https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61913
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
It seems quite a major deficiency if we are going to keep adding warnings to
LTO, which are never tested and there is a high chance they are not working
at all. Is there a PR about
It seems quite a major deficiency if we are going to keep adding warnings to
LTO, which are never tested and there is a high chance they are not working
at all. Is there a PR about it? Is Jan or someone else working on it?
I don't know about such PR. Neither do I know whether Jan's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61913
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibá??ez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #5)
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibá??ez from comment #4)
It is pretty strange that you need a Var() if it is not used anywhere.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61913
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61913
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibá??ez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #5)
(In reply to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61938
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
array[selectvector[i]]
is not handled.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61923
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33200
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33200action=edit
original testcase
The issue is more visible with the original attached
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61942
Bug ID: 61942
Summary: loop-iv.c:2272 signed integer overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61943
Bug ID: 61943
Summary: tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:4148 signed integer overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61944
Bug ID: 61944
Summary: loop-iv.c:2610 signed integer overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61123
--- Comment #8 from xuepeng guo xguo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: xguo
Date: Tue Jul 29 07:11:02 2014
New Revision: 213147
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213147root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/c-family/
2014-07-29 Terry Guo terry@arm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61945
Bug ID: 61945
Summary: tree check fail with -Woverloaded-virtual
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60037
--- Comment #11 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch posted.
I must have been nuts.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61320
--- Comment #63 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #62 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
[...]
With the patch, SPARC bootstrap concluded on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61946
Bug ID: 61946
Summary: rope construction, passing allocator referenct without
const
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61938
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61946
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61712
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61544
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55035
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.10.0
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61947
Bug ID: 61947
Summary: Ambiguous calls when constructing std::tuple
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54664
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52478
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 29 11:10:49 2014
New Revision: 213153
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213153root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-07-29 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61948
Bug ID: 61948
Summary: [ARM] [4.9 regression] ICE with DImode shift by 1 bit
(in copyprop_hardreg_forward_1)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61875
--- Comment #4 from charles.barcza at blackpanther dot hu ---
Hi,
Confirmed this problem but the follow post solved libsanitizer problem:
Comment #3 from Tatiana Udalova t.udalova at samsung dot com ---
You can fix problem in Tizen via
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61948
cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61868
Bingfeng Mei bmei at broadcom dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|driver |lto
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725
--- Comment #8 from Marat Zakirov m.zakirov at samsung dot com ---
UPDATE
Using little fix you may got a much better code...
transpose_16x16:
.fnstart
@ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0
@ frame_needed = 0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61947
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725
--- Comment #9 from Marat Zakirov m.zakirov at samsung dot com ---
I used following patch
diff --git a/gcc/cse.c b/gcc/cse.c
index 34f9364..a9e0442 100644
--- a/gcc/cse.c
+++ b/gcc/cse.c
@@ -2862,6 +2862,9 @@ canon_reg (rtx x, rtx insn)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61734
--- Comment #10 from Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com ---
Thanks for the fix!
Is there any reason for ABS_EXPR detection for not working on 64bit target for
the same test? The only difference should be the long long type size. How
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61947
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33203
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33203action=edit
proposed patch
Add std::allocator_arg_t parameter to unary _Head_base constructors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61949
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61929
--- Comment #4 from Charles Greathouse gcc at crg4 dot com ---
I now have a testcase for failure with -floop-parallelize-all (without
-fcheck-data-deps). I believe this is the same bug, or at least related,
because this testcase also fails with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61949
Bug ID: 61949
Summary: [4.10 regression] SEGV compiling
gcc.dg/pch/import-[12].c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61950
Bug ID: 61950
Summary: [4.10 regression] Many 64-bit fortran allocate tests
FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61950
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61951
Bug ID: 61951
Summary: -wExtra switch produce warning: parameter 'ptr' set
but not used [-Wunused-but-set-parameter]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60652
Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61734
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Is there any reason for ABS_EXPR detection for not working on 64bit target
for the same test?
It is probably visible in the .original dump.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61947
Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61952
Bug ID: 61952
Summary: ICE allocattion of array of type of type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61948
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61734
--- Comment #12 from Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com ---
Before your last fix both 32bit and 64bit versions of .original look similar
except a condition. We have (a - b 0) for 64 bit and (a b) for 32bit.
64bit version (before and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60652
--- Comment #2 from Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: charlet
Date: Tue Jul 29 14:46:27 2014
New Revision: 213201
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213201root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-07-29 Robert Dewar de...@adacore.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61114
Alan Lawrence alan.lawrence at arm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60037
--- Comment #12 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: emsr
Date: Tue Jul 29 14:56:45 2014
New Revision: 213207
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213207root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-07-29 Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw...@verizon.net
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61953
Bug ID: 61953
Summary: [C++11] The template parameter pack of a function
template should be the last template parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61885
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61734
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Before your last fix both 32bit and 64bit versions of .original look similar
except a condition. We have (a - b 0) for 64 bit and (a b) for 32bit.
That's obsolete though,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61954
Bug ID: 61954
Summary: Ada fails to properly pass pointer arguments on x32
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61914
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Jul 29 15:19:22 2014
New Revision: 213213
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213213root=gccview=rev
Log:
Replace strtok with strtoken
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61914
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955
Bug ID: 61955
Summary: libsanitizer fails to compile on RHEL4
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61955
--- Comment #1 from Bruce Adams tortoise_74 at yahoo dot co.uk ---
configuring with --disable-libsantizer progresses the build but it fails later
on linking cilk. See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61956
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61956
Bug ID: 61956
Summary: problem links cilk on RHEL4
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61956
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Can you try a newer binutils?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60037
emsr at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60037
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes, OK for 4.9 - thanks again
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61947
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Jul 29 17:30:34 2014
New Revision: 213221
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213221root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/61947
* include/std/tuple
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61946
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Jul 29 17:30:25 2014
New Revision: 213220
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213220root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/61946
* include/ext/rope
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61947
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.10.0
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61946
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed on trunk so far
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61958
--- Comment #1 from Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe at redhat dot com ---
Created attachment 33207
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33207action=edit
gzipped .i file for the good case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61958
Bug ID: 61958
Summary: function arbitrarily placed in .text.unlikely section
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61938
--- Comment #3 from harmeeksingh at gmail dot com ---
#include stdio.h
#define VEC 1024
typedef long int int64;
typedef int int32;
void foo (int arraysize,
int *__restrict result,
int *__restrict
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61938
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Please show what you would like the code to look like after vectorization.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61958
--- Comment #2 from Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe at redhat dot com ---
I see a similar issue with another patch to a different kernel file:
diff --git a/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c b/net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c
index b10cd43a..40c275f 100644
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61958
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Josh Poimboeuf from comment #2)
This results in fib_info_hashfn() no longer being inlined (despite its
static inline directive), and being placed in .text.unlikely.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61844
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61959
Bug ID: 61959
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when
building Mozilla code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61958
Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61959
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
See file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.7/README.Bugs for instructions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61959
--- Comment #2 from Botond Ballo botond at mozilla dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
See file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.7/README.Bugs for instructions.
Here is the output of g++ -v:
Using built-in specs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61959
Botond Ballo botond at mozilla dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.7.3 |4.9.0
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61959
--- Comment #4 from Botond Ballo botond at mozilla dot com ---
Reduced code that triggers the ICE:
template class T, class Sub, class Coord
struct BasePoint {
Coord x, y;
constexpr BasePoint(Coord aX, Coord aY) : x(aX), y(aY) {}
};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61954
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
Ada seems to use a struct for pointers, something
like
struct pointer
{
void *p;
void *b;
};
But it fails to properly zero-extend pointers when calling
C functions:
[hjl@gnu-6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60037
--- Comment #15 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: emsr
Date: Wed Jul 30 00:25:17 2014
New Revision: 213231
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=213231root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-07-29 Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw...@verizon.net
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61954
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
Maybe Ada fails to tell the backend that a parameter is a pointer:
[hjl@gnu-6 tmp]$ cat p2.c
struct pointer
{
int p;
int b;
};
extern void bar (int p);
void
xxx (struct pointer p)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61959
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61958
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
80 matches
Mail list logo
