[Bug c++/61653] New: Warning 'literal-suffix' is not suppressed by gcc pragma

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61653 Bug ID: 61653 Summary: Warning 'literal-suffix' is not suppressed by gcc pragma Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/61654] New: [4.9.1] ICE in release_function_body, at cgraph.c:1699

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61654 Bug ID: 61654 Summary: [4.9.1] ICE in release_function_body, at cgraph.c:1699 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/39612] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] LIM inserts loads from uninitialized local memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39612 Bug 39612 depends on bug 61607, which changed state. Bug 61607 Summary: DOM missed jump threading and destroyed loops https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61607 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/61607] DOM missed jump threading and destroyed loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61607 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/61654] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in release_function_body, at cgraph.c:1699

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61654 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/61628] A program that reads from a file with stream access and uses pack() suddenly stops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61628 --- Comment #7 from Arjen Markus arjen.markus895 at gmail dot com --- Hi Jerry, no, it does not - it should have printed all values in the array (matrix) that are not 1, the first one thousand elements and finally it should have printed Done.

[Bug bootstrap/61320] [4.10 regression] ICE in jcf-parse.c:1622 (parse_class_file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61320 --- Comment #46 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- After expand, the newly created 16bit big endian load becomes: (insn 688 687 689 (set (reg:HI 482) (mem:HI (reg/v/f:SI 189 [ ptr ]) [0 MEM[base: ptr_110, offset: 0B]+0 S2 A8]))

[Bug middle-end/61654] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in release_function_body, at cgraph.c:1699

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61654 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth

[Bug c++/61655] New: Copy constructor not called on CRTP schema

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61655 Bug ID: 61655 Summary: Copy constructor not called on CRTP schema Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug driver/60968] [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap fails on mingw32 with -dumpspecs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60968 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c++/61655] Copy constructor not called on CRTP schema

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61655 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Try -fno-elide-constructors. Why would you want a copy? Is it because of the parentheses in the return statement that you expect elision not to be performed?

[Bug c++/61655] Copy constructor not called on CRTP schema

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61655 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/61633] AArch64 SISD ASHR instruction split clobbers input register.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61633 --- Comment #1 from mshawcroft at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mshawcroft Date: Mon Jun 30 07:54:59 2014 New Revision: 212137 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212137root=gccview=rev Log: [AArch64] Fix register clobber in,

[Bug middle-end/57541] [Cilkplus]: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7809

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57541 --- Comment #10 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kyukhin Date: Mon Jun 30 08:14:39 2014 New Revision: 212138 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212138root=gccview=rev Log: PR middle-end/57541 gcc/c/ *

[Bug target/52268] tls support should be added for darwin11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268 --- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia from comment #8) Seems to work to me in gcc-4.6: TLS _is_ supported on Darwin by means of emutls (emulation using pthreads interfaces). This

[Bug c++/61655] Copy constructor not called on CRTP schema

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61655 --- Comment #3 from Fabien Picarougne fabien.picarou...@univ-nantes.fr --- This code is minimal and is just here to illustrate the problem, I use a more complex one to handle generic matrix. But The copy constructor here is not neutral, there is

[Bug rtl-optimization/60947] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Unable to handle kernel paging request (linux kernel 2.6.28.9) with gcc 4.9 release

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60947 --- Comment #19 from YuFan yufan8.chen at gmail dot com --- After patching the memset.S, it works correctly. Thanks a lot.

[Bug middle-end/57541] [Cilkplus]: internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7809

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57541 --- Comment #11 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kyukhin Date: Mon Jun 30 08:22:43 2014 New Revision: 212139 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212139root=gccview=rev Log: PR middle-end/57541 gcc/c/ *

[Bug c++/61655] Copy constructor not called on CRTP schema

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61655 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Look up copy elision (the wikipedia article will do).

[Bug target/61637] C++ program does not catch exceptions on AIX 7.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61637 --- Comment #13 from Krishnamoorthy C chandrakm at hotmail dot com --- (In reply to Krishnamoorthy C from comment #12) (In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #11) I tested a corrected version of your example with both G++ 4.8.1 from

[Bug tree-optimization/61518] [4.10 Regression] wrong code (by tree vectorizer) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61518 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Isn't this fixed now?

[Bug tree-optimization/61517] [4.10 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61517 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- Isn't this fixed now?

[Bug tree-optimization/61517] [4.10 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61517 thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/61656] New: Undefined behavior in classify_argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61656 Bug ID: 61656 Summary: Undefined behavior in classify_argument Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug rtl-optimization/61657] New: Undefined behavior in loop-iv.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61657 Bug ID: 61657 Summary: Undefined behavior in loop-iv.c Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug ipa/61160] [4.9/4.10 Regression] wrong code with -O3 (or ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed: edge points to wrong declaration)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61160 christophe.lyon at st dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||christophe.lyon at st dot

[Bug driver/60968] [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap fails on mingw32 with -dumpspecs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60968 --- Comment #8 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) So fixed? yes.

[Bug driver/60968] [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap fails on mingw32 with -dumpspecs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60968 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/61633] AArch64 SISD ASHR instruction split clobbers input register.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61633 --- Comment #2 from mshawcroft at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mshawcroft Date: Mon Jun 30 11:58:18 2014 New Revision: 212143 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212143root=gccview=rev Log: [AArch64] Fix register clobber in,

[Bug target/61616] Internal compiler error during reload in gcc-4.7.4 configured as a cross-compiler for a mips target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61616 niva at niisi dot msk.ru changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.1 --- Comment #4 from

[Bug target/61633] AArch64 SISD ASHR instruction split clobbers input register.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61633 mshawcroft at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/61214] [4.9/4.10 regression] Weird interaction between -fvisibility-inlines-hidden, inline virtuals and devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61214 Vadim Zeitlin vz-gcc at zeitlins dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vz-gcc at

[Bug c++/61488] [4.9 regression] Regression in template argument substitution in 4.9+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61488 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 30 12:36:37 2014 New Revision: 212145 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212145root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/61488 * pt.c

[Bug c++/61500] [4.8/4.9 Regression][C++11] Can't take pointer to member referenced via member pointer template parameter.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61500 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 30 12:36:28 2014 New Revision: 212144 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212144root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/61500 * tree.c (lvalue_kind): Handle

[Bug c/58286] Need option to make incompatible pointer type warnings into compiler errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58286 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/61658] New: Invalid std::string(size_type, value_type) constructor implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61658 Bug ID: 61658 Summary: Invalid std::string(size_type, value_type) constructor implementation Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/61658] Invalid std::string(size_type, value_type) constructor implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61658 --- Comment #1 from __vic d.v.a at ngs dot ru --- If replace with: std::string st(1U, '0'); then prints as expected: 1 0 Why {1U, '0'} is treated as std::initializer_listchar ?

[Bug c++/61647] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] internal compiler error: in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:219 for a c++ header, clang++ 3.4 generate .pch without error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61647 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/61639] GCC 4.7.4 can't longer compile clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61639 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/61634] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1423

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61634 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c++/58845] Operator || and broken for vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58845 --- Comment #22 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #21) One argument against the sequence point is that we don't have one for ?: . If we add one for ?: several testcases regress, so we have to

[Bug libstdc++/61658] Invalid std::string(size_type, value_type) constructor implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61658 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/51253] [C++11][DR 1030] Evaluation order (sequenced-before relation) among initializer-clauses in braced-init-list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51253 --- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 30 14:25:21 2014 New Revision: 212150 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212150root=gccview=rev Log: DR 1030 PR c++/51253 PR c++/61382

[Bug c++/61382] parameter pack expansion unexpected order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61382 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 30 14:25:21 2014 New Revision: 212150 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212150root=gccview=rev Log: DR 1030 PR c++/51253 PR c++/61382 *

[Bug c++/61488] [4.9 regression] Regression in template argument substitution in 4.9+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61488 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/61659] New: Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659 Bug ID: 61659 Summary: Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/61500] [4.8/4.9 Regression][C++11] Can't take pointer to member referenced via member pointer template parameter.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61500 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 30 15:05:32 2014 New Revision: 212152 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212152root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/61500 * tree.c (lvalue_kind): Handle

[Bug c++/61659] Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659 --- Comment #1 from Rafael Avila de Espindola rafael.espindola at gmail dot com --- The undefined is still present with -fno-devirtualize-speculatively.

[Bug c++/61539] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: in unify_one_argument, at cp/pt.c:15465

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61539 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 30 15:11:14 2014 New Revision: 212154 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212154root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/61539 * pt.c (unify_one_argument):

[Bug ipa/61555] [4.9/4.10 Regression] LLVM build failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61555 Rafael Avila de Espindola rafael.espindola at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/61659] Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- I don't see why you think this is a bug. parserint::getOption will be part of the vtable of PassNameParser anyways.

[Bug c++/61659] Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Oh I see it, it is declared inside the template.

[Bug ipa/61659] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug ipa/61659] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659 --- Comment #4 from Rafael Avila de Espindola rafael.espindola at gmail dot com --- I ran the testcase with just -O2 (original code with -O3, but the reduced testcase with -O2). getOption will be part of the vtable, but it can end up being

[Bug c++/61660] New: static_assert triggering when it should not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61660 Bug ID: 61660 Summary: static_assert triggering when it should not Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/51400] [c++0x] ICE with constexpr and attribute noreturn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51400 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Jun 30 15:41:16 2014 New Revision: 212155 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212155root=gccview=rev Log: /c-family 2014-06-30 Paolo Carlini

[Bug c++/51400] [c++0x] ICE with constexpr and attribute noreturn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51400 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 51400, which changed state. Bug 51400 Summary: [c++0x] ICE with constexpr and attribute noreturn https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51400 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/61637] C++ program does not catch exceptions on AIX 7.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61637 David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug c++/61539] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: in unify_one_argument, at cp/pt.c:15465

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61539 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 30 15:58:58 2014 New Revision: 212156 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212156root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/61539 * pt.c (unify_one_argument):

[Bug c++/61500] [4.8/4.9 Regression][C++11] Can't take pointer to member referenced via member pointer template parameter.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61500 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/61566] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in write_unscoped_name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61566 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/61660] static_assert triggering when it should not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61660 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- That's not how static_assert works.

[Bug c++/61539] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: in unify_one_argument, at cp/pt.c:15465

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61539 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/61660] static_assert triggering when it should not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61660 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/51849] -Wc99-compat would be considered useful

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51849 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug ipa/61659] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug ipa/61659] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/57233] Vector lowering of LROTATE_EXPR pessimizes code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57233 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jun 30 16:56:01 2014 New Revision: 212158 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212158root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-06-30 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com

[Bug c++/61660] static_assert triggering when it should not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61660 --- Comment #3 from Udo Steinberg us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de --- Created attachment 33035 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33035action=edit Testcase 2 Then, similar to this new test case, I would expect something like

[Bug tree-optimization/61299] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Performance regression for the SIMD rotate operation with GCC vector extensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61299 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jun 30 16:56:01 2014 New Revision: 212158 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212158root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-06-30 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com

[Bug tree-optimization/61299] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Performance regression for the SIMD rotate operation with GCC vector extensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61299 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/57233] Vector lowering of LROTATE_EXPR pessimizes code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57233 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/61637] C++ program does not catch exceptions on AIX 7.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61637 --- Comment #15 from Krishnamoorthy C chandrakm at hotmail dot com --- Thanks for the info. Sorry, the original intent was to generate a shared lib hence the shared options, but i have moved the code to generate executable program, but the

[Bug ipa/61659] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat

[Bug c++/61660] static_assert triggering when it should not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61660 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Udo Steinberg from comment #3) Created attachment 33035 [details] Testcase 2 Then, similar to this new test case, I would expect something like the following:

[Bug c++/61539] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: in unify_one_argument, at cp/pt.c:15465

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61539 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 30 17:30:22 2014 New Revision: 212161 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212161root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/61539 * pt.c (unify_one_argument):

[Bug c++/61539] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: in unify_one_argument, at cp/pt.c:15465

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61539 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/61647] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] internal compiler error: in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:219 for a c++ header, clang++ 3.4 generate .pch without error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61647 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/52268] tls support should be added for darwin11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268 --- Comment #10 from Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia jeremyhu at macports dot org --- Ah, gotcha. In that case, please retitle as well to indicate such. Prior to gcc-4.5, even support via emutls was not available on darwin, so some people in

[Bug c++/61660] static_assert triggering when it should not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61660 --- Comment #5 from Udo Steinberg us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) That is still correct s is not a constant expression. Yes, I'm saying a similar warning should be emitted for x.

[Bug c++/61660] static_assert triggering when it should not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61660 --- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Udo Steinberg from comment #5) Yes, I'm saying a similar warning should be emitted for x. No it should not, you are using x and s in completely different ways.

[Bug c++/61661] New: [C++11][4.9/4.10 Regression] Bogus error: ‘const Outer::Foo{Outer::Bar}’ is not a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61661 Bug ID: 61661 Summary: [C++11][4.9/4.10 Regression] Bogus error: ‘const Outer::Foo{Outer::Bar}’ is not a constant expression Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug target/52268] native tls support should be added for darwin11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268 --- Comment #11 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed title to reflect that this is for native tls.

[Bug c++/54891] [C++11] lambda-expression and explicit type conversion (cast notation)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54891 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Jun 30 18:30:50 2014 New Revision: 212162 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212162root=gccview=rev Log: /cp 2014-06-30 Paolo Carlini

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 54891, which changed state. Bug 54891 Summary: [C++11] lambda-expression and explicit type conversion (cast notation) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54891 What|Removed

[Bug c++/54891] [C++11] lambda-expression and explicit type conversion (cast notation)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54891 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/61647] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] internal compiler error: in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:219 for a c++ header, clang++ 3.4 generate .pch without error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61647 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 30 18:44:24 2014 New Revision: 212163 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212163root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/61647 * pt.c

[Bug c++/61566] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in write_unscoped_name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61566 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 30 18:51:29 2014 New Revision: 212165 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212165root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/61566 * mangle.c

[Bug c++/61566] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in write_unscoped_name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61566 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 30 18:52:39 2014 New Revision: 212166 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212166root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/61566 * mangle.c

[Bug c++/61647] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] internal compiler error: in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:219 for a c++ header, clang++ 3.4 generate .pch without error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61647 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 30 18:52:45 2014 New Revision: 212167 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212167root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/61647 * pt.c

[Bug c++/61566] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in write_unscoped_name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61566 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/61647] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] internal compiler error: in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:219 for a c++ header, clang++ 3.4 generate .pch without error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61647 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jun 30 19:09:57 2014 New Revision: 212168 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212168root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/61647 * pt.c

[Bug c++/61647] [4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] internal compiler error: in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:219 for a c++ header, clang++ 3.4 generate .pch without error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61647 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c/53662] Cannot build static gcc on i686 linux gnu with -m64 support.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53662 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/36299] spurious and undocumented warning with -Waddress for a == 0 when a is an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36299 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug c/39433] ICE on header file conflict with -fstack-protector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39433 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/61608] [4.10 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/arm/epilog-1.c scan-assembler tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61608 --- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rth Date: Mon Jun 30 20:14:42 2014 New Revision: 212172 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212172root=gccview=rev Log: PR rtl-opt/61608 PR target/39284 *

[Bug middle-end/39284] Computed gotos combined too aggressively

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39284 --- Comment #15 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rth Date: Mon Jun 30 20:14:42 2014 New Revision: 212172 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212172root=gccview=rev Log: PR rtl-opt/61608 PR target/39284

[Bug c++/61648] g++ accepts literal operator friends for non-template classes but not for *template* classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61648 Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw4rd at verizon dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||3dw4rd at

  1   2   >