http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57662
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
Fixed according to
2013-08-14 Andrey Belevantsev a...@ispras.ru
PR rtl-optimization/57662
* sel-sched.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58295
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So why don't reject it at
TARGET_LEGITIMATE_COMBINED_INSN/ix86_legitimate_combined_insn
instead of limit at combine phase if it's only benefit for x86 ?
The question sounds
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58868
octoploid at yandex dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||octoploid at yandex dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58868
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58295
--- Comment #12 from Kito Cheng npickito at gmail dot com ---
The question sounds self-contradictory... Anyway, rather than inventing a
new
hook for each problem, let's try to formulate it in terms of existing hooks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58900
--- Comment #3 from nick87720z at gmail dot com ---
Looks like i just did not get something from gcc info book. After short search
for topics about gcc for possible describing of such error i found one
(russian), explicating it by feature to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58900
nick87720z at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58295
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
TARGET_LEGITIMATE_COMBINED_INSN hook is add in r190846
and x86 used it in r190847.
Sure, but you cannot use an x86 hook to reject something for non-x86 arches...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58935
Bug ID: 58935
Summary: cannot install `libcilkrts.la' to a directory not
ending in
/usr/local/gcc_current/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gn
u/
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58925
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58935
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58936
Bug ID: 58936
Summary: wrong Makefile generated when gmp/mpfr/mpc installed
in custom folder
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58936
--- Comment #2 from Liu Jian eoodin at outlook dot com ---
correction:
Makefile I corrected should be SRChost-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc/Makefile
Correction:
GMPLIBS = -lmpc -lmpfr -lgmp
==
GMPLIBS = $HOME/lib/libmpc.a $HOME/lib/libmpfr.a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58936
--- Comment #1 from Liu Jian eoodin at outlook dot com ---
correction:
Makefile I corrected should be SRChost-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc/Makefile
Correction:
GMPLIBS = -lmpc -lmpfr -lgmp
==
GMPLIBS = $HOME/lib/libmpc.a $HOME/lib/libmpfr.a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58595
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58936
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Liu Jian from comment #0)
I configured gcc using:
./configure --prefix=$HOME --with-gmp=$HOME --with-mpfr=$HOME
--with-mpc=$HOME
When I am compiling gcc 4.8.2,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58543
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58595
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 31116
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31116action=edit
reduced testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58901
--- Comment #3 from Martin Husemann martin at netbsd dot org ---
Matt asked for the instruction involved - I think it is this:
(insn 245 244 246 51 (set (mem:HI (reg/v/f:SI 1 %r1 [orig:67 sup ] [67]) [2
*sup_104+0 S2 A16])
(plus:HI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58581
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Oct 31 10:11:49 2013
New Revision: 204249
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204249root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-10-30 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58581
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58932
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58937
Bug ID: 58937
Summary: Preloaded libasan segfaults on unsanitized executables
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56853
g toedt at embl dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||toedt at embl dot de
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56853
--- Comment #4 from g toedt at embl dot de ---
cpu is an Intel Core 2 Duo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58934
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|cris-axis-elf |cris-axis-elf,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58938
Bug ID: 58938
Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] std::exception_ptr is missing
on architectures with incomplete atomic int support
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58929
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm not really sure what we can do here. You need to use -pthread.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58934
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58929
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I suppose we could turn all timed waiting functions into sleeps, and wait()
into an infinite loop, when libpthread is not linked in, but I'd prefer not to
add that complexity.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58932
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58937
--- Comment #1 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com ---
Created attachment 31118
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31118action=edit
Draft patch
Here is a draft patch implementing my proposal.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58934
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|cris-axis-elf,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58937
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Why don't you add __attribute__((constructor)) to __asan_init instead?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51001
Yufeng Zhang yufeng at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58934
chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58932
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Oct 31 12:09:17 2013
New Revision: 204250
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204250root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-10-31 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58466
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Oct 31 12:09:17 2013
New Revision: 204250
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204250root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-10-31 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58934
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58543
--- Comment #10 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ygribov
Date: Thu Oct 31 12:10:01 2013
New Revision: 204251
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204251root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-10-31 Richard Sandiford rsand...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58932
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Oct 31 12:10:20 2013
New Revision: 204252
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204252root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-10-31 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58466
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Oct 31 12:10:20 2013
New Revision: 204252
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204252root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-10-31 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58932
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58466
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58938
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58937
Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31118|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58939
Bug ID: 58939
Summary: Cannot Cross-Build Android Native GCC 4.8 libcpp build
conversion errors
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58934
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 31121
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31121action=edit
arm-none-eabi reduced testcase
./cc1 -O2 -g -mthumb -mcpu=cortex-a9 -mfpu=neon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58938
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So why is this a regression? Does ARM define _GLIBCXX_ATOMIC_BUILTINS_4 but
ATOMIC_INT_LOCK_FREE=1 ? That seems like a bug in those definitions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58701
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
However, I think this is invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58931
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58580
--- Comment #6 from Dodji Seketeli dodji at gcc dot gnu.org ---
A candidate patch was sent to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-10/msg02676.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58938
Rafał Rawicki rafal at rawicki dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rafal at rawicki
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58938
--- Comment #4 from Rafał Rawicki rafal at rawicki dot org ---
(In reply to Rafał Rawicki from comment #3)
This is a regression, because a more specific _GLIBCXX_ATOMIC_BUILTINS_4 was
defined (but is no longer available) and now there is defined
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10474
--- Comment #14 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu Oct 31 13:39:26 2013
New Revision: 204254
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204254root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-10-31 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58934
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu Oct 31 13:39:26 2013
New Revision: 204254
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204254root=gccview=rev
Log:
2013-10-31 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58940
Bug ID: 58940
Summary: [C++11] Bogus error: use of deleted function ...
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58934
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|cris-axis-elf, |cris-axis-elf,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58856
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58941
Bug ID: 58941
Summary: MIPS: value modification on zero-length array
optimized away
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58938
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|rafal at rawicki dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58938
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Rafał Rawicki from comment #3)
This is a regression, because a more specific _GLIBCXX_ATOMIC_BUILTINS_4 was
defined (but is no longer available) and now there is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58162
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Oct 31 14:41:55 2013
New Revision: 204263
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204263root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/58162
* parser.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58901
--- Comment #4 from Martin Husemann martin at netbsd dot org ---
I got a quick lesson in addressing modes for vax ;-)
It seems the mode = HImode passed to the upper functions in the call stack is
the problem - with HImode we can only use index
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Bug 58616 depends on bug 58162, which changed state.
Bug 58162 Summary: [C++11] bogus error: use of deleted function 'constexpr
A::A(const A)'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58162
What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58162
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58938
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Macleod amacleod at redhat dot com ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6)
(In reply to Rafał Rawicki from comment #3)
This is a regression, because a more specific _GLIBCXX_ATOMIC_BUILTINS_4 was
defined
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58942
Bug ID: 58942
Summary: cilkplus internal compiler error: tree check
__sec_reduce_max_ind
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
with: ../configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-4.9 --enable-languages='c
c++ fortran'
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131031 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-O2' '-ftree-vectorize' '-fopenmp' '-std=c99'
'-funroll-loops' '--param' 'max-unroll-times=4' '-c' '-fcilkplus' '-v'
'-mtune
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58834
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Marc, can you prepare a patch?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58925
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58943
Bug ID: 58943
Summary: wrong calculation of indirect structure member
arithmetic via function call
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58134
Sharad Singhai singhai at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58929
--- Comment #3 from Johan Lundberg lundberj at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
I suppose we could turn all timed waiting functions into sleeps, and wait()
into an infinite loop, when libpthread is not linked in,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58929
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I don't think -pthread sets _REENTRANT for all targets, although it might do
for all those where we actually support std::condition_variable.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40196
Sean Santos quantheory at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||quantheory at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58929
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also, some people compile without -pthread then link with -lpthread manually.
We could say that's technically unsupported, but currently it works.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58162
--- Comment #4 from James Dennett james.dennett at gmail dot com ---
Thanks, Jason.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56037
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58687
--- Comment #14 from Max TenEyck Woodbury mtewoodbury at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 31125
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31125action=edit
Patch to postpone __LINE__ evaluation to the end of a # line directive.
Patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58944
Bug ID: 58944
Summary: [4.9 Regression] bogus -Wunused-macros warnings when
compiling Libreoffice
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58929
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58944
octoploid at yandex dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tmsriram at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58945
Bug ID: 58945
Summary: Improve atomic_compare_and_swap*_doubleword pattern
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58945
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58946
Bug ID: 58946
Summary: [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in
operator[], at vec.h:722
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58943
Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58947
Bug ID: 58947
Summary: [OOP] ICE on select type with non-polymorphic
selector
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58948
Bug ID: 58948
Summary: c++0x support for enums in namespaces
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58946
octoploid at yandex dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58946
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to octoploid from comment #1)
Started with r204194.
Yes I expected failures to happen in reassoc due it not being well tested
before and now my patch is forcing the path
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58949
Bug ID: 58949
Summary: libcilkrts will not bootstrap on x86_64 without
libstdc++.i686 32 bit libraries installed
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58925
--- Comment #4 from octoploid at yandex dot com ---
The following patch fixes the issue for me:
diff --git a/libcilkrts/Makefile.am b/libcilkrts/Makefile.am
index f332cfb13de6..40a19787fda7 100644
--- a/libcilkrts/Makefile.am
+++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58946
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58925
--- Comment #5 from Balaji V. Iyer bviyer at gmail dot com ---
Hi,
I just submitted a patch to the gcc-patches mailing list. Can you try
that out?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:02 PM, octoploid at yandex dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58950
Bug ID: 58950
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Missing statement has no effect
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58925
--- Comment #6 from octoploid at yandex dot com ---
(In reply to Balaji V. Iyer from comment #5)
Hi,
I just submitted a patch to the gcc-patches mailing list. Can you try
that out?
Our mails just crossed and I think your patch is fine.
Will
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58925
--- Comment #7 from bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: bviyer
Date: Thu Oct 31 23:55:21 2013
New Revision: 204280
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204280root=gccview=rev
Log:
Fix for PR other/58925
+2013-10-31 Balaji V. Iyer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58951
Bug ID: 58951
Summary: [4.9 regression] cilk build fails due to use of -ldl
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58951
Gerald Pfeifer gerald at pfeifer dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
