[Bug middle-end/70526] [5/6 Regression] GCC 6 miscompiles Firefox JIT compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70526 --- Comment #34 from Vittorio Zecca --- The Intel icpc compiler complains that in the reduced testcase ansi-alias rules are violated. icpc gccerr45.C -Wstrict-aliasing gccerr45.C(77) (col. 32): warning #2102: violation of ansi-alias rules This

[Bug c++/71166] [6/7 Regression] ICE with nested constexpr/initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/56671] Gcc uses large amounts of memory and processor power with large C++11 bitsets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56671 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc-bugzilla at bmevers dot de ---

[Bug c++/63728] Memory exhaustion using constexpr constructors for classes with large array members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63728 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 63728, which changed state. Bug 63728 Summary: Memory exhaustion using constexpr constructors for classes with large array members https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63728 What|Removed

[Bug target/71151] [avr] -fmerge-constants and -fdata-sections/-ffunction-sections results in string constants in .progmem.gcc_sw section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151 --- Comment #1 from Senthil Kumar Selvaraj --- A workaround is to disable constant merging (-fno-merge-constants).

[Bug tree-optimization/63586] x+x+x+x -> 4*x in gimple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63586 --- Comment #8 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kugan Date: Wed May 18 00:58:45 2016 New Revision: 236356 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236356=gcc=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2016-05-17 Kugan Vivekanandarajah

[Bug middle-end/70795] [7 Regression] gcc/libjava/interpret.cc:1948:1: ICE: in binds_to_current_def_p, at symtab.c:2232

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70795 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin --- Created attachment 38511 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38511=edit Revert r235318 Reverting r235318 restores boot.

[Bug c/18063] Gcc doesn't check overflowed size of structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18063 --- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I think we should diagnose the definition of the struct (generally, any construction of a too-large fixed-size type in any context).

[Bug libstdc++/70511] tuple constructor from elements hides copy constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70511 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/66461] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on missing end program in fixed source

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66461 --- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle --- I have a patch testing for this. I am not sure this is a regression. I see it as far back as 4.5. I don't have any earlier builds. My thinking is that since this is an ICE on invalid code, I don't want

[Bug rtl-optimization/71148] [7 Regression] Compile time hog w/ -O3 -funroll-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71148 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical --- Comment #3 from Eric

[Bug middle-end/19987] [meta-bug] fold missing optimizations in general

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987 Bug 19987 depends on bug 54579, which changed state. Bug 54579 Summary: missed optimization: ASR idiom https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54579 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/54579] missed optimization: ASR idiom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54579 Mikhail Maltsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/19987] [meta-bug] fold missing optimizations in general

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987 Bug 19987 depends on bug 55299, which changed state. Bug 55299 Summary: missed optimization: ASR idiom https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55299 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/55299] missed optimization: ASR idiom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55299 Mikhail Maltsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/54579] missed optimization: ASR idiom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54579 --- Comment #2 from Mikhail Maltsev --- Author: miyuki Date: Tue May 17 20:50:22 2016 New Revision: 236344 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236344=gcc=rev Log: Fold bit_not through ASR and rotate gcc/ PR tree-optimization/54579

[Bug middle-end/55299] missed optimization: ASR idiom

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55299 --- Comment #3 from Mikhail Maltsev --- Author: miyuki Date: Tue May 17 20:50:22 2016 New Revision: 236344 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236344=gcc=rev Log: Fold bit_not through ASR and rotate gcc/ PR tree-optimization/54579

[Bug target/69401] gcc 5.3.0 on microblaze: internal compiler error: in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1027

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69401 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Petazzoni --- Created attachment 38510 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38510=edit Pre-processed source code

[Bug target/69401] gcc 5.3.0 on microblaze: internal compiler error: in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1027

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69401 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Petazzoni --- This still happens with gcc 6.1. With gcc 6.1: - The file can be built with no optimization, with and without -fPIC - The file can be built in -O2 or -O3 without

[Bug c++/70613] -fabi-version docs don't match implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70613 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/71115] Missing warning: excess elements in struct initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/70613] -fabi-version docs don't match implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70613 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug c++/69793] ICE on invalid code in "cp_lexer_peek_nth_token"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69793 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug ipa/71146] [7 Regression] error: __builtin_unreachable or __builtin_trap call with arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71146 --- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Tue May 17 20:00:41 2016 New Revision: 236343 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236343=gcc=rev Log: PR ipa/71146 * tree-inline.c (expand_call_inline): Call

[Bug middle-end/70526] [5/6 Regression] GCC 6 miscompiles Firefox JIT compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70526 --- Comment #33 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On May 17, 2016 8:55:26 PM GMT+02:00, guido at trentalancia dot net wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70526 > >guido at trentalancia dot net changed:

[Bug libstdc++/70511] tuple constructor from elements hides copy constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70511 --- Comment #2 from Ivan Le Lann --- It seems that this has been "fixed". Fedora 24, using "gcc (GCC) 6.1.1 20160510 (Red Hat 6.1.1-2)" gives me the intuitive behavior. I did a local revert of this this commit

[Bug c++/71167] New: Long typenames produce extremely hard to read diagnostics and slow down compilation time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71167 Bug ID: 71167 Summary: Long typenames produce extremely hard to read diagnostics and slow down compilation time Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/70526] [5/6 Regression] GCC 6 miscompiles Firefox JIT compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70526 guido at trentalancia dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||guido at trentalancia dot

[Bug fortran/66461] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on missing end program in fixed source

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66461 --- Comment #11 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- ... some more variations with slightly different "line breaks" : $ cat z6.f program p integer x x = 0 if ( x > &

[Bug c++/70613] -fabi-version docs don't match implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70613 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70613] -fabi-version docs don't match implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70613 --- Comment #4 from Jim Wilson --- Author: wilson Date: Tue May 17 18:42:16 2016 New Revision: 236339 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236339=gcc=rev Log: Make -fabi-version docs match the implementation. gcc/ PR c++/70613

[Bug c++/70466] [ICE on invalid code in tree check: expected constructor, have parm_decl in convert_like_real, at cp/call.c:6371 with -std=c++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70466 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/69008] gcc emits unneeded memory access when passing trivial structs by value (ARM)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69008 Michael Collison changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |rtl-optimization --- Comment #3 from

[Bug target/71153] aarch64 LSE __atomic_fetch_and() generates inversion for constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71153 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 38509 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38509=edit Full fix which needs full testing I think I have a full fix. Basically there is no reason why we can't expand

[Bug c/18063] Gcc doesn't check overflowed size of structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18063 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2005-09-18 01:37:52 |2016-5-17 CC|

[Bug c++/71166] New: ICE with nested constexpr/initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166 Bug ID: 71166 Summary: ICE with nested constexpr/initializer Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug ipa/71146] [7 Regression] error: __builtin_unreachable or __builtin_trap call with arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71146 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug ipa/71146] [7 Regression] error: __builtin_unreachable or __builtin_trap call with arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71146 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka --- Aha, this is because we do not re-evaulate the predicates for inlined edges and in the inline order we first inline into thunk and then inline thunk. This results in some extra work done by tree-inline but is

[Bug c++/71165] New: std::array with aggregate initialization generates huge code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71165 Bug ID: 71165 Summary: std::array with aggregate initialization generates huge code Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/71146] [7 Regression] error: __builtin_unreachable or __builtin_trap call with arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71146 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug target/70860] [nvptx] Revisit cfun->machine->doing_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70860 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge --- Author: tschwinge Date: Tue May 17 16:08:37 2016 New Revision: 236326 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236326=gcc=rev Log: [PR target/70860] [nvptx] Handle NULL cfun in nvptx_libcall_value Backport

[Bug c/71115] Missing warning: excess elements in struct initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/71120] [6/7 Regression] Aliasing "struct sockaddr_storage" produces invalid code due to SRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71120 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/71120] [6/7 Regression] Aliasing "struct sockaddr_storage" produces invalid code due to SRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71120 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/49244] __sync or __atomic builtins will not emit 'lock bts/btr/btc'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49244 --- Comment #20 from dhowells at redhat dot com --- Here's a further underoptimisation with -Os: bool foo_test_and_change_bit(unsigned long *p) { return test_and_change_bit(83, p); } is compiled to: 0015 :

[Bug fortran/70856] [6/7 Regression] ICE with -fopenacc in get_constraint_for_ssa_var, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2952

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70856 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug target/70981] [7 regression] gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vprord-1.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70981 Kirill Yukhin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgcc/70720] moxie-rtems stanza does not include crti/crtn extra_parts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70720 Joel Sherrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71164] New: tree check fail at cp/pt.c:12961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71164 Bug ID: 71164 Summary: tree check fail at cp/pt.c:12961 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug sanitizer/71158] ICE in tree_to_uhwi with -fsanitize=address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71158 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||16994 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor

[Bug target/71153] aarch64 LSE __atomic_fetch_and() generates inversion for constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71153 --- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #5) > In the foo_clear_bit_unlock case combine tries to match: > (parallel [ > (set (mem/v:DI (reg:DI 88) [-1 S8 A64]) >

[Bug bootstrap/71134] GCC fails to build with in-tree dependencies: missing libopcodes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71134 --- Comment #3 from Dan Collins --- https://gcc.gnu.org/install/download.html states that you can "unpack the binutils distribution either in the same directory or a separate one"

[Bug bootstrap/71134] GCC fails to build with in-tree dependencies: missing libopcodes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71134 --- Comment #2 from Dan Collins --- https://gcc.gnu.org/install/download.html states that you can "unpack the binutils distribution either in the same directory or a separate one" On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:38 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org <

[Bug middle-end/70526] [5/6 Regression] GCC 6 miscompiles Firefox JIT compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70526 --- Comment #31 from Vittorio Zecca --- It seems the following is related to the FF compilation issue: The program runs differently depending on the optimization level. With gcc 5.3.0 runs same regardless of the optimization level. // g++

[Bug tree-optimization/71031] [6/7 Regression] ICE in extract_range_from_binary_expr_1, at tree-vrp.c:2535 w/ -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71031 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/71153] aarch64 LSE __atomic_fetch_and() generates inversion for constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71153 --- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- In the foo_clear_bit_unlock case combine tries to match: (parallel [ (set (mem/v:DI (reg:DI 88) [-1 S8 A64]) (unspec_volatile:DI [ (and:DI (not:DI

[Bug ipa/71146] [7 Regression] error: __builtin_unreachable or __builtin_trap call with arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71146 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- I'm afraid I can't really answer that. I can see that while inline_small_functions -> inline_call -> inline_merge_summary -> remap_edge_summaries -> edge_set_predicate determine that for (gdb) p e->caller

[Bug sanitizer/71163] ICE in get_ubsan_type_info_for_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71163 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug sanitizer/71163] New: ICE in get_ubsan_type_info_for_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71163 Bug ID: 71163 Summary: ICE in get_ubsan_type_info_for_type Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer

[Bug libstdc++/11196] _GNU_SOURCE vs. M_PI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11196 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #11) > "g++ -E -" compiles as C (see PR 67023) Oops, I mean it preprocesses as C, of course :) > It's till set: s/till/still/

[Bug middle-end/70526] [5/6 Regression] GCC 6 miscompiles Firefox JIT compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70526 --- Comment #30 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 17 May 2016, zeccav at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70526 > > Vittorio Zecca changed: > >What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/70809] [AArch64] aarch64_vmls pattern should be rejected if -ffp-contract=off

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70809 --- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue May 17 13:08:01 2016 New Revision: 236321 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236321=gcc=rev Log: [AArch64] PR target/70809: Delete aarch64_vmls pattern

[Bug libstdc++/11196] _GNU_SOURCE vs. M_PI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11196 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2005-12-31 03:19:52 |2016-5-17 --- Comment #11 from

[Bug middle-end/70526] [5/6 Regression] GCC 6 miscompiles Firefox JIT compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70526 Vittorio Zecca changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zeccav at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/71161] [7 Regression] Lots of ASAN and libgo runtime FAILs after r236090

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71161 --- Comment #7 from Ilya Enkovich --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6) > Well, the fact that libgo has a lot of execute fails doesn't point to > libsanitizer. Maybe to split-stack support, who knows. > > What is special about

[Bug tree-optimization/71132] [7 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu with “seg fault”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71132 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue May 17 12:53:30 2016 New Revision: 236320 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236320=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-17 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/71132] [7 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu with “seg fault”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71132 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71162] New: powerpc64 __atomics should probably emit bne- after stdcx.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71162 Bug ID: 71162 Summary: powerpc64 __atomics should probably emit bne- after stdcx. Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/71161] [7 Regression] Lots of ASAN and libgo runtime FAILs after r236090

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71161 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 17 May 2016, ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71161 > > --- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich --- So > do all of r236090 related failures

[Bug tree-optimization/71104] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (with vfork / error: definition in block 3 does not dominate use in block 7 )

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71104 --- Comment #9 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #8) > Not that I like this proposal at all (given it changes function arg > evaluation order on x86_64). Does it? "the function is evaluated before all its

[Bug target/71161] [7 Regression] Lots of ASAN and libgo runtime FAILs after r236090

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71161 --- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich --- So do all of r236090 related failures are reproducible with glibc 2.11.3 only? IIUC the problem most probably hides in sanitizer runtime libraries and you can't make preprocessed testcase reproducible with

[Bug target/70809] [AArch64] aarch64_vmls pattern should be rejected if -ffp-contract=off

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70809 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue May 17 12:15:05 2016 New Revision: 236318 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236318=gcc=rev Log: [AArch64] PR target/70809: Delete aarch64_vmls pattern PR

[Bug target/71161] [7 Regression] Lots of ASAN and libgo runtime FAILs after r236090

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71161 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 38506 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38506=edit testresults

[Bug tree-optimization/71104] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (with vfork / error: definition in block 3 does not dominate use in block 7 )

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71104 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 17 May 2016, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71104 > > --- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)

[Bug tree-optimization/71104] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (with vfork / error: definition in block 3 does not dominate use in block 7 )

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71104 --- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > C11 6.5.16/3 suggests that the LHS "operand" is evaluated in unspecified > order. It seems that C++ is moving towards specifying the order

[Bug tree-optimization/71104] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (with vfork / error: definition in block 3 does not dominate use in block 7 )

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71104 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- C11 6.5.16/3 suggests that the LHS "operand" is evaluated in unspecified order. 6.5.2.2/10 says function argument "operands" are evaluated before the actual call (which denotes a sequence point) and the

[Bug target/71161] [7 Regression] Lots of ASAN and libgo runtime FAILs after r236090

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71161 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Updating to r236315, the fix for PR71114 doesn't fix it. I'm going to attach testresults after all testing finished.

[Bug lto/71089] [7 Regression] Failed to build 483.xalancbmk in SPEC CPU 2006

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71089 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka --- > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71089 > > --- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- > (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #5) > > Hi, > > I reproduced the firefox ICE now (it needs -O3

[Bug lto/71159] [7 regression] ICE in lto_output_edge() lto-cgraph.c:263

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71159 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #3) > Sorry, got it wrong way around. > Index: lto-cgraph.c > === > --- lto-cgraph.c

[Bug lto/71089] [7 Regression] Failed to build 483.xalancbmk in SPEC CPU 2006

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71089 --- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #5) > Hi, > I reproduced the firefox ICE now (it needs -O3 instead of default flags). I > am testing > the following patch which fixes some confusion between thunk

[Bug lto/71159] [7 regression] ICE in lto_output_edge() lto-cgraph.c:263

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71159 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/71104] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (with vfork / error: definition in block 3 does not dominate use in block 7 )

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71104 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Interesting one. Not that I think we previously handled this "correctly": : foo (); : p.0 = p; : D.1765 = vfork (); *p.0 = D.1765; return; : ABNORMAL_DISPATCHER (0); so we keep p.0

[Bug lto/71089] [7 Regression] Failed to build 483.xalancbmk in SPEC CPU 2006

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71089 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka --- Hi, I reproduced the firefox ICE now (it needs -O3 instead of default flags). I am testing the following patch which fixes some confusion between thunk and non-thunk inline clones (there can be both, because

[Bug target/71106] MIPS: Unaligned load/store instructions are not used to access a variable with an aligned attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71106 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/71132] [7 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu with “seg fault”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71132 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- So the issue is that loop distribution computes control dependences in the function once and queries them after processing some loops already (in this case removing a loop and replacing it with a builtin

[Bug target/71114] [7 Regression] Several test suite failures on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision r236090

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71114 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71114] [7 Regression] Several test suite failures on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision r236090

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71114 --- Comment #22 from Ilya Enkovich --- Author: ienkovich Date: Tue May 17 09:28:15 2016 New Revision: 236315 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236315=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/71114 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug lto/71159] [7 regression] ICE in lto_output_edge() lto-cgraph.c:263

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71159 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- Sorry, got it wrong way around. Index: lto-cgraph.c === --- lto-cgraph.c(revision 236275) +++ lto-cgraph.c(working copy) @@

[Bug lto/71159] [7 regression] ICE in lto_output_edge() lto-cgraph.c:263

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71159 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug sanitizer/71160] libasan: Backport support for malloc within dlsym

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71160 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue May 17 09:17:54 2016 New Revision: 236314 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236314=gcc=rev Log: PR sanitizer/71160 * asan/asan_malloc_linux.cc: Cherry pick

[Bug target/71161] [7 Regression] Lots of ASAN and libgo runtime FAILs after r236090

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71161 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Probably dup of PR 71114. Does the patch in comment PR 71114#c13 work for you? It should be PR 71114#c15 (PR 71114#c13 is broken).

[Bug target/71161] [7 Regression] Lots of ASAN and libgo runtime FAILs after r236090

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71161 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- Probably dup of PR 71114. Does the patch in comment PR 71114#c13 work for you?

[Bug target/71153] aarch64 LSE __atomic_fetch_and() generates inversion for constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71153 --- Comment #4 from dhowells at redhat dot com --- That looks better here: 007c : 7c: d2a00801mov x1, #0x40 // #4194304 80: f8611001ldclrl x1, x1, [x0] 84: d65f03c0ret

[Bug c++/71105] [6/7 regression] lambas with default captures improperly have function pointer conversions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71105 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.2 Summary|[6 regression]

[Bug target/71106] MIPS: Unaligned load/store instructions are not used to access a variable with an aligned attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71106 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||mips CC|

[Bug target/71161] [7 Regression] Lots of ASAN and libgo runtime FAILs after r236090

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71161 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug target/71161] New: [7 Regression] Lots of ASAN and libgo runtime FAILs after r236090

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71161 Bug ID: 71161 Summary: [7 Regression] Lots of ASAN and libgo runtime FAILs after r236090 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug target/71114] [7 Regression] Several test suite failures on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision r236090

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71114 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug c++/71117] [6/7 Regression] Overeager application of conversion to function pointer during overload resolution of call to function object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71117 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Target Milestone|---

  1   2   >