https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63765
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64277
--- Comment #18 from ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Wed Jan 28 11:41:40 2015
New Revision: 220204
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220204root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/64277
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64834
Bug ID: 64834
Summary: Captured variable not available in unevaluated context
in a lambda with auto argument
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64753
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Rasmus Villemoes from comment #0)
At the two places marked # we do a cmp and a conditional jump to .L3, where
for good measure the same cmp is done again... there's no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64814
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
N.B. libc++ changed its copy_n with
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20110221/039404.html
and then libstdc++ did the same in PR 50119
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225
--- Comment #19 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #18 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Rainer,
Zhenqiang has left GCC development.
I didn't know that: now wonder the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64829
--- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Index: gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c
===
--- gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c(revision 220205)
+++ gcc/tree-vect-patterns.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64838
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64829
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
In fact we recognize a widening shift but it gets dropped on the floor:
t.c:48:2: note: --vectorizing statement: result_15 = val0_14 4;
t.c:48:2: note: --vectorizing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64838
Bug ID: 64838
Summary: ICE in type_size, at go/go-gcc.cc:1110
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4)
It it certainly related, but I'm not sure it is an exact duplicate.
In particular the above PR has quite a history and includes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64809
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64836
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64835
Bug ID: 64835
Summary: -fno-ipa-cp is inconsitently supported when attributes
optimize or target are used
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64834
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64836
Bug ID: 64836
Summary: go.test/test/fixedbugs/issue4348.go FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837
Bug ID: 64837
Summary: lto plugun doesn't call ld_plugin_release_input_file
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64837
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63743
Thomas Preud'homme thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thopre01
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64828
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Oh, del_opsv.cc ... I changed del_ops.cc and didn't notice a second warning.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64810
--- Comment #8 from ramana.radhakrishnan at arm dot com ramana.radhakrishnan
at arm dot com ---
On 27/01/15 20:00, dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64810
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61925
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64828
Bug ID: 64828
Summary: libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/del_opvs.cc:30:1: warning:
‘void operator delete [](void*, std::size_t)’ is a
usual (non-placement) deallocation function in C++14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64829
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64828
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64828
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Marked as a regression, as this breaks -Werror builds.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64827
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64212
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62103
Thomas Preud'homme thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64829
Bug ID: 64829
Summary: [ARM] ICE at -O3 in vect_get_vec_def_for_stmt_copy
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64798
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 28 09:53:39 2015
New Revision: 220201
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220201root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-01-28 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64799
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34600
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34600action=edit
fix for 64-bit Solaris 10 failures
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64798
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64799
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
[...]
Looks good so far: I've applied the patch,
Hi
I am attempting to compile the following but the compilation fails
rather than issue an autological compare warning.
#include iostream
#include omp.h
int main()
{
#pragma omp simd
for(unsigned int i=0;i0u;++i)
{
}
return 1;
}
g++ -fopenmp omp_bug.cxx
Error message
omp_bug.cxx: In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64809
--- Comment #8 from ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Wed Jan 28 11:46:44 2015
New Revision: 220205
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220205root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/64809
* cfgexpand.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833
Bug ID: 64833
Summary: [SH]: Error: pcrel too far when compiling imagemagick
and graphicsmagick on Debian sh4
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64823
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64686
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #3)
Created attachment 34603 [details]
C++ source code
The attached code does the following with trunk dated 20150128 with
flag -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64686
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Created attachment 34604
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34604action=edit
Preprocessed source for 4.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64829
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Doesn't reproduce with a cross from x86_64-linux on trunk.
./xgcc -B. t.c -O3 -v -Wall
Reading specs from ./specs
COLLECT_GCC=./xgcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=./lto-wrapper
Target:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64831
Bug ID: 64831
Summary: Preprocessing # operator with C++11 user-defined
literal produces bad output
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64537
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64831
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.0
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63907
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64686
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman dcb314 at hotmail dot com ---
Created attachment 34603
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34603action=edit
C++ source code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64753
--- Comment #1 from Rasmus Villemoes rv at rasmusvillemoes dot dk ---
FWIW, I wrote a stupid script looking for the pattern
test/cmp instruction
(conditional) jump to abcd
...
abcd: same test/cmp instruction
Compiling a defconfig linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
As expected the underlying problem has been introduced by r216305.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62103
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Preud'homme thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ok, I have a local fix. The existing testcase didn't catch it because the
precision of the bitfield is not a multiple of CHAR_BITS.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64828
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Wasn't this fixed at r219317 ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64368
--- Comment #30 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #25 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Great, thanks for confirming it. As you say, let's leave this open for now in
case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64829
--- Comment #1 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34599
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34599action=edit
testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64832
Bug ID: 64832
Summary: [SH]: Internal compiler error when trying to compile
webkitgtk on Debian sh4
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64718
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Preud'homme thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Wed Jan 28 10:20:19 2015
New Revision: 220203
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220203root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-01-28 Thomas Preud'homme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64830
Bug ID: 64830
Summary: g++ generating segfaulting binaries
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61925
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So, it seems this is a complete mess.
The reason why we ICE is that the target pragma support is broken.
The main issue I see is that ix86_reset_to_default_globals doesn't actually
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64829
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63707
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The member array case only fails when the array element has a user-defined
destructor
Here's the failing testcase repeated from the attachment and reduced slightly:
struct Child
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64829
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
are you sure it isn't already fixed?
Don't think so. It ICEs for me with r220203.
I'm using the options -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=hard -O3 -march=armv7-a.
The -mfloat-abi=hard is important,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64830
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64828
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
BTW: These warnings also appear in libsanitizer:
/home/uros/gcc-svn/trunk/libsanitizer/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:107:6: warning:
‘void operator delete(void*, size_t)’ is a usual
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64828
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64841
Bug ID: 64841
Summary: libsanitizer/asan/asan_new_delete.cc:107:6: warning:
‘void operator delete(void*, size_t)’ is a usual
(non-placement) deallocation function in C++14 (or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64799
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Duh, that should have been obvious.
Thanks for the fix. I'll push them
upstream at the same time.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58597
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 58597, which changed state.
Bug 58597 Summary: [5 Regression] ICE with lambda in default argument of
template function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58597
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63522
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64840
--- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-01-28 11:22 AM, howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu wrote:
ps I assume it will be sufficient to match libgomp-plugin-host_nonshm.sl.1 as
it is unclear why hpux automatically appends .0 to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64635
--- Comment #20 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Created attachment 34610
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34610action=edit
proposed fix with aix and hpux support added and changelog
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64785
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #1)
Another more radical approach could be to insert an RTL pass that
pre-allocates the R0 reg for those insns that have z constraint
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64635
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Just pick it from say libgomp/config/linux/proc.h, replace 2011-2015 with 2015
and put your name in there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64823
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64804
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64810
--- Comment #12 from David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34612
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34612action=edit
WIP patch to inject configure-time options into jit's toplev::main (no
ChangeLog yet)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64810
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Wouldn't it be better to move the minimal spec parsing stuff from gcc.c to a
separate source file that you could link into libgccjit.so?
Adding another native build only restriction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64845
Bug ID: 64845
Summary: FAIL:
libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/reduction-
4.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host_nonshm=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=0
(test for excess errors)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63504
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 28 20:30:30 2015
New Revision: 220216
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220216root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR other/63504
* dwarf2out.c (add_AT_wide,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64843
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64847
Bug ID: 64847
Summary: FAIL:
30_threads/shared_lock/requirements/explicit_instantia
tion.cc (test for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64848
Bug ID: 64848
Summary: G++ internal compiler error with templated lambdas
capturing variable
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64840
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-01-28 11:22 AM, howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu wrote:
Try the proposed patch athttps://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34609
which is enhanced to handle hpux.
The patch works
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It's not a very new regression, and it is quite risky in my opinion;
I prefer to have this dealt with in stage1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64635
--- Comment #23 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Patch posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg02536.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64659
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Wed Jan 28 21:11:37 2015
New Revision: 220217
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220217root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/64659
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64805
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
*** Bug 64804 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64635
--- Comment #25 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Wed Jan 28 21:25:19 2015
New Revision: 220220
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220220root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-01-28 Jack Howarth
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64635
--- Comment #24 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Wed Jan 28 21:23:14 2015
New Revision: 220218
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220218root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-01-28 Jack Howarth
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64635
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64849
Bug ID: 64849
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90 -O0 (test
for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.5 |6.0
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64844
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64810
--- Comment #11 from David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
A breakpoint on do_option_spec in the driver shows that the options come from
configure_default_options and option_default_specs.
configure_default_options comes from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64810
--- Comment #13 from David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #12)
Created attachment 34612 [details]
WIP patch to inject configure-time options into jit's toplev::main (no
ChangeLog yet)
With this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64843
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
(And this shows an admission from the stdatomic.h tests - a new
gcc.dg/atomic/stdatomic-op-*.c test should be added that tests _add and
_sub for pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64797
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
The test has been introduced at r219780. The first failure I see is for r219808
(the previous tested revision is r219776). It is likely that the test has never
worked on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64843
--- Comment #5 from Richard Smith richard-gccbugzilla at metafoo dot co.uk ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #3)
The first question is whether this code is actually valid.
To my reading, the C11 standard says that these
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
