[Bug target/70117] ppc long double isinf() is wrong?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70117 --- Comment #7 from Ulrich Weigand --- Ah, OK. I did't realize this value didn't fit into a 106-bit mantissa. I agree that it probably doesn't make sense to change the internal representation to allow larger mantissas. First of all, there's

[Bug sanitizer/70135] New: -fsanitize=undefined causes static_assert to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70135 Bug ID: 70135 Summary: -fsanitize=undefined causes static_assert to fail Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/70112] [lto] Segmentation fault in Libreoffice's program gengal.bin when build with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70112 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at ucw dot cz --- Comment

[Bug lto/69953] [5/6 Regression] Using lto causes gtkmm/gparted and gtkmm/inkscape compile to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69953 --- Comment #16 from john.frankish at outlook dot com --- Any news on a possible patch?

[Bug c/7652] -Wswitch-break : Warn if a switch case falls through

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652 --- Comment #38 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Matthew Woehlke from comment #37) > [[fallthrough]] was approved for C++17. While the standard does not > normatively *require* a diagnostic, it's certainly expected that one be > issued. It's

[Bug c++/53637] NRVO not applied where there are two different variables involved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53637 TC changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com --- Comment #6 from TC

[Bug rtl-optimization/70134] New: combine misses jump optimization on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70134 Bug ID: 70134 Summary: combine misses jump optimization on powerpc64le Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug c/70133] New: AArch64 -mtune=native generates improperly formatted -march parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70133 Bug ID: 70133 Summary: AArch64 -mtune=native generates improperly formatted -march parameters Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/70117] ppc long double isinf() is wrong?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70117 --- Comment #6 from Alan Modra --- > Well, what I don't quite understand is that the gnulib value, which is > > 0x1.f7cp+1023 Sorry, I didn't look properly at the bug before commenting last night. For some reason I

[Bug target/70117] ppc long double isinf() is wrong?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70117 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- The issue is that GCC internally handles IBM long double as having a 106-bit mantissa. There is one value that is larger than can be represented with a 106-bit mantissa, while still being

[Bug c/70114] Incompatible implicit function declaration error when parameters actually match a prototype in another scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70114 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Mon, 7 Mar 2016, tanzx940228 at hotmail dot com wrote: > 3.gcc.error.c > - > int main() { > { > int foo(float arg0, float arg1); > foo(3.0f, 4.0f); >

[Bug target/70048] [6 Regression][AArch64] Inefficient local array addressing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70048 --- Comment #12 from Wilco --- (In reply to Jiong Wang from comment #11) > (In reply to Richard Henderson from comment #10) > > Created attachment 37890 [details] > > second patch > > > > Still going through full testing, but I wanted to post

[Bug fortran/70058] Segmentation fault when open file with existing file and status = "UNKNOWN"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70058 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70112] [lto] Segmentation fault in Libreoffice's program gengal.bin when build with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70112 --- Comment #3 from Marek Behun --- Created attachment 37892 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37892=edit sanitizer-output.txt

[Bug target/70048] [6 Regression][AArch64] Inefficient local array addressing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70048 --- Comment #11 from Jiong Wang --- (In reply to Richard Henderson from comment #10) > Created attachment 37890 [details] > second patch > > Still going through full testing, but I wanted to post this > before the end of the day. > > This

[Bug c++/70112] [lto] Segmentation fault in Libreoffice's program gengal.bin when build with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70112 --- Comment #2 from Marek Behun --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1) Does not happen with -O0, does with -O1, -O2, -O3. When gengal.bin is compiled with -O0 -fsanitize=undefined, then in runs successfully, but the sanitizer

[Bug driver/70132] New: ARM -mcpu=native can cause a double free abort.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70132 Bug ID: 70132 Summary: ARM -mcpu=native can cause a double free abort. Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/70128] Linux kernel div patching optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70128 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Well, it is a question if it is -fno-strict-aliasing or -std=kernel thing. Anyway, IMHO what matters is the points-to stuff: Points-to sets ANYTHING = { ANYTHING } ESCAPED = { ESCAPED NONLOCAL __aeabi_uidiv

[Bug target/59054] Powerpc -O0 -mcpu=power7 generates sub-optimal code to load 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59054 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/70131] PowerPC ISA 2.07 is inefficient at doint (float)(int)x.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70131 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/70131] New: PowerPC ISA 2.07 is inefficient at doint (float)(int)x.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70131 Bug ID: 70131 Summary: PowerPC ISA 2.07 is inefficient at doint (float)(int)x. Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/70128] Linux kernel div patching optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70128 --- Comment #7 from Richard Henderson --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > I still say this is undefined even with -fno-strict-aliasing because > patching a function is undefined. Oh please. I think that's short-sighted. I don't

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] New: h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 Bug ID: 70130 Summary: h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/70128] Linux kernel div patching optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70128 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Note since 4.5 is not out yet there looks to be another week before it comes out. The fix to the kernel can make it in.

[Bug tree-optimization/70128] Linux kernel div patching optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70128 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- I still say this is undefined even with -fno-strict-aliasing because patching a function is undefined.

[Bug tree-optimization/70128] Linux kernel div patching optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70128 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Shouldn't the call to v7_coherent_kern_range prevent DSE from removing the store to fn_addr[0] and fn_addr[1]? It feels like the undefined nature of this code is leading to a lack of proper dataflow for

[Bug target/70048] [6 Regression][AArch64] Inefficient local array addressing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70048 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #37886|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug lto/69650] [6 Regression] ICE in linemap_line_start, at libcpp/line-map.c:803

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69650 --- Comment #9 from Bernd Schmidt --- Hmm, seems to break Ada of all things...

[Bug libstdc++/70129] [6 Regression] stdlib.h: No such file or directory when using -isystem /usr/include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70129 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/70129] [6 Regression] stdlib.h: No such file or directory when using -isystem /usr/include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70129 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/70127] [6 Regression] wrong code on x86_64-linux-gnu at -O3 in 32-bit and 64-bit modes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70127 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug libstdc++/70129] New: [6 Regression] stdlib.h: No such file or directory when using -isystem /usr/include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70129 Bug ID: 70129 Summary: [6 Regression] stdlib.h: No such file or directory when using -isystem /usr/include Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/70064] Wrong code with custom flags and quite big testcase @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70064 --- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > So, shall we silently disable -mred-zone for -fpic/-fPIE in 32-bit code? > Or error out in that combination? > Or disable it only if we need PIC pointer? > What

[Bug target/70064] Wrong code with custom flags and quite big testcase @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70064 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/70128] Linux kernel div patching optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70128 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- *.mergephi1 has (just the first half, the second one is analogous): __aeabi_uidiv.0_1 = (long unsigned int) __aeabi_uidiv; fn_addr_2 = __aeabi_uidiv.0_1 & 4294967294; fn_addr.1_3 = (unsigned int *)

[Bug target/70064] Wrong code with custom flags and quite big testcase @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70064 --- Comment #10 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Mon Mar 7 19:54:02 2016 New Revision: 234050 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234050=gcc=rev Log: PR target/70064 * config/i386/i386.h (machine_function):

[Bug tree-optimization/70128] Linux kernel div patching optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70128 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Just so I'm clear on what's happening here. Precisely which stores are getting removed?

[Bug tree-optimization/70128] Linux kernel div patching optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70128 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think anyone patching functions need to be considered special and undefined. In most cases they did not mean to do it. Just the kernel is special. > just add an optimization barrier on fn_addr (like asm

[Bug tree-optimization/70128] New: Linux kernel div patching optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70128 Bug ID: 70128 Summary: Linux kernel div patching optimized away Product: gcc Version: 6.0 URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303147 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/70126] VLA accepted in sizeof and typedef, allowing integer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70126 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Yes, there are some significant differences between C99 VLAs and N3639. I don't know how common using sizeof with VLA types is in C++. I suspect not very. VLAs never did make it into C++ 14 (though I'm not

[Bug target/70048] [6 Regression][AArch64] Inefficient local array addressing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70048 --- Comment #9 from Richard Henderson --- While I fully believe in CSE'ing "base + reg*scale" when talking about non-stack-based pointers, when it comes to stack-based data access I'm less certain about the proper approach. All things work out

[Bug tree-optimization/70094] Missed optimization when passing a constant struct argument by value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70094 --- Comment #2 from Robert Obryk --- Note that this optimization can not only be applied when the parameter is a compile-time constant. The following function can also be compiled so as not to touch the stack: --snip-- struct foo { int a;

[Bug web/70127] New: wrong code on x86_64-linux-gnu at -O3 in 32-bit and 64-bit modes

Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20160307 (experimental) [trunk revision 234022] (GCC) $: $: gcc-trunk -O3 small.c ; ./a.out 0 $: gcc-4.7 -O3 small.c ; ./a.out 0 $: gcc-4.8 -O3 small.c ; ./a.out 0 $: gcc-trunk -O0 small.c ; ./a.out 1 $: cat small.c int printf(const char *, ...); struct S0

[Bug target/24998] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Build failure: undefined symbol __floatunsitf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24998 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/44756] [meta-bug] --enable-werror-always issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44756 Bug 44756 depends on bug 49401, which changed state. Bug 49401 Summary: Warning regression for 'uninitialized' variable on non-existant code path (in mep-pragma.c) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49401 What|Removed

[Bug other/49401] Warning regression for 'uninitialized' variable on non-existant code path (in mep-pragma.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49401 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/64402] mep-elf ICE in pre_and_rev_post_order_compute, at cfganal.c:1022

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64402 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/70126] VLA accepted in sizeof and typedef, allowing integer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70126 --- Comment #1 from Florian Weimer --- There seems to be a fundamental incompatibility here with supporting the GNU CC VLA extension and this new (and apparently dead) C++ VLA specification. I wonder how much existing G++ code applies sizeof to

[Bug target/70048] [6 Regression][AArch64] Inefficient local array addressing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70048 --- Comment #8 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Henderson from comment #6) > Created attachment 37886 [details] > proposed patch > > I agree -- at minimum virtual and eliminable frame registers ought to be > special-cased.

[Bug testsuite/70009] test case libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/vprop.c fails starting with its introduction in r233607

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70009 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc*-*-*, aarch64-*-* |powerpc*-*-*, aarch64-*-*,

[Bug c++/70105] [6 regression] giant warning when building gcc-5 with gcc-6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70105 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/70126] New: VLA accepted in sizeof and typedef, allowing integer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70126 Bug ID: 70126 Summary: VLA accepted in sizeof and typedef, allowing integer overflow Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/70123] [6 Regression] Miscompilation of cfitsio testcase on s390x-linux starting with r222144

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70123 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Ah, the spilled value is pseudo 240, which holds Dunno why instead of spilling it it couldn't be rematerialized. Anyway, the value in r6 after the f9 call is needed, so all that seems to be wrong is the

[Bug target/70123] [6 Regression] Miscompilation of cfitsio testcase on s390x-linux starting with r222144

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70123 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- The __builtin_strcat in the testcase should be __builtin_strcpy, it reproduces even with that and without it it has UB. Anyway, what I see is that the f9 call loads the g variable into %r6 register (for

[Bug c++/16994] [meta-bug] VLA and C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994 Bug 16994 depends on bug 21113, which changed state. Bug 21113 Summary: Jumps into VLA or VM scope not rejected for C++ https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21113 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/21113] Jumps into VLA or VM scope not rejected for C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21113 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Last reconfirmed|2012-01-05

[Bug c++/70076] no exception for excess initializer elements in a multidimensional VLA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70076 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70019] VLA size overflow not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70019 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Patch for this bug and for bug 69517 posted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00441.html

[Bug c++/69517] [5/6 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- Patch posted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00441.html

[Bug rtl-optimization/19705] -fno-branch-count-reg doesn't prevent decrement and branch instructions on a count register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19705 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/66786] [5/6 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66786 --- Comment #8 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Mon Mar 7 17:09:53 2016 New Revision: 234038 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234038=gcc=rev Log: Adjust fix for PR c++/66786 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: PR c++/66786 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/19705] -fno-branch-count-reg doesn't prevent decrement and branch instructions on a count register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19705 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Mon Mar 7 17:10:12 2016 New Revision: 234039 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234039=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/19705 - -fno-branch-count-reg doesn't prevent decrement

[Bug tree-optimization/69740] [5/6 Regression] gcc ICE at -O2 and above on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "verify_loop_structure"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69740 --- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Mon Mar 7 17:01:54 2016 New Revision: 234036 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234036=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/69740 * cfghooks.c (remove_edge): Request loop

[Bug target/70120] [6 Regression][aarch64] -g causes Assembler messages: Error: unaligned opcodes detected in executable segment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70120 Zdenek Sojka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6 Regression][aarch64] |[6 Regression][aarch64] -g

[Bug rtl-optimization/69052] [6 Regression] Performance regression after r229402.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69052 --- Comment #17 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: amker Date: Mon Mar 7 16:39:27 2016 New Revision: 234034 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234034=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/69052 * rtlanal.c

[Bug c++/70124] alignas error in constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70124 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- Bug 70125 tracks the problem with the missing context of the diagnostic.

[Bug c++/70125] New: attributes diagnostics missing essential context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70125 Bug ID: 70125 Summary: attributes diagnostics missing essential context Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug lto/69650] [6 Regression] ICE in linemap_line_start, at libcpp/line-map.c:803

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69650 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/70124] New: alignas error in constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70124 Bug ID: 70124 Summary: alignas error in constexpr function Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug rtl-optimization/69633] [6 Regression] Redundant move is generated after r228097

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69633 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/70123] [6 Regression] Miscompilation of cfitsio testcase on s390x-linux starting with r222144

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70123 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/70117] ppc long double isinf() is wrong?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70117 --- Comment #4 from Ulrich Weigand --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #3) > > while with GCC, we get: > > > > high double: 7FEF > > low double: 7C8F FFFE > > Right. This is 0x1.f78p+1023

[Bug target/70123] New: [6 Regression] Miscompilation of

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70123 Bug ID: 70123 Summary: [6 Regression] Miscompilation of Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/70120] [6 Regression][aarch64] -freorder-functions -g causes Assembler messages: Error: unaligned opcodes detected in executable segment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70120 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.4, 5.3.1

[Bug tree-optimization/69666] [5 Regression] gcc ICE at -O2 and -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "verify_gimple failed"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69666 --- Comment #14 from Martin Jambor --- With the reverted patch re-applied, this should be again fixed everywhere (and the fix should not be causing any new issues).

[Bug target/70120] [aarch64] -mno-pc-relative-literal-loads -g causes Assembler messages: Error: unaligned opcodes detected in executable segment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70120 --- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka --- Created attachment 37888 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37888=edit another testcase This testcase does not need -mno-pc-relative-literal-loads. $ aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -Og

[Bug target/63503] [AArch64] A57 executes fused multiply-add poorly in some situations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63503 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/7652] -Wswitch-break : Warn if a switch case falls through

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652 --- Comment #37 from Matthew Woehlke --- > Essentially, this warning and the "intentional fallthrough" attribute exist for both clang and MSVC and will be enabled there; but GCC still doesn't have this feature. [[fallthrough]] was approved for

[Bug tree-optimization/70116] tail-merge merges ubsan internal fns with different location information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70116 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/70048] [6 Regression][AArch64] Inefficient local array addressing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70048 Jiong Wang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug libstdc++/69879] Create a pointer to the default operator new and delete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69879 Gabriel Ibarra changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #37848|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/69666] [5 Regression] gcc ICE at -O2 and -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "verify_gimple failed"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69666 --- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Mon Mar 7 15:17:49 2016 New Revision: 234030 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234030=gcc=rev Log: Fix PR 69666 and PR 69920 2016-03-07 Martin Jambor

[Bug middle-end/69920] [6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr42704.C -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69920 --- Comment #16 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Mon Mar 7 15:17:49 2016 New Revision: 234030 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234030=gcc=rev Log: Fix PR 69666 and PR 69920 2016-03-07 Martin Jambor

[Bug c/7652] -Wswitch-break : Warn if a switch case falls through

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652 Tom Tromey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #36

[Bug target/70117] ppc long double isinf() is wrong?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70117 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/70013] [6 Regression] packed structure tree-sra loses initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70013 --- Comment #9 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- In analyze_access_subtree (since r147980, "New implementation of SRA", 2009): else if (root->grp_write || TREE_CODE (root->base) == PARM_DECL) root->grp_unscalarized_data = 1; /* not

[Bug libgomp/70122] [openacc] Handle acc loop directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70122 --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to vries from comment #2) > For now, marking missed-optimization/enhancement. There might also be > correctness failures due to the lack of explicit handling, I'm not sure. Which is why

[Bug libgomp/70122] [openacc] Handle acc loop directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70122 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- For now, marking missed-optimization/enhancement. There might also be correctness failures due to the lack of explicit handling, I'm not sure.

[Bug libgomp/70122] [openacc] Handle acc loop directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70122 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug libgomp/70122] [openacc] Handle acc loop directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70122 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization, patch

[Bug tree-optimization/70013] [6 Regression] packed structure tree-sra loses initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70013 --- Comment #8 from Martin Jambor --- That is what I suspected. Please have at look why analyze_access_subtree (which has to set the grp_unscalarized_data flag) acts differently then.

[Bug libgomp/70122] New: [openacc] Handle acc loop directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70122 Bug ID: 70122 Summary: [openacc] Handle acc loop directive Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgomp

[Bug rtl-optimization/69710] performance issue with SP Linpack with Autovectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69710 --- Comment #15 from Doug Gilmore --- > I had a patch too, will send it for review in GCC7 if it's still needed. Sorry I got side track last week and didn't make much progress. Please go ahead and submit if you have something you feel

[Bug tree-optimization/70116] tail-merge merges ubsan internal fns with different location information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70116 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Mon Mar 7 14:50:13 2016 New Revision: 234029 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234029=gcc=rev Log: Skip ubsan/asan internal fns with different location in tail-merge

[Bug c++/67364] [5/6 Regression] "accessing uninitialized member" error in constexpr context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364 --- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Mar 7 14:43:14 2016 New Revision: 234028 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234028=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/67364 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_store_expression): Replace

[Bug lto/69607] undefined reference to MAIN__._omp_fn.0 in atomic_capture-1.f with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69607 --- Comment #24 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to vries from comment #23) > pinged patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01632.html ping^2: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00487.html

[Bug tree-optimization/70013] [6 Regression] packed structure tree-sra loses initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70013 --- Comment #7 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- *second* half, sorry. grp_to_be_replaced is here true, but grp_unscalarized_data is false, so handle_unscalarized_data_in_subtree sets sad->refreshed=UDH_LEFT and we build the access to the LHS.

[Bug target/70083] [6 Regression] ICE: in assign_stack_local_1, at function.c:409 with -fschedule-insns -mavx512* @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70083 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- RA is not my area of expertise, so sure, go ahead (unless Vlad wants to have a look).

[Bug c++/70121] [5/6 Regression] spurious warning and crash when returning a reference from lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70121 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRMED

  1   2   >