[Bug c++/66520] bad code generated code for branches with single

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66520 --- Comment #7 from Fisnik fkastrati at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #5) Compiler should not generate the same code, and should listen to the developer, when she/he connects predicates with single `'. I already

[Bug bootstrap/66508] Attempt to Compile gcc-6.0 on OSX 10.9.4 cause segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66508 --- Comment #5 from Fan You youfan.noey at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #4) (In reply to Fan You from comment #3) (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2) Duplicate of pr66448? Which revision are you

[Bug c++/66520] bad code generated code for branches with single

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66520 --- Comment #4 from Fisnik fkastrati at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #3) There should be at least some flag available, such that we can set such a flag and have the compiler generate only a single jump for the

[Bug c++/66520] bad code generated code for branches with single

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66520 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Fisnik from comment #8) To this end, the compiler should respect the code written by the developer. As far as the C++ standard is concerned the built-in and

[Bug fortran/66385] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE: FORALL writing multiple elements of one array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66385 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Jun 14 10:08:00 2015 New Revision: 224465 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224465root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-06-14 Thomas Koenig tkoe...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug ada/65102] gnat-style.texi warning from including fdl.texi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65102 --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to vries from comment #2) requested approval for fdl.texi part from docs co-maintainer: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-03/msg01056.html Posted updated patch:

[Bug c++/66520] bad code generated code for branches with single

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66520 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Compiler should not generate the same code, and should listen to the developer, when she/he connects predicates with single `'. I already wrote that I did benchmarks, and also

[Bug c++/66520] bad code generated code for branches with single

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66520 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- If a and b are side-effect-free, pure-boolean expressions then `a b' and `a b' are completely equivalent and there is no reason to generate different code for them.

[Bug fortran/66534] New: Compilation error of gfortran building on YDL6.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66534 Bug ID: 66534 Summary: Compilation error of gfortran building on YDL6.2 Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/66520] bad code generated code for branches with single

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66520 --- Comment #8 from Fisnik fkastrati at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #6) If a and b are side-effect-free, pure-boolean expressions then `a b' and `a b' are completely equivalent and there is no reason to generate

[Bug fortran/66534] Compilation error of gfortran building on YDL6.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66534 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug tree-optimization/65511] transform_to_exit_first_loop looses edge probabilities

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65511 --- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- pinged patches at: - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg00976.html - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg00977.html

[Bug tree-optimization/66512] PRE fails to optimize calls to pure functions in C++, ok in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66512 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/65719] Link error with constexpr variable template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65719 --- Comment #9 from Louis Dionne ldionne.2 at gmail dot com --- I can confirm that my original use case now works. Thanks a bunch!

[Bug c/29192] gcc will delete the c_source_file.c without any alarm!

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29192 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yongjin.ohn at lge

[Bug c/66532] Source file deleted when we use gcc compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66532 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/66520] bad code generated code for branches with single

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66520 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- There should be at least some flag available, such that we can set such a flag and have the compiler generate only a single jump for the method with single ampersand. You

[Bug middle-end/66325] [6 Regression] ICE in gcc.c-torture/execute/930408-1.c, verify_type fails with --enable-checking=yes on arm-none-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66325 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hubicka Date: Sun Jun 14 07:05:03 2015 New Revision: 224463 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224463root=gccview=rev Log: PR middle-end/66325 * c-decl.c

[Bug c++/66533] New: ICE: in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:21073

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66533 Bug ID: 66533 Summary: ICE: in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:21073 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/65488] parloops runs for functions it doesn't process

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65488 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from

[Bug c/66532] New: Source file deleted when we use gcc compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66532 Bug ID: 66532 Summary: Source file deleted when we use gcc compile Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug debug/66535] New: segfault in gen_subprogram_die after debug-early merge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66535 Bug ID: 66535 Summary: segfault in gen_subprogram_die after debug-early merge Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug c++/58063] default arguments evaluated twice per call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58063 --- Comment #12 from plokinom at gmail dot com --- I can confirm this still happens with g++ 5.1.0.

[Bug c/66527] incorrect line number in diagnostics for multiline initializers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66527 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug ada/66242] Front-end error if exception propagation disabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66242 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|arm-eabi, |

[Bug c++/66387] [5/6 Regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl with lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66387 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/66281] [C++14][Variable templates] internal compiler error: in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:12022

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66281 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/66483] [4.9 Regression] ICE (in add_stores, at var-tracking.c:6000) on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66483 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer perezmeyer at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/66483] [4.9 Regression] ICE (in add_stores, at var-tracking.c:6000) on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66483 --- Comment #6 from Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer perezmeyer at gmail dot com --- FWIW, it seems fixed in the linaro branch.

[Bug c/66425] (void) cast doesn't suppress __attribute__((warn_unused_result))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425 Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at

[Bug target/66483] [4.9 Regression] ICE (in add_stores, at var-tracking.c:6000) on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66483 Thomas Preud'homme thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joseph

[Bug c++/66536] New: [5/6 Regression] ICE in build_ctor_subob_ref, at cp/tree.c:2534

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66536 Bug ID: 66536 Summary: [5/6 Regression] ICE in build_ctor_subob_ref, at cp/tree.c:2534 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/66483] [4.9 Regression] ICE (in add_stores, at var-tracking.c:6000) on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66483 --- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I have no backport plans for this patch.

[Bug libgomp/66429] ICE in expand_GOMP_SIMD_LAST_LANE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66429 --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 35777 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35777action=edit tentative patch Using this patch, we avoid the ICE. Not sure if this is the right way to fix it.

[Bug fortran/52846] [F2008] Support submodules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Testcase: ! Test vehicle for submodules ! 14th June 2015 ! ! Paul Thomas - check1406b.diff applies ! ! FIXED OR MOSTLY FIXED: ! Access in submodules to PROCEDURE COMPONENTS - FIXED

[Bug c++/66537] An explicit default constructor is accepted when initializing from empty braces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66537 Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/66528] [6 Regression] unbalanced IF/ENDIF with -fmax-errors=1 causes invalid free

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66528 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #3) (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2) Usual suspect r223677 (pr66082). I don't believe that a change to

[Bug c++/66537] New: An explicit default constructor is accepted when initializing from empty braces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66537 Bug ID: 66537 Summary: An explicit default constructor is accepted when initializing from empty braces Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/66537] An explicit default constructor is accepted when initializing from empty braces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66537 --- Comment #2 from Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #1) Isn't that similar to bug 54835? As far as I remember Jason interprets the standard that the code should be valid, see his

[Bug c++/66538] New: Parameter not in scope of generic lambda trailing decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66538 Bug ID: 66538 Summary: Parameter not in scope of generic lambda trailing decltype Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/66181] [6 Regression]: /usr/include/bits/types.h:134:16: ICE: verify_type failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66181 --- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hubicka Date: Sun Jun 14 23:40:12 2015 New Revision: 224471 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224471root=gccview=rev Log: PR ipa/66181 * lto.c

[Bug jit/66539] New: Missing parentheses in jit dumps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66539 Bug ID: 66539 Summary: Missing parentheses in jit dumps Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: jit

[Bug fortran/52846] [F2008] Support submodules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846 Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug fortran/52846] [F2008] Support submodules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 35779 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35779action=edit draft patch

[Bug c/66425] (void) cast doesn't suppress __attribute__((warn_unused_result))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425 --- Comment #19 from rusty at rustcorp dot com.au --- I like WUR as a sanity-check, and it is useful that more and more library authors are using it (generally quite well). As Andrew points out, this has taken 10 years! The downside is that

[Bug ada/66242] Front-end error if exception propagation disabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66242 --- Comment #3 from simon at pushface dot org --- (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #2) Patches on mailing list please along with a testcase and stating how it was regression tested. Done.