http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58903
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58903
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
-fdevirtualize-speculatively was added in r202145 and the ICE occurs in this
revision, but then the ICE disappeared and came back in recent revisions.
Anyway, something for Honza.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58909
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58580
Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58905
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58893
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |preprocessor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58889
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58910
Bug ID: 58910
Summary: std::Tuple_impl is non constexpr when using identical
userdefined structs as type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19831
--- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19831
--- Comment #17 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54327
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58905
--- Comment #2 from Kito Cheng npickito at gmail dot com ---
However older version autoconf use such style to detect,
It will broken some older project when configure with lto.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58911
Bug ID: 58911
Summary: ice in operator[], at vec.h:827
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58911
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
Created attachment 31102
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31102action=edit
gzipped C source code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54327
--- Comment #10 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
Please open a new bugreport - this seems completely unrelated.
Done - # 58911
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58689
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: glisse
Date: Tue Oct 29 13:15:48 2013
New Revision: 204159
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204159root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-10-29 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 31103
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31103action=edit
untested patch
Patch I am testing on x86_64-linux - can you give ppc/ppc64 a try?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19831
--- Comment #19 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: glisse
Date: Tue Oct 29 13:19:08 2013
New Revision: 204160
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204160root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-10-29 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58910
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #3)
Confirmed. The problem appears to show up with the use of mapcs on the
command line. Mine.
sched2 moves this ahead -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58508
--- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
(In reply to Cong Hou from comment #5)
I guess I should add
/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_int } */
to the test case. It is right?
Yes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865
--- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks, Richi -- yes, I'll give this a try later today (lots of meetings in the
way but I'll get to it sooner or later).
Bill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865
--- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58910
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57084
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Oct 29 14:32:13 2013
New Revision: 204163
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204163root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-10-29 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58789
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Oct 29 14:32:13 2013
New Revision: 204163
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204163root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-10-29 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31103|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58789
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10474
--- Comment #12 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I have submitted a different patch that addresses this issue, this
time by splitting live ranges of pseudos representing the formal
parameters of a function. The patch is pending
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58911
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 31105
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31105action=edit
lightly tested patch.
completely untested but appears to fix the problem - Ben,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58911
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 31106
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31106action=edit
autoreduced testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tejohnson at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Oct 29 15:20:10 2013
New Revision: 204164
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204164root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-10-29 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58079
--- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Oct 29 15:44:15 2013
New Revision: 204165
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204165root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2013-08-08 Richard Sandiford
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58079
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58912
Bug ID: 58912
Summary: make_shared value initializes storage space even when
not desired
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
--- Comment #4 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com ---
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:05 AM, tejohnson at google dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58508
--- Comment #7 from Cong Hou congh at google dot com ---
OK. I made a new patch to fix this problem. Waiting to be approved.
thanks,
Cong
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 9d0f4a5..3d9916d 100644
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865
--- Comment #14 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hi Richi,
Passes bootstrap on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu and fixes this test, but breaks
two others:
57,60c57,68
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-96.c scan-tree-dump-times vect
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913
Bug ID: 58913
Summary: Segmentation fault on real128 array
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58914
Bug ID: 58914
Summary: Internal compiler error when using lambdas as default
parameters in static methods
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41488
--- Comment #5 from davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com ---
Alternative approach -- introduce a special forward propagation before or after
the ivopt to get rid of the redundant iv. This propagation needs to propagate
through header phi.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
What operating system? Where did you get gfortran?
Your program works for 4.7.4, 4.8.2, and trunk on
x86_64 FreeBSD
I take it back. Your program does not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913
--- Comment #3 from Rodrigo Rodrigues rrodrigues at poli dot ufrj.br ---
Windows 7 x86
I got gfortran from mingw.
Actually, real128 returns 16 in my machine. It is totally equivalent to 16
here.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu ---
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 07:47:36PM +, rrodrigues at poli dot ufrj.br wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913
--- Comment #3 from Rodrigo Rodrigues
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913
--- Comment #5 from Rodrigo Rodrigues rrodrigues at poli dot ufrj.br ---
There is no compile error. Adding -g for running doesn't show any new
information, just the same:
Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation Fault - invalid memory
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58915
Bug ID: 58915
Summary: [missed optimization] GCC fails to get the loop bound
for some loops.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu ---
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 08:02:08PM +, rrodrigues at poli dot ufrj.br wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913
--- Comment #5 from Rodrigo Rodrigues
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913
--- Comment #7 from Rodrigo Rodrigues rrodrigues at poli dot ufrj.br ---
Here goes the backtrack:
#0 0x in ?? ()
#1 0x0042d483 in output_float_FMT_G_16 (comp_d=optimized out,
zero_flag=optimized out, sign_bit=optimized out,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
--- Comment #5 from tejohnson at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: tejohnson
Date: Tue Oct 29 20:39:49 2013
New Revision: 204178
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204178root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-10-29 Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58793
Bug 58793 depends on bug 58858, which changed state.
Bug 58858 Summary: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_8.f90 fails
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58858
What|Removed |Added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58858
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54236
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Tue Oct 29 20:45:56 2013
New Revision: 204180
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204180root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/54236
* config/sh/sh.md (*addc):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58793
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu ---
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 08:39:15PM +, rrodrigues at poli dot ufrj.br wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913
--- Comment #7 from Rodrigo Rodrigues
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58839
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Oct 29 21:33:29 2013
New Revision: 204184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204184root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/58839
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44350
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Oct 29 21:48:02 2013
New Revision: 204185
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204185root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-10-29 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58858
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #2)
Fixed on trunk.
By the commit r204181
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58858
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #3)
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #2)
Fixed on trunk.
By the commit r204181
Actually, I meant the commit r204177 (even if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53987
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
As of rev 204180 (4.9) this problem still exists.
As far as I understand, the actual root of the problem is that the 'unsigned
char' mem loads into regs are neither sign nor zero
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58839
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Oct 29 21:58:27 2013
New Revision: 204186
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204186root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/58839
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58916
Bug ID: 58916
Summary: Allocation of a class(*) scalar with array source
allowed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58917
Bug ID: 58917
Summary: ICE with allocation of a scalar with array source
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58839
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854
--- Comment #6 from bccheng at android dot com ---
Patch appears to be working:
c012c7ec: e51b3034ldr r3, [fp, #-52] ; 0x34
c012c7f0: e51b203cldr r2, [fp, #-60] ; 0x3c
c012c7f4: e51b0038ldr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58918
Bug ID: 58918
Summary: [4.9 regression] cilk #includes alloc.h
unconditionally, even when not present
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44350
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58857
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried compiling the code of comment 0 with different compilers. Result:
* Cray ftn simply compiled it.
* Portland Group's pgf90 rejected it with the bogus:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58869
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58919
Bug ID: 58919
Summary: run with thread error, until i set -fprofile-arcs flag
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58920
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 31109
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31109action=edit
Simplified testcase
Here's a simplified version of one of the ext_pointer testcases.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58920
Bug ID: 58920
Summary: Overeager optimization based on TREE_THIS_NOTRAP
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913
--- Comment #9 from Rodrigo Rodrigues rrodrigues at poli dot ufrj.br ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #8)
Unfortnately, your trace suggests to me that this is MingW
specific. I can't help beyond this point. Prehaps, ping
the MingW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58920
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The problem is the middle-end treats pointers and references as the same so
sometimes it removes the casting between the pointer type and reference types.
GCC has no representation
-werror
--enable-checking=none --with-gmp=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--with-mpfr=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --with-mpc=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--with-cloog=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131029 (experimental) [trunk revision 204186] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk
79 matches
Mail list logo
