https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60943
--- Comment #4 from Anders Sjögren anders at sjogren dot info ---
Thanks for fixing the bug!
It seems that the test file
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/gcc/testsuite/g%2B%2B.dg/cpp1y/pr60943.C?view=markuppathrev=223502
contains an error.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60943
--- Comment #6 from Anders Sjögren anders at sjogren dot info ---
An alternative test case, which also tests that the correct version is
selected, could be:
#include type_traits
using expected_lvalue_res_t = int;
using expected_rvalue_res_t =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66233
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri May 22 08:12:08 2015
New Revision: 223522
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223522root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-05-21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66199
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri May 22 08:10:32 2015
New Revision: 223521
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223521root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-05-19
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
--- Comment #7 from Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
Created attachment 35595
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35595action=edit
Experimental fix
Can you please check whether this patch works for you? The patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61071
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66133
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri May 22 08:04:41 2015
New Revision: 223520
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223520root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-05-13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61071
--- Comment #2 from Krzysztof Kundzicz athantor+gccbugzilla at athi dot pl ---
GCC 5.1 - no change.
Compiling with clang generates debugable binary.
Bug report at ASAN project:
https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/issues/detail?id=390
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47043
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri May 22 09:07:31 2015
New Revision: 223527
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223527root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/47043
* c-common.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56926
--- Comment #13 from asmwarrior asmwarrior at gmail dot com ---
I did some further test with the condition I stated in comment 11. That is gcc
5.1.
Now, I have pch.h.gch file (about 200M) already generated.
First thing, I try to see whether
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Doesn't this disable all the other s390 tests?
Supposedly you need to prune them from the non-torture lists, see e.g.
g++.dg/dg.exp on how it prunes tests.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47043
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60943
--- Comment #5 from Anders Sjögren anders at sjogren dot info ---
A typo snuck in...
However, as an l-value at the site of the call[...]
should be
However, a is an l-value at the site of the call[...]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65752
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
Target Milestone: ---
recent regression (last day):
gcc version 6.0.0 20150522 (experimental) [trunk revision 223512] (GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66103
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Due to r223391, a variant of this already fails without LTO - see PR66214.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66214
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Works after reverting Honza's r223391.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66251
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65701
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri May 22 09:08:46 2015
New Revision: 223528
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223528root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-05-22 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66240
--- Comment #3 from Josh Triplett josh at joshtriplett dot org ---
(In reply to Denis Vlasenko from comment #2)
(In reply to Josh Triplett from comment #1)
Another alternative discussed in that thread, which seems near-ideal: align
functions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66256
Bug ID: 66256
Summary: noexcept evaluation done before end of class
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66257
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
Although I have marked the PR as a regression, I am not sure that it is not
INVALID: the error has been introduced on purpose.
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66079
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35603
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35603action=edit
Nearly OK patch
The attached bootstraps and regtests on 6.0.0. The following runs without
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66257
Bug ID: 66257
Summary: Regression: ELEMENTAL procedure pointer component XX
is not allowed as an actual argument
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66257
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66237
--- Comment #6 from Mikhail Maltsev miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: miyuki
Date: Fri May 22 22:58:22 2015
New Revision: 223596
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223596root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/66237
* bb-reorder.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66251
Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66257
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56926
--- Comment #14 from asmwarrior asmwarrior at gmail dot com ---
The bug can be seen when -E and -fpch-preprocess is used together to
generate a preprocessed file.
If I have a small pch file named spch.h and spch.h.gch(note the spch.h.gch
size is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66259
Bug ID: 66259
Summary: Combined gcc and binutils build from git-master fails,
with gas/as-new not existing
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66258
Bug ID: 66258
Summary: compiling a stdarg function with arch +nofp generates
an ICE
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66259
--- Comment #1 from Michael Darling darlingm at gmail dot com ---
BTW, this happens on stage 2.
Uncombined build works just fine...
If I:
mkdir binutils.build.gcc492
cd binutils.build.gcc492
../gcc.binutils.combined/binutils-gdb.git/configure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477
--- Comment #22 from Tomasz Gajewski tomga at wp dot pl ---
In comment #10 I've provided test patch to test case that exposed a problem
(and in comment #11 some fix to all those tests). Currently I can't check if it
applies cleanly and if errors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63387
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: glisse
Date: Fri May 22 21:05:26 2015
New Revision: 223591
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223591root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-05-22 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
] = fooT;
^
prog.cc:6:34: error: expected primary-expression before ';' token
constexpr bool fooT[N] = fooT;
^
prog.cc:6: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
6.0 20150522 at least tries to compile the recursion, but fails nonetheless
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66255
Mikhail Maltsev miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66223
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65415
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
--- Comment #11 from Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
As for the hotpatch testcases, have you tested them also with
-fno-dwarf2-cfi-asm (as they seem to contain .cfi directives in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65061
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Jason, shall we just close this as fixed in 5.1, or we want to try backporting
the simple fix to 4_9-branch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
--- Comment #9 from Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
Yeah, I accidentally left the other test cases commented out. I'll clean that
up in the next version of the patch. That doesn't have an impact on the
correctness of the code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65598
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62171
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
It may already work
if you use C++ and
static double __attribute__((noinline, noclone))
f (struct omp_data_i __restrict__ p, int argc)
{
?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65061
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66142
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ah, but fre2 is able to optimize those:
D.2881[_12].dir.x = x_13;
...
_32 = MEM[(const struct Ray *)D.2881][_12].dir.x;
cases to
_32 = x_13;
The problem in FRE2 is only with the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66142
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ah, and the reason for the ifcvt failure is that we have an unoptimized
virtual PHI in the loop that ifcvt gives up on:
# .MEM_55 = PHI .MEM_55(7), .MEM_5(D)(2)
Only phicprop2 pass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66142
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35596
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35596action=edit
gcc6-pr66142.patch
Fix for the ifcvt issue. With this the modified testcase is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66251
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62171
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
And maybe set DECL_BY_REFERENCE, a mere REFERENCE_TYPE doesn't prevent
you from doing (param)[2] which we'd miscompile. Not sure who added
that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62171
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #3)
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
And maybe set DECL_BY_REFERENCE, a mere REFERENCE_TYPE doesn't prevent
you from doing (param)[2] which we'd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089
--- Comment #9 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
That was a rhetorical question.
In the patch you submitted in comment #2 could you put a comment (in the
source) at:
Index: trans-array.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66241
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2015-05-21 00:00:00 |2015-5-22
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66142
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
As for the hotpatch testcases, have you tested them also with
-fno-dwarf2-cfi-asm (as they seem to contain .cfi directives in the regexps)?
And for the main patch, the change will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66252
Bug ID: 66252
Summary: [6 regression] bootstrap comparison failures on
sparc-linux
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54006
Nick nick.mayerho...@rise-world.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66251
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri May 22 12:34:46 2015
New Revision: 223552
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223552root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-05-22 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66252
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52049
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There is a GSoC 2015 project which will try to address the AMS problem.
https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/project/details/google/gsoc2015/erikvarga/5693417237512192
It will be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66250
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
--- Comment #12 from Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
Created attachment 35597
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35597action=edit
Experimental fix 2
Version 2 of the patch with the suggested changes and test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66224
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dje
Date: Fri May 22 12:43:02 2015
New Revision: 223554
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223554root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/66224
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
--- Comment #14 from Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
Is it possible that a function has no insns at all?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35597|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65832
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
On a related note, store_constructor handles VECTOR_TYPE constructors through
the vec_init optab but that doesn't work for vector elements:
/* Don't use vec_initmode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253
Bug ID: 66253
Summary: [6 Regression] 459.GemsFDTD in SPEC CPU 2006 is
miscompiled
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66251
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The only function without active insns I'm aware of is:
void
foo (void)
{
__builtin_unreachable ();
}
which only contains notes and a BARRIER, nothing else (at least on s390x).
It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53911
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There is a GSoC 2015 project which will try to address the AMS problem.
https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/project/details/google/gsoc2015/erikvarga/5693417237512192
It will be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35598|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60890
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There is a GSoC 2015 project which will try to address the AMS problem.
https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/project/details/google/gsoc2015/erikvarga/5693417237512192
It will be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66224
--- Comment #4 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dje
Date: Fri May 22 13:02:34 2015
New Revision: 223564
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223564root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/66224
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The function I've mentioned has:
(note 1 0 3 NOTE_INSN_DELETED)
(note 3 1 12 [bb 2] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK)
(note 12 3 2 NOTE_INSN_PROLOGUE_END)
(note 2 12 5 NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56590
--- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There is a GSoC 2015 project which will try to address the AMS problem.
https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/project/details/google/gsoc2015/erikvarga/5693417237512192
It will be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50749
--- Comment #19 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There is a GSoC 2015 project which will try to address the AMS problem.
https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/project/details/google/gsoc2015/erikvarga/5693417237512192
It will be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42612
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
There is a GSoC 2015 project which will try to address the AMS problem.
https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/project/details/google/gsoc2015/erikvarga/5693417237512192
It will be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65491
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65598
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri May 22 14:14:38 2015
New Revision: 223576
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223576root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-05-22 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
Probably related to PR66251 aka strided store support.
It is caused by r223486.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61198
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||galbramc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253
--- Comment #3 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Can you check if the patch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg02133.html
helps also gemsfdtd?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65764
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66195
David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66142
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
As for the FRE (actually SCCVN) issue, seems this affects more than
GOMP_SIMD_LANE, seems there is insufficient canonicalization of the references
performed by SCCVN, so the same
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65598
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65491
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Fri May 22 14:36:27 2015
New Revision: 223577
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223577root=gccview=rev
Log:
[AArch64] PR target/65491: Classify V1TF vectors as AAPCS64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65750
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Michael Matz from comment #3)
Can you check if the patch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg02133.html
helps also gemsfdtd?
I tried and I still got
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253
Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |matz at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48052
--- Comment #13 from AK hiraditya at msn dot com ---
We have an updated patch that works for both the cases.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg01991.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65815
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66017
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66253
--- Comment #5 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
I tried and I still got
Running Benchmarks
Running 459.GemsFDTD ref peak lnx32e-gcc default
*** Miscompare of sphere_td.nft; for details
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66240
Josh Triplett josh at joshtriplett dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||josh at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61831
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66255
Bug ID: 66255
Summary: ice in retrieve_specialization
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66148
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thopre01
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
