https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71622
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71622
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71622
Thiago Macieira changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thiago at kde dot org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71627
Khuong Nguyen Tan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||AVR
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71627
Bug ID: 71627
Summary: AVR error: unable to find a register to spill in class
'POINTER_X_REGS'
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49905
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71560
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to vries from comment #3)
That would make sense. Please let me know if you're planning to make these
changes, otherwise I can give it a whirl.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71626
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71610
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01658.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71613
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01658.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71613
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71567
--- Comment #6 from Artem ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #5)
>
> Your code is still broken and it may get miscompiled with a different
> version of GCC or a different compiler or due to any changes to the
> surrounding code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67400
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Jun 22 22:06:56 2016
New Revision: 237720
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237720=gcc=rev
Log:
PR target/67400
* config/i386/i386-protos.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71618
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
Okay, I updated the Wiki. I would have liked to have added a link to the
--help option in the manual but, unfortunately, the anchors in it change from
one release to the next. I suppose the next best thing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71618
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #5)
> Though I guess a bit of redundancy in the place you suggest may indeed
> help...
It is also OK to link to the manual. See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71618
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse ---
We already have, just above the description of -O in the manual:
" Not all optimizations are controlled directly by a flag. Only
optimizations that have a flag are listed in this section.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71618
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #3)
Good idea. Thanks. I think it might help set the right expectation if this
detail was more succinctly mentioned in the manual itself. For instance, under
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71625
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Renlin Li from comment #0)
> char array[] = "abc";
> return __builtin_strlen (array);
There are DUPs for this part.
> int hallo ();
> int dummy ()
> {
> char array[] = "abc";
> return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71618
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
---
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160622 (experimental) [trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71610
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #2)
> I'm working on this
Considering Bug 71613, it may be better to follow Clang and make the main
location the one of the enum label.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71625
Bug ID: 71625
Summary: missing strlen optimization on different array
initialization style
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71619
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Practically the same issue as PR48189.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71610
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71607
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71606
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12944
Bug 12944 depends on bug 31336, which changed state.
Bug 31336 Summary: template friends and Koenig lookup
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31336
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59366
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew.olson at hughes dot net
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65608
Bug 65608 depends on bug 31336, which changed state.
Bug 31336 Summary: template friends and Koenig lookup
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31336
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31336
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37804
Bug 37804 depends on bug 31336, which changed state.
Bug 31336 Summary: template friends and Koenig lookup
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31336
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71490
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at linux dot
vnet.ibm.com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71611
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Certainly not here.
int
f1 ()
{
enum I { c = -__LONG_MAX__ - 1 } x = c;
x = -x;
return x;
}
int
f2 ()
{
enum J { c = -__INT_MAX__ - 1 } x = c;
x = -x;
return x;
}
int
f3 ()
{
int x =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71618
Roger Jeurninck changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #2 from Roger
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71611
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
On 06/22/2016 06:08 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> This has nothing to do with enums based on long, but about anonymous enums.
> is what is used for all types that don't have a name.
> Would
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70339
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Jun 22 15:20:41 2016
New Revision: 237714
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237714=gcc=rev
Log:
C FE: suggest corrections for misspelled identifiers and type names
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71621
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67008
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12944
Bug 12944 depends on bug 67008, which changed state.
Bug 67008 Summary: Qualified name-lookup in using-declaration fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67008
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71616
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70522
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71611
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This has nothing to do with enums based on long, but about anonymous enums.
is what is used for all types that don't have a name.
Would you prefer instead or ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71615
Mianzhi Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71420
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71615
--- Comment #3 from Mianzhi Wang ---
The bug disappears on an i7 3700k with the identical OS, GCC, and valgrind.
Should be something related to the AMD CPU.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30417
--- Comment #13 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Senthil Kumar Selvaraj from comment #12)
> This works if the start of data is specified as -Tdata 0xaddress. Other ways
> of specifying the same thing don't work; -Tdata=0xaddress,
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68147
--- Comment #11 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
When I have a moment, I intend to fix 5- and 6-branches.
Cheers
Paul
On 22 June 2016 at 16:12, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
wrote:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71618
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71616
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71602
--- Comment #8 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #7)
> The previous patch did give the error for -m32.
Meant: The previous patch did _not_ give the error for -m32.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71619
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71623
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71602
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38736|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68147
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Any reason why this PR is not closed as FIXED?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71488
--- Comment #11 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Wed Jun 22 14:05:55 2016
New Revision: 237706
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237706=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/71488
* tree-vect-patterns.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66867
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #38740|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71624
Bug ID: 71624
Summary: [6 regression][7 regression][CHKP] internal compiler
error: in duplicate_thunk_for_node
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71623
Bug ID: 71623
Summary: Segfault when allocating deferred-length characters to
size of a pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71594
--- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
btw, to trigger the ICE on other tuning options use:
--param max-rtl-if-conversion-insns=2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71594
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58008
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71621
Bug ID: 71621
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in assign_by_spills, at
lra-assigns.c:1417 (error: unable to find a register
to spill) w/ -O2 -mavx2 -ftree-vectorize
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71619
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71347
--- Comment #5 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #4)
> Created attachment 38744 [details]
> pr71347.c.214t.optimized
>
> The new testcase FAILs on sparc*-sun-solaris2.* (both 32 and 64-bit):
>
> FAIL:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71620
Bug ID: 71620
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/slp-45.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71620
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71594
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71347
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71594
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30417
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||saaadhu at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71619
Bug ID: 71619
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE: in predict_loops, at
predict.c:1772 with --param=max-predicted-iterations=0
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71578
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|wrong-code |lto
--- Comment #6 from Markus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71560
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2)
> 99) Note that this differs from a cast expression. For example, a cast
> specifies a conversion to scalar types or void only, and the result of a
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71618
Bug ID: 71618
Summary: Improve C++ compilation by adding specific
optimization flags
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71617
Bug ID: 71617
Summary: rs6000.c:8483:32: warning: comparison is always true
due to limited range of data type [-Wtype-limits]
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71615
nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nsz at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71592
鍾 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from 鍾 ---
77 matches
Mail list logo