https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
The test case in comment #0 stopped breaking on trunk with r221077, the fix for
PR65236 (a gcc-5 IPA regression). Backporting r221077 to 4.9.3 unbreaks this
test case there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66692
Bug ID: 66692
Summary: gcc-4.9 fails to compile with gcc-5.1.0
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66691
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
-fno-lra-remat fixes the issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66682
Mikhail Maltsev miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Is there any update regarding this issue? Adrian, were you able to get a
preprocessed source file which reproduces the problem?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66620
--- Comment #8 from Chen Gang gang.chen.5i5j at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 35866
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35866action=edit
Full insns for without -fno-reorder-blocks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66689
--- Comment #1 from John Maddock john at johnmaddock dot co.uk ---
I think I've found the problem - make the nu parameter negative and you get the
correct answers.
These functions appear to use the same definition for ellint_3 as GSL uses
(same
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66614
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
I checked a few apps, and have not yet found any impact of the return
value of rtx_addr_can_trap_p_1 on the final code so far.
That means that this is probably only a low
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66691
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66691
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14940
--- Comment #48 from asmwarrior asmwarrior at gmail dot com ---
Hi, Martin Richter, thanks, I have post this patch link in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56926.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66691
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
Confirmed, I have to use:
cc1 -m32 -O3 -g -mtune=generic -march=i686
Breakpoint 1, internal_error (gmsgid=gmsgid@entry=0x163d677 in %s, at %s:%d)
at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56926
--- Comment #19 from asmwarrior asmwarrior at gmail dot com ---
Martin Richter has post a patch to solve this issue, see: [Comment
47](https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14940#c47), also there are
some discussion in [MinGW-w64 - for 32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563
--- Comment #38 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Sun Jun 28 07:02:47 2015
New Revision: 225104
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225104root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/66563
* [SH] Add a new operand to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66690
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66620
--- Comment #9 from Chen Gang gang.chen.5i5j at gmail dot com ---
After check the assembly result for the without -fno-reorder-block, it is OK.
It is for lsetup optimization.
And for having -fno-reorder-block, the insns are also correct, and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66620
--- Comment #12 from Chen Gang gang.chen.5i5j at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 35869
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35869action=edit
The result before lsetup optimization
The lsetup information is below:
lsetup
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833
--- Comment #9 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.de ---
Created attachment 35870
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35870action=edit
Pre-processed source Magick.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66689
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks for the analysis.
I'd like to re-use the TR1 code for an implementation of ISO/IEC 29124:2010
(whether or not it also goes into C++17) so we should fix this first.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66693
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66620
--- Comment #10 from Chen Gang gang.chen.5i5j at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 35867
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35867action=edit
The result after skip the assert() for having -fno-reorder-block
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66692
Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66620
--- Comment #11 from Chen Gang gang.chen.5i5j at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 35868
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35868action=edit
The result when without -fno-reorder-block
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833
--- Comment #8 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.de ---
Alright, know that I understand how to create pre-processed sources manually,
I'm attaching the requested pre-processed sources.
Here's how I obtained the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833
--- Comment #10 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.de ---
Created attachment 35871
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35871action=edit
Source file Magick.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66620
--- Comment #7 from Chen Gang gang.chen.5i5j at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Chen Gang from comment #2)
(In reply to Mikhail Maltsev from comment #1)
Started with r208165.
OK, thanks. Really it is, it is valuable to me (it can generate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66693
Bug ID: 66693
Summary: [C++17] std::tuple_size fails with const std::array
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66687
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Guido Haztsis from comment #6)
I am pretty sure it can be reproduced without any libc. Actually, for some
reason the libc.a file isn't even in the res file. This used to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66687
--- Comment #6 from Guido Haztsis guido.hatzsis at yandex dot com ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
MUSL support is not included in GCC 5.x is another thing. Also you are
using x32 which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66694
Bug ID: 66694
Summary: Failure in function returning an allocated CHARACTER
array
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64130
--- Comment #11 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Mon Jun 29 00:15:41 2015
New Revision: 225108
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225108root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-06-29 Kugan Vivekanandarajah
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833
--- Comment #11 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #9)
Created attachment 35870 [details]
Pre-processed source Magick.i
I've tried compiling that file with '-x c -std=gnu99 -O2 -g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66687
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Guido Haztsis from comment #6)
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
MUSL support is not included in GCC 5.x is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833
--- Comment #12 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I could reproduce the problem on trunk with '-DXS_VERSION=\6.89\ -fwrapv
-fno-strict-aliasing -fopenmp -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -fexceptions -fPIC'
with the cross
34 matches
Mail list logo
