http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59554
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59545
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52794
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
I confirm that this PR is fixed by r206070, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-12/msg01811.html and
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-12/msg01813.html.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59536
--- Comment #10 from bin.cheng amker.cheng at gmail dot com ---
The offending loop before IVOPT is like:
bb 350:
# var_index_1889 = PHI 1(924), var_index_983(923)
# var_index.250_1269 = PHI 1(924), var_index.250_1959(923)
if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46991
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59536
bin.cheng amker.cheng at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59536
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
-fno-auto-inc-dec avoids the crash. Dup of #52306?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59536
--- Comment #13 from bin.cheng amker.cheng at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #12)
-fno-auto-inc-dec avoids the crash. Dup of #52306?
It looks like, AFAICT. Only this time it's blocking bootstrap :(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306
--- Comment #23 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
*** Bug 59536 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59536
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59203
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #1)
Thanks for catching, yep, s/t1/t2/ there.
You are welcome.
Not sure why you mean by code rework, looks otherwise clear to me.
I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59555
Bug ID: 59555
Summary: bogus error: template with C linkage with preprocessed
c++ file
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59535
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #32 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Would it be possible to post the fix? TIA.
Committed upstream as
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=196779view=rev
Feel free to commit the exact same change to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #33 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #32)
Would it be possible to post the fix? TIA.
Committed upstream as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #34 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Feel free to commit the exact fix as in ...
Sorry, no write access.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #35 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #34)
Feel free to commit the exact fix as in ...
Sorry, no write access.
Give me 1-2 hours.
Just in case, please verify that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59535
--- Comment #12 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #11)
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #9)
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #5)
I think major problem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50955
--- Comment #20 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to bin.cheng from comment #19)
not about an iv use appearing in memory reference while not marked as
address_p, and can be fixed by revise the existing check
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635
philipp at marek dot priv.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||philipp at marek dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59545
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59436
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I've looked at dozens of the failures, except for one they were all about an
expected TREE_VEC being written as 0s (i.e. ERROR_MARK) in the PCH file, the
one exception was TREE_LIST
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #36 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Give me 1-2 hours.
Just in case, please verify that the patch still works on Mac 10.6
(I don't have access to 10.6)
Already done: see comment 27. Anyway, I guarantee a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59556
Bug ID: 59556
Summary: Floating-point __sec_reduce_add tests not robust in
face of contraction
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635
--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to philipp from comment #4)
I have this or a very similar problem with debian amd64 4:4.8.2-1:
main.c: In function ‘main’:
main.c:1231:23: error: ‘rv’ may be used
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306
--- Comment #24 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
So where does that leave us? Disable -fauto-inc-dec by default, or try to make
m68k work with LRA (which hopefully should avoid this reload bug)?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59557
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59557
Bug ID: 59557
Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635
--- Comment #6 from philipp at marek dot priv.at ---
I'm trying to get a minimized file via creduce.
In case you have an experienced guess please look at src/main.c from
github.com:ClusterLabs/booth.git
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59557
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chris at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635
--- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to philipp from comment #6)
I'm trying to get a minimized file via creduce.
In case you have an experienced guess please look at src/main.c from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635
--- Comment #9 from philipp at marek dot priv.at ---
Created attachment 31480
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31480action=edit
main.c
not much use because of includes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635
--- Comment #8 from philipp at marek dot priv.at ---
I forgot to say that the uninitialized rv is in query_get_string_answer().
I've got a reduced main.c - but sadly there are still includes to other files,
so it won't help that much.
I'll
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59558
Bug ID: 59558
Summary: [MSP430-gcc] CPU setup, pre start program
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635
--- Comment #10 from philipp at marek dot priv.at ---
Well, I've found the culprit, so it's not that important to me anymore.
Getting a completely wrong code location is the problem - you don't know what
to fix, and have to do some kind of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59387
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306
--- Comment #26 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
What does that mean, it's too late?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59387
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Seems it is SCCP that breaks this.
We have a loop like:
bb 4:
c.2_10 = (unsigned char) c_lsm.11_20;
_11 = c.2_10 + 255;
c.3_12 = (char) _11;
_14 = b_f1_lsm.12_7 + 1;
bb 5:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306
bin.cheng amker.cheng at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker.cheng at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59387
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note already the chrec is {c_lsm.11_15, +, -1}_2 with char type everywhere (but
the 2 which is int, but that is irrelevant), so the information that the
decrement was performed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38183
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59519
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47016
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Any reason to keep this PR open?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18135
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Posted more than three years ago:
Andrew,
Do you still see this issue with current gcc trunk since...
Any reason to keep this PR open?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59519
bin.cheng amker.cheng at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker.cheng at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59413
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59557
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59543
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38183
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
Works on Linux/x86-64 with GCC 4.8.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59542
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #37 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #36)
Give me 1-2 hours.
Just in case, please verify that the patch still works on Mac 10.6
(I don't have access to 10.6)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59541
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59559
Bug ID: 59559
Summary: ICE: invalid RTX sharing in expmed.c:expand_divmod
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59535
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59528
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The reason I added this verification is that code does not expect those to
appear at non-outermost handled-component. a V_C_E around a vector type
B_F_R should have been split into
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59527
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59521
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59516
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59493
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59515
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58344
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59512
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59469
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59511
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59510
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560
Bug ID: 59560
Summary: Resolution generic procedure of derived types fail
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59501
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59496
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59494
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560
--- Comment #1 from klaas_giesbertz at hotmail dot com ---
Sorry, the 2nd argument of Init of UseBase in the 1st test should have been
target instead of pointer. In that case 'program Test' becomes the same as in
the 2nd test.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59561
Bug ID: 59561
Summary: [4.9 Regression] warning: iteration 4 invokes
undefined behavior
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59561
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59285
Yufeng Zhang yufeng at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yufeng at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59557
--- Comment #2 from Chris Jefferson chris at bubblescope dot net ---
Investigating
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59519
--- Comment #4 from bin.cheng amker.cheng at gmail dot com ---
First clue.
b_lsm.11_13 is recognized as chrec {1, +, 1}_2 with the patch, thus the loop
can be vectorized now.
bb 5:
bb 6:
# b.4_30 = PHI b.4_12(5), 1(12)
# prephitmp_28 =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59557
--- Comment #3 from Chris Jefferson chris at bubblescope dot net ---
Can I just confirm I am testing this code correctly?
caj@caj-laptop ~/Downloads g++ BVH_Example.cpp -O0
caj@caj-laptop ~/Downloads ./a.out
Brute force distance = 0.00428018,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59562
Bug ID: 59562
Summary: __builtin_assume_aligned loses constness when used as
initializer element
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59557
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Chris Jefferson from comment #3)
Can I just confirm I am testing this code correctly?
caj@caj-laptop ~/Downloads g++ BVH_Example.cpp -O0
caj@caj-laptop ~/Downloads
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52306
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54694
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52370
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58746
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59115
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58007
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59198
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59414
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59224
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59513
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59561
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58007
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59559
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58410
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58344
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59115
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58746
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo