=\ (experimental)\ -DPKGVERSION=\(GCC

[Bug middle-end/57955] Uniquization of constants breaks constant alignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57955 --- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org --- The change caused a testcase failure, which was not investigated. I don't understand the comment questionable optimization patterns. Optimizing for size should be controlled by -Os.

[Bug middle-end/57661] [4.9 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in verify_ssa

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57661 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 30537 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30537action=edit gcc49-pr57661.patch Untested fix.

[Bug fortran/57957] New: Double free or corruption (fasttop)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57957 Bug ID: 57957 Summary: Double free or corruption (fasttop) Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug middle-end/57780] Wasted work in subst_dup()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57780 --- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu --- Patch sent to gcc-patches@ http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00970.html

[Bug c++/57958] New: Incorrect code generation in lambda with argument of type reference to template class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57958 Bug ID: 57958 Summary: Incorrect code generation in lambda with argument of type reference to template class Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/57958] Incorrect code generation in lambda with argument of type reference to template class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57958 --- Comment #1 from Tudor Bosman tudorb at fb dot com --- Created attachment 30539 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30539action=edit Source file that exhibits broken behavior

[Bug c++/57958] Incorrect code generation in lambda with argument of type reference to template class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57958 --- Comment #2 from Tudor Bosman tudorb at fb dot com --- g++ -v output (ignore the weird paths): Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=l/f/third-party/centos5.2-native/gcc/gcc-4.7.1/cc6c9dc/bin/g++

[Bug fortran/57957] Double free or corruption (fasttop)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57957 Tao Song songtao.thu at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major

[Bug c++/57926] Atomic functions broken with C++ but not C?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57926 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Macleod amacleod at redhat dot com --- btw, that patch passes bootstrap and a new testcase based on a modified version of the bug report test.