[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 --- Comment #36 from Evandro --- (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #35) > (In reply to Evandro from comment #32) > > Because of side effects of the Haiffa scheduler, the loads now pile up, and > > the ADRPs may affect the load issue

[Bug fortran/52673] implement -fheap-arrays in gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52673 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #2 from

[Bug middle-end/67295] [ARM][6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/arm/builtin-bswap-1.c scan-assembler-times revshne\\t 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67295 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/68216] [F2003] IO problem with allocatable, deferred character length arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68216 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I think that a meta-bug would be an excellent idea. It is pr68241.

[Bug target/68178] [arm] Relative address expressions bind at as-time, even if symbol is weak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68178 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug go/66138] json decoder Decode function fails for some structure return values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66138 --- Comment #4 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Sat Nov 7 01:25:43 2015 New Revision: 229908 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229908=gcc=rev Log: PR go/66138 reflect, encoding/json, encoding/xml: fix unexported

[Bug go/66138] json decoder Decode function fails for some structure return values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66138 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/66138] json decoder Decode function fails for some structure return values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66138 --- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Sat Nov 7 01:24:57 2015 New Revision: 229907 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229907=gcc=rev Log: PR go/66138 reflect, encoding/json, encoding/xml: fix unexported

[Bug inline-asm/10396] Constraint alternatives cause error " `asm' operand requires impossible reload"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10396 David changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gccbugzilla@limegreensocks. |

[Bug middle-end/65947] Vectorizer misses conditional assignment of constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65947 Alan Hayward changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 65947, which changed state. Bug 65947 Summary: Vectorizer misses conditional assignment of constant https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65947 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/68233] Performance : GCC not uses possible LDP-Instruction on ARM64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68233 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to

[Bug tree-optimization/68234] New: tree-vrp pass need to be improved when handling ASSERT/PLUS/MINUS/_EXPR and Phi node

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68234 Bug ID: 68234 Summary: tree-vrp pass need to be improved when handling ASSERT/PLUS/MINUS/_EXPR and Phi node Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/64164] [4.9/5/6 Regression] one more stack slot used due to one less inlining level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164 --- Comment #56 from Alexandre Oliva --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Nov 6 10:34:13 2015 New Revision: 229840 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229840=gcc=rev Log: [PR67753] fix copy of PARALLEL entry_parm to CONCAT target_reg In

[Bug rtl-optimization/67753] [6 Regression] FAIL: cxg1005, cxg2002, cxg2006, cxg2007, cxg2008, cxg2018, cxg2019 and cxg2020

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67753 --- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Nov 6 10:34:13 2015 New Revision: 229840 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229840=gcc=rev Log: [PR67753] fix copy of PARALLEL entry_parm to CONCAT target_reg In

[Bug fortran/68227] ICE on using variable limit in forall header (gfc_do_allocate)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/68221] libgomp reduction-11/12 failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68221 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/68231] [6 Regression] bootstrap failure after placement new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68231 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-ibm-aix*| Summary|[6 Regression] AIX

[Bug debug/68229] .debug_pubnames length field is too large

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68229 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-debug

[Bug middle-end/68232] New: gcc.dg/ifcvt-4.c fails on some arm configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68232 Bug ID: 68232 Summary: gcc.dg/ifcvt-4.c fails on some arm configurations Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/68162] [5/6 Regression] Incompatible pointer type using a typedef

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68162 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #8) > I don't know what DWARF semantics are meant to be, but the language > semantics are definitely that in C array types are always unqualified, >

[Bug tree-optimization/65963] Missed vectorization of loads strided with << when equivalent * succeeds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65963 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/68233] New: Performance : GCC not uses possible LDP-Instruction on ARM64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68233 Bug ID: 68233 Summary: Performance : GCC not uses possible LDP-Instruction on ARM64 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/68232] gcc.dg/ifcvt-4.c fails on some arm configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68232 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/68233] Performance : GCC not uses possible LDP-Instruction on ARM64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68233 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Can you try GCC 5 or the trunk, I think this was just fixed recently. And it is not 1 cycle, it is 4 cycles (the latency to L1).

[Bug target/68233] Performance : GCC not uses possible LDP-Instruction on ARM64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68233 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/53852] [4.9/5/6 Regression] -ftree-loop-linear: large compile time / memory usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53852 --- Comment #21 from vondele at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vondele Date: Fri Nov 6 09:51:12 2015 New Revision: 229839 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229839=gcc=rev Log: Add testcases for middle-end/53852 and middle-end/67518 2015-11-06

[Bug middle-end/67518] [6 Regression][graphite] ISL: position out of bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67518 --- Comment #4 from vondele at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vondele Date: Fri Nov 6 09:51:12 2015 New Revision: 229839 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229839=gcc=rev Log: Add testcases for middle-end/53852 and middle-end/67518 2015-11-06

[Bug tree-optimization/66612] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/20050830-1.c scan-assembler bdn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66612 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/68227] ICE on using variable limit in forall header (gfc_do_allocate)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68227 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The ICE occurs at gcc_assert (INTEGER_CST_P (size)); I don't follow the logic of gfc_do_allocate (tree bytesize, tree size, tree * pdata, stmtblock_t * pblock, tree

[Bug tree-optimization/68235] New: gimple optimisations always use global -fmath-errno setting

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68235 Bug ID: 68235 Summary: gimple optimisations always use global -fmath-errno setting Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug target/57845] ICE with -freg-struct-return on SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57845 --- Comment #8 from Sergey Organov --- I'm trying to upgrade from 3.4.4 to 5.2.0, and I used -freg-struct-return for years with 3.4.4 with no issues. Not that there is huge amount of code that actually uses functions returning structures, but

[Bug fortran/55099] Surprising but valid 'PROCEDURE attribute conflicts with INTENT attribute' error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55099 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/68234] tree-vrp pass need to be improved when handling ASSERT/PLUS/MINUS/_EXPR and Phi node

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68234 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug target/68228] __builtin_ia32_pbroadcastd256 generates wrong insn at >= -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68228 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||5.3.0, 6.0 --- Comment #3 from Uroš

[Bug tree-optimization/68145] [6 Regression] ICE: in vectorizable_store, at tree-vect-stmts.c:5684

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68145 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/57845] ICE with -freg-struct-return on SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57845 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/68235] gimple optimisations always use global -fmath-errno setting

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68235 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/68236] [6 Regression] selective scheduling with --param=sched-autopref-queue-depth=10 ICEs a lot @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68236 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 --- Comment #30 from Evandro --- The performance impact of always referring to constants as if they were far away is significant on targets which do not fuse ADRP and LDR together. What's the status of the solution that evaluates the function

[Bug fortran/68216] [F2003] IO problem with allocatable, deferred character length arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68216 --- Comment #4 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Dear Dominique, I think that a meta-bug would be an excellent idea. I am 5 regressions away from a fix for this PR. I'll get the patch to you over the weekend. Many thanks for your

[Bug fortran/68216] [F2003] IO problem with allocatable, deferred character length arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68216 --- Comment #5 from neil.n.carlson at gmail dot com --- Paul, I'm delighted than someone is finally working on this long-standing problem. I hope you're also taking a look at all the other related PRs that Dominique pointed out; I suspect that

[Bug fortran/44491] Diagnostic just shows "" instead of a locus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44491 --- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4) > Compiling the test in comment 0 with 5.2.0 or trunk gives an ICE > > in gfc_format_decoder, at fortran/error.c:936 There is an assert at that

[Bug rtl-optimization/68236] [6 Regression] selective scheduling with --param=sched-autopref-queue-depth=10 ICEs a lot @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68236 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/68237] New: ICE on invalid with submodules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68237 Bug ID: 68237 Summary: ICE on invalid with submodules Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug tree-optimization/68238] New: Vector cost model overestimates prologue cost for SLPed code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68238 Bug ID: 68238 Summary: Vector cost model overestimates prologue cost for SLPed code Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/68237] ICE on invalid with submodules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68237 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/68237] ICE on invalid with submodules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68237 --- Comment #2 from Martin Reinecke <mar...@mpa-garching.mpg.de> --- I'm using gcc version 6.0.0 20151106 (experimental) [trunk revision 2aebc1a:abfaa95:74905ec39301718edde3609ddd97ef8e0f9eb934] (GCC)

[Bug fortran/68237] ICE on invalid with submodules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68237 --- Comment #3 from Martin Reinecke --- Sorry, I update my sources via git... I hope this still helps.

[Bug bootstrap/68231] [6 Regression] bootstrap failure after placement new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68231 --- Comment #6 from David Edelsohn --- This seems to be fixed after Martin's second patch. Although the placement new size test in the testsuite fails on AIX.

[Bug tree-optimization/65963] Missed vectorization of loads strided with << when equivalent * succeeds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65963 --- Comment #4 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- I confirm the testcase fails execution on armeb-none-eabi (also at -O0), but it does so both with and without the patch to tree-scalar-evolution.c, which did not change codegen (at -O2

[Bug debug/68229] .debug_pubnames length field is too large

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68229 --- Comment #4 from Todd Allen --- It appears to have been fixed in gcc-4.9.0 by Sterling Augustine, 2013-07-25, with the new include_pubname_in_output function. I don't have a 4.9.0 compiler, but I did test it with gcc-4.9.2 on Fedora 21, and

[Bug fortran/68237] ICE on invalid with submodules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68237 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > Which revision are you using (gfortran -v). I get > > pr68237.f90:4:13: > > submodule (m1) m2 > 1 > Fatal Error: Can't open module file

[Bug fortran/68237] ICE on invalid with submodules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68237 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I still get the error with revision r229832 (2015-11-06). > gcc version 6.0.0 20151106 (experimental) [trunk revision > 2aebc1a:abfaa95:74905ec39301718edde3609ddd97ef8e0f9eb934] (GCC) exactly

[Bug bootstrap/68231] [6 Regression] bootstrap failure after placement new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68231 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Note that bootstrap fails also with ../../work/gcc/cp/init.c: In function 'void warn_placement_new_too_small(tree, tree, tree, tree)': ../../work/gcc/cp/init.c:2454:17: error: format '%lu' expects

[Bug fortran/68216] [F2003] IO problem with allocatable, deferred character length arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68216 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Paul, I'm delighted than someone is finally working on this long-standing > problem. Seconded! > I hope you're also taking a look at all the other related PRs that Dominique > pointed out; I

[Bug fortran/68237] ICE on invalid with submodules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68237 --- Comment #6 from Martin Reinecke --- Ah, my bad ... I still had an old m1.smod lying on disk from earlier tests! This slightly changed test case should demonstrate the problem: module m1 interface module

[Bug c++/67942] diagnose placement new buffer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67942 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Fri Nov 6 15:42:41 2015 New Revision: 229857 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229857=gcc=rev Log: Correct entry for PR c++/67942. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog

[Bug fortran/50221] Allocatable string length fails with array assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50221 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Note that the output for comment 0 is array=xxyyzz 2 3 when compiled with Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/opt/gcc/gcc6a-222042/bin/gfortran

[Bug fortran/68237] ICE on invalid with submodules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68237 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #7 from

[Bug bootstrap/68231] [6 Regression] bootstrap failure after placement new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68231 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug ipa/68057] [6 Regression] 450.soplex in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68057 --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Fri Nov 6 16:04:38 2015 New Revision: 229859 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229859=gcc=rev Log: PR ipa/68057 PR ipa/68220 * ipa-polymorphic-call.c

[Bug ipa/68220] [5/6 Regression] Devirtualization ICE in record_target_from_binfo, at ipa-devirt.c:2389

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68220 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Fri Nov 6 16:04:38 2015 New Revision: 229859 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229859=gcc=rev Log: PR ipa/68057 PR ipa/68220 * ipa-polymorphic-call.c

[Bug ipa/68057] [6 Regression] 450.soplex in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68057 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/67056] [5 regression] Wrong code generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67056 Bug 67056 depends on bug 68057, which changed state. Bug 68057 Summary: [6 Regression] 450.soplex in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68057 What|Removed |Added

[Bug ipa/68220] [5 Regression] Devirtualization ICE in record_target_from_binfo, at ipa-devirt.c:2389

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68220 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6 Regression]|[5 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/65419] incorrect sibcalls to libgomp functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65419 --- Comment #17 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Fri Nov 6 11:48:06 2015 New Revision: 229843 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229843=gcc=rev Log: Revert "Add IFN_GOACC_DATA_END_WITH_ARG" 2015-11-06 Tom de Vries

[Bug fortran/37513] Misleading error for (invalid) protected_pointer => unprotected_pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37513 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68145] [6 Regression] ICE: in vectorizable_store, at tree-vect-stmts.c:5684

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68145 --- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich --- Author: ienkovich Date: Fri Nov 6 13:31:51 2015 New Revision: 229848 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229848=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ PR tree-optimization/68145 * tree-vect-stmts.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/68106] c-c++-common/torture/builtin-arith-overflow-11.c FAILs with -flra-remat @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68106 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Fri Nov 6 17:33:01 2015 New Revision: 229868 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229868=gcc=rev Log: 2015-11-06 Vladimir Makarov PR

[Bug lto/67709] ICE: in estimate_function_body_sizes, at ipa-inline-analysis.c:2489 on x86_64-apple-darwin*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67709 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/68236] New: [6 Regression] selective scheduling with --param=sched-autopref-queue-depth=10 ICEs a lot @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68236 Bug ID: 68236 Summary: [6 Regression] selective scheduling with --param=sched-autopref-queue-depth=10 ICEs a lot @ aarch64 Product: gcc Version: 6.0

[Bug bootstrap/68231] [6 Regression] bootstrap failure after placement new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68231 Ulrich Weigand changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug debug/66728] [5/6 Regression] CONST_WIDE_INT causes corrupted DWARF debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66728 --- Comment #8 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mrs Date: Fri Nov 6 20:16:06 2015 New Revision: 229885 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229885=gcc=rev Log: PR debug/66728 * dwarf2out.c (get_full_len): Return a value

[Bug tree-optimization/68240] New: compilation hangs on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68240 Bug ID: 68240 Summary: compilation hangs on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/68239] New: libbacktrace allocation is sometimes very slow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68239 Bug ID: 68239 Summary: libbacktrace allocation is sometimes very slow Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 --- Comment #31 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to Evandro from comment #30) > The performance impact of always referring to constants as if they were far > away is significant on targets which do not fuse ADRP and LDR together. What

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 --- Comment #33 from Wilco --- (In reply to Evandro from comment #32) > (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #31) > > (In reply to Evandro from comment #30) > > > The performance impact of always referring to constants as if they were

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 --- Comment #32 from Evandro --- (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #31) > (In reply to Evandro from comment #30) > > The performance impact of always referring to constants as if they were far > > away is significant on targets

[Bug target/68088] [6 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'subreg' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1782 @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68088 --- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Fri Nov 6 12:04:15 2015 New Revision: 229845 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229845=gcc=rev Log: [ARM/AArch64] PR 68088: Fix RTL checking ICE due to subregs inside

[Bug fortran/44491] Diagnostic just shows "" instead of a locus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44491 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/67753] [6 Regression] FAIL: cxg1005, cxg2002, cxg2006, cxg2007, cxg2008, cxg2018, cxg2019 and cxg2020

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67753 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/64164] [4.9/5/6 Regression] one more stack slot used due to one less inlining level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164 Bug 64164 depends on bug 67753, which changed state. Bug 67753 Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL: cxg1005, cxg2002, cxg2006, cxg2007, cxg2008, cxg2018, cxg2019 and cxg2020 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67753 What

[Bug target/68088] [6 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'subreg' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1782 @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68088 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/55099] Surprising but valid 'PROCEDURE attribute conflicts with INTENT attribute' error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55099 --- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4) > Improving the message will be quite trivial once an agreement is found about > the improvement. Would the addition of "This name has not been

[Bug middle-end/68221] libgomp reduction-11/12 failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68221 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- I don't have any testcase that would exhibit a problem with variable low-bound, but that is not a proof there isn't a problem. Trying: typedef __UINTPTR_TYPE__ uintptr_t; void bar (unsigned short *,

[Bug fortran/31560] improve error message for using components of later decl. variables in specification expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31560 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #10 from

[Bug target/68236] [6 Regression] selective scheduling with --param=sched-autopref-queue-depth=10 ICEs a lot @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68236 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 --- Comment #34 from Evandro --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #33) > (In reply to Evandro from comment #32) > ADRP latency to load-address should be zero on any OoO core - ADRP is > basically a move-immediate, so can execute early and hide

[Bug debug/66728] [5/6 Regression] CONST_WIDE_INT causes corrupted DWARF debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66728 mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/54224] Warn for unused internal procedures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54224 --- Comment #31 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Fri Nov 6 21:49:18 2015 New Revision: 229894 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229894=gcc=rev Log: 2015-11-06 Dominique d'Humieres PR

[Bug fortran/54224] Warn for unused internal procedures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54224 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/54221] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Explicit private access specifier signals "unexpected defined but not used [-Wunused-function]" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221 Bug 54221 depends on bug 54224, which changed state. Bug 54224 Summary: Warn for unused internal procedures https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54224 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/68241] New: [meta-bug] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug ID: 68241 Summary: [meta-bug] Deferred-length character Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 --- Comment #35 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- (In reply to Evandro from comment #32) > (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #31) > > (In reply to Evandro from comment #30) > > > The performance impact of always referring to constants

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|