[Bug lto/71907] [6/7 regression] missing buffer overflow warnings with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71907 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||5.1.0 Summary|missing buffer

[Bug lto/71907] New: missing buffer overflow warnings with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71907 Bug ID: 71907 Summary: missing buffer overflow warnings with -flto Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto

[Bug fortran/66310] Problems with intrinsic repeat for large number of copies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66310 --- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #12) --- snip --- > > f951: out of memory allocating 18446744073441116160 bytes after a total of > 569344 bytes > I should mention there is really nothing wrong

[Bug debug/71906] New: Fortran allocatable strings debug info type size regression

ent (if applicable): PASS: gcc-5.3.1-2.fc23.x86_64 FAIL: gcc-6.1.1-3.fc24.x86_64 FAIL: 7.0.0 20160716 (experimental) How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: cat >stringalloc.f90 < ( character*1 ) <2>: Abbrev Number: 8 (DW_TAG_variable) DW_AT_name: (indirect string

[Bug middle-end/71905] bogus -Wlarger-than=N and -Wframe-larger-than= -Wstack-usage= warnings on small objects with large N

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71905 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|driver |middle-end Summary|bogus

[Bug fortran/66310] Problems with intrinsic repeat for large number of copies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66310 --- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle --- I have found that there is a practical limit of 2**28-1 on the size. The test case: program p character, parameter :: z = 'z' print *, repeat(z, (268435456)) ! 2**28 end gives when compiled: f951:

[Bug driver/71905] New: bogus -Wlarger-than=N and -Wframe-larger-than warnings on small objects with large N

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71905 Bug ID: 71905 Summary: bogus -Wlarger-than=N and -Wframe-larger-than warnings on small objects with large N Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/71463] [6/7 regression] unexpected warning: ignoring function return attributes on template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- I didn't know that GCC considers attribute warn_unused_result part of the function type. When you say that most of these attributes apply to the function type, which others are you referring to? FWIW, I

[Bug fortran/71795] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] Two Bugs in array constructors (optimization)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71795 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Vladimir Fuka from comment #6) > Agree, but it is currently P4 critical. P1 is most important (release blocker), P2 is important (no more than 100 at release), P3 is unclassified, P4 and P5

[Bug libstdc++/71899] An internal BooleanTestable trait should be provided

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71899 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler --- I have now a working implementation available, my minimum requirement set is summarized by the following trait definition: // // Utility to detect BooleanTestable types

[Bug c++/71892] Recent optimization changes introduce bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71892 --- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Kern Sibbald from comment #6) > As you say, everything has been said and in any case, it is clear that you > are going to stick with the current compiler behavior. What you have failed

[Bug c++/71904] New: comparing this to NULL should give a warning by default (this == NULL)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71904 Bug ID: 71904 Summary: comparing this to NULL should give a warning by default (this == NULL) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/71795] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] Two Bugs in array constructors (optimization)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71795 --- Comment #6 from Vladimir Fuka --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #4) > (In reply to Vladimir Fuka from comment #3) > > I suppose it should not be P4 critical? > > All Fortran regressions are classified below P3. > Fortran is not

[Bug fortran/71795] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] Two Bugs in array constructors (optimization)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71795 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/71892] Recent optimization changes introduce bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71892 --- Comment #6 from Kern Sibbald --- As you say, everything has been said and in any case, it is clear that you are going to stick with the current compiler behavior. What you have failed to understand is that I do very well understand that

[Bug c++/71903] New: Wrong opcode using x86 SSE _mm_cmpge_ps intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71903 Bug ID: 71903 Summary: Wrong opcode using x86 SSE _mm_cmpge_ps intrinsics Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/71862] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_component_ref, at fortran/class.c:241

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71862 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The patch for class.c in comment 2 fixes the ICE for the first test in comment0. The patch for resolve.c changes the error message and the tests allocate_class_1.f90 allocate_class_2.f90 class_2.f03

[Bug c++/71892] Recent optimization changes introduce bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71892 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/71902] [5/6/7 Regression] Unneeded temporary on reallocatable character assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71902 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug fortran/71902] New: [5/6/7 Regression] Unneeded temporary on reallocatable character assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71902 Bug ID: 71902 Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] Unneeded temporary on reallocatable character assignment Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/71795] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] Two Bugs in array constructors (optimization)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71795 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Vladimir Fuka from comment #3) > I suppose it should not be P4 critical? All Fortran regressions are classified below P3. Fortran is not considered release critical for the whole of gcc.

[Bug libstdc++/71107] wstring_convert::from_bytes produces wide chars with the wrong byte order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71107 --- Comment #5 from Bitterblue --- Is it even possible to fix this?

[Bug c/57853] pointer arithmetic on arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57853 --- Comment #18 from this is me --- This is why C arrays are not pointers. It was possible to easily misconstrue datatypes like especially with imported variables. Defined as a short integer in one file but, is being used as a character in

[Bug target/71493] [6/7 regression] accidental ABI change for structure return on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71493 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Any progress on this? We'd like to release 6.2 soon, and this is a blocker for that.

[Bug tree-optimization/71901] [7 Regression] ice in find_or_generate_expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71901 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug c/71901] New: ice in find_or_generate_expression

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 38916 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38916=edit C source code The attached source code, when compiled with -O2 on gcc trunk dated 20160716, d

[Bug middle-end/71876] longjmp is miscompiled with -ffreestanding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71876 --- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger --- Created attachment 38915 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38915=edit possible patch This is an attempt of a fix. Not really perfect, but should be at least safe. Only ECF_RETURN_TWICE

[Bug c++/71892] Recent optimization changes introduce bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71892 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/71764] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_structure_assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71764 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/71764] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_structure_assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71764 --- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Jul 16 06:06:45 2016 New Revision: 238412 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238412=gcc=rev Log: 2016-07-15 Jerry DeLisle Backport from