https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62231
--- Comment #2 from manfred.rudigier at omicron dot at ---
I've built 4.9.2 today and can also confirm that it is working with this
version, so it seems the bug has already been fixed in newer GCC versions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63470
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57353
--- Comment #2 from Roland Stigge stigge at antcom dot de ---
Yes, me neither. Consider it gone. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61634
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 27 09:33:32 2014
New Revision: 218113
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218113root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-27 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62173
Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61634
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63994
--- Comment #7 from Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6)
I see. I mainly wonder because of LTO which can combine TUs from C
and Ada and because for example both Fortran and Ada define
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64091
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
We have this debug bind statement:
# DEBUG b = NULL
then we iterate on its SSA_OP_USEs, but USE_FROM_PTR is a debug_expr_decl
(D#1), not a ssa_name.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63704
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63704
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 27 09:51:32 2014
New Revision: 218114
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218114root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-27 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64083
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 27 09:57:13 2014
New Revision: 218115
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218115root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-27 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64083
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63671
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64091
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59593
--- Comment #5 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Thu Nov 27 11:00:15 2014
New Revision: 218118
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218118root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-27 Thomas Preud'homme thomas.preudho...@arm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64091
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Same issue on the 4.9 and 4.8 branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64025
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 27 11:02:02 2014
New Revision: 218119
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218119root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR lto/64025
* alias.c (find_base_term):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64024
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 27 11:03:12 2014
New Revision: 218120
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218120root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/64024
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64067
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 27 11:04:16 2014
New Revision: 218121
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218121root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/64067
* expr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64093
Bug ID: 64093
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE error: unrecognizable insn with
-mcpu=cell
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64093
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Try this patch:
Index: rs6000.md
===
--- rs6000.md(revision 218072)
+++ rs6000.md(working copy)
@@ -2644,7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64094
Bug ID: 64094
Summary: No such file or directory - No such file
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64093
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
Try this patch:
Index: rs6000.md
===
--- rs6000.md (revision
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64093
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Only to hit another issue:
arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:208:1: error: unrecognizable insn:
}
^
(insn 53 52 54 6 (set (reg:DI 213 [ bits ])
(and:DI (reg/v:DI 180 [
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64093
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64088
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64087
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64086
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64074
Florian Miedniak florian.miedniak at web dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62173
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014, jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62173
Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62173
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62173
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64094
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63904
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Nov 27 12:56:58 2014
New Revision: 218122
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218122root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/63904
* g++.dg/cpp0x/pr63904.C: New.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63904
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Thu Nov 27 13:02:45 2014
New Revision: 218123
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218123root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-27 Kai Tietz kti...@redhat.com
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 63904, which changed state.
Bug 63904 Summary: ICE when accessing array member of constexpr struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63904
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63904
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62173
--- Comment #15 from Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #14)
I'd be happy to approve such a change - maybe you can check if
it helps you and whether it passes testing and enough benchmarks?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64094
Harald van Dijk harald at gigawatt dot nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
--- Comment #16 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Thu Nov 27 13:58:35 2014
New Revision: 218126
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218126root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-13 Thomas Preud'homme thomas.preudho...@arm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64094
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
No such file or directory is a familiar, recognizable error message, and is
automatically translated through libc. Is the required complexity for this
special case really worth it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846
--- Comment #17 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Thu Nov 27 14:10:10 2014
New Revision: 218127
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218127root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-27 Thomas Preud'homme thomas.preudho...@arm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63851
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64094
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
My preference would be a gnulib/glibc/libiberty function that all GNU utilities
could use to give more precise error messages (open_strerror(int errnum, int
flags)?). Then,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64088
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Nov 27 14:22:29 2014
New Revision: 218128
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218128root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-27 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64088
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64091
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63424
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63634
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62178
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64009
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64011
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64095
Bug ID: 64095
Summary: [C++14] Ellipsis at end of generic lambda
parameter-declaration-clause should be parsed as a
parameter pack
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573
--- Comment #25 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There's updated version of Honza's patch that fixes testcase instroduced in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573#c23:
diff --git a/gcc/tree-inline.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64086
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573
Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63814
--- Comment #26 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
I proposed a fix on the mailing list:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg02832.html
I have this patch in my working tree as well as the patch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64096
Bug ID: 64096
Summary: std::list, set and map violate a rule about
allocator::construct
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64032
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Stubbs ams at gcc dot gnu.org ---
When I configure for powerpc-linux-gnu, undefined-loop-2.c.003t.original
contains this:
if (((p != 0 ? (unsigned char) array1[i] != 0 : (unsigned char) array2[i] !=
0) i = 4) i =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64093
Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573
--- Comment #28 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #25)
There's updated version of Honza's patch that fixes testcase instroduced in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573#c23:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64077
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Dixie from comment #2)
In p5, is inaccessible meant to include friendship relationships granted
by the current scope or instead use the explicit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64075
Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64077
Andrew Dixie gcc at dixie dot net.nz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63833
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63833
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Nov 27 21:03:32 2014
New Revision: 218132
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218132root=gccview=rev
Log:
Use R15_REG for REAL_PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64077
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Dixie from comment #4)
If the 'accessible' in p5 includes friendships relationships, then the
dynamic_cast should succeed.
Yes, friendship
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63833
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63870
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12277
Andrew Dixie gcc at dixie dot net.nz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at dixie dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12277
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Dixie gcc at dixie dot net.nz ---
Created attachment 34130
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34130action=edit
dynamic_cast warning
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63842
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57249
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
We probably should simply move cunrolli to early passes and let it to cunroll
only when size is going to decrease (i.e. when we know late cunrolli will
unroll no matter on the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64097
Bug ID: 64097
Summary: Bug with nested WHERE constructs
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63851
--- Comment #4 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
There's a pair of functions 'g' and 'h' that are proved by IPA ICF to be
equal and thunk is created (darwin does not have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63758
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm not disputing that the code is wrong…
… and the change that you've put forward looks reasonable.
However, I'm not finding it easy to reproduce any failure - I've got a cross
from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64012
cbaylis at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64096
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rylai from comment #0)
As we can see, std::list implementation tries to call construct for whole
list node (U = std::_List_nodeint),
This is already fixed on the SVN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64012
Airbak airbak.li at huawei dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64092
xbguo guoxiangbin86 at 126 dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42616
java4ada at yahoo dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||java4ada at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63497
--- Comment #8 from Tim Shen timshen at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: timshen
Date: Fri Nov 28 06:50:34 2014
New Revision: 218138
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218138root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/63497
83 matches
Mail list logo
