[Bug fortran/38351] Poor error message for rank mismatch in operator args

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38351 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Index: resolve.c === --- resolve.c (revision 236243) +++ resolve.c (working copy) @@ -3586,7 +3586,13 @@ resolve_operator

[Bug fortran/29819] Error/warning message should ignore comments for "1" in %C output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29819 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Index: parse.c === --- parse.c (revision 236243) +++ parse.c (working copy) @@ -5237,6 +5237,7 @@ parse_contained (int

[Bug c/71560] union compound literal initializes wrong union field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71560 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Patch posted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg00069.html

[Bug middle-end/71734] [7 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/simd4.f90 -O3 -g execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71734 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/71595] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:704

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71595 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Known to

[Bug c++/70385] Lambda capture by reference of const reference fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70385 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug c++/71710] [7 Regression] ICE on valid C++11 code with decltype and alias template: in lookup_member, at cp/search.c:1255

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71710 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c/71713] "initializer element is not constant" with nested casts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71713 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71733] ICE in vmx test cases with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71733 --- Comment #1 from Peter Bergner --- That altivec load should not be using reg+offset (dform) addressing. I'll have a look.

[Bug target/71722] incorrect code for test pr64252.c for -mcpu=power9 -mpower9-vector -ftree-vectorize -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71722 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/71718] [6/7 Regression] ICE on erroneous recursive template error printing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71718 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Known to

[Bug c++/71728] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with goto in statement-expression inside a condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71728 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code CC|

[Bug middle-end/71734] New: [7 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/simd4.f90 -O3 -g execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71734 Bug ID: 71734 Summary: [7 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/simd4.f90 -O3 -g execution test Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/41922] Diagnostic: No location shown for overlappingly initialized EQUIVALENCEd character vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41922 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Index: target-memory.h === --- target-memory.h (revision 237855) +++ target-memory.h (working copy) @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ int

[Bug fortran/71687] ICE in omp_add_variable, at gimplify.c:5821

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71687 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jul 1 20:52:54 2016 New Revision: 237926 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237926=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/71687 * f95-lang.c (struct binding_level): Add reversed

[Bug target/71722] incorrect code for test pr64252.c for -mcpu=power9 -mpower9-vector -ftree-vectorize -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71722 --- Comment #2 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- adding -mno-power9-dform-vector does not help this one. So, likely not dform-vector related.

[Bug middle-end/71732] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr71532.c at -O2 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71732 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin --- The following insn is deleted in postreload: (insn 55 50 91 2 (set (mem:SI (reg/f:SI 17 %r17 [101]) [0 S4 A32]) (reg:SI 18 %r18 [102]))

[Bug target/71733] New: ICE in vmx test cases with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71733 Bug ID: 71733 Summary: ICE in vmx test cases with -mcpu=power9 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug fortran/68566] ICE on using unusable array in reshape (double free or corruption)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68566 --- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to kargl from comment #12) > === > --- check.c (revision 237855) > +++ check.c (working copy) > @@ -3820,7 +3820,7 @@

[Bug target/71731] incorrect result for vectorized char rotate with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71731 --- Comment #2 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- This fails with trunk 237811 or later, but that is because power9-dform-vector was turned on by default there. For instance 237715 also fails this if you add -mpower9-dform-vector to the flags.

[Bug fortran/35849] "wrong" line shown in error message for parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35849 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Index: simplify.c === --- simplify.c (revision 237855) +++ simplify.c (working copy) @@ -3280,7 +3280,6 @@ gfc_simplify_ishftc

[Bug middle-end/71732] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr71532.c at -O2 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71732 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- Present in 4.9, 5 and 6.

[Bug middle-end/71732] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr71532.c at -O2 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71732 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin --- The last argument (in r18) is not stored to argument slot: ldi 5,%r4 stw %r18,-80(%r30) stw %r16,-76(%r30) stw %r14,-72(%r30) stw %r12,-68(%r30) stw

[Bug middle-end/71732] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr71532.c at -O2 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71732 Bug ID: 71732 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr71532.c at -O2 and above Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/49905] Better sanity checking on sprintf src & dest to produce warning for dodgy code ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49905 --- Comment #8 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #7) > Patch posted for review: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg00056.html Fascinating stuff. Thanks. I'll give it a good going over by throwing

[Bug target/71720] initialization of a vector of floats generates incorrect code for -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71720 --- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Fri Jul 1 18:23:29 2016 New Revision: 237920 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237920=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2016-07-01 Michael Meissner PR

[Bug middle-end/49905] Better sanity checking on sprintf src & dest to produce warning for dodgy code ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49905 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Patch posted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg00056.html

[Bug target/65248] Copy relocation against protected symbol doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248 --- Comment #11 from Nix --- The symptoms are failures to link with "relocation against protected symbol is invalid" errors which go away when you use gold. (You can see it if you try to build firefox, for instance.)

[Bug target/71656] ICE in reload when generating code for -mcpu=power9 -mpower9-dform-vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71656 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71656] ICE in reload when generating code for -mcpu=power9 -mpower9-dform-vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71656 --- Comment #6 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Fri Jul 1 17:56:54 2016 New Revision: 237919 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237919=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ Backport from trunk 2016-06-27 Peter Bergner

[Bug debug/71667] [7 Regression] ICE in as_a, at is-a.h:192 w/ -g -O2 -ftree-vectorize

/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160701 (experimental) [trunk revision 23791

[Bug fortran/71730] ICE when character length specification uses an undefined variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71730 --- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Index: decl.c === @@ -905,6 +906,7 @@ char_len_param_value (gfc_expr **expr, b goto syntax; else if ((*expr)->expr_type ==

[Bug target/71698] ICE related to decimal float when compiling with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71698 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71698] ICE related to decimal float when compiling with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71698 --- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Fri Jul 1 16:06:26 2016 New Revision: 237917 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237917=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ Backport from trunk 2016-07-01 Peter Bergner

[Bug target/71731] incorrect result for vectorized char rotate with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71731 --- Comment #1 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 38815 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38815=edit asm source of test case

[Bug target/71731] New: incorrect result for vectorized char rotate with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71731 Bug ID: 71731 Summary: incorrect result for vectorized char rotate with -mcpu=power9 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/71729] -Wl,-z,noexecstack Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71729 --- Comment #2 from Pierre Navaro --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Don't do it then. -z noexecstack asserts there are no trampolines in the > code, but your code does need trampolines and thus executable stack, because > you

[Bug fortran/71730] New: ICE when character length specification uses an undefined variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71730 Bug ID: 71730 Summary: ICE when character length specification uses an undefined variable Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/71724] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault, deep recursion between combine_simplify_rtx and subst

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71724 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug fortran/71729] -Wl,-z,noexecstack Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71729 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/71717] A gfortran silent "wrong code" bug in the transition from 4.9.0 -> 4.9.1, using OpenMP.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71717 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jul 1 15:13:28 2016 New Revision: 237916 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237916=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/71717 * trans-openmp.c (gfc_omp_privatize_by_reference):

[Bug c/71719] [7 Regression] invalid set-but-not-used warning with vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71719 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 38813 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38813=edit gcc7-pr71719.patch Untested fix.

[Bug fortran/71729] New: -Wl,-z,noexecstack Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71729 Bug ID: 71729 Summary: -Wl,-z,noexecstack Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c++/71728] ICE with goto in statement-expression inside a condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71728 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/65248] Copy relocation against protected symbol doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248 --- Comment #10 from jb999 at gmx dot de --- Could someone please explain what this means for binutils >= 2.26 and gcc 4.9.3?

[Bug c++/71728] New: ICE with goto in statement-expression inside a condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71728 Bug ID: 71728 Summary: ICE with goto in statement-expression inside a condition Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug web/69601] current/ redirect is off by at least a day

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69601 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2016-06-26 00:00:00 |2016-7-1 --- Comment #4 from Joost

[Bug target/71698] ICE related to decimal float when compiling with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71698 --- Comment #6 from Peter Bergner --- Author: bergner Date: Fri Jul 1 13:51:35 2016 New Revision: 237911 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237911=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/71698 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c

[Bug middle-end/71719] [7 Regression] invalid set-but-not-used warning with vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71719 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/70748] [6/7 Regression] ICE with debug in gfc_trans_block_construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70748 Antony Lewis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71714] -g flag doubles size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71714 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- You need to explain what you mean by "release version" and "debug version". There are no such "modes" for GCC, you can use any combination of -O optimization options and also use -g for debug info. So

[Bug rtl-optimization/70164] [6/7 Regression] Code/performance regression due to poor register allocation on Cortex-M0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70164 --- Comment #16 from Andre Vieira --- Any progress on this one?

[Bug rtl-optimization/71709] powerpc64le: argument to strcpy() optimised out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71709 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71151] [avr] -fmerge-constants and -fdata-sections/-ffunction-sections results in string constants in .progmem.gcc_sw section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151 --- Comment #14 from Georg-Johann Lay --- Author: gjl Date: Fri Jul 1 12:09:53 2016 New Revision: 237910 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237910=gcc=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ PR target/71151 * gcc.target/avr/pr71151-common.h

[Bug rtl-optimization/71709] powerpc64le: argument to strcpy() optimised out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71709 --- Comment #8 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Fri Jul 1 11:15:17 2016 New Revision: 237909 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237909=gcc=rev Log: strcpy arg optimised out For functions that return an argument unchanged, like

[Bug middle-end/71716] [7 Regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-4.c is miscompiled with -march=corei7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71716 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/70729] Loop marked with omp simd pragma is not vectorized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70729 --- Comment #28 from Kirill Yukhin --- Author: kyukhin Date: Fri Jul 1 09:42:01 2016 New Revision: 237907 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237907=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/70729 gcc/ * tree-vectorizer.c

[Bug c/71727] New: O3 optimization assumes 16byte alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71727 Bug ID: 71727 Summary: O3 optimization assumes 16byte alignment Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug tree-optimization/71726] New: Simplify (intptr_t)p+4-(intptr_t)(p+4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71726 Bug ID: 71726 Summary: Simplify (intptr_t)p+4-(intptr_t)(p+4) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/71716] [7 Regression] gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-4.c is miscompiled with -march=corei7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71716 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/71725] New: Backend decides to generate larger and possibly slower float ops for integer ops that appear in source

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71725 Bug ID: 71725 Summary: Backend decides to generate larger and possibly slower float ops for integer ops that appear in source Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status:

[Bug fortran/71723] ICE with attempted pointer initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71723 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug c++/71718] ICE on erroneous recursive template error printing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71718 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/71717] A gfortran silent "wrong code" bug in the transition from 4.9.0 -> 4.9.1, using OpenMP.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71717 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/71623] [5/6/7 Regression] Segfault when allocating deferred-length characters to size of a pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71623 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #5 from

[Bug target/71709] powerpc64le: argument to strcpy() optimised out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71709 --- Comment #7 from Alan Modra --- find_call_crossed_cheap_reg is certainly confusing. On looking at it again this morning, I can't see why it uses reg_overlap_mentioned_p to break out of the loop. Who cares if the reg is referenced (except