https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66826
Bug ID: 66826
Summary: Unused dlsym return results in segfault
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66522
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2015-07/msg00440.html:
Author: vries
Date: Fri Jul 10 08:25:18 2015
New Revision: 225655
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225655root=gccview=rev
Log:
Insert new
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66522
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66703
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
This patch makes testcase more robust:
--cut here--
Index: readeflags-1.c
===
--- readeflags-1.c (revision 225648)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66827
Bug ID: 66827
Summary: [6 Regression] left shifts of negative value warnings
due to C++14 switch
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66828
Bug ID: 66828
Summary: [5/6 Regression] gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.c:2182:38:
runtime error: left shift of 72057594037927936 by 8
places cannot be represented in type 'long int'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66822
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #3)
Please hold a bit with this change, I have a patch that improves generation
of zero_extend substantially.
Eh, it won't have such drastic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66823
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 10 07:53:06 2015
New Revision: 225652
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225652root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-07-10 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66218
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 10 07:25:55 2015
New Revision: 225650
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225650root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/66218
* gcc/cp/pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66092
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 10 07:25:49 2015
New Revision: 225649
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225649root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/66092
* gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66758
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 10 07:26:01 2015
New Revision: 225651
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225651root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/66758
* gcc/cp/parser.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65592
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
This issue is already fixed in mainline. I'm adding a testcase and closing it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65592
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jul 10 09:33:34 2015
New Revision: 225658
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225658root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-07-10 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65592
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66775
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66780
--- Comment #6 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Fri Jul 10 09:50:18 2015
New Revision: 225660
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225660root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/66780
* config/sh/sh.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563
--- Comment #53 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #52)
We are lucky:-) The test for backport of PR66780 patch for gcc-5 was done
and we get a chance to commit it:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66794
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 10 12:33:28 2015
New Revision: 225671
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225671root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-07-10 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43341
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 10 12:33:28 2015
New Revision: 225671
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225671root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-07-10 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66703
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4)
This patch makes testcase more robust:
--cut here--
Index: readeflags-1.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65945
--- Comment #17 from npl at chello dot at ---
Hi,
so if I understand it right, the access fault itself isnt fixed, but if I use
ABI Version = 9 it wont occur with this code?
Should I open a separate Bug for the unaligned access issue?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66828
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66313
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr23294.c should be still optimized, no? there is not a single
case with a possibly overflowing addition in there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66313
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
With the conversion to unsigned we're also no longer able to optimize
tree-ssa/tailrecursion-6.c.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563
--- Comment #54 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.de ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #53)
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #52)
We are lucky:-) The test for backport of PR66780 patch for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66313
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Right now .optimized looks like this:
f6 (int a, int b)
{
int _2;
int _4;
int _5;
bb 2:
_2 = a_1(D) * 3;
_4 = _2 - b_3(D);
_5 = _4 * 2;
return _5;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66313
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think I'll restrict the computation in unsigned only for
TYPE_OVERFLOW_SANITIZED, otherwise we fail to optimize important stuff :/ (e.g.
tree-ssa/pr23294.c).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66820
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jul 10 10:26:19 2015
New Revision: 225661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225661root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/66820
* gimplify.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66829
Bug ID: 66829
Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL:
23_containers/multiset/modifiers/erase/dr130-linkage-c
heck.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66813
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Jul 10 11:56:48 2015
New Revision: 225662
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225662root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/66813
* config/i386/i386.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66826
--- Comment #1 from Daurnimator quae at daurnimator dot com ---
nalaginrut (from #gcc irc channel) confirmed that the issue only occurs in GCC
5 at -O2 and higher. (the bug is *not* present in GCC 4.9 or at -O1).
Note: only the compilation of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66829
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66827
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66813
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66758
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66758
--- Comment #9 from Eric Niebler eric.niebler at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 35950
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35950action=edit
Bug number 4
ICE ICE baby
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66758
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #11)
Fixed.
in r225710.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66838
Bug ID: 66838
Summary: Calling multiple SYSV AMD64 ABI functions from MS x64
ABI one results in clobbered parameters
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66834
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This was introduced by my patch for bug 66092, applying the tentative
resolution of core issue 1430 to concepts as well as alias templates. This
makes sense to me since they have the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66758
Eric Niebler eric.niebler at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Noticed while doing translation of the gcc messages. Please apply to trunk
if OK as I have no rfead/write access anymore AFAIK.
2015-07-10 Philipp Thomas p...@suse.de
* params.def: fix typo.
index 3e4ba3a..08b5c7f 100644
--- a/gcc/params.def
+++ b/gcc/params.def
@@ -572,7 +572,7 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66633
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jul 10 14:13:19 2015
New Revision: 225677
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225677root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66633
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
On 2015.07.10 at 16:58 +0200, Philipp Thomas wrote:
Noticed while doing translation of the gcc messages. Please apply to trunk
if OK as I have no rfead/write access anymore AFAIK.
Patches should be sent to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org.
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org is for automated Bugzilla mail only.
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66715
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66313
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
No, that's not a good approach either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66823
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jul 10 12:33:28 2015
New Revision: 225671
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225671root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-07-10 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66830
Bug ID: 66830
Summary: Problem with C++ unique symbols in plugins
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66782
--- Comment #14 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Jul 10 13:17:02 2015
New Revision: 225674
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225674root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-07-10 Vladimir Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66820
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jul 10 14:14:18 2015
New Revision: 225678
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225678root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/66820
* gimplify.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66820
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60842
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60842
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jul 10 14:44:43 2015
New Revision: 225679
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225679root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-07-10 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52749
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66372
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62085
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21385
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66782
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61991
--- Comment #1 from Ryan Johnson scovich at gmail dot com ---
C++14 (N3652 [1]) specifically alters the Standard to state that a thread_local
object with static or constexpr initialization may have a non-trivial
destructor (implying that such a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66758
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66218
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60842
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
This is fixed in mainline. I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13590
--- Comment #22 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Not sure if Fabien is actively working on this..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66758
Eric Niebler eric.niebler at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54521
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66758
--- Comment #4 from Eric Niebler eric.niebler at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 35948
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35948action=edit
Preprocessed source, bug the third
The previous fix caused the code in attachment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66833
Bug ID: 66833
Summary: [4.9/5.1/6.0]: ICE on assumed-rank character actual
argument to intrinsic functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66832
Bug ID: 66832
Summary: [concepts] parameters in requires clauses conflicting
with function arguments
Product: gcc
Version: c++-concepts
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66834
Bug ID: 66834
Summary: [concepts] concept parameter kind mismatch causes hard
error
Product: gcc
Version: c++-concepts
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks like bug 13876.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66353
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752
Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ysrumyan at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66752
--- Comment #4 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 35947
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35947action=edit
test-case to reproduce
compile with -Ofast -m32 -march=slm and notice redundant test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66831
Bug ID: 66831
Summary: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/iinline-attr-2.c scan-assembler
p2align
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66835
Bug ID: 66835
Summary: C++ openMP test failed after switching to C++14
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66835
--- Comment #1 from Stupachenko Evgeny evstupac at gmail dot com ---
wrong revision bisected. Was just bootstrap fail. Searching for really bad.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66087
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
I think combine should reject this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66703
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Jul 10 15:32:48 2015
New Revision: 225680
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225680root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/66703
* gcc.target/i386/readeflags-1.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66837
Bug ID: 66837
Summary: Non-Native Default_Scalar_Storage_Order Breaks
Enum'Image
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66835
--- Comment #3 from Stupachenko Evgeny evstupac at gmail dot com ---
The same reproduced on GCC 5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66835
Stupachenko Evgeny evstupac at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66819
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jul 10 20:30:10 2015
New Revision: 225688
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225688root=gccview=rev
Log:
Allow indirect sibcall with register arguments
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66836
Bug ID: 66836
Summary: inconsistent unqualified lookup for friend declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66758
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 10 22:11:22 2015
New Revision: 225696
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225696root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/66758
* gcc/cp/pt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66758
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66758
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 10 22:45:41 2015
New Revision: 225704
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225704root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/66758
PR c++/66832
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66832
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 10 22:45:41 2015
New Revision: 225704
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225704root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/66758
PR c++/66832
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66832
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54521
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jul 10 22:56:35 2015
New Revision: 225705
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225705root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-07-10 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54521
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30044
--- Comment #8 from Patrick Palka ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ppalka
Date: Fri Jul 10 23:21:39 2015
New Revision: 225706
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225706root=gccview=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/30044
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66740
--- Comment #4 from tprince at computer dot org ---
It optimizes with implicit simd reduction and gives correct result with option
-ffast-math in place of -fopenmp.
92 matches
Mail list logo
