https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65975
Bug ID: 65975
Summary: !$ is not recognized as a comment when -fopenmp flag
is used
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65975
--- Comment #1 from Carl Ponder CPonder at nVidia dot Com ---
This is a problem with both 4.8.4 and 5.1.0.
I didn't test any of the others.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65973
Bug ID: 65973
Summary: Current gcc 6 snapshot fails with segmentation fault
when compiling C++14 code
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65974
Bug ID: 65974
Summary: Bogus deprecated-declarations warnings for inline
definitions of deprecated virtual methods
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59098
fenugrec at users dot sourceforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fenugrec at users
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #33 from Matt Breedlove breedlove.matt at gmail dot com ---
bootstrap-lto fails to build:
`isl_union_map_read_from_str' referenced in section `.text' of
M:\msys64\tmp\cceOtKWH.ltrans0.ltrans.o: defined in discarded section `.text'
of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65976
Bug ID: 65976
Summary: gfortran man-page lists the -fno-fixed-form flag but
does not define it, and it doesn't work
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63791
Marcus Kool marcus.kool at urlfilterdb dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65971
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63791
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63791
--- Comment #4 from Marcus Kool marcus.kool at urlfilterdb dot com ---
movl%edi, -12(%rsp)
vpxor %xmm1, %xmm1, %xmm1
vmovd -12(%rsp), %xmm0
xorl%eax, %eax
vpshufb %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #31 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #23)
The patch looks pretty obvious to me - though I wonder if archives still
work on x86_64-linux after it (or rather I wonder how they
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65965
Bug ID: 65965
Summary: Straight-line memcpy/memset not vectorized when
equivalent loop is
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65959
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63791
--- Comment #3 from Marcus Kool marcus.kool at urlfilterdb dot com ---
Created attachment 35436
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35436action=edit
example code to show code generation on AVX platform (avx.c)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65959
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab schwab at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: schwab
Date: Fri May 1 14:07:51 2015
New Revision: 222682
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222682root=gccview=rev
Log:
Summary: Mark help string in DEFPARAM as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65964
Bug ID: 65964
Summary: [meta] Operand Shortening
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65964
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65966
Bug ID: 65966
Summary: sorry, unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind
try_block when initializing a 2D array
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65958
Bug ID: 65958
Summary: -fstack-check breaks __builtin(alloca)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65898
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
--- Comment #22 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
Program aborted. Backtrace:
#0 0x3FF95D8B973
FAIL: gfortran.dg/bound_9.f90 -O execution test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65957
Bug ID: 65957
Summary: Loop with if-statement yields different results for
-O3 vs -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65967
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65967
Bug ID: 65967
Summary: error: unable to emulate ‘XF’
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63791
Marcus Kool marcus.kool at urlfilterdb dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65971
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #32 from Matt Breedlove breedlove.matt at gmail dot com ---
I've been building with just the corrected open call and have successfully
built LTO versions of binutils, mpc, mpfr, isl, libiconv, bzip2, zlib, etc
without any issue but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65971
--- Comment #2 from Manfred Schwarb manfred99 at gmx dot ch ---
Hmm, that's a pretty new binutils version.
So it is not possible any more to build GCC on somewhat older
installations?
This seems not to be documented at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65970
Bug ID: 65970
Summary: [C++14] Endless loop with constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65971
Bug ID: 65971
Summary: bootstrap fails with multiple definition of
'__cpu_indicator_init'
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65968
Bug ID: 65968
Summary: Failure to remove casts, cause poor code generation
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65969
Bug ID: 65969
Summary: typename allowed in using declaration of non-types
names
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63791
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65858
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri May 1 18:43:40 2015
New Revision: 222699
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222699root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-05-01 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65858
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65858
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri May 1 18:47:55 2015
New Revision: 222700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222700root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-05-01 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65959
Bug ID: 65959
Summary: plain text incorrectly marked as format-c
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
--- Comment #23 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #22)
Program aborted. Backtrace:
#0 0x3FF95D8B973
FAIL: gfortran.dg/bound_9.f90 -O execution test
Thanks for the report! Before we can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #30 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
(I added some debug code to Bugzilla to try to understand what's wrong. Just
ignore this email.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64454
--- Comment #9 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
VRP could still do better:
typedef unsigned short T;
T f(T x, T y){
// Avoid narrowing in the front-end
int ix=x;
int iy=y;
T z=ix%iy;
int iz=z;
return z%iy;
}
ix and iy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65960
Bug ID: 65960
Summary: ICE in Cilk spawn with argument with non-trivial
constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65559
--- Comment #30 from Rainer Emrich rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de ---
I'm testing the following instead:
Index: gcc/lto-wrapper.c
===
--- gcc/lto-wrapper.c (Revision 222611)
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65955
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65904
jules at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60198
Hans Vandierendonck hvdieren at elis dot ugent.be changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65959
--- Comment #1 from Roland Illig roland.illig at gmx dot de ---
I only noticed this because GNU gettext complains that I must not translate %p
to %W.
Error: 'msgstr' is not a valid C format string, unlike 'msgid'. Reason: In the
directive number
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #31 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
(ignore this one as well)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65952
--- Comment #4 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hmmm. Yes. Well, x * 16 = x 4, of course. Or, in theory something like VRP
could let us see that
# i_12 = PHI i_9(4), 0(2)
# ivtmp_18 = PHI ivtmp_17(4), 4(2)
_5 = (long unsigned int)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65951
--- Comment #3 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes you are right, we have no V2DI multiply. We do have V2DI shifts + add,
however, which would work well for some constants, e.g. the multiply by 16 in
PR/65952; perhaps the vectorizer does not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65972
Bug ID: 65972
Summary: ICE after applying a patch to enable the vectorizer.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65776
prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65858
--- Comment #8 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 65776 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65958
Anthony G. Basile basile at opensource dot dyc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65961
Bug ID: 65961
Summary: ice in vect_is_simple_use_1 with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65958
--- Comment #2 from Felix Janda felix.janda at posteo dot de ---
Actually I can hit this issue also with sh4 and microblaze. The test
program needs to be modified slightly:
int main(void)
{
char *p;
if(1) {
char
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697
--- Comment #49 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #43)
(In reply to torvald from comment #37)
(In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #35)
So by the strict letter of the specification, no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65961
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
--- Comment #24 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Reduced test
module tst
implicit none
contains
subroutine bar (a, b, n, m)
integer, dimension(:), allocatable, intent(inout) :: a
integer, dimension(:),
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65962
Bug ID: 65962
Summary: Missed vectorization of strided stores
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65962
--- Comment #1 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I believe this is a known issue, but have not identified an existing PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65963
Bug ID: 65963
Summary: Missed vectorization of loads strided with when
equivalent * succeeds
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
--- Comment #25 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #24)
I wonder if the above code is valid Fortran.
y is not associated, so not suitable for passing as ARRAY argument to LBOUND:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65476
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri May 1 13:24:16 2015
New Revision: 222680
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222680root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR ada/65476
*
64 matches
Mail list logo