[Bug c++/58188] ICE in gimple_add_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:738

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58188 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at

[Bug c++/58198] duplicate codes generated for variant function and base function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58198 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/58188] ICE in gimple_add_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:738

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58188 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/58199] New: [4.9 regression] ICE in dump_type_inheritance_graph

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58199 Bug ID: 58199 Summary: [4.9 regression] ICE in dump_type_inheritance_graph Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug c++/58178] variant function name was used for user defined constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58178 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- The configure line for the compiler is needed on Solaris as well.

[Bug middle-end/58199] [4.9 regression] ICE in dump_type_inheritance_graph

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58199 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/58188] ICE in gimple_add_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:738

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58188 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/42947] multilib and startup files paths differ on sh4 with -m4 and without -m4 where -m4 is default multilib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42947 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Stubbs ams at gcc dot gnu.org --- With multilibs enabled this is usually the correct behaviour, but I wouldn't have expected this with --disable-multilib.

[Bug c++/58190] FAIL: g++.dg/pr57878.C (test for excess errors) on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58190 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Created attachment 30676 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30676action=edit Obvious patchlet

[Bug c++/58190] FAIL: g++.dg/pr57878.C (test for excess errors) on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58190 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/57843] Polymorphic assignment for derived type is resolved with parent's generic instead of its own

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57843 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/58018] [4.9 Regression] ICE in tree_ssa_unswitch_loops at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58018 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/57393] [4.9 Regression] error: definition in block 4 follows the use / internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393 --- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 58018 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/58018] [4.9 Regression] ICE in tree_ssa_unswitch_loops at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58018 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/57843] [OOP] Polymorphic assignment for derived type is resolved with parent's generic instead of its own

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57843 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Polymorphic assignment for |[OOP] Polymorphic

[Bug middle-end/57393] [4.9 Regression] error: definition in block 4 follows the use / internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at

[Bug fortran/58200] New: Option fcheck is misleadingly located in option descriptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58200 Bug ID: 58200 Summary: Option fcheck is misleadingly located in option descriptions Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug fortran/57843] [OOP] Polymorphic assignment for derived type is resolved with parent's generic instead of its own

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57843 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57798] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Incorrect handling of sum over first dimension of a product of automatic arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57798 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #2) Mikael, this seems to be your area of expertise. Do you have any idea? Hmm, in the dump, D.1917 is initialized to late, just before

[Bug fortran/57798] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Incorrect handling of sum over first dimension of a product of automatic arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57798 Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/57393] [4.9 Regression] error: definition in block 4 follows the use / internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393 --- Comment #13 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #12) Started with r199048. yes, as was pointed out in PR57370 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57370#c2 which

[Bug c++/58190] FAIL: g++.dg/pr57878.C (test for excess errors) on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58190 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Before committing anything, do you have any idea why the testcase isn't simply skipped on darwin10? Because I just built mainline on a darwin12 machine and the testcase is

[Bug fortran/57843] [OOP] Type-bound assignment is resolved to non-polymorphic procedure call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57843 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug tree-optimization/58137] [trunk, ICE] full unroll + AVX2 vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58137 --- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- OK, a slightly improved patch was posted at: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg01099.html

[Bug c++/58190] FAIL: g++.dg/pr57878.C (test for excess errors) on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58190 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #3) Before committing anything, do you have any idea why the testcase isn't simply skipped on darwin10? Because I just built mainline on a

[Bug middle-end/57393] [4.9 Regression] error: definition in block 4 follows the use / internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393 David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc

[Bug c++/58190] FAIL: g++.dg/pr57878.C (test for excess errors) on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58190 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Ok, that makes sense, it simply means that on darwin, at variance with Linux, for -m32 a size_t is an unsigned long instead of an unsigned int, we can simply apply the patchlet

[Bug c++/58190] FAIL: g++.dg/pr57878.C (test for excess errors) on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58190 --- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #5) Ok, that makes sense, it simply means that on darwin, at variance with Linux, for -m32 a size_t is an unsigned long instead of an unsigned

[Bug fortran/57843] [OOP] Type-bound assignment is resolved to non-polymorphic procedure call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57843 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/58190] FAIL: g++.dg/pr57878.C (test for excess errors) on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58190 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/57393] [4.9 Regression] error: definition in block 4 follows the use / internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393 --- Comment #15 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- The fix am about to test (optimize_range_tests can change the ranks...) --- gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c.mp2013-08-20 13:40:45.478290165 +0200 +++ gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c

[Bug middle-end/57393] [4.9 Regression] error: definition in block 4 follows the use / internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/57393] [4.9 Regression] error: definition in block 4 follows the use / internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393 --- Comment #17 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yeah, it fixed a few testcases for me, but it's wrong. :(

[Bug middle-end/58199] [4.9 regression] ICE in dump_type_inheritance_graph

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58199 Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/58190] FAIL: g++.dg/pr57878.C (test for excess errors) on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58190 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.0 |4.8.2 ---

[Bug fortran/57590] [OOP] wrong code with class variables of different shapes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57590 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Bug fortran/57843] [OOP] Type-bound assignment is resolved to non-polymorphic procedure call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57843 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #6) This patch fixes the ordering in gfc_extend_assign and in this way repairs the behavior on the code in comment 3. ... and regtests cleanly.

[Bug fortran/57562] [OOP] Internal compiler error due to extended derived type with PARAMETER attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57562 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/57562] [OOP] Internal compiler error due to extended derived type with PARAMETER attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57562 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #3) Slightly reduced test case. ... is here: type :: Parent integer :: member = 0 end type type, extends(Parent) :: Child end type type(Child),

[Bug c++/58119] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Invalid ambiguous default type conversion with only a single invalid conversion listed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58119 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/57590] [OOP] wrong code with class variables of different shapes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57590 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #3) I think in general it's ok to use the same class container type for all of them, but we should not fix the array spec of the _data component at compile time

[Bug fortran/57590] [OOP] wrong code with class variables of different shapes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57590 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/58201] New: [g++] Undefined reference to `B::B(void const**)'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58201 Bug ID: 58201 Summary: [g++] Undefined reference to `B::B(void const**)' Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug other/58202] New: [graphite] qtcore-4.8* (compiling with glib support):error fatal: glib.h: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58202 Bug ID: 58202 Summary: [graphite] qtcore-4.8* (compiling with glib support):error fatal: glib.h: No such file or directory Product: gcc Version: 4.7.4

[Bug fortran/57590] [OOP] wrong code with class variables of different shapes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57590 --- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #3) (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #0) Every of the 'a' dummy argument should have its own class container type. This means that we have to

[Bug fortran/57590] [OOP] wrong code with class variables of different shapes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57590 --- Comment #7 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #5) (In reply to janus from comment #4) Will check if this survives a regtest. Certainly not! At least we need to check if an as is present at all

[Bug fortran/53655] [F03] default initializer warnings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53655 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/57590] [OOP] wrong code with class variables of different shapes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57590 --- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #5) Index: gcc/fortran/class.c === --- gcc/fortran/class.c (revision 201871) +++

[Bug fortran/57590] [OOP] wrong code with class variables of different shapes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57590 --- Comment #9 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #8) Error: Assumed shape array at (1) must be a dummy argument I suppose s/AS_ASSUMED_SHAPE/AS_DEFERRED/ would do for this case, but the problem

[Bug c++/58201] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Undefined reference to `B::B(void const**)'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58201 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug fortran/57590] [OOP] wrong code with class variables of different shapes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57590 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #9) (In reply to janus from comment #8) Error: Assumed shape array at (1) must be a dummy argument I suppose s/AS_ASSUMED_SHAPE/AS_DEFERRED/ would do

[Bug lto/58203] memset/memcpy are discarded with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58203 --- Comment #1 from kukyakya at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 30679 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30679action=edit Test case

[Bug lto/58203] New: memset/memcpy are discarded with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58203 Bug ID: 58203 Summary: memset/memcpy are discarded with -flto Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto

[Bug fortran/57590] [OOP] wrong code with class variables of different shapes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57590 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #6) The two above need some adjustements at translation stage, which defeats the purpose of generating the class container using front-end structures only.

[Bug c++/58201] [4.9 Regression] Undefined reference to `B::B(void const**)'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58201 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Honza could you please look into this?

[Bug fortran/58204] New: Spurious error when using BOZ literal to set an integer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58204 Bug ID: 58204 Summary: Spurious error when using BOZ literal to set an integer Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/54300] [4.7 Regression] Erroneous optimization causes wrong Neon data management

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54300 Eric Batut eric.batut at allegorithmic dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|4.8.0 |

[Bug other/58197] subversion-1.8.x breaks script contrib/gcc_update

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58197 --- Comment #1 from Winfried Magerl winfried.mag...@t-online.de --- checked some ancient versions of subversion and there was no format-change to URL: since subversion-1.0.0 (2004): ./subversion-1.0.0/subversion/clients/cmdline/info-cmd.c:

[Bug other/58202] [graphite] qtcore-4.8* (compiling with glib support):error fatal: glib.h: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58202 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug middle-end/57393] [4.9 Regression] error: definition in block 4 follows the use / internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393 --- Comment #18 from Easwaran Raman eraman at google dot com --- Could you confirm if the patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg01584.html fix this? I am waiting for someone to review that patch.

[Bug fortran/57904] [4.9 Regression] Bogus(?) invokes undefined behavior warning with Fortran's finalization wrapper (gfortran.dg/class_48.f90)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57904 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c/58205] New: ../../gcc-4.1/gcc/crtstuff.c:323: internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58205 Bug ID: 58205 Summary: ../../gcc-4.1/gcc/crtstuff.c:323: internal compiler error Product: gcc Version: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/58178] variant function name was used for user defined constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58178 --- Comment #9 from chihin ko chihin.ko at oracle dot com --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #8) The configure line for the compiler is needed on Solaris as well. Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/pkg/gnu/bin/g++-4.8.1-5.10

[Bug c++/58198] duplicate codes generated for variant function and base function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58198 --- Comment #2 from chihin ko chihin.ko at oracle dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) For book keeping of what? GCC before 4.7.0 are no longer supported. oracle solstudtio debugger dbx support gnu compiler v4.1 v4.5.2...etc,

[Bug tree-optimization/57370] [4.9 Regression] compiler hangs in reassoc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57370 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug middle-end/57393] [4.9 Regression] error: definition in block 4 follows the use / internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug c++/58201] [4.9 Regression] Undefined reference to `B::B(void const**)'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58201 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/58206] New: [4.9 Regression] AIX bootstrap broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58206 Bug ID: 58206 Summary: [4.9 Regression] AIX bootstrap broken Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug fortran/45076] [OOP] gfortran.dg/dynamic_dispatch_6.f03 ICEs with -fprofile-use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45076 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to janus from comment #3) With 4.7 I get instead of an ICE just the warning: Same with curent 4.8 trunk: dynamic_dispatch_6.f03:66:0: note: Skipping target new_periodic_5th_order

[Bug bootstrap/58206] [4.9 Regression] AIX bootstrap broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58206 David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug bootstrap/58206] [4.9 Regression] AIX bootstrap broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58206 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Most likely related to bug 58201.

[Bug c++/58207] New: ICE in sort_constexpr_mem_initializers due to out of bounds vector access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58207 Bug ID: 58207 Summary: ICE in sort_constexpr_mem_initializers due to out of bounds vector access Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/58143] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58143 --- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- Created attachment 30681 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30681action=edit possible fix This seems to be a possible fix. What do you think of it, Jan?

[Bug c++/58208] New: dequestd::string 32-bit -O3 bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58208 Bug ID: 58208 Summary: dequestd::string 32-bit -O3 bug Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/58207] [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in sort_constexpr_mem_initializers due to out of bounds vector access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58207 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/58208] dequestd::string 32-bit -O3 bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58208 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++

[Bug ada/58151] conflict of writable function parameter in construct with arbitrary order of evaluation is often a spurious error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58151 Anh Vo anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anhvofrcaus at gmail

[Bug ada/58151] conflict of writable function parameter in construct with arbitrary order of evaluation is often a spurious error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58151 --- Comment #2 from David Starner prosfilaes at gmail dot com --- I don't expect any problem from those lines. But it's giving me an error message on those lines when there's an error on an unrelated line. Comment that unrelated line out, and then