[Bug c++/71243] Implicitly defined assignment operator is not constexpr even though it should be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71243 --- Comment #2 from Michele Caini --- According to https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html#cxx14, GCC5 should fully implement the C++14 rules. Am I wrong? Anyway, tested on debian sid (unstable), g++ v5.3.1-20 and it works. I guess this can

[Bug c++/71193] [6/7 Regression] error: invalid use of incomplete type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71193 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/70344] [6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70344 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/66461] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on missing end program in fixed source

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66461 --- Comment #24 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue May 24 04:15:39 2016 New Revision: 236627 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236627=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-23 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/66461

[Bug c++/70344] [6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70344 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue May 24 03:37:10 2016 New Revision: 236626 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236626=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/70344 - ICE with recursive constexpr * constexpr.c

[Bug c++/70344] [6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70344 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue May 24 03:34:55 2016 New Revision: 236625 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236625=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/70344 - ICE with recursive constexpr * constexpr.c

[Bug c/71249] -Wswitch-unreachable false positive for a compound statement containing a used label

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71249 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Ah, right, my mistake. But there is a false positive there, despite my initial test case not demonstrating it. Changing the first of the compound statement to some other non-label statement such as a

[Bug c++/71251] New: ICE on invalid code, with unusual template name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71251 Bug ID: 71251 Summary: ICE on invalid code, with unusual template name Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug regression/71231] [7 Regression]: 300% runtime increase for rnflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71231 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- By the way the source does not compile as you did not include 'rnfprm.h'.

[Bug bootstrap/70896] gcc4 ABI compatible bootstrap fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70896 Akihiko Odaki changed: What|Removed |Added CC||akihiko.odaki.4i at stu dot hosei.

[Bug c/71249] -Wswitch-unreachable false positive for a compound statement containing a used label

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71249 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- The warning is correct that is i = 0; can never be executed.

[Bug regression/71231] [7 Regression]: 300% runtime increase for rnflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71231 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- This code has the following warning: !CRAY - The following multiply must be done with 64 bits (not 46 bits) ! The algoritm depends on the overflow characteristics of ! a 32 or 64 bit multiply.

[Bug tree-optimization/71170] [7 Regression] ICE in rewrite_expr_tree, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:3898

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71170 --- Comment #10 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kugan Date: Tue May 24 00:14:13 2016 New Revision: 236619 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236619=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2016-05-24 Kugan Vivekanandarajah

[Bug target/71201] PowerPC XXPERM instruction fails on ISA 3.0 system.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71201 --- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Mon May 23 23:42:52 2016 New Revision: 236617 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236617=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2016-05-23 Michael Meissner PR

[Bug other/71250] New: -Wmissing-field-initializers documentation is incomplete

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71250 Bug ID: 71250 Summary: -Wmissing-field-initializers documentation is incomplete Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug regression/71231] [7 Regression]: 300% runtime increase for rnflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71231 --- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak --- The difference in _optimized dumps is: $ diff -u rnflow.f90.210t.optimized rnflow.f90.210t.optimized_ --- rnflow.f90.210t.optimized 2016-05-23 23:44:55.327695414 +0200 +++ rnflow.f90.210t.optimized_

[Bug c/71249] New: -Wswitch-unreachable false positive for a compound statement containing a used label

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71249 Bug ID: 71249 Summary: -Wswitch-unreachable false positive for a compound statement containing a used label Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug regression/71231] [7 Regression]: 300% runtime increase for rnflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71231 --- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak --- Created attachment 38547 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38547=edit rnflow source and data file Compile with -Ofast to see the failure.

[Bug regression/71231] [7 Regression]: 300% runtime increase for rnflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71231 --- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak --- Actually, rnflow gets miscompiled, but scripts doesn't detect the failure. Current mainline produces following results: 0: 0:24.469 -> Compare results 45 , 53 38523934

[Bug c++/71248] New: crash on in-class initializer of array of pointer to member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71248 Bug ID: 71248 Summary: crash on in-class initializer of array of pointer to member Product: gcc Version: 4.8.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/71204] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with -O0 in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9651

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71204 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de ---

[Bug fortran/71247] [6 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9651

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71247 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug regression/71231] [7 Regression]: 300% runtime increase for rnflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71231 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > Maybe a missing :s or this could be just increasing register pressure. :s would have no effect, you would need to do it manually (simplify (bit_and SSA_NAME@0

[Bug fortran/71247] New: [6 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9651

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71247 Bug ID: 71247 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:9651 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/70584] constexpr variables cannot be used as intrinsic arguments where an immediate is expected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70584 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon May 23 21:21:24 2016 New Revision: 236616 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236616=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/70584 - error with parenthesized builtin arg *

[Bug c++/70735] [5/6/7 Regression] problem combining std::function, generic lambdas and static variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70735 --- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon May 23 21:21:18 2016 New Revision: 236615 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236615=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/70735 - generic lambda and local static variable * pt.c

[Bug regression/71231] [7 Regression]: 300% runtime increase for rnflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71231 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug regression/71231] [7 Regression]: 300% runtime increase for rnflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71231 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2) > Reverting r236338, the -Ofast runtime on my x86_64-linux-gnu box goes from > 0m24.650s to 0m15.037s. Maybe a missing :s or this could be just increasing register

[Bug c++/70972] [6 Regression] Inheriting constructors taking parameters by value should move them, not copy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70972 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6/7 Regression] Inheriting |[6 Regression] Inheriting

[Bug c++/70972] [6/7 Regression] Inheriting constructors taking parameters by value should move them, not copy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70972 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon May 23 20:50:10 2016 New Revision: 236614 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236614=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2016-05-23 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug tree-optimization/71230] [7 Regression] ICE : in zero_one_operation, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:1230

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71230 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at

[Bug c++/71244] ice in zero_one_operation, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:1230

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71244 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/69095] internal compiler error: in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:19399

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69095 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69095] internal compiler error: in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:19399

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69095 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon May 23 19:24:22 2016 New Revision: 236610 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236610=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2016-05-22 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug inline-asm/71246] New: "+g" assembly constraint causes error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71246 Bug ID: 71246 Summary: "+g" assembly constraint causes error: inconsistent operand constraints in an 'asm' Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/71240] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O2 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71240 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- To be precise, it should instead force it into a temporary SSA_NAME.

[Bug c++/70735] [5/6/7 Regression] problem combining std::function, generic lambdas and static variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70735 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/71240] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O2 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71240 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- For non-INTEGRAL_TYPE_P guess we need to first VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR it to corresponding integral type. Though, even that looks wrong. src_stmt in this case is _4 = BIT_FIELD_REF ; and bswap_type

[Bug c++/71245] New: std::atomic load/store bounces the data to the stack using fild/fistp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71245 Bug ID: 71245 Summary: std::atomic load/store bounces the data to the stack using fild/fistp Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug tree-optimization/71240] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O2 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71240 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Cleaned up testcase: struct L { unsigned int l[2]; }; union U { double a; struct L l; } u; void foo (double a, struct L *p) { u.a = a; struct L l = u.l, m; m.l[0] = 0; m.l[1] = (((l.l[0] &

[Bug c++/71244] New: ice in zero_one_operation, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:1230

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71244 Bug ID: 71244 Summary: ice in zero_one_operation, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:1230 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/66461] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on missing end program in fixed source

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66461 --- Comment #23 from Mikael Morin --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #22) > This patch, by itself, fixes the whole issue. > Yes, it's OK to commit for me.

[Bug tree-optimization/71240] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O2 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71240 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/71234] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value in ipa_get_indirect_edge_target_1 (ipa-cp.c:2029)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71234 --- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Mon May 23 16:31:14 2016 New Revision: 236598 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236598=gcc=rev Log: [PR 71234] Avoid valgrind warning in ipa-cp 2016-05-23 Martin Jambor

[Bug c++/71243] Implicitly defined assignment operator is not constexpr even though it should be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71243 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- The code is not valid in C++11, only C++14, and it seems that GCC 5 doesn't implement the C++14 rules fully. Since it's already fixed in GCC 6 I think this can be closed as FIXED.

[Bug c++/71243] New: Implicitly defined assignment operator is not constexpr even though it should be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71243 Bug ID: 71243 Summary: Implicitly defined assignment operator is not constexpr even though it should be Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/71242] New: [ia64] Missing built-in functions for float128 NaNs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71242 Bug ID: 71242 Summary: [ia64] Missing built-in functions for float128 NaNs Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/71241] New: [x86] Missing built-in functions for float128 NaNs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71241 Bug ID: 71241 Summary: [x86] Missing built-in functions for float128 NaNs Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/49859] gcc could warn about statements between "switch" and first "case"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49859 --- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Mon May 23 15:37:09 2016 New Revision: 236597 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236597=gcc=rev Log: PR c/49859 * common.opt (Wswitch-unreachable): New option.

[Bug c/49859] gcc could warn about statements between "switch" and first "case"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49859 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71240] ICE on valid code at -O2 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71240 --- Comment #1 from Roger Orr --- (The example code compiles with gcc revision 236175, dated 20160512)

[Bug c++/71240] New: ICE on valid code at -O2 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_gimple failed

-abi=gcc4-compatible Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160523 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug libffi/65567] ERROR: tcl error sourcing /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libffi/testsuite/libffi.complex/complex.exp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65567 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Schwinge --- Author: tschwinge Date: Mon May 23 14:54:04 2016 New Revision: 236594 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236594=gcc=rev Log: [PR libffi/65567] libffi: Fix, and simply libffi_feature_test

[Bug libffi/65567] ERROR: tcl error sourcing /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libffi/testsuite/libffi.complex/complex.exp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65567 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Schwinge --- Author: tschwinge Date: Mon May 23 15:00:41 2016 New Revision: 236595 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236595=gcc=rev Log: [PR libffi/65567] libffi: Fix, and simply libffi_feature_test Backport trunk

[Bug libffi/65567] ERROR: tcl error sourcing /test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libffi/testsuite/libffi.complex/complex.exp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65567 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Schwinge --- Author: tschwinge Date: Mon May 23 15:03:08 2016 New Revision: 236596 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236596=gcc=rev Log: [PR libffi/65567] libffi: Fix, and simply libffi_feature_test Backport trunk

[Bug tree-optimization/71239] [7 Regression] ICE in operand_equal_p (fold-const.c:2769)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71239 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 38544 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38544=edit Candidate patch

[Bug tree-optimization/71239] New: [7 Regression] ICE in operand_equal_p (fold-const.c:2769)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71239 Bug ID: 71239 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in operand_equal_p (fold-const.c:2769) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/71238] New: Undeclared function message imprecisely points to error column

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71238 Bug ID: 71238 Summary: Undeclared function message imprecisely points to error column Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/70677] Suboptimal cond on AVR: unneeded stack frame

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70677 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay --- You can follow the bug reporting instructions an provide the preprocessed code and the compiler output as described in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#need Just add -v -save-temps to the compiler's command

[Bug target/70676] suboptimal code generation on AVR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70676 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay --- You can follow the bug reporting instructions an provide the preprocessed code and the compiler output as described in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#need Just add -v -save-temps to the compiler's command

[Bug tree-optimization/71237] [7 regression] scev tests failing after pass reorganization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71237 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug tree-optimization/71230] [7 Regression] ICE : in zero_one_operation, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:1230

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71230 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71230] [7 Regression] ICE : in zero_one_operation, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:1230

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71230 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon May 23 14:09:35 2016 New Revision: 236591 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236591=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-23 Richard Biener PR

[Bug fortran/57284] [OOP] ICE with find_array_spec for polymorphic arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Is there any progress concerning this bug? I'm trying GCC-5.3. Usual answer: what did you do to fix it?

[Bug testsuite/52563] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-[3,4].c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52563 --- Comment #19 from Andre Vieira --- > First of all please open a new bug for the FAILs. Second, the fix will > be mostly adjusting the testcase expectations (eventually disabling LIM > for example if we want to test SCCP abilities). Opened a

[Bug tree-optimization/71237] New: scev tests failing after pass reorganization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71237 Bug ID: 71237 Summary: scev tests failing after pass reorganization Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/57284] [OOP] ICE with find_array_spec for polymorphic arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284 Benedict changed: What|Removed |Added CC||holysword at inbox dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug target/69634] [4.9 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -fno-dce -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-vrp @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69634 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug target/69634] [4.9/5 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -fno-dce -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-vrp @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69634 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon May 23 12:51:29 2016 New Revision: 236588 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236588=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-23 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug middle-end/69845] [4.9 Regression] Expression getting incorrectly optimized after being rewritten by compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69845 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon May 23 12:51:29 2016 New Revision: 236588 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236588=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-23 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug c++/70347] [5 Regression] default member initializer not picked up by union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70347 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/70347] [5 Regression] default member initializer not picked up by union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70347 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon May 23 12:51:29 2016 New Revision: 236588 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236588=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-23 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug middle-end/68142] unsafe association of multiplication

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68142 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon May 23 12:51:29 2016 New Revision: 236588 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236588=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-23 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug c++/71227] [6/7 Regression] template friend function cannot be resolved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71227 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/70972] [6/7 Regression] Inheriting constructors taking parameters by value should move them, not copy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70972 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71236] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71236 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Target

[Bug ipa/71190] [7 Regression] ICE in assemble_variable_contents, at varasm.c:2054

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71190 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/71227] [6/7 Regression] template friend function cannot be resolved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71227 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/70919] [6/7 Regression] wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70919 Bug 70919 depends on bug 70884, which changed state. Bug 70884 Summary: [6 regression] 2nd SRA pass confused by load from constant pool https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70884 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/70884] [6 regression] 2nd SRA pass confused by load from constant pool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70884 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/70884] [6 regression] 2nd SRA pass confused by load from constant pool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70884 --- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor --- Author: jamborm Date: Mon May 23 11:27:14 2016 New Revision: 236584 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236584=gcc=rev Log: [PR 70884] Constant pool SRA fix 2016-05-23 Martin Jambor

[Bug c++/71236] New: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71236 Bug ID: 71236 Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid code Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/71235] New: march=silvermont turns on aes by default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71235 Bug ID: 71235 Summary: march=silvermont turns on aes by default Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/71233] [ARM] missing AdvSIMD poly64 intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233 --- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon --- You are right, sorry for not double-checking the list provided by James: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg01014.html

[Bug target/70123] [5 Regression] Miscompilation of cfitsio testcase on s390x-linux starting with r222144

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70123 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Bernd Schmidt from comment #8) > I'll take your comment as approval and install on gcc-5 as well. Ping?

[Bug target/71233] [ARM] missing AdvSIMD poly64 intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71233 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/69239] [5 Regression] g++.dg/ipa/devirt-c-3.C FAILs with -O2 -fPIC --param=early-inlining-insns=196

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69239 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug target/69252] [4.9/5 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-iv-9.c FAILs with -Os -fmodulo-sched -fmodulo-sched-allow-regmoves -fsched-pressure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69252 --- Comment #16 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon May 23 10:41:35 2016 New Revision: 236583 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236583=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-23 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug c++/66487] sanitizer/warnings for lifetime DSE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66487 --- Comment #22 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon May 23 10:41:35 2016 New Revision: 236583 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236583=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-23 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug rtl-optimization/68814] [4.9 regression] gcc.dg/pr63594-2.c fails since r226005

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68814 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||5.4.0, 6.1.0 Summary|[4.9/5

[Bug rtl-optimization/68814] [4.9 regression] gcc.dg/pr63594-2.c fails since r226005

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68814 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||5.4.0, 6.1.0 Summary|[4.9/5

[Bug ipa/69239] [5 Regression] g++.dg/ipa/devirt-c-3.C FAILs with -O2 -fPIC --param=early-inlining-insns=196

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69239 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon May 23 10:41:35 2016 New Revision: 236583 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236583=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-23 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug lto/69003] [4.9/5 Regression] Undefined reference with gcc -r incremental linking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69003 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon May 23 10:41:35 2016 New Revision: 236583 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236583=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-23 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug other/70945] Offloading: compatibility of target and offloading toolchains

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70945 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #38484|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ipa/71234] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value in ipa_get_indirect_edge_target_1 (ipa-cp.c:2029)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71234 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/58135] [x86] Missed opportunities for partial SLP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58135 vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/71070] MPX gives a false positive when allocating a string longer than 16 bytes on the stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71070 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/71234] New: Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value in ipa_get_indirect_edge_target_1 (ipa-cp.c:2029)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71234 Bug ID: 71234 Summary: Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value in ipa_get_indirect_edge_target_1 (ipa-cp.c:2029) Product: gcc Version: 7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/58135] [x86] Missed opportunities for partial SLP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58135 --- Comment #3 from vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vekumar Date: Mon May 23 09:48:54 2016 New Revision: 236582 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236582=gcc=rev Log: Fix PR58135. 2016-05-23 Venkataramanan Kumar

[Bug fortran/69368] [6 Regression] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails with the g++ 6.0 compiler starting with r232508

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 --- Comment #95 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 23 May 2016, izamyatin at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 > > Igor Zamyatin changed: > >What|Removed

  1   2   >