[Bug fortran/63867] LEN is lost for a CHARACTER variable inside SELECT TYPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63867 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/32199] jc1: out of memory allocating 4072 bytes after a total of 805021000 bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32199 nightstrike changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nightstrike at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug fortran/70006] Duplicate errors "label not defined"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70006 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > OK, How about WONTFIX? If the programmer fixes the > issue reported in the "duplicate" error message, then > the problem goes away. Well, this is quite general: if your code does not generate any

[Bug tree-optimization/42108] [4.9 Regression] 50% performance regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42108 --- Comment #72 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Fixed on trunk (solar). Any plan for 4.9 or should this PR closed as FIXED?

[Bug target/70014] New: [ARM] Predicate does not match constraint (*subsi3_carryin_const)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70014 Bug ID: 70014 Summary: [ARM] Predicate does not match constraint (*subsi3_carryin_const) Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/60126] Internal compiler error with code using pointer reshaping (gfortran 4.8.2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60126 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/60126] Internal compiler error with code using pointer reshaping (gfortran 4.8.2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60126 --- Comment #7 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Mon Feb 29 06:09:47 2016 New Revision: 233802 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233802=gcc=rev Log: 2016-02-29 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/60126

[Bug tree-optimization/70013] New: packed structure tree-sra loses initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70013 Bug ID: 70013 Summary: packed structure tree-sra loses initialization Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/70012] New: test case gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-33.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70012 Bug ID: 70012 Summary: test case gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-33.c fails Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/70011] [6 regression] test case gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-fast-math-vect-pr29925.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70011 Bill Seurer changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64le-linux-gnu CC|

[Bug target/70011] New: [6 regression] test case gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-fast-math-vect-pr29925.c fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70011 Bug ID: 70011 Summary: [6 regression] test case gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-fast-math-vect-pr2 9925.c fails Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status:

[Bug c/70010] powerpc: -flto forgets 'no-vsx' function attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70010 --- Comment #2 from Cyril Bur --- Created attachment 37820 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37820=edit with -flto

[Bug c/70010] powerpc: -flto forgets 'no-vsx' function attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70010 --- Comment #1 from Cyril Bur --- Created attachment 37819 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37819=edit without -flto

[Bug c/70010] New: powerpc: -flto forgets 'no-vsx' function attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70010 Bug ID: 70010 Summary: powerpc: -flto forgets 'no-vsx' function attributes Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/70001] [5 regression] Infinity compilation time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #6) > struct X > { > int a; > > constexpr X () : a (0) { } > }; > > const int N = 1 << 19; > > struct A > { > X elems[N]; > } F; > > > Just playing around,

[Bug target/70009] New: test case libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/vprop.c fails starting with its introduction in r233607

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70009 Bug ID: 70009 Summary: test case libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/vprop.c fails starting with its introduction in r233607 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/70006] Duplicate errors "label not defined"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70006 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- OK, How about WONTFIX? If the programmer fixes the issue reported in the "duplicate" error message, then the problem goes away. Amazing what an error message can convey! PS: The first duplicate

[Bug libgcc/69997] GCC5.3.0 _Unwind_ForcedUnwind Always Abort While pthread_exit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69997 --- Comment #2 from Liu Qiang --- yeah, i recommitted the page before the first committing done.

[Bug libgcc/69997] GCC5.3.0 _Unwind_ForcedUnwind Always Abort While pthread_exit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69997 Liu Qiang changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||EH Severity|normal

[Bug c++/70001] [5 regression] Infinity compilation time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001 --- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka --- struct X { int a; constexpr X () : a (0) { } }; const int N = 1 << 19; struct A { X elems[N]; } F; Just playing around, but naively sharing the constructor of each array element in the case of

[Bug target/70008] New: [ARM] Reverse subtract with carry can be generated in thumb2 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70008 Bug ID: 70008 Summary: [ARM] Reverse subtract with carry can be generated in thumb2 mode Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/69990] decl alignment not respected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69990 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- Oh, and in case it isn't obvious, -free-loop-vectorize is what triggers the alignment increase of arrays in pass_ipa_increase_alignment.

[Bug tree-optimization/69990] decl alignment not respected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69990 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- Created attachment 37817 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37817=edit prevent var alias Jan, does this look reasonable?

[Bug tree-optimization/69990] decl alignment not respected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69990 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/60126] Internal compiler error with code using pointer reshaping (gfortran 4.8.2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60126 --- Comment #6 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Sun Feb 28 22:40:06 2016 New Revision: 233798 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233798=gcc=rev Log: 2016-02-28 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/60126

[Bug fortran/47674] gfortran.dg/realloc_on_assign_5.f03: Segfault at run time for deferred (allocatable) string length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47674 --- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Feb 28 22:27:55 2016 New Revision: 233797 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233797=gcc=rev Log: 2016-02-28 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/68147

[Bug fortran/68147] Potential incorrect code generation for string self-assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68147 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Feb 28 22:27:55 2016 New Revision: 233797 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233797=gcc=rev Log: 2016-02-28 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/68147

[Bug fortran/70006] Duplicate errors "label not defined"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70006 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW

[Bug fortran/70006] Duplicate errors "label not defined"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70006 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/70006] Duplicate errors "label not defined"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70006 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70001] [5 regression] Infinity compilation time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/70007] New: [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code with -mbmi2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70007 Bug ID: 70007 Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code with -mbmi2 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug c++/70001] [5 regression] Infinity compilation time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from

[Bug fortran/70006] New: Duplicate errors "label not defined"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70006 Bug ID: 70006 Summary: Duplicate errors "label not defined" Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug rtl-optimization/70005] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70005 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/56007] Remarkably bad error message with DO array=1,2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56007 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/70005] New: wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20160228 (experimental) [trunk revision 233789] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -Os small.c; ./a.out $ gcc-5.3 -O2 small.c; ./a.out $ $ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c $ ./a.out Aborted (core dumped) $ --- unsigned char a = 6

[Bug c++/70001] [5 regression] Infinity compilation time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Actually the nested array is enough to reproduce the issue: #include #include const int LOG = 17; const int N = (1 << LOG); std::array, LOG> F;

[Bug target/70004] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/scalar_shift_1.c scan-assembler-times neg\\td[0-9]+, d[0-9]+ 4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70004 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug target/70004] New: [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/scalar_shift_1.c scan-assembler-times neg\\td[0-9]+, d[0-9]+ 4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70004 Bug ID: 70004 Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/scalar_shift_1.c scan-assembler-times neg\\td[0-9]+, d[0-9]+ 4 Product: gcc Version: 6.0

[Bug testsuite/70003] gcc.target/aarch64/scalar_shift_1.c should be split up

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70003 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||aarch64-linux-gnu

[Bug testsuite/70003] New: gcc.target/aarch64/scalar_shift_1.c should be split up

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70003 Bug ID: 70003 Summary: gcc.target/aarch64/scalar_shift_1.c should be split up Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/70002] [6 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr52429.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70002 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|target Target Milestone|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/70002] New: [6 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr52429.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70002 Bug ID: 70002 Summary: [6 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr52429.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none ICEs Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/70001] [5 regression] Infinity compilation time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- markus@x4 tmp % cat fft-old.cpp #include #include using namespace std; typedef std::complex cd; const int LOG = 17; const int N = (1 << LOG); array A; array B; void FFT(array

[Bug fortran/56007] Remarkably bad error message with DO array=1,2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56007 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun Feb 28 19:07:42 2016 New Revision: 233795 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233795=gcc=rev Log: 2016-02-28 Harald Anlauf Jerry DeLisle

[Bug c++/70001] [5 regression] Infinity compilation time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/69989] [6 Regression] ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes (in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1639)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69989 --- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Sun Feb 28 18:54:00 2016 New Revision: 233794 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233794=gcc=rev Log: Add a test for PR tree-optimization/69989 Backport from mainline

[Bug fortran/66310] Problems with intrinsic repeat for large number of copies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66310 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #8) ... snip ... > before the patch and with > > pr66310_1.f90:3:0: > >print *, repeat(z, huge(1_4)) > > internal compiler error: Segmentation

[Bug fortran/56007] Remarkably bad error message with DO array=1,2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56007 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/70001] New: Infinity compilation time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001 Bug ID: 70001 Summary: Infinity compilation time Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/67013] Compilation error for well-formed program with empty declaration in the global namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67013 TC changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com --- Comment #11 from TC

[Bug fortran/61156] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Internal compiler error for Fortran files when specifying a file instead of an include directory with -I

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61156 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/61156] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Internal compiler error for Fortran files when specifying a file instead of an include directory with -I

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61156 --- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun Feb 28 18:16:56 2016 New Revision: 233793 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233793=gcc=rev Log: 2016-02-28 Jerry DeLisle Backported from

[Bug tree-optimization/70000] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr69666.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/69989] [6 Regression] ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes (in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1639)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69989 --- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Sun Feb 28 17:41:45 2016 New Revision: 233792 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233792=gcc=rev Log: Add a test for PR tree-optimization/69989 PR

[Bug tree-optimization/70000] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr69666.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin --- Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00975130 in is_gimple_reg_type (type=0x0) at ../../gcc/gcc/gimple-expr.h:75 75return !AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (type); (gdb) bt #0 0x00975130 in

[Bug tree-optimization/70000] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr69666.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7 Bug ID: 7 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr69666.c (internal compiler error) Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/69961] Segfault when calling constructor from variadic template by referring to T::T

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69961 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/69995] [5/6 Regression] [C++14] Invalid result when evaluating constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69995 --- Comment #2 from Louis Dionne --- I know but using a runtime assert allows showing that with/without constexpr have different results. Also, I wanted to emphasize the fact that it could result into a runtime error, since these are much more

[Bug ada/69926] compiler crash on invalid Range attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69926 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug fortran/60126] Internal compiler error with code using pointer reshaping (gfortran 4.8.2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60126 --- Comment #5 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Sun Feb 28 13:39:39 2016 New Revision: 233790 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233790=gcc=rev Log: 2016-02-28 Harald Anlauf PR fortran/60126

[Bug fortran/66310] Problems with intrinsic repeat for large number of copies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66310 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Created attachment 37811 > --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37811=edit > Proposed patch > > This patch fixes some signed integer problems in a few places and allows the > test

[Bug tree-optimization/69999] [6 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1639 (error: loop with header 3 not in loop tree) at -O3 or -Ofast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/69995] [5/6 Regression] [C++14] Invalid result when evaluating constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69995 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal

[Bug tree-optimization/69999] New: [6 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1639 (error: loop with header 3 not in loop tree) at -O3 or -Ofast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6 Bug ID: 6 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1639 (error: loop with header 3 not in loop tree) at -O3 or -Ofast Product: gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/67800] [6 Regression] Missed vectorization opportunity on x86 (DOT_PROD_EXPR in non-reduction)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67800 afomin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED CC|

[Bug target/69988] libgo.so: undefined reference to `__unorddf2'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69988 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- The gccgo commandline uses -static-libgcc. Make sure that -lgcc is linked after libgo.

[Bug libgcc/69997] GCC5.3.0 _Unwind_ForcedUnwind Always Abort While pthread_exit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69997 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |normal

[Bug libgcc/69997] GCC5.3.0 _Unwind_ForcedUnwind Always Abort While pthread_exit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69997 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- *** Bug 69998 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug libgcc/69998] GCC5.3.0 _Unwind_ForcedUnwind Always Abort While pthread_exit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69998 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/69995] [C++14] Invalid result when evaluating constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69995 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|